Please don't insult all Americans by throwing them into the same bucket as I am a [whatever]....
Recent Reviews
-
I was given the Ipod nano 6th generation for Christmas 2011. I was starting to take up running and needed something to track my run. since I just started I was only using my Ipod roughly 3 times...
-
I have had the iPad Verizon 4G LTE for a month now, and over all I couldn't be happier with the machine. The only issue I have found so far is when on wifi it has a slower speed in processing...
-
I have owned at least a dozen different Mac laptops over the years, starting with a Powerbook 1400 back in the day. The 13-inch Air is my absolute favorite of the bunch. It's the first laptop...
-
I spent quite a bit of time reading the setup manuals and various Apple articles about manually setting up this device since I have an unusual setup, and the setup manuals indicated I would have...
-
all i have to say is i love it its so much faster and i could just slip it into my purse p.s it has a ton of space for the 64gb
Australian government accuses Apple of 'misleading' 4G claims with new iPad - Page 3
- Joined: Jan 2008
- Location: Flyover country
- Posts: 1,771
- offline
- Select All Posts By This User

I'm still not seeing any change in wording on the Australian Apple store site
http://store.apple.com/au/browse/hom...ad/select_ipad
Not even a footnote that 4G isn't available to Australian's purchasing the iPad 4G.
Did the ITU revoke 4G status for HSPA+ recently? No? Well, there you go.
Google Maps: ("Directions may be inaccurate, incomplete, dangerous, or prohibited.")
MA497LL/A FB463LL/A MC572LL/A FC060LL/A MC700LL/A MD481LL/A MD644LL/A MD388LL/A
Google Maps: ("Directions may be inaccurate, incomplete, dangerous, or prohibited.")
MA497LL/A FB463LL/A MC572LL/A FC060LL/A MC700LL/A MD481LL/A MD644LL/A MD388LL/A
I thought the discussion was about Australian's expectations, not the definition from the ITU. Is that what Australians expect 4G to be? What's the point of having country specific sales sites if the information on them isn't specific to that country?

melior diabolus quem scies
"No theatrics and no more personal attacks, just stick to the logic and tell me why I don't have any argument ~ Jragosta/2012
melior diabolus quem scies
"No theatrics and no more personal attacks, just stick to the logic and tell me why I don't have any argument ~ Jragosta/2012
Or both.
Put another shrimp on the barby.
I am long on my shares of AAPL at $37.00
I am long on my shares of AAPL at $37.00
Where on this page does Apple say that 4G isn't available to the Aussie iPad 4G? In fact where does it even say it's only available in North America, even in a tiny footnote somewhere? I don't see it as a reading failure as much as an advertising failure.
http://store.apple.com/au/browse/hom...ad/select_ipad
melior diabolus quem scies
"No theatrics and no more personal attacks, just stick to the logic and tell me why I don't have any argument ~ Jragosta/2012
melior diabolus quem scies
"No theatrics and no more personal attacks, just stick to the logic and tell me why I don't have any argument ~ Jragosta/2012

I'm still not seeing any change in wording on the Australian Apple store site
http://store.apple.com/au/browse/hom...ad/select_ipad
Not even a footnote that 4G isn't available to Australian's purchasing the iPad 4G.
References to LTE on the Au Store have been removed
The US iPad store site has been changed as well, but like Canada includes LTE.
- I am a Zither Zather Zuzz
- ConradJoe
- Joined: Jan 2012
- Posts: 1,566
- offline
- Select All Posts By This User

Where on this page does Apple say that 4G isn't available to the Aussie iPad 4G? In fact where does it even say it's only available in North America, even in a tiny footnote somewhere? I don't see it as a reading failure as much as an advertising failure.
http://store.apple.com/au/browse/hom...ad/select_ipad
The ad creates an impression. The impression is false.
A careful reading might reveal the truth. Ads are too often read quickly.

Where on this page does Apple say that 4G isn't available to the Aussie iPad 4G? In fact where does it even say it's only available in North America, even in a tiny footnote somewhere? I don't see it as a reading failure as much as an advertising failure.
http://store.apple.com/au/browse/hom...ad/select_ipad
Select a product. Even a blind man isn't as will see it.
The appropriate amount used as necessary.
Regarding the labelling of the cellular-enabled iPad in the United Kingdom, it should be labeled '3G' because the 3rd generation of mobile telecommunications is the highest generation of standard mobile telecommunication services the iPad supports in the United Kingdom.
Furthermore, the cellular-enabled iPad supports frequencies within the spectrum band of 700 MHz to 2,100 MHz. However, the scheduled 4G LTE network in the United Kingdom will use the 800 MHz, 1,800 MHz and 2,600 MHz cellular bands whereas the iPad supports 4G LTE on the 700 MHz and 2,100 MHz bands.
- SolipsismX
- Mogul Gaberator
- Joined: Nov 2011
- Location: The Ansible
- Posts: 12,618
- online
- Select All Posts By This User

Hill60, why is it a footnote, intended as a technical clarification? Do you really honestly believe that a footnote is proper notice considering the site is only for Australian buyers of iPad's intended for use in Australia?
A plain and simple "4G services are not available for Apple's iPad 4G in Australia" right above the selection box for iPad wi-fi with 4G would be more appropriate wouldn't it, assuming Apple didn't actually intend for there to be some confusion? I'm interested in your answer.
1) It's the name of the device. Do you think Apple should have a different name for each country just because a user might not have access to certain network or because a country has chosen not to use the ITU'R's definition of '4G' because they deemed it unmarketable?
2) If we start going down that route we have to say that 802.11n is only available for those with routers that are capable of 802.11n. Do you honestly support a lawsuit that says Apple claimed speeds 10x faster than 802.11g but only put in a technical footnote about you needing a router that supports 802.11n. Of course not! So all this irrationality now.
3) Is there really a law that has defined '4G' being LTE Advance in Australia or it just an accepted marketing term?
PS: It's fine that Australia and other countries don't want to follow the ITU-R's definition of '4G". They have that right just as T-Mobile USA had that right back in 2009 which eventually caused the ITU-R to redefine their very, very stupid gap between '3G' and '4G' but the same questions remain: WHy does Apple have to now cater to all these countries that aren't following the ITU-R's definition? Why should Apple have a new name for the device in every country that chooses not to recognize the ITU-R's accepted use of '4G'?
"Blank! BLANK! You're not looking at the big picture!"
"Blank! BLANK! You're not looking at the big picture!"
- SolipsismX
- Mogul Gaberator
- Joined: Nov 2011
- Location: The Ansible
- Posts: 12,618
- online
- Select All Posts By This User
So you're saying Apple is technically and legally correct and therefore shouldn't be sued. Glad to hear it.
"Blank! BLANK! You're not looking at the big picture!"
"Blank! BLANK! You're not looking at the big picture!"
- Joined: Jan 2008
- Location: Flyover country
- Posts: 1,771
- offline
- Select All Posts By This User

Furthermore, the cellular-enabled iPad supports frequencies within the spectrum band of 700 MHz to 2,100 MHz. However, the scheduled 4G LTE network in the United Kingdom will use the 800 MHz, 1,800 MHz and 2,600 MHz cellular bands whereas the iPad supports 4G LTE on the 700 MHz and 2,100 MHz bands.
Be sure to update us when that becomes a real "first-world" problem for you.
I'll bet there is a world-mode LTE iPad (4th gen) long before LTE is actually rolled out across the UK.
Google Maps: ("Directions may be inaccurate, incomplete, dangerous, or prohibited.")
MA497LL/A FB463LL/A MC572LL/A FC060LL/A MC700LL/A MD481LL/A MD644LL/A MD388LL/A
Google Maps: ("Directions may be inaccurate, incomplete, dangerous, or prohibited.")
MA497LL/A FB463LL/A MC572LL/A FC060LL/A MC700LL/A MD481LL/A MD644LL/A MD388LL/A
I did. This is the only statement about 4G that I see. Did I miss it? I'll be the first to admit my eyesight isn't near what it used to be.
"The iPad with Wi-Fi + 4G model can roam worldwide on fast GSM/UMTS networks, including HSPA, HSPA+, and DC-HSDPA. When you travel internationally, you can use a micro-SIM card from a local carrier. You can also connect to the 4G LTE networks of AT&T in the U.S. and Bell, Rogers, and Telus in Canada."
melior diabolus quem scies
"No theatrics and no more personal attacks, just stick to the logic and tell me why I don't have any argument ~ Jragosta/2012
melior diabolus quem scies
"No theatrics and no more personal attacks, just stick to the logic and tell me why I don't have any argument ~ Jragosta/2012
That's certainly not for me to decide.

IMO the advertising could be considered misleading. Perhaps the Aussie government thinks so too. Or not.
melior diabolus quem scies
"No theatrics and no more personal attacks, just stick to the logic and tell me why I don't have any argument ~ Jragosta/2012
melior diabolus quem scies
"No theatrics and no more personal attacks, just stick to the logic and tell me why I don't have any argument ~ Jragosta/2012
- SolipsismX
- Mogul Gaberator
- Joined: Nov 2011
- Location: The Ansible
- Posts: 12,618
- online
- Select All Posts By This User
This whole thing is very odd. I've never seen a case where using the definition of a standards body is considered misleading but using the colloquial definition generated by marketing firms is the legal definition.
"Blank! BLANK! You're not looking at the big picture!"
"Blank! BLANK! You're not looking at the big picture!"
- SolipsismX
- Mogul Gaberator
- Joined: Nov 2011
- Location: The Ansible
- Posts: 12,618
- online
- Select All Posts By This User
I have been unsuccessful in finding out how many LTE bands are supported by the Qualcomm MDM9615 presumed to be used in the 6th gen iPhone. Anyone know this?
"Blank! BLANK! You're not looking at the big picture!"
"Blank! BLANK! You're not looking at the big picture!"
OK I'm confused then. Is my phone supposed to be faster now? I didn't see 4G in the status bar until I updated to the latest version of iOS.

- SockRolid
- Almost Rock Solid
- Joined: Jan 2010
- Location: California
- Posts: 1,289
- offline
- Select All Posts By This User
AT&T is misleading consumers as well. They've re-named their HSPA+ network "4G" on their coverage maps.
Neither LTE nor HSPA+ is "4G." LTE's full name is "3rd Generation Partnership Project Long Term Evolution."
And "real 4G" exists only in laboratories.
Here's a link to definitions of HSPA+ and LTE (appropriately on 3GPP.org):
http://www.3gpp.org/Specifications
Sent from my iPhone Simulator
Sent from my iPhone Simulator
- SolipsismX
- Mogul Gaberator
- Joined: Nov 2011
- Location: The Ansible
- Posts: 12,618
- online
- Select All Posts By This User

AT&T is misleading consumers as well. They've re-named their HSPA+ network "4G" on their coverage maps.
Neither LTE nor HSPA+ is "4G." LTE's full name is "3rd Generation Partnership Project Long Term Evolution."
And "real 4G" exists only in laboratories.
Here's a link to definitions of HSPA+ and LTE (appropriately on 3GPP.org):
http://www.3gpp.org/Specifications
It's like Ground Hog's day around here. Again, the ITU is the definition that everyone first grabbed onto but they changed their definition in 2010. So why do you continue to use their antiquated and out of data definition? Also, since when is a cardinal number followed by a letter protected by and governed by the US government? Could you not call the iPhone 4 the 4G iPhone without being sued by the US government? Did we not refer to many iPods in this way without it being confusing we weren't referring to the ITU's definition of 2G, 3G, and 4G?
"Blank! BLANK! You're not looking at the big picture!"
"Blank! BLANK! You're not looking at the big picture!"
- Joined: Jan 2008
- Location: Flyover country
- Posts: 1,771
- offline
- Select All Posts By This User
The ITU reclassified HSPA+ as "4G". Apple subsequently updated the status bar to report 4G for an HSPA+ data connection, starting in iOS 5.1.
Google Maps: ("Directions may be inaccurate, incomplete, dangerous, or prohibited.")
MA497LL/A FB463LL/A MC572LL/A FC060LL/A MC700LL/A MD481LL/A MD644LL/A MD388LL/A
Google Maps: ("Directions may be inaccurate, incomplete, dangerous, or prohibited.")
MA497LL/A FB463LL/A MC572LL/A FC060LL/A MC700LL/A MD481LL/A MD644LL/A MD388LL/A

I agree. The iPad supports the 700 MHz and 2,100 MHz frequencies which is used in the United States and Canada for 4G LTE networking. The present and future 4G networks in Europe will use the 800 MHz, 1,800 MHz and 2,600 MHz cellular bands.
The cellular-enable iPad should be labeled accordingly, i.e. '3G' worldwide and '4G' in the United States and Canada.
Good point. The iPad 3 will NEVER be 4G compatible in the UK in its current format so how they can advertise it as 4G is beyond me. It's totally misleading to the average person. They should REMOVE all references to 4G outside the US and Canada.
- Joined: Jan 2008
- Location: Flyover country
- Posts: 1,771
- offline
- Select All Posts By This User
Fixed.
Google Maps: ("Directions may be inaccurate, incomplete, dangerous, or prohibited.")
MA497LL/A FB463LL/A MC572LL/A FC060LL/A MC700LL/A MD481LL/A MD644LL/A MD388LL/A
Google Maps: ("Directions may be inaccurate, incomplete, dangerous, or prohibited.")
MA497LL/A FB463LL/A MC572LL/A FC060LL/A MC700LL/A MD481LL/A MD644LL/A MD388LL/A
What are you basing your 4G definition on? Who is your source for 4G definition? Link please.
- Joined: Jan 2008
- Location: Flyover country
- Posts: 1,771
- offline
- Select All Posts By This User
<sigh>
OK, once more from the top...
The ITU, the international body responsible for defining telecommunications standards, has redefined 4G to include HSPA+ and DC-HSDPA, in addition to LTE (and Wi-Max). If that offends your delicate sensibilities, perhaps you could more effectively take the matter up with them?
In the mean time, as long as Apple isn't advertising LTE functionality in the UK -- LTE service which, I might add, doesn't even exist outside Bristol and possibly Cornwall -- why shouldn't they sell this as a 4G-compatible device, which it is? Or don't Three, Orange, Everything Everywhere, etc. support DC-HSDPA and HSPA+?
Google Maps: ("Directions may be inaccurate, incomplete, dangerous, or prohibited.")
MA497LL/A FB463LL/A MC572LL/A FC060LL/A MC700LL/A MD481LL/A MD644LL/A MD388LL/A
Google Maps: ("Directions may be inaccurate, incomplete, dangerous, or prohibited.")
MA497LL/A FB463LL/A MC572LL/A FC060LL/A MC700LL/A MD481LL/A MD644LL/A MD388LL/A

Okay, it notes on the Apple Australia website, "4G LTE is supported only on AT&T and Verizon networks in the US; and on Bell, Rogers and Telus networks in Canada. See your carrier for details."
http://www.apple.com/au/ipad/compare/
Only in the fine print and that doesn't fly in this country. You cannot have a big banner saying one thing and tiny small print saying something else.
ISP's were prosecuted here for using the term "unlimited" but then using throttling when you went over a capped limit.
Show me where Telstra have said that?? It's quite clear on there website to me.
http://www.telstra.com.au/bigpond-in...dband/bigpond/
You are correct and this is very much illegal in this country.
- SolipsismX
- Mogul Gaberator
- Joined: Nov 2011
- Location: The Ansible
- Posts: 12,618
- online
- Select All Posts By This User

Only in the fine print and that doesn't fly in this country. You cannot have a big banner saying one thing and tiny small print saying something else.
ISP's were prosecuted here for using the term "unlimited" but then using throttling when you went over a capped limit.
So Apple sells a device that is capable of a particular network connection but is not allowed to advertise that fact because carriers of a particular country aren't capable of supporting it. So Apple can't advertise there Macs can get 802.11n with spatial streams if I don't own a router capable of that connectivity, or is the connectivity still inherent to the device? Could someone who is from a rational country or traveling to one be confused to see the iPad (3) with only 3G?
PS: I'm stil confused as to why So many countries have made a marketing term cannon while ignoring the ITU-R's definition of 4G.
"Blank! BLANK! You're not looking at the big picture!"
"Blank! BLANK! You're not looking at the big picture!"

And as it states right under the ad on the Australian site, which is the same as the US and Canada sites,
And on the Australian iPad Store, it clearly lets you choose a model and further states:
This is a world-wide launch. Attempting to satisfy all the idiosyncrasies for every country and having to modify each and every time it changed would be ludicrous. One would think that Aussies never leave their continent.
And this is a country (as all countries) that post laws such as:
P.S. No one is immune from such stupidity.
By the way, my car has a top speed of 220 km/hr. Should it have a sticker on it that states, "Not in your driveway".
So Apple is above the law in each country is it? The Italian government didn't think so....
So I have to travel to another country to use the feature of the product?? Dumb argument...

It's like Ground Hog's day around here. Again, the ITU is the definition that everyone first grabbed onto but they changed their definition in 2010. So why do you continue to use their antiquated and out of data definition? Also, since when is a cardinal number followed by a letter protected by and governed by the US government? Could you not call the iPhone 4 the 4G iPhone without being sued by the US government? Did we not refer to many iPods in this way without it being confusing we weren't referring to the ITU's definition of 2G, 3G, and 4G?
The ITU has not yet completed this work, the recommendation based upon the work in 2010 is still in process.
"These technologies will now move into the final stage of the IMT-Advanced process, which provides for the development in early 2012 of an ITU-R Recommendation specifying the in-depth technical standards for these radio technologies."
http://www.itu.int/net/pressoffice/p...s/2010/40.aspx
Perhaps if the governments spent more time supporting the standards groups to get this work done we would have a world wide standard that manufacturers could build upon.

So Apple sells a device that is capable of a particular network connection but is not allowed to advertise that fact because carriers of a particular country aren't capable of supporting it. So Apple can't advertise there Macs can get 802.11n with spatial streams if I don't own a router capable of that connectivity, or is the connectivity still inherent to the device? Could someone who is from a rational country or traveling to one be confused to see the iPad (3) with only 3G?
PS: I'm stil confused as to why So many countries have made a marketing term cannon while ignoring the ITU-R's definition of 4G.
Correct, it's illegal...in this country anyway.
Apple's biggest crime is the iPad 2( I have one) didn't get the personal hotspot with 5.1 too! :P :P :P :P If they left it out on purpose just to promote the new iPad then thats just a very shitty cynical thing to do!

The ITU has not yet completed this work, the recommendation based upon the work in 2010 is still in process.
<snip>
Perhaps if the governments spent more time supporting the standards groups to get this work done we would have a world wide standard that manufacturers could build upon.
btw, based upon the 2009 proposal, even current LTE and WiMax proposals are not considered to be 4G. The specifications of the 2009 proposal call for 1Gb/s stationary and neither of those standards meet that mark. Until LTE-A and WiMax2 are released, according to this proposal, there are NO 4G devices anywhere in the world.
Is Australia ready to sue every manufacturer and service provider that is currently advertising 4G for their products?
- SolipsismX
- Mogul Gaberator
- Joined: Nov 2011
- Location: The Ansible
- Posts: 12,618
- online
- Select All Posts By This User
You have to travel to the US or Canada to use LTE (a very specific acronym) but you can use 4G in any country that supports HSPA+ or better, providing your local networks support the bands in the device.
"Blank! BLANK! You're not looking at the big picture!"
"Blank! BLANK! You're not looking at the big picture!"
- SolipsismX
- Mogul Gaberator
- Joined: Nov 2011
- Location: The Ansible
- Posts: 12,618
- online
- Select All Posts By This User
OK, then show me laws that state only LTE Advance can be called 4G and that you can't call something 802.11n capable if the customer can't connect to said network. In guessing you won't be able to find either.
"Blank! BLANK! You're not looking at the big picture!"
"Blank! BLANK! You're not looking at the big picture!"
The main point the ACCC is making is you can't sell something in big bold letters then say it won't work in the fine print. It's misleading and luckily for us Aussie's illegal.
Has the ACCC begun proceedings to sue Telstra for misleading 4G claims since their network does not meet the ITU-R's requirement for 1Gb/sec in the recommendation that they are still writing? Otherwise they are all working off an ITU-R document that states that HSPDA+ is considered 4G.
Recent Discussions
- › Steve Jobs's family has been giving money away anonymously for more... 16 seconds ago
- › Judge says evidence will likely show Apple culpable in e-book price... 2 minutes ago
- › AT&T to reportedly add Apple's iPhone to GoPhone prepaid lineup 2 minutes ago
- › Haswell chips could bring 50% more battery life to Apple's next-gen... 4 minutes ago
- › ISLAM WATCH 8 minutes ago
- › New Microsoft Windows 8 ad turns Apple's Siri against her maker 8 minutes ago
- › Apple's iPad mini seen as 'winning template' for launching low-cost... 10 minutes ago
- › Verizon Cloud iPhone backup software launches on Apple's App Store 11 minutes ago
- › Apple airs new iPhone ad, continues brilliant 'quiet' TV campaign 24 minutes ago
- › Cook: US-built Mac will be refreshed version of existing product 28 minutes ago
Recent Reviews
- › Apple iPod nano - 16GB, Silver MC526LL/A (6th Generation) by cc420
- › Apple iPad with Retina Display Wi-Fi + Verizon/Sprint 4G - 64GB,... by Aaron Krahn
- › 13.3-inch Apple MacBook Air MD231LL/A (Mid-2012) by ahilal
- › Apple Time Capsule - 2TB (MD032LL/A) by biyahero
- › Apple iPad Wi-Fi - 64GB, White (MD330LL/A) by raeganapril
- › Apple Magic Trackpad (MC380LL/A) by WisdomSeed
- › Aperture 3 by bcbcbroderick
- › 17-inch Apple MacBook Pro MD311LL/A (Late 2011) by bcbcbroderick
- › Apple iPod touch - 32GB, Black MC544LL/A (4th Generation) by bcbcbroderick
- › Apple iPod touch - 8 GB, White MD057LL/A (4th Generation) by bcbcbroderick
New Apple Wikis
- › 2013 'Modified' iPod touch by Mikeycampbell81
- › 2013 MacBook Pros by Mikeycampbell81
- › iPad mini 2 with Retina display by Mikeycampbell81
- › 2013 iPhone 5S by Mikeycampbell81
- › Trade in your old devices for holiday cash by Mikeycampbell81
- › How to sell your old iPad for cash by Mikeycampbell81
- › How to offset the cost of a new iPhone by... by Mikeycampbell81
- › How to save money on AppleCare extended... by Kasper
- › How to offset the cost of a new iPad mini by... by Mikeycampbell81
- › Apple Prototypes by Mikeycampbell81
About AppleInsider | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2013 AppleInsider is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map





