AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Samsung guilty of patent infringement, Apple awarded nearly $1.05B [u]
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Samsung guilty of patent infringement, Apple awarded nearly $1.05B [u] - Page 2

post #41 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:35pm

More tension in here than during the Apple keynote liveblogs… lol.gif

PhilBoogie
That's Google alright. For a stupid company they sure do dumb things.
Reply
PhilBoogie
That's Google alright. For a stupid company they sure do dumb things.
Reply
post #42 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:36pm

Are you aware of the current rash of bad retina panels for the new macbook pro?  The problems seem to be linked directly to LG.  I don't think Apple is going to stop using Samsung as long as they have the best product. It is also telling that Samsung has added to production capacity for the plant in Texas that makes the CPU for the iPhone and iPad.

Reply
Reply
post #43 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:37pm
Originally Posted by Macnewsjunkie View Post
Are you aware of the current rash of bad retina panels for the new macbook pro?  The problems seem to be linked directly to LG.  I don't think Apple is going to stop using Samsung as long as they have the best product. It is also telling that Samsung has added to production capacity for the plant in Texas that makes the CPU for the iPhone and iPad.

 

Wrong thread, maybe? I can move the post if that's the case.

PhilBoogie
That's Google alright. For a stupid company they sure do dumb things.
Reply
PhilBoogie
That's Google alright. For a stupid company they sure do dumb things.
Reply
post #44 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:38pm

meanwhile, something to listen to looks like an Apple win

 

"The cobbler's children have no shoes", is a saying that applies a lot to companies who provide products and services. -KDarling on Google Search.

Reply

"The cobbler's children have no shoes", is a saying that applies a lot to companies who provide products and services. -KDarling on Google Search.

Reply
post #45 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:42pm

💥💫🌟✨🌅

🎆🎇💰💵💷

💶💴🔔📢📣

🔊🎈🎈🎈🏁

🎉🎊🎁💣🏆

🎧😃😂🌋🌠

🌈💯💮📳

📱📱📱📱❗

 

Even a partial victory is great news!


Edited by Tallest Skil - 8/24/12 at 3:54pm
PhilBoogie
That's Google alright. For a stupid company they sure do dumb things.
Reply
PhilBoogie
That's Google alright. For a stupid company they sure do dumb things.
Reply
post #46 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:42pm
All Samsung devices infringe Apples '301 patent.

This is going to take quite a while since it looks like they're going to go through every claim for every patent.

'915 patent. Most Samsung devices infringe.

'163 patent. Most Samsung devices infringe.

Samsung should have settled when the had the chance.


Looks like a big victory for innovation.
Reply
Reply
post #47 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:43pm
Bloomberg ticker says "rubberbanding patent infringed"
Reply
Reply
post #48 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:44pm

Confirmed!  Apple won!

 

"For each of the following products did Samsung (SEC, SEA, STA) infringe claim 19 of /301 patent"

"Answer for all devices is YES"

"for SEA, Galaxy Tab Wifi"

"STA yes for Captivate"

"Continuum, Droid Charge, Exhibit 4G, Galasy Ace, Prevail, S 4G, S II, Galaxy Tab, The Gem, Indulge, Infuse 4G, Mesmerie, Nexus S 4G, Replenish and Vibrant"

"For SEC Captivate, continuum, droid charge, fascinate, Galaxy Prevail, Galaxy S 4G, Galaxy S II, i9100, Galaxy s 2 Tmobile, Tab, Tab 10.1, Gem, Indulge, Infuse, Nexus S 4G, all yes"

"No on Ace Intercept and Replenish"

"For SEA: Yes on Galaxy Tab 10.1"

 

 
Reply
Reply
post #49 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:45pm

Yoohoo! Apple is winning! Bring the drinks on!

iMac 21.5" 2.7 GHz (2011), iPod Touch 4G 8GB Black, iPod Touch 2G 8GB

Reply

iMac 21.5" 2.7 GHz (2011), iPod Touch 4G 8GB Black, iPod Touch 2G 8GB

Reply
post #50 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:45pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigdaddyp View Post


Why yes I would love some. Thank you

Don't forget the Appletinis and Apple flavored vodka shots!

 

 


Tim Cook using Galaxy Tabs as frisbees
-Michael Steeber

 

Reply

 

 


Tim Cook using Galaxy Tabs as frisbees
-Michael Steeber

 

Reply
post #51 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:46pm

Is there an appeal's process?

Reply
Reply
post #52 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:46pm

Shots, shots, shots, shots!

 

 


Tim Cook using Galaxy Tabs as frisbees
-Michael Steeber

 

Reply

 

 


Tim Cook using Galaxy Tabs as frisbees
-Michael Steeber

 

Reply
post #53 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:47pm

Now this is rad news, winning.

iMac 2007, Macbook pro 2008, Mac Mini 2011
Reply
iMac 2007, Macbook pro 2008, Mac Mini 2011
Reply
post #54 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:48pm

Wow "YES for all devices" on some of the patents....Sammy is F_cked!

Reply
Reply
post #55 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:48pm

It seems like they're reading up a whole long list of different verdicts, but Samesung is guilty of infringing upon a whole number of things on many of their devices.

 

 

YES!!!!!!

 

Boom! Bang! Take that, You Samesung mofo's! 

 

Samesung infringed! HAHAHAHA! There is true justice in this world, and today is a bad day for copycatting thieves and untalented people with no original ideas of their own.

 

And I'd like to give a big middle finger to all Fandroids everywhere too! You suck! The whole lot of you!

Reply
Reply
post #56 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:48pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoonerYoda View Post

Is there an appeal's process?
Yes, but Samsung will for sure settle now.
Reply
Reply
post #57 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:49pm
Overwhelmingly yes, so far.
"We're Apple. We don't wear suits. We don't even own suits."
Reply
"We're Apple. We don't wear suits. We don't even own suits."
Reply
post #58 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:49pm
What do SEC, SEA, and STA stand for?
it's = it is / it has, its = belonging to it.
Reply
it's = it is / it has, its = belonging to it.
Reply
post #59 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:51pm
The utility patents were pretty obvious that Samsung infringed. Now they're on to the design patents - and most Samsung products infringed the design patents as well.

Samsung is in BIG trouble.
Reply
Reply
post #60 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:51pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. H View Post

What do SEC, SEA, and STA stand for?

Samsung Electronics Co. (SEC), Samsung Electronics America (SEA), and/or Samsung Telecommunications America (STA) 

Reply
Reply
post #61 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:51pm

HOORAY!

Reply
Reply
post #62 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:52pm
Bloomberg now states Design patents infringed too, and the Samsung Parent company is responsible.
Note they say "wait for the validity of the patents" question and the Damages.
Reply
Reply
post #63 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:53pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. H View Post

What do SEC, SEA, and STA stand for?

 

The various entities of Samsung:  Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung Electronics America Inc.; Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. 
 
Reply
Reply
post #64 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:53pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by e_veritas View Post

 

I'll see your static image, and raise you a gif:

 

Reply
Reply
post #65 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:54pm

It will be interesting to see the London newspaper headlines:-

 

SAMSUNG COPIED APPLE

"The cobbler's children have no shoes", is a saying that applies a lot to companies who provide products and services. -KDarling on Google Search.

Reply

"The cobbler's children have no shoes", is a saying that applies a lot to companies who provide products and services. -KDarling on Google Search.

Reply
post #66 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:54pm
Interesting. 'No' to the D889 patent on the tablets. That looked to me like one of the ones that was most obvious.
Reply
Reply
post #67 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:54pm

Glad to see the jury didn't fall for any of Samsung's examples of prior art for pinch/zoom and overscroll bounce.

Author of The Fuel Injection Bible

Reply

Author of The Fuel Injection Bible

Reply
post #68 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:55pm

Samsung Electronics America (SEA)

Samsung Telecommunications America (STA)

Samsung Electronics Co. (SEC)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. H View Post

What do SEC, SEA, and STA stand for?
Reply
Reply
post #69 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:55pm

No on the D 889 (rounded rectangles)

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply
post #70 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:56pm

Wow, willful infringement, that's where the big money is ...

Reply
Reply
post #71 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:56pm

happy times here, all smiles =)

 

Gotta get my wetsuit on and wade through the tears over at engadget, should be comical.

Reply
Reply
post #72 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:57pm
....................
Reply
Reply
post #73 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:58pm

I can hear the groans from Seoul now....... 

 

lol.giflol.giflol.gif

Reply
Reply
post #74 of 413
8/24/12 at 3:59pm
Interesting. Validity of patents upheld.

Jury finds that Apple's trade dress for the phones is protectable, but not the tablets. I guess Samsung's Fidler tablet nonsense actually convinced someone.
Reply
Reply
post #75 of 413
8/24/12 at 4:00pm

"Question 9 — Should Samsung have know they were infringing?"

 

"D'677: Yes for Fascinate, S 4G, S2 ATT, S2 Tmobile, Epic 4G Touch, Skyrocket, Showcase, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, and Vibrant"

 

"D'087: Yes for S 4G, Vibrant. No for S2 ATT, S2 Epic 4G Touch, S2 Skyrocket, Infuse 4G."

 

"D'305: Yes for Captivate, Continuum, Showcase, Gem, Indugle, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, Vibrant."

 

"'889 No for both Galaxy Tab models."

 

 

"Was Samsung willful in its infringement? Big one here for damages."

 

"SEC: Yes for all but D'087 and D'889"

 

"SEA: Yes for 381, 915, 163"

 

"STA: Yes for all but D'087 and D'889"

 

"All patents valid!"

 

 

Emphasis is mine.

 

Basically, Apple won.  The only remaining question is; how much did they win considering the infringement was deliberate and willful?

 
Reply
Reply
post #76 of 413
8/24/12 at 4:00pm

I can't wait to see how the markets react to this. 

Reply
Reply
post #77 of 413
8/24/12 at 4:00pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by xRCx View Post

happy times here, all smiles =)

 

Gotta get my wetsuit on and wade through the tears over at engadget, should be comical.

Ack! wetsuit wasen't, enough nearly drowned, staying here where its safe =)

Reply
Reply
post #78 of 413
8/24/12 at 4:00pm
Samsung is getting hammered. Good for Apple, what's right is right.
"A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject" - Winston Churchill
"Just because something is deemed the law doesn't make it just" - SolipsismX
Reply
"A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject" - Winston Churchill
"Just because something is deemed the law doesn't make it just" - SolipsismX
Reply
post #79 of 413
8/24/12 at 4:01pm
[The verdict has not finished, so do not start celebrating just yet, Yes I am Apple supporter, but verdict is long and very complex. I am watching on Cnet live blog.

Edit Galaxy tab 10.1 please pass to Apple 1.5billion wow
Edited by souliisoul - 8/24/12 at 4:07pm
Reply
Reply
post #80 of 413
8/24/12 at 4:01pm
AAPL climbing in after hours. Up 1.4% so far.
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: General Discussion
AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Samsung guilty of patent infringement, Apple awarded nearly $1.05B [u]