AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Samsung guilty of patent infringement, Apple awarded nearly $1.05B [u]
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Samsung guilty of patent infringement, Apple awarded nearly $1.05B [u] - Page 6

post #201 of 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by jragosta View Post

I want to add one thing.
There have been endless complaints about Tim Cook and arguments that he's not fit for the job and that he couldn't accomplish anything.
He's just finished his 1 year anniversary and Apple stock is up about $270 billion from when he took over. Under his tenure, Apple just one one of the biggest lawsuits ever in the mobile phone industry.
Congratulations are in order for Tim Cook.

 

Agreed.  the man is largely responsible for the resurgence Apple has seen for many years now.  He was just the behind the scenes guy making it happen reliably while Jobs was the front man/rock star.

 

Cook isn't the personality Jobs was.  But he is definitely the mind.  He is not quite as creative.  But he is possibly even more business savvy and disciplined.  

post #202 of 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by jragosta View Post

I want to add one thing.
There have been endless complaints about Tim Cook and arguments that he's not fit for the job and that he couldn't accomplish anything.
He's just finished his 1 year anniversary and Apple stock is up about $270 billion from when he took over. Under his tenure, Apple just one one of the biggest lawsuits ever in the mobile phone industry.
Congratulations are in order for Tim Cook.

Hear, hear
"A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject" - Winston Churchill
"Just because something is deemed the law doesn't make it just" - SolipsismX
Reply
"A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject" - Winston Churchill
"Just because something is deemed the law doesn't make it just" - SolipsismX
Reply
post #203 of 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ewan View Post

He didn't initiate the lawsuit, neither did he win it, the lawyers did. I don't see how he deserves any credit for this.

Then you must be blind...

post #204 of 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by pfisher View Post

I wouldn't lump Samsung's phone business with the rest of their businesses, which make everything under the sun. They are a conglomerate and they are very good at what they do with technology advancements.

 

 

Actually, Samsung spends a lot of time stealing from others. Sharp sued it for violating its TV patents. If LG hasn't sued it for violating its washer and dryer designs, it should. The company has made fortune using the research and development of other companies. 

post #205 of 413

Court resumes. Two problems. Stay tuned.

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply
post #206 of 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by jragosta View Post


You don't think Cook had any say in the strategy? You don't think Cook had any part of the settlement discussions? You don't think Cook had to decide whether to file the suit - and then continue it?
You're really confused.

He clearly didn't do a good job at the settlement discussions because they didn't settle. So if anything, by allowing the verdict to go to Jury, it shows that Tim Cook did a poor job and couldn't keep Apple's fate in his own hands.

post #207 of 413

score one for the good guys!  Samesung is lucky. they should have be banned from selling phones and tablets in the USA ever since alls they do is copy Apple.

post #208 of 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by mac512 View Post
What was it ?

 

The iPad's "rounded rectangle" patent.

 

OK, Thanks.

 

That leaves room for constructors to build tablets and compete, in a fair way. It's maybe the reason for that.

post #209 of 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ewan View Post

He clearly didn't do a good job at the settlement discussions because they didn't settle. So if anything, by allowing the verdict to go to Jury, it shows that Tim Cook did a poor job and couldn't keep Apple's fate in his own hands.

Would you not say this was a much better outcome than any settlement? sheesh 1rolleyes.gif
"A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject" - Winston Churchill
"Just because something is deemed the law doesn't make it just" - SolipsismX
Reply
"A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject" - Winston Churchill
"Just because something is deemed the law doesn't make it just" - SolipsismX
Reply
post #210 of 413

Awkward situation when the verdict was announced: Samsung lawyers looked at Apple lawyers to copy their reaction.

post #211 of 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by Asim Soofi View Post

Apple just got a $1 Billion discount on parts...nothing more.

 

So how much of it do the lawyers get?

 

You're ignoring the broad ramifications for the infringements on the products. That's worth well in excess of several billion more.

post #212 of 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClemyNX View Post

Many people fail to understand how this verdict is to be read. The 1 billion something is the total SM has to pay, the rest that was given per phone was just a breakdown. So basically Apple got half of what they requested, still a big success for them since Sam didn't get a penny.
They answered following the grid they had to fill so it was pretty easy to follow with that as a reference.

 

 

Keep in mind, however, the money judgement can be quite a bit larger. The judge can treble the jury award where the jury found willful infringement. 

post #213 of 413
I thought the sum of damages is 2.3 billion...
post #214 of 413

Do you think before samsungs appeal goes through that they will make sure their laywers are all licensed to practice?

post #215 of 413
Originally Posted by Ewan View Post
He clearly didn't do a good job at the settlement discussions because they didn't settle. So if anything, by allowing the verdict to go to Jury, it shows that Tim Cook did a poor job and couldn't keep Apple's fate in his own hands.

 

… Okay, so when your little brother keeps saying, "No." "No." "No." "No." "No." to everything you say and you have to have your mother moderate instead of breaking his thumbs like a proper gangster, that's YOUR fault? I don't think so.

PhilBoogie
That's Google alright. For a stupid company they sure do dumb things.
Reply
PhilBoogie
That's Google alright. For a stupid company they sure do dumb things.
Reply
post #216 of 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ewan View Post

He clearly didn't do a good job at the settlement discussions because they didn't settle. So if anything, by allowing the verdict to go to Jury, it shows that Tim Cook did a poor job and couldn't keep Apple's fate in his own hands.

 

They did not settle because Samesung wants to steal from Apple.  Cook clearly did a good job and did not "settle" for pennies.  Samesung only knows how to copy, they can not innovate.

post #217 of 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by 9secondko View Post

 

Agreed.  the man is largely responsible for the resurgence Apple has seen for many years now.  He was just the behind the scenes guy making it happen reliably while Jobs was the front man/rock star.

 

Cook isn't the personality Jobs was.  But he is definitely the mind.  He is not quite as creative.  But he is possibly even more business savvy and disciplined.  

Agreed +++

post #218 of 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. H View Post


No, they didn't:
Obviously the guys over at Cnet got very confused and thought that:
a.) 1 billion, 51 million = $1.5 billion
b.) That that was for the Tab 10.1 when in fact it was the total awarded

Does this really matter? It is a rather trivial sum (did I say that about something in the billions!? lol.gif) in the larger scheme of things. Indeed, irrelevant.

 

Apple could have been awarded $1 in damages, and it would still be beyond HUGE.

post #219 of 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by jungmark View Post

Awkward situation when the verdict was announced: Samsung lawyers looked at Apple lawyers to copy their reaction.

LOL!!!
post #220 of 413

The image speaks for itself. Before iPhone and after. Blatantly obvious.

"An investment in knowledge always pays the best interest."
"Those who would give up essential liberties to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither." -Ben Franklin
Reply
"An investment in knowledge always pays the best interest."
"Those who would give up essential liberties to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither." -Ben Franklin
Reply
post #221 of 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by TBell View Post

 

 

Actually, you could write a hit song using any of those names and it would be OK.

In Korea you sure could, it's done on a weekly basis and called 'K-pop" (really cheesy cringeworthy pop music, often with melodies entirely ripped off from western songwriters, in case you didn't know). 

 

But if you're so cocksure why don't you go ahead and write Imagine, with all those same letters of the alphabet as the original written by John Lennon, and with almost the same melody, and see how many record labels you can rustle up to market it stateside? I'm betting Yoko Ono would ride you like a kayak to Takeshima before you could say kimchee! :)

post #222 of 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by jungmark View Post

Awkward situation when the verdict was announced: Samsung lawyers looked at Apple lawyers to copy their reaction.

HAAAA!!!
"A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject" - Winston Churchill
"Just because something is deemed the law doesn't make it just" - SolipsismX
Reply
"A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject" - Winston Churchill
"Just because something is deemed the law doesn't make it just" - SolipsismX
Reply
post #223 of 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by jragosta View Post

I want to add one thing.
There have been endless complaints about Tim Cook and arguments that he's not fit for the job and that he couldn't accomplish anything.
He's just finished his 1 year anniversary and Apple stock is up about $270 billion from when he took over. Under his tenure, Apple just one one of the biggest lawsuits ever in the mobile phone industry.
Congratulations are in order for Tim Cook.

I second that. Absolutely!!

He may not have Steves charisma, but from what I see he does more than an exellent job.
post #224 of 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by bullhead View Post

score one for the good guys!  Samesung is lucky. they should have be banned from selling phones and tablets in the USA ever since alls they do is copy Apple.

No, they're not lucky. Bans are coming soon. That's phase two.

post #225 of 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ewan View Post

He clearly didn't do a good job at the settlement discussions because they didn't settle. So if anything, by allowing the verdict to go to Jury, it shows that Tim Cook did a poor job and couldn't keep Apple's fate in his own hands.

You can't reach a settlement with irrational thieves. Tim Cook made the wise choice.

post #226 of 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdriftmeyer View Post

 

You're ignoring the broad ramifications for the infringements on the products. That's worth well in excess of several billion more.

Indeed. The market has already awarded Apple over $10B. With more to come, I am sure....

post #227 of 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by jragosta

In the end, though, it won't matter. The money won't mean much to Apple. The fact that they won so many of their claims and had their patents upheld is far more important in the long run.

 

 I think it matters, the closest to the 2.5 billions claimed by Apple the best for Apple.

post #228 of 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apple ][ View Post

No, they're not lucky. Bans are coming soon. That's phase two.

This is bad news for the carriers, too.  They will not be able to force a subsidy cut on Apple if the Android phones become weaker.

post #229 of 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by "Apple 
[" url="/t/152115/samsung-guilty-of-patent-infringement-apple-awarded-1-05b/200#post_2175175"]No, they're not lucky. Bans are coming soon. That's phase two.

which of the phones are still actually on sale though? I got the feeling that most of the claims against the Galaxy S line stuck, while most against the S2 didn't. With the S3 already out, I think Samsung would just quickly phase out the S and S2 anyways.
post #230 of 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apple ][ View Post

You're severely underestimating the importance that the US has upon other markets.

 

In what way?  

 

Or are you meaning the continuing  pressure of the US to pressure smaller countries to alter their intellectual property laws to suit the USA?

Household: MacBook, iPad 16gb wifi, iPad 64gb wifi, iPad Mini 32gb, iPhone 4S 32gb, iPhone 32gb, iPod Touch 4th gen x2, iPod touch 16gb gen 2, iPod nano 16gb gen 5 x2, iPod nano gen 3 8gb, iPod...

Reply

Household: MacBook, iPad 16gb wifi, iPad 64gb wifi, iPad Mini 32gb, iPhone 4S 32gb, iPhone 32gb, iPod Touch 4th gen x2, iPod touch 16gb gen 2, iPod nano 16gb gen 5 x2, iPod nano gen 3 8gb, iPod...

Reply
post #231 of 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by majjo View Post

which of the phones are still actually on sale though? I got the feeling that most of the claims against the Galaxy S line stuck, while most against the S2 didn't. With the S3 already out, I think Samsung would just quickly phase out the S and S2 anyways.

True, but count on Apple to quickly file utility patent claims against the SIII and ask for an injunction. Given how convincing this decision was, chances are good that they'll get it.
post #232 of 413
1) Bring in the guilty bastards

2) Give them a fair trial

3) Hang 'em


Summarized from my non-infringed iPad
"So at the end of the presentation, Steve came up to me and said: Is the iPhone worth criticizing? And I said: Make the screen five inches by eight inches, and you’ll rule the world."
– Alan Kay –
Reply
"So at the end of the presentation, Steve came up to me and said: Is the iPhone worth criticizing? And I said: Make the screen five inches by eight inches, and you’ll rule the world."
– Alan Kay –
Reply
post #233 of 413

Hopefully Samsung will make original designs in future, now that they have no choice. Microsoft was able to.

post #234 of 413
If PSY from Gangnam Style is also a copy of some American pop star I will die

Lol
post #235 of 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by ascii View Post

Hopefully Samsung will make original designs in future, now that they have no choice. Microsoft was able to.

Micro- Who?
post #236 of 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by ascii View Post

Hopefully Samsung will make original designs in future, now that they have no choice. Microsoft was able to.

Microsoft is actually paying apple for patents in their windows phones. Sammy did not wanted to...
post #237 of 413

Bring us the girl, and wipe away the debt.

Reply

Bring us the girl, and wipe away the debt.

Reply
post #238 of 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTR View Post

Brilliant!

post #239 of 413

It'll be appealed.

 

Nobody, no matter how damning the evidence, is just going to roll over & fork out $1 billion.  They're going to exhaust all possible routes first.

post #240 of 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by jungmark View Post

Awkward situation when the verdict was announced: Samsung lawyers looked at Apple lawyers to copy their reaction.

 

LOL

 

-kpluck

Do you use MagicJack?

If so be advised that when you sign up, the default settings will automatically charge your credit card each year for service renewal. You will not be notified or warned in...

Reply
Do you use MagicJack?

If so be advised that when you sign up, the default settings will automatically charge your credit card each year for service renewal. You will not be notified or warned in...

Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: General Discussion
AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Samsung guilty of patent infringement, Apple awarded nearly $1.05B [u]