or Connect
AppleInsider › Forums › Mobile › iPhone › Apple adapters for new 9-pin dock to cost $10, cables will be $19 - report
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Apple adapters for new 9-pin dock to cost $10, cables will be $19 - report

post #1 of 57
Thread Starter 
Apple will be the only initial vendor to offer adapters and cables for its new 9-pin iPhone dock connector, with the new adapter costing around $10 and USB cables for $19, according to a new report.

Citing sources familiar with the company's plans, iLounge reported on Wednesday that the new "Dock Connector Adapter" from Apple will cost about $10, while three-packs will be available for $29. There won't be any third-party adapters available for the new iPhone, at least at launch.

Apple will also be selling its own USB cables for charging and syncing the new iPhone for $19 each.

Apple is said to have stopped approving third-party proposals for connector-equipped accessories in recent months. Sources in the third-party accessory business have reportedly expressed concern that Apple could block out cable makers much as it has done with the MagSafe connector on its notebooks.

"One source notes that Apple will reap a windfall by limiting competition in this manner, generating revenues of $100 million for every 10 million Dock Connector Adapters it sells for $10," author Jeremy Horwitz wrote. "According to the source, Apple estimates that it will sell the first 10 million Adapters by the end of 2012."

Docking cable


Last month, AppleInsider was first to report last week that Apple's new mini dock connector for its next iPhone is expected to feature a 9-pin, orientation-independent design — 8 gold pins that have been seen, plus the metal shell of the connector also serving as a functional contact. Taking cues from its patented MagSafe adapters, the new plug is expected to work in two orientations.

The new mini dock connector will also take up about 60 percent less real estate than its predecessor, the legacy 30-pin dock connector that has been a staple of Apple's handheld devices since it debuted in the third-generation iPod classic nearly 10 years ago.

The new, smaller dock connector is expected to be one of the new features on Apple's next-generation iPhone. The company has scheduled a keynote presentation for next week where it will presumably unveil its new handset.
post #2 of 57

If it's got to do with the functionality of an Apple product, it'll sell. 

post #3 of 57

How nice of them to provide bulk in just the number I'll need…

post #4 of 57

I assume they'd include cable with the new iPhone, so it's no big deal, can just wait a few months before the OEMs start selling the cheap alternatives.

post #5 of 57

"One source notes that Apple will reap a windfall by limiting competition in this manner, generating revenues of $100 million for every 10 million Dock Connector Adapters it sells for $10," author Jeremy Horwitz wrote. "According to the source, Apple estimates that it will sell the first 10 million Adapters by the end of 2012."

 

 

They needed to quote someone to multiple some number by $10 to calculate total revenue from selling a $10 item?
 

post #6 of 57

I have shun away from cheap alternatives after prior bad experiences... Most, if not all, those cheap alternatives just ain't the same kind of quality and sleek as Apple's.

post #7 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post

Apple is said to have stopped approving third-party proposals for connector-equipped accessories in recent months. Sources in the third-party accessory business have reportedly expressed concern that Apple could block out cable makers much as it has done with the MagSafe connector on its notebooks.
"One source notes that Apple will reap a windfall by limiting competition in this manner, generating revenues of $100 million for every 10 million Dock Connector Adapters it sells for $10," author Jeremy Horwitz wrote. "According to the source, Apple estimates that it will sell the first 10 million Adapters by the end of 2012."

 

Or maybe they're going to wait to announce the new connector, then let the 3rd party accessory market get busy designing new docks and accessories once the design spec is published.

 

Nah, it has to be space aliens.  It's always space aliens...  :LOL:

   Apple develops an improved programming language.  Google copied Java.  Everything you need to know, right there.

 

    AT&T believes their LTE coverage is adequate

Reply

   Apple develops an improved programming language.  Google copied Java.  Everything you need to know, right there.

 

    AT&T believes their LTE coverage is adequate

Reply
post #8 of 57

Any word on bulk cable discounts? I've got at least four cables to be replaced, not counting the connector in my Elevation Dock that will need to be replaced. 

post #9 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by chaicka View Post

I have shun away from cheap alternatives after prior bad experiences... Most, if not all, those cheap alternatives just ain't the same kind of quality and sleek as Apple's.

 

The OEMs cheap cable are crap, but from my experience, the Apple's own cables are not that much better, still break after a year or so on average. I'd rather buy $1x10 OEM cables and burn 1 every 2-3 months than buying 1 $10 Apple cable and gone after 1 year.  

post #10 of 57
Originally Posted by John.B View Post
Nah, it has to be space aliens.  It's always space aliens...  :LOL:

 

 

But really, they could very well stop third parties from doing that. 

post #11 of 57

9 pins? That should be at least 1/3 the price!!!

 

/s

Citing unnamed sources with limited but direct knowledge of the rumoured device - Comedy Insider (Feb 2014)
Reply
Citing unnamed sources with limited but direct knowledge of the rumoured device - Comedy Insider (Feb 2014)
Reply
post #12 of 57

I was going more for:

 

 

... but I like that better!  LOL!

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallest Skil View Post

 

But really, they could very well stop third parties from doing that. 

 

They could but my guess is that, at worst, they'll just license them like the "Made for iPhone" program.  No reason why Apple wouldn't continue to work with 3rd party accessories (including 9-pin cables) when it serves to promote product lock-in -- especially where the connector will be changing.

 

Then again, I think the reason they don't license the MagSafe connectors is that poorly made knock-offs could potentially start fires.  (Or maybe it is space aliens...)

   Apple develops an improved programming language.  Google copied Java.  Everything you need to know, right there.

 

    AT&T believes their LTE coverage is adequate

Reply

   Apple develops an improved programming language.  Google copied Java.  Everything you need to know, right there.

 

    AT&T believes their LTE coverage is adequate

Reply
post #13 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by John.B View Post

...

They could but my guess is that, at worst, they'll just license them like the "Made for iPhone" program.  No reason why Apple wouldn't continue to work with 3rd party accessories (including 9-pin cables) when it serves to promote product lock-in -- especially where the connector will be changing.

...

 

They already do this.  The way it works is that Apple willingly licences most of their cables and connectors, but the "industry" (cheap Chinese knock-off factories), doesn't want to pay most of the time as it just adds a item to their list of production costs.  

 

That's why most of them are total shite.  Not because Apple doesn't want to licence them and thereby ensure a certain quality level, but because no one wants to pay for licensing anymore (now that the manufacture of most tech devices has moved to China).  Most third party cables you see in stores are technically illegal copies for this reason.

 

This is also part of the reason why there are very few "Airplay" speakers and the market is flooded with inferior "Bluetooth" speakers instead (the other reason being a misguided, dumbass attempt to be "Android compatible")

post #14 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by chaicka View Post

I have shun away from cheap alternatives after prior bad experiences... Most, if not all, those cheap alternatives just ain't the same kind of quality and sleek as Apple's.

 

There are some bad 3rd party ones, but I have a ton of really great 3rd party 30-pin cables.  I usually buy them for wanting much longer lengths, but sometimes it's a matter of having really short lengths, or different colors, or multi-headed ends.

 

I really hope Apple is liberal with their licensing on the new connector and wish they would open up on the MagSafe... especially when it comes to external batteries.

post #15 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post

Apple will be the only initial vendor to offer adapters and cables for its new 9-pin iPhone dock connector, with the new adapter costing around $10 and USB cables for $19, according to a new report.

 

We'll see if Monster Cable tries to cash in on iPhone 5 with their usual $100 price for any cable with a brand new connector type.

Sent from my iPhone Simulator

Reply

Sent from my iPhone Simulator

Reply
post #16 of 57

oh great ... more alarmism from soccer mom Horowitz over at iLounge. 

 

His credibility is less than zero when it comes to Apple. Stick to reviewing iPod screen covers.

post #17 of 57

Does the pictured design strike anyone else as flawed (if it isn't fake)? Exposed contacts would have poor durability and would increase the risk of static discharge from someone's hand into a computer's USB port, no?  Whatever happened to the industry-wide agreement (following the EU's 2009 Common External Power Supply initiative) to adopt Micro USB-B connectors for new mobile devices?  Wasn't Apple one of the original signatories to the MoU? Based on Micro USB's thin profile, what possible reason is there NOT to implement a Micro USB-B 3.0 receptacle on the upcoming iPhone besides a misguided desire to control the third-party accessory market using proprietary-connector patents as a cudgel?  

post #18 of 57

I sure hope they have a 9-pin to 30-pin adapter, or else this will be useless in my car, especially if they use this new 9-pin in future iPods as well.  I have one of those VW proprietary plugs that connects via 30-pin connector.  And I'm pretty sure they won't be making any adapters anytime soon.  Not to mention in my car stereo (the touch-screen one 2012 model year) the BT audio feature only allows to view the song, play/pause, forward/next.  The proprietary 30-pin jack handles all the on-board menu functions.

post #19 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bakamono View Post

Does the pictured design strike anyone else as flawed (if it isn't fake)? Exposed contacts would have poor durability and would increase the risk of static discharge from someone's hand into a computer's USB port, no?  

This is actually a good point. Exposed contacts could even create a short - possibly allowing up to 500mA (1A? 2.1A?) at 5V...

13" MBP 2.53GHz C2D, 21.5" Alu iMac 3.06GHz C2D, 24" Alu iMac 2.8GHz C2D, 15" MBP 2.2GHz i7 (work)
AppleTV: 320GB, 2; TC 500GB; iPad 32GB; iPhone: 3G 8GB, 4 32GB; iPod: 30GB 5G, 80GB Classic, 2GB...

Reply

13" MBP 2.53GHz C2D, 21.5" Alu iMac 3.06GHz C2D, 24" Alu iMac 2.8GHz C2D, 15" MBP 2.2GHz i7 (work)
AppleTV: 320GB, 2; TC 500GB; iPad 32GB; iPhone: 3G 8GB, 4 32GB; iPod: 30GB 5G, 80GB Classic, 2GB...

Reply
post #20 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by chaicka View Post

I have shun away from cheap alternatives after prior bad experiences... Most, if not all, those cheap alternatives just ain't the same kind of quality and sleek as Apple's.

In most cases I would agree with you, but...it's a cable.  I'm not paying Apple $19 for a 3ft or 6ft cable or whatever it is.  Give me a cheapy one for $5 all day long.

post #21 of 57

I wouldn't mind this. So many people that I know who have problems with their iPhones are form using shitty 3rd party connectors that don't work well. 

post #22 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallest Skil View Post

How nice of them to provide bulk in just the number I'll need…

 

The bulk discount seems pretty miserly though.  3 1/3% off if you buy 3!

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bakamono View Post

Does the pictured design strike anyone else as flawed (if it isn't fake)? Exposed contacts would have poor durability and would increase the risk of static discharge from someone's hand into a computer's USB port, no?  Whatever happened to the industry-wide agreement (following the EU's 2009 Common External Power Supply initiative) to adopt Micro USB-B connectors for new mobile devices?  Wasn't Apple one of the original signatories to the MoU? Based on Micro USB's thin profile, what possible reason is there NOT to implement a Micro USB-B 3.0 receptacle on the upcoming iPhone besides a misguided desire to control the third-party accessory market using proprietary-connector patents as a cudgel?  

 

I think the EU directive basically agreed upon specs for the power supplies that were needed, and actual connectors to the device can be offered using an adaptor from micro USB.  I would guess Apple can still do that.


It seems to me that what everyone is standardizing on anyway is a power adaptor that has a standard USB port on it, then you just plug in whichever cable you need.  The power brick for my iPad now happily charges my Kindle and powers my Raspberry Pi (which if you've not seen it is a nice little toy!) happily, all I need to do is switch which USB cable I use.

post #23 of 57
Originally Posted by PaulMJohnson View Post
The bulk discount seems pretty miserly though.  3 1/3% off if you buy 3!

 

*shrug* It's Apple. I'd rather my adapters look good and work indefinitely than be shoddily made and break.

post #24 of 57

As long as the adapter works with my new Apogee Jam, I'll be happy...

post #25 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulMJohnson View Post

I think the EU directive basically agreed upon specs for the power supplies that were needed, and actual connectors to the device can be offered using an adaptor from micro USB.  I would guess Apple can still do that.

I believe you are correct that there is an adapter "loophole" in the EU directive. So Apple can go proprietary and be in compliance. But if there is no technical reason not to adopt Micro USB 3.0 connectors, I'd suggest that they aren't keeping with the "spirit" of the original Memorandum of Understanding. Which is their prerogative, no matter how disappointing.

post #26 of 57

It is this greed and total lack of imagination by Apple (such imagination ended with the iPhone 1/2G on the phone front) that will be their downfall.

 

Nokia have just launched a phone (the Lumia 920) whose innovations are each more useful than any iPhone feature, and save the user money and hassle. the wireless charging means you won't NEED any cables for charging and the NFC means you won't need any cables for music streaming/transfer. (Wireless charging hotspots will be everywhere soon, so we won't need to buy them except for our desks.)

 

Further, the PureView lens will offer pictures better than any other phone.

 

I'm an Apple guy (using a MBA to type this), but I am saddened at how Apple have totally failed to innovate since MagSafe.

 

Even iOS 6 is way dated over Android 4.1 Jelly Bean.

 

 

If the industrial design of the new iPhone really is the same as the 4 series, except for size, then I predict their gradual downfall.

 

I hope they have a surprise, such as a wrist controller, or a radical new form factor and these leaked pictures are the result of a massive deception by Apple and their suppliers.

post #27 of 57
Originally Posted by Bakamono View Post
But if there is no technical reason not to adopt Micro USB 3.0 connectors…


Fortunately there are a dozen or more reasons not to waste time with Mini or MicroUSB proper. 

post #28 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by malax View Post

"One source notes that Apple will reap a windfall by limiting competition in this manner, generating revenues of $100 million for every 10 million Dock Connector Adapters it sells for $10," author Jeremy Horwitz wrote. "According to the source, Apple estimates that it will sell the first 10 million Adapters by the end of 2012."

 

 

They needed to quote someone to multiple some number by $10 to calculate total revenue from selling a $10 item?
 

 

A "windfall"? Seriously? The sensationalist nature of these reports is always ridiculous. A hundred million isn't a windfall for a company that makes almost a 10 figure quarterly profit. I love how ilounge and macrumors also make it seem as if the primary reason Aple changed the conector is because it wants to sell new cables and accessories. What a ridiculously false and cynical (not to mention trollish) perspective. 

post #29 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallest Skil View Post
Fortunately there are a dozen or more reasons not to waste time with Mini or MicroUSB proper. 

Would you please elaborate? Photos have circulated of adapters converting Micro USB-B to the new 9-pin dock connector, such as those republished here on August 28 ("Rumor: Next-gen iPhone accessories with 9-pin dock connector revealed"), which would be consistent with an adapter loophole in the EU mandate.


Edited by Bakamono - 9/5/12 at 1:01pm
post #30 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slurpy View Post

I love how ilounge and macrumors also make it seem as if the primary reason Aple changed the conector is because it wants to sell new cables and accessories. What a ridiculously false and cynical (not to mention trollish) perspective. 

It's an evil plot to change the connector ONCE EVERY 10 YEARS¡ It's pretty much the most absurd thing one can imagine.

"The real haunted empire?  It's the New York Times." ~SockRolid

"There is no rule that says the best phones must have the largest screen." ~RoundaboutNow

Reply

"The real haunted empire?  It's the New York Times." ~SockRolid

"There is no rule that says the best phones must have the largest screen." ~RoundaboutNow

Reply
post #31 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bakamono View Post

I believe you are correct that there is an adapter "loophole" in the EU directive. So Apple can go proprietary and be in compliance. But if there is no technical reason not to adopt Micro USB 3.0 connectors, I'd suggest that they aren't keeping with the "spirit" of the original Memorandum of Understanding. Which is their prerogative, no matter how disappointing.

I recall the issue being with the power supply, not the cable attached to it. Note that Apple's power supplies have a detachable cable and it's been 7 or 8 years since they started including USB-A on them. That means any reasonable phone vendor's cable will plug into Apple's power supply if the one end has USB-A. Again, a few stranded or plastic coated copper is the not the reason this mandate was set, it's the power supply.

"The real haunted empire?  It's the New York Times." ~SockRolid

"There is no rule that says the best phones must have the largest screen." ~RoundaboutNow

Reply

"The real haunted empire?  It's the New York Times." ~SockRolid

"There is no rule that says the best phones must have the largest screen." ~RoundaboutNow

Reply
post #32 of 57
Originally Posted by Bakamono View Post
Photos have circulated of adapters converting Micro USB-B to the new 9-pin dock connector, such as those republished here on August 28 ("Rumor: Next-gen iPhone accessories with 9-pin dock connector revealed"), which would be consistent with an adapter loophole in the EU mandate.

 

Sure, and that's needed because the EU not only thinks it can tell manufacturers what to make, it thinks it knows what's best for the future of technology, too. It doesn't. There's nothing wrong with it existing, but wanting to forgo it for the sake of replacing Dock Connector or Dock Connector 2 with straight up USB is ignoring the benefits thereof.

post #33 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oflife View Post

It is this greed and total lack of imagination by Apple (such imagination ended with the iPhone 1/2G on the phone front) that will be their downfall.
Yep, greed for using the same connector for nearly a decade that work across 3 class of devices, and have a power supply with a detachable cable that uses the standard USB-A¡ What assholes¡
Quote:
Nokia have just launched a phone (the Lumia 920) whose innovations are each more useful than any iPhone feature, and save the user money and hassle. the wireless charging means you won't NEED any cables for charging
How do that work with the EU law since you need an entirely new device for charging?
Quote:
and the NFC means you won't need any cables for music streaming/transfer.
NFC for steaming music? First I've heard of that.
Quote:
(Wireless charging hotspots will be everywhere soon, so we won't need to buy them except for our desks.)
It's always soon. Soooon. Soooooon! Is Godot bringing it?
Quote:
Further, the PureView lens will offer pictures better than any other phone.
OK, so it's about a name brand of a lens... and nothing else? Personally, I would wait for a review of all these new phones before saying which will be better based on a single marketable component, but I'm crazy that way.
Quote:
I'm an Apple guy (using a MBA to type this), but I am saddened at how Apple have totally failed to innovate since MagSafe.
You claim that nothing rom Apple after January, 10th 2006 has been innovative and you expect people to take you serious?
Quote:
Even iOS 6 is way dated over Android 4.1 Jelly Bean.
And yet Project Butter is only starting with Jelly Bean to address horrendous lag issues for an OS that I've heard since 1.0 is just as fast, just as fluid and just as smoother as iOS.
Quote:
If the industrial design of the new iPhone really is the same as the 4 series, except for size, then I predict their gradual downfall.
If you have eyes and believe the the images of the leaks are real then you'll be able to see it's a completely different industrial design.
Quote:
I hope they have a surprise, such as a wrist controller, or a radical new form factor and these leaked pictures are the result of a massive deception by Apple and their suppliers.
You want something innovative but you reference a 1930's comic strip? So much for nothing innovative since the beginning of 2006.

"The real haunted empire?  It's the New York Times." ~SockRolid

"There is no rule that says the best phones must have the largest screen." ~RoundaboutNow

Reply

"The real haunted empire?  It's the New York Times." ~SockRolid

"There is no rule that says the best phones must have the largest screen." ~RoundaboutNow

Reply
post #34 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallest Skil View Post

Sure, and that's needed because the EU not only thinks it can tell manufacturers what to make, it thinks it knows what's best for the future of technology, too. It doesn't. There's nothing wrong with it existing, but wanting to forgo it for the sake of replacing Dock Connector or Dock Connector 2 with straight up USB is ignoring the benefits thereof.

Then people can complain that their video and audio out no longer work. If Apple fixed all the problems people like to complain about we'd have too many people complaining about having nothing to complain about. We can't have that, can we?

"The real haunted empire?  It's the New York Times." ~SockRolid

"There is no rule that says the best phones must have the largest screen." ~RoundaboutNow

Reply

"The real haunted empire?  It's the New York Times." ~SockRolid

"There is no rule that says the best phones must have the largest screen." ~RoundaboutNow

Reply
post #35 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by SolipsismX View Post
I recall the issue being with the power supply, not the cable attached to it. Note that Apple's power supplies have a detachable cable and it's been 7 or 8 years since they started including USB-A on them. That means any reasonable phone vendor's cable will plug into Apple's power supply if the one end has USB-A. Again, a few stranded or plastic coated copper is the not the reason this mandate was set, it's the power supply.

My recollection may be colored by the Micro USB hype at the time the MoU was signed. I pulled "Annex II to MoU regarding Harmonisation of a Charging Capability for Mobile Phones, June 5th, 2009" <http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/rtte/files/chargers/chargers_annex_ii_to_mou_january_12_2010_en.pdf>. This looks to be the relevant section (internal cites omitted): "2. DC Plug Connector Specification. The cable assembly shall terminate in a Micro-B plug. The plug shall meet the USB-IF Connector Test Requirements, shall be compliant to the Micro-USB Cables and Connectors Specification, Rev 1.01 (Micro-USB 1.01), and shall be rated to meet all electrical specifications. An EPS provided with a detachable cable shall be equipped with a USB Standard-A receptacle. Standard detachable cable assembly, supplied for use with the EPS, shall have Standard-A and Micro-B plugs and meet the USB-IF Cable Assembly Test Requirements for Compliant Usage of Connectors and Cables in Micro-USB 1.01. Above requirement also applies to detachable cables used as adaptor i.e. where the Micro-B is replaced by a proprietary plug." -- So we have a "shall terminate in a Micro-B plug" combined with a loophole for proprietary plugs at the end.

post #36 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by SolipsismX View Post


Then people can complain that their video and audio out no longer work. If Apple fixed all the problems people like to complain about we'd have too many people complaining about having nothing to complain about. We can't have that, can we?

 

Graham Chapman: I think all righthtinking people in this country are sick and tired of being told that ordinary, decent people are fed up in this country with being sick and tired.

All: Yes, yes...

Graham Chapman: I'm certainly not! And I'm sick and tired of being told that I am.

Not Sure?: Mrs. Havoc-Jones.

Mrs. Havoc-Jones: Well, I meet a lot of people and I'm convinced that the vast majority of wrongthinking people are right.

 

And there you have it. Bring on the keynote.

post #37 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bakamono View Post

My recollection may be colored by the Micro USB hype at the time the MoU was signed. I pulled "Annex II to MoU regarding Harmonisation of a Charging Capability for Mobile Phones, June 5th, 2009" <<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/rtte/files/chargers/chargers_annex_ii_to_mou_january_12_2010_en.pdf" class="bbcode_url">http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/rtte/files/chargers/chargers_annex_ii_to_mou_january_12_2010_en.pdf>. This looks to be the relevant section (internal cites omitted): "2. DC Plug Connector Specification. The cable assembly shall terminate in a Micro-B plug. The plug shall meet the USB-IF Connector Test Requirements, shall be compliant to the Micro-USB Cables and Connectors Specification, Rev 1.01 (Micro-USB 1.01), and shall be rated to meet all electrical specifications. An EPS provided with a detachable cable shall be equipped with a USB Standard-A receptacle. Standard detachable cable assembly, supplied for use with the EPS, shall have Standard-A and Micro-B plugs and meet the USB-IF Cable Assembly Test Requirements for Compliant Usage of Connectors and Cables in Micro-USB 1.01. Above requirement also applies to detachable cables used as adaptor i.e. where the Micro-B is replaced by a proprietary plug." -- So we have a "shall terminate in a Micro-B plug" combined with a loophole for proprietary plugs at the end.

It's not a loophole as there is ambiguity to skate around an intended rule. It's very clear. If your EPS has a detachable cable you can use a proprietary plug to connect to your device while the EPS has a USB-A port.

Again, the intent was to reduce EPS waste and Apple is not the problem here. If everyone else had used a USB-A port on their EPS there would have been no ruling. On top of that, Apple has used the same plug for all but one of their iPods (which uses the 3.5mm headphone jack for charging and syncing), their iPhone and iPads. That's pretty damn impressive when you consider the number of years and devices all being compatible that way. Walk into many stores and you'll see a revolving stand of different EPS for different phones and I doubt you'll find just one type for all phones from a single vendor.

"The real haunted empire?  It's the New York Times." ~SockRolid

"There is no rule that says the best phones must have the largest screen." ~RoundaboutNow

Reply

"The real haunted empire?  It's the New York Times." ~SockRolid

"There is no rule that says the best phones must have the largest screen." ~RoundaboutNow

Reply
post #38 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallest Skil View Post
Sure, and that's needed because the EU not only thinks it can tell manufacturers what to make, it thinks it knows what's best for the future of technology, too. It doesn't. There's nothing wrong with it existing, but wanting to forgo it for the sake of replacing Dock Connector or Dock Connector 2 with straight up USB is ignoring the benefits thereof.

Apple wasn't forced into signing the MoU, and I only see three "benefits" over Micro USB-B: (1) there is no upside-down, right-side-up problem; (2) the potential for extra data lines when not connecting at the other end to a USB port; (3) Apple's ability to use the proprietary connector to control the accessories market. I am assuming the two connectors have similar dimensions. Acknowledging (1) and (2), based on the exposed contacts, the pictured connector still looks to be a flawed design.

post #39 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by SolipsismX View Post
It's not a loophole as there is ambiguity to skate around an intended rule. It's very clear. If your EPS has a detachable cable you can use a proprietary plug to connect to your device while the EPS has a USB-A port.
Again, the intent was to reduce EPS waste and Apple is not the problem here. If everyone else had used a USB-A port on their EPS there would have been no ruling. On top of that, Apple has used the same plug for all but one of their iPods (which uses the 3.5mm headphone jack for charging and syncing), their iPhone and iPads. That's pretty damn impressive when you consider the number of years and devices all being compatible that way. Walk into many stores and you'll see a revolving stand of different EPS for different phones and I doubt you'll find just one type for all phones from a single vendor.

Agreed.  My recollection had been it was an adapter loophole (Micro-USB to proprietary), but reading the passage, the last line does seem to gut the entire point of using "shall" at the beginning.


Edited by Bakamono - 9/5/12 at 2:17pm
post #40 of 57

I've found that price is rarely an indication of cable quality.

 

All my HDMI cables, even the one I got for $5 works fine.

On the flip side I have three FireWire 800 cables and the only one that works is the generic Chinese one I got at a discount PC shop. The one that came with my now dead Mediasonic case never worked at all and the one that came with my LaCie drive refuses to maintain a connection.

I don't use Apple earbuds, but I've heard that they don't last very long. I've been using a set of Sennheiser earbuds every day for three years now.

 

It's very annoying that Apple won't license MagSafe. Everybody else can get DC transformers for $30-40, but Mac owners are forced to pay $79 for a device that manages to get only 1.5 or 2 stars on Apple's own website. It's gouging a captive market pure and simple. I actually have a Chinese transformer with a MagSafe connector, purchased before Apple put the fear of lawsuits into all the importers. The cables are thicker than the ones Apple uses and all the typical break points are nicely reinforced. I'm confident it'll outlive my Apple one.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: iPhone
  • Apple adapters for new 9-pin dock to cost $10, cables will be $19 - report
AppleInsider › Forums › Mobile › iPhone › Apple adapters for new 9-pin dock to cost $10, cables will be $19 - report