
Whilst I would agree that many of the gun deaths in the USA seem to be the result of drug related crime, thus far, none of the pro gun members here have attempted to explain why other countries with similar rates of drug "abuse" and stricter gun laws have much lower rates of gun violence.
There may, or may not be some merit in legalising all drugs but I am not sure that the prohibition of alcohol is a valid argument. Few of the currently illegal drugs ever had wide spread popularity prior to be outlawed and none of them have ever been an essential part of the staple diet. It is also worth noting that other "first world" states with historically low gun ownership did not see massive rises in gun activity during their periods of alcohol prohibition.
Yet again we need to ask why the USA has such higher rates of gun crime, simply blaming it on drugs is overly simplistic: Comparisons with other similar countries evidences this.
And, thus far, none of the gun control advocates have attempted to explain why some countries with high gun ownership such as Switzerland and Finland have very low rates of violent crime.
Perhaps the over simplification is happening on both sides of the argument?
Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.
(I prefer the tumult of liberty to the quiet of servitude.)
Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.
(I prefer the tumult of liberty to the quiet of servitude.)





