In the federal appeals case, Apple and Google's Motorola Mobility filed a joint request asking the CAFC to tack on 60 days to the deadline to file initial arguments. Both parties are appealing a previous July ruling from Judge Richard Posner, dismissing a two-way lawsuit that has been in litigation since 2010.
As noted by FOSS Patents' Florian Mueller, Apple's current deadline to file is Sept. 28, with Motorola's response due 40 days later on Nov. 7, however the parties say "the complexity of this case and the press of other matters" warrants an extension. At issue is Judge Posner's dismissal of a variety of inunction requests, but also a number of summary judgment orders and the denial of a jury trial regarding damages incurred.
From the joint motion:
There are over 1000 entries on the district court docket, the parties filed over 125 motions and applications to the court, the district court issued 107 orders, and the record contains over 8.5 gigabytes of pleadings and over 72.4 gigabytes of expert reports and supporting materials.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. | Source: U.S. Courts
As for Motorola's suit against Apple in Florida, both parties filed a stipulation on Tuesday requesting a two-month deadline extension for their mutual infringement and invalidity contentions, due Sept. 7 and Oct. 5, respectively. Mueller said the request was made to accommodate for an assessment of new products being launched by both companies, with Motorola wanting to add new contentions for devices that won't be released by the original deadlines. Both Apple and Motorola are expected to be debuting a variety of devices in the coming weeks, including Apple's much-awaited next-generation iPhone which is likely to be unveiled on Sept. 12.
Presiding Judge Robert Scola granted the stipulation on Wednesday, taking note of Motorola's previous statements regarding case scheduling.
The parties indicate that they have agreed to extend the deadlines to exchange infringement and invalidity contentions. Motorola, who so vehemently protested the longer schedule advanced by Apple and adopted by the Court, now (without a hint of irony) joins in a request to further extend deadlines. The Court is nonetheless pleased that the parties have been able to reach agreement on something. Therefore, in the spirit of rewarding the parties? efforts to confer and reach agreement, the Court finds good cause for the requested extension and hereby grants the same.
Infringement contentions are now due by Nov. 7, while invalidity contentions must be in by Dec. 5.