or Connect
AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Samsung guilty of patent infringement, Apple awarded nearly $1.05B [u]
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Samsung guilty of patent infringement, Apple awarded nearly $1.05B [u] - Page 3

post #81 of 409

http://live.theverge.com/apple-samsung-verdict-live/

post #82 of 409
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apple II 
Samsung Electronics Co. (SEC), Samsung Electronics America (SEA), and/or Samsung Telecommunications America (STA)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacBook Pro View Post

The various entities of Samsung:  Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung Electronics America Inc.; Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcrs View Post

Samsung Electronics America (SEA)
Samsung Telecommunications America (STA)
Samsung Electronics Co. (SEC)

Thanks All!
it's = it is / it has, its = belonging to it.
Reply
it's = it is / it has, its = belonging to it.
Reply
post #83 of 409
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maecvs View Post

I can't wait to see how the markets react to this. 

700 for Apple?

 

 


Tim Cook using Galaxy Tabs as frisbees

 

Reply

 

 


Tim Cook using Galaxy Tabs as frisbees

 

Reply
post #84 of 409
Originally Posted by Maecvs View Post

I can't wait to see how the markets react to this. 

 

 

Originally posted by Marvin

Even if [the 5.5” iPhone exists], it doesn’t deserve to.
Reply

Originally posted by Marvin

Even if [the 5.5” iPhone exists], it doesn’t deserve to.
Reply
post #85 of 409
Quote:
Originally Posted by souliisoul View Post

The verdict has not finished, so do not stay celebrating just yet, Yes I am Apple supporter, but verdict is long and vey complex. I am watching on Cnet live blog.

True, but Apple has won almost everything but the tablets - for at least some of the devices.

Samsung would have to win big on their FRAND counterclaims to defeat Apple's wins here. The big one will be in how much the jury awards in damages.
"I'm way over my head when it comes to technical issues like this"
Gatorguy 5/31/13
Reply
"I'm way over my head when it comes to technical issues like this"
Gatorguy 5/31/13
Reply
post #86 of 409

Damages: USD $ 1,051,855,000!

 
 
post #87 of 409
Damages:
$1.5 BILLION - just for the Tab.
"I'm way over my head when it comes to technical issues like this"
Gatorguy 5/31/13
Reply
"I'm way over my head when it comes to technical issues like this"
Gatorguy 5/31/13
Reply
post #88 of 409
1 billion, 51 million 855 thousand dollars lol.gif

Originally posted by Marvin

Even if [the 5.5” iPhone exists], it doesn’t deserve to.
Reply

Originally posted by Marvin

Even if [the 5.5” iPhone exists], it doesn’t deserve to.
Reply
post #89 of 409

Damages so far

 

Samsung owes apple 1 billion, 51 million 855 thousand dollars

post #90 of 409

1 billion, 51 million 855 thousand dollars

 

lol.gif

post #91 of 409

For those who wanna check the verdict form questions, here's the article having it:

http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/12/08/20/overly_complex_verdict_form_could_confuse_jury_judge_says.html

iMac 21.5" 2.7 GHz (2011), 1TB HDD, 8GB RAM; iPhone 5c 16GB White; iPod Touch 4G 8GB Black; iPod Touch 2G 8GB
Reply
iMac 21.5" 2.7 GHz (2011), 1TB HDD, 8GB RAM; iPhone 5c 16GB White; iPod Touch 4G 8GB Black; iPod Touch 2G 8GB
Reply
post #92 of 409

Yeah, take that Samesung!

post #93 of 409

Am wondering how the jury comes up with the damages so precisely?

iMac 21.5" 2.7 GHz (2011), 1TB HDD, 8GB RAM; iPhone 5c 16GB White; iPod Touch 4G 8GB Black; iPod Touch 2G 8GB
Reply
iMac 21.5" 2.7 GHz (2011), 1TB HDD, 8GB RAM; iPhone 5c 16GB White; iPod Touch 4G 8GB Black; iPod Touch 2G 8GB
Reply
post #94 of 409
Even better - Apple didn't infringe Samsung's patents.....
"I'm way over my head when it comes to technical issues like this"
Gatorguy 5/31/13
Reply
"I'm way over my head when it comes to technical issues like this"
Gatorguy 5/31/13
Reply
post #95 of 409
Quote:
Originally Posted by jragosta View Post

Damages:
$1.5 BILLION - just for the Tab.

 

$1.051 Billion

post #96 of 409
Quote:
Originally Posted by Radar View Post

 

The picture says it all. There's really no other way for this to go other than Apple winning BIG time. Anything else and American/Western innovation might as well self-immolate or simply farm its R&D off to China, Korea, or any other lowest-common-denomitator knock-off artists.

The picture doesnt really say much at all

Household: MacBook, iPad 16gb wifi, iPad 64gb wifi, iPad Mini 32gb, coming iPhone 5S, iPhone 4S 32gb, iPhone 32gb, iPod Touch 4th gen x1, iPod nano 16gb gen 5 x2, iPod nano gen 3 8gb, iPod classic...
Reply
Household: MacBook, iPad 16gb wifi, iPad 64gb wifi, iPad Mini 32gb, coming iPhone 5S, iPhone 4S 32gb, iPhone 32gb, iPod Touch 4th gen x1, iPod nano 16gb gen 5 x2, iPod nano gen 3 8gb, iPod classic...
Reply
post #97 of 409
Quote:
Originally Posted by jragosta View Post

Hey, where are our usual trolls? /s

This verdict is so dumb! Apple thinks that they invented the square? You can't patent a square! Apple users are such sheep. They've gotta be brainwashed and dumb to choose the best phone and tablet on the market! Who would ever do such a thing?

post #98 of 409
Quote:
Originally Posted by jragosta View Post

True, but Apple has won almost everything but the tablets - for at least some of the devices.
Samsung would have to win big on their FRAND counterclaims to defeat Apple's wins here. The big one will be in how much the jury awards in damages.

That why I said wait, since FRAND counterclaims are not in


Edit Samsung have not proven their case, do far no damages awarded .lol
post #99 of 409

Samsung claims:

 

No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no…

 

BA HA HA HA HA HA!

Originally posted by Marvin

Even if [the 5.5” iPhone exists], it doesn’t deserve to.
Reply

Originally posted by Marvin

Even if [the 5.5” iPhone exists], it doesn’t deserve to.
Reply
post #100 of 409
I agree with the verdict. As an American (Californian even haha), I'm also happy with a U.S. win. :-P I hope Samsung won't try anything in the way of trying to disrupt Apple's supply chain, as there are quite a few Samsung parts in the iPhone, iPad, and MacBook's. For example, I REALLY like the 256GB Samsung 830 SSD, which is in all the new Retina MacBook Pro's as well as at least half the Mac Book Air's, which Apple renames "Apple SSD SM256E". And whenever you find "0x80AD" next to any part, you're once again looking at a part from Samsung.

Then again, at least using the SSD example, Intel's 520 Series SSD is basically equally as phenomenal but would likely increase Apple's overall costs for making its notebooks. I'm not so sure if that's the case for the various Samsung parts needed to make the iPhone and iPad.

(Mid-2012) 15.4" MacBook Pro w/ IPS Retina Display | Quad Core i7-3720QM 2.6GHz / 3.6GHz Max. Turbo | 16GB DDR3-1600MHz RAM | 256GB Samsung 830 SSD-based NAND Flash ETA 9/5

Reply

(Mid-2012) 15.4" MacBook Pro w/ IPS Retina Display | Quad Core i7-3720QM 2.6GHz / 3.6GHz Max. Turbo | 16GB DDR3-1600MHz RAM | 256GB Samsung 830 SSD-based NAND Flash ETA 9/5

Reply
post #101 of 409
The only big thing left is whether damages are trebled for willful infringement or whether there are punitive damages.
"I'm way over my head when it comes to technical issues like this"
Gatorguy 5/31/13
Reply
"I'm way over my head when it comes to technical issues like this"
Gatorguy 5/31/13
Reply
post #102 of 409

Up to around 2.3 billion now...

post #103 of 409

Sammy has literally not scored a single point. Nothing! Lose, Lose, Lose!

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply
post #104 of 409

I'll bet the appeal by Samsung has already been filed...

post #105 of 409

Woo-hoo!


Edited by anantksundaram - 8/24/12 at 4:24pm
post #106 of 409

AAPL up $7.78 as of 7:13 PM.lol.gif

post #107 of 409

"And boy have we patented it!" - Steve Jobs

/

/

/

Ten years ago, we had Steve Jobs, Bob Hope and Johnny Cash.  Today we have no Jobs, no Hope and no Cash.

Reply

Ten years ago, we had Steve Jobs, Bob Hope and Johnny Cash.  Today we have no Jobs, no Hope and no Cash.

Reply
post #108 of 409
Samsung is Guilty... it has been copying Palms designs, Blackberry's and then Apple's. Book 'em Judge! For selling smartphones that suck!
post #109 of 409
Interesting. Samsung isn't guilty of antitrust for its FRAND / SEP games.

However, even if Apple infringed, Samsung could not collect due to patent exhaustion.

This is HUGE. Aside from the monetary damages, it sends a clear message. More importantly, it establishes a precedent that Apple can use against other infringers.
"I'm way over my head when it comes to technical issues like this"
Gatorguy 5/31/13
Reply
"I'm way over my head when it comes to technical issues like this"
Gatorguy 5/31/13
Reply
post #110 of 409
4:43 AM | by David Hamilton
Scorecard so far:
* Jury finds Samsung infringement of Apple utility, design patents for some (though not all) products
* Jury upholds Apple utility, design patents
* Jury upholds Apple trade dress '983
* Jury finds Samsung "diluted" Apple's registered iPhone, iPhone 3 and "Combination iPhone" trade dress on some products, not on others
* No Apple infringement of Samsung utility patents
* Jury found Samsung violated antitrust law by monopolizing markets related to the UMTS standard

Damages owed by Samsung:
* $2.3 billion and counting
post #111 of 409
Quote:
Originally Posted by hill60 View Post

It will be interesting to see the London newspaper headlines:-

SAMSUNG COPIED APPLE BUT THEY ARE STILL NOT COOL

There I corrected that for you.
;-)
post #112 of 409

Total Damages to be paid by Samsung = $2,490,185,000 USD

 

Total Damages to be paid by Apple = $0 USD

 

 

 

Team Apple!  Fu.. Yeah!

 
post #113 of 409

BAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!  Oh man! I just got home and read the news.  It's about time!!  Scamscum and its phandroid b!tches are getting a really good taste of humble pie!

Samsung had it coming, and while they didn't get the machete to the head, they certainly had the sledgehammer dropped on them!

This will be great for consumers.  Why?  Because this sends a message that competition is good only if you make your own stuff and not steal from others.  Let's see what Samesung can do if they actually have to think for themselves!!

It's a great day!

post #114 of 409
Quote:
Originally Posted by hill60 View Post

It will be interesting to see the London newspaper headlines:-

 

SAMSUNG COPIED APPLE

I'd be curious to see the Korean newspaper headlines....lol.gif

post #115 of 409
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apple ][ View Post

AAPL up $7.78 as of 7:13 PM.lol.gif

And Google down about $10.

 

Love to see Apple wipe the smirk of Larry (The Rat) Page's face.

post #116 of 409
Quote:
Originally Posted by mstone View Post

Sammy has literally not scored a single point. Nothing! Lose, Lose, Lose!

That's not true. Samsung won almost all the design patent issues related to tablets. That's an important win for them. They also won the arguments on whether they abused FRAND / SEP

Not important enough to make up for the massive losses, but it's incorrect to say that they didn't score a single point.
"I'm way over my head when it comes to technical issues like this"
Gatorguy 5/31/13
Reply
"I'm way over my head when it comes to technical issues like this"
Gatorguy 5/31/13
Reply
post #117 of 409

I think Google just sh*t in their pants.

post #118 of 409

why did the headline change to say 1 billion in damages?  from what I saw, it was much higher... 1 count alone was 1.5, and many other million ones... it should be over 2 billion.

post #119 of 409
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigdaddyp View Post

Whoa. That seems awfully fast for such a complicated case. I mean complicated in the amount of information and instructions presented to the Jurors not the charge itself.
Methinks this might not be good, hope I am wrong.

Not complicated at all if you have eyes and a brain. The copy was plain to see. Blatant.
post #120 of 409
Quote:
Originally Posted by doh123 View Post

why did the headline change to say 1 billion in damages?  from what I saw, it was much higher... 1 count alone was 1.5, and many other million ones... it should be over 2 billion.

Roughly $2.3 B was the number reported.
"I'm way over my head when it comes to technical issues like this"
Gatorguy 5/31/13
Reply
"I'm way over my head when it comes to technical issues like this"
Gatorguy 5/31/13
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: General Discussion
AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Samsung guilty of patent infringement, Apple awarded nearly $1.05B [u]