No, that's not how this works.
That's Google alright. For a stupid company they sure do dumb things.
That's Google alright. For a stupid company they sure do dumb things.

Agreed. No one else is yet positioned to replace Apple, and there may not be for years.
melior diabolus quem scies
"No theatrics and no more personal attacks, just stick to the logic and tell me why I don't have any argument ~ Jragosta/2012
melior diabolus quem scies
"No theatrics and no more personal attacks, just stick to the logic and tell me why I don't have any argument ~ Jragosta/2012
Apple and Microsoft both hold standards based patents subject to FRAND, h.264 for example.
When have they EVER abused them in the way that Google is doing now, i.e. by seeking injunctions to keep competitors out of a market?
"The cobbler's children have no shoes", is a saying that applies a lot to companies who provide products and services. -KDarling on Google Search.
"The cobbler's children have no shoes", is a saying that applies a lot to companies who provide products and services. -KDarling on Google Search.

Sure, sure because Apple is a non-for profit organization. They are here for the benefit of mankind. Get real... If Apple could get away with closing the door on its competitors they would. Contrary to popular belief, Apple is not your friend. They are a seller of products. Period, point, blank. It just so happens that I like what they sell but I am not under the illusion that they are doing me any favors...
Do you use Android or Chrome?
Take a look in the open source licence acknowledgements.
Apple ARE doing you favours, it's there in black and white, Google can't strip those acknowledgements out, they are part of the open source licensing Apple uses.
"The cobbler's children have no shoes", is a saying that applies a lot to companies who provide products and services. -KDarling on Google Search.
"The cobbler's children have no shoes", is a saying that applies a lot to companies who provide products and services. -KDarling on Google Search.
I'm not trying anything. In fact I really do not seem to care about this as much as you do. Maybe a slow day on your end but if you insist on keeping this going, I'm game for one last round. Here goes....
As I originally posted: "Hell yeah they need to be investigated just as Microsoft and Apple should be if the shoes are on the other foot. It either of them were in the same position, they would use the patents to freeze out other companies. Sad but true..."... Pretty strong stuff on my part, and pure conjecture. I can say whatever I want as an opinion. Surely you know the difference. If I need to caveat things for you in the future I will gladly. Last thing I want is for you to be confused or mislead by something I said. Soooo to wrap this up, in my opinion, I postulate, I guess, I speculate, I think, I SWAG, **shoulder shrug**, **nod, nod, wink, wink**, coin flip, feel that if given the chance, Apple being the bastion of freedom and FairPlay who only spies on your data to provide you a better user experience, might be inclined to play fast and loose with FRAND if they own critical patents. Also, considering the fact that SJ wanted to go all kinds medieval Nuclear on Google FRAND patents might be one way to go. Again seem my caveats regarding opinions....
Are we done now? I'm bored with this....
What a strange statement!
So, are we to understand that you buy their products because they make things harder for you?
It's okay.
I think we're very, very clear on where you stand now, although you may have generated some confusion with your reference to 'Medieval Nuclear'.
We understand the lack of interest that losing can generate: You can run away from the discussion now.
Bring us the girl, and wipe away the debt.
Bring us the girl, and wipe away the debt.