Saturation maybe?
"Just because something is deemed the law doesn't make it just" - SolipsismX
"Just because something is deemed the law doesn't make it just" - SolipsismX

Wow, the difference between the US and the rest of the world is very stark.
I suspect it largely comes down to a combination of (1) price related issues and (2) completeness of Apple's ecosystem in the US.
Regarding the first, the issue is that in the US, the perceived difference in price between Android phones and iPhones isn't as large, since the carriers absorb a big chunk of the difference. Internationally, end-users feel the full difference in phone prices.
Regarding the second, Apple's whole "ecosystem" is just a lot better developed in the US (completeness of the iTunes and App stores, and just as importantly, the pervasiveness of the retail stores).
If Apple can get out lower cost iPhone models internationally and build up the ecosystem, then perhaps Apple can replicate their success in the US globally.
Some of the "smart phones" in parts of the world are barely more than a "feature phone," running an early version of Android. Those users have little need for an ecosystem. It's not to say that many of these present users will never become an iPhone user, but, for now their simple needs are being met.
The story gives the major reasons:
Lots of trolling indeed.
I, personally, don't plan to celebrate until OSX breaks 12%, and maybe not even then as 15% would be more meaningful.

If you bothered to actually read both OPs you would see there is no contradiction. In the UK Android devices range from cheap 50 quid phones on PAYG to 500 quid phones on contract. The iPhone does not have the same price range with just 3 models and is still basically targeted at contract users. I wan't trying to make an anti Apple or pro Android point, just stating a fact.
The China syndrome, it has been talked a lot. I believe one of the misleads of estimates of Q3 was about the mythical sales of Q2 in China, that, truly, were caused by their New Year. This phenomena is probably hard to understand for us.
Which means nothing assures that Q4, even with the new Ipad, will have good sales in China. Can't understand why Apple is so loose about other markets, leaving the field clear for Scamsung to gain marketshare. Previously I thought it was a kind of demand-contention policy, given the limited production capacity, delaying some markets until the demand on developed ones begins to slowdown. But last Q numbers seems not to back up this theory anymore, since countries like India are still abandoned, with childish excuses, btw.
They're dumb phones.

(2) 2010 27" iMac i7, 2012 15" Retina MacBook Pro i7, 2011 Mac Mini i5
iPad 4, iPad Mini, (2) iPhone 5, iPod Touch 5, iPod Nano 7
Time Capsule 4, Airport Extreme 5, (3) Apple TV 3
(2) 2010 27" iMac i7, 2012 15" Retina MacBook Pro i7, 2011 Mac Mini i5
iPad 4, iPad Mini, (2) iPhone 5, iPod Touch 5, iPod Nano 7
Time Capsule 4, Airport Extreme 5, (3) Apple TV 3

Hm..., If Apple is GAINING market share in the declining US smartphone marketplace [the excuse was the economy according to the survey] then Apple must be seriously LOSING market share overseas. The oversea's share of Apple sales is 26 million minus 7.9 million or about 18 million phones. Do you remember Apple's CEO mantra? Apple's growth is in China. Without China, Apple goes bye...bye..., kaputski. People mostly buy Iphone at cost overseas, and this is also why most Apple buyers over there are affluent people. People who can buy 10 Iphones for their families with cash. This is the place where Apple gets the real cold hard cash, and unfortunately, it is also where Apple hide most of its cash to avoid paying taxes. The current estimate of Apple's cash and investment "hidden" oversea is between US 70 billion to 90 Billion. It's a very tax-responsible company, isn't it? I am sure the Fed is very happy about that.
Almost everywhere else outside of North America, including China [with its 1.5 Billion people], India [with its 1 Billion People], Indonesia [with 250 million people], and so on, Apple market share is quite negligible compare to Android's. Strangely enough, in Indonesia, RIM's Blackberry hold the number 1 position for smartphone's market share. Apple is indeed DOOMED outside the US and Canada, and you don't even have to go far to look at failing Apple growth strategy. You just have a look at the southern neighbor. Mexico's Iphone sales number is so tiny, it is actually a carbon copy of Apple's performance in most places around the world. Apple is mostly a dud outside its home turf. That will spell trouble with Apple's growth strategy coined by Cook.
Apple has already paid tax on those phones sold in China, just that its to the Chinese treasury and not the US one cause the profit from those phones was "earned" in China.

iPhone (6th gen) will be sleek, powerful, and ...
... wait for it ...
... patented. The Apple / Samsung trial should be over by the time the new iPhone is rolled out.
Perfect timing.
Sent from my iPhone Simulator
Sent from my iPhone Simulator
From Wikipedia:
"According to a November 2011 research note from Canaccord Genuity, Apple Inc. holds 52% of the total mobile industry's operating profits, while only holding 4.2% of the global handset market."
That 4.2% number means that there's plenty of room for growth worldwide. On the other hand, apparently roughly 60% of all cell phones sold in the US were smartphones. So there's far less room for growth in the US.
Sent from my iPhone Simulator
Sent from my iPhone Simulator