So it's completely unpredictable.
J.
Profit taking.
In the short term, technicals > fundamentals. Always. Long term outlook depends on whether or not Apple can continue to grow, the mobile segment is beginning to get a little saturated.

Hahaha. What BS. Have you ever invested in the stock market?
People buy stock based on projections 3 years away? I guess record breaking iPhone 5 numbers, the fact that hey can't build them fast enough to match the INCREDIBLE demand, the fact that the phone IS regarded higher than any iPhone before it (ignoring the Fandroid geek trolling that permeates message boards to try and manipulate facts to match their obsessed theories), garnering more attention and hype than any before it, iPad Mini, basically more money than anybody else has.... anywhere (no debt to match), and a nice Dividend won't matter when people buy today.
Where do you guys come up with this stuff. No wonder you're so bitter, you probably never bought AAPL because they've been doooooooomed all along!

I am not against all taxes. There should be sufficient tension between tax revenue and efficient services provided by the government that are Constitutionally limited and I presume this tension would create periods of insufficiently funded government. The balance between states rights and the federal government swing continuously, just as freedom of the people tends to decrease as the powers of government increase, which results in an eventual backlash and defunding of the illegitimate functions of government. These swings and continual tension ensures no one branch of government, or special interest becomes too powerful. Inevitably, "the people" get what they want, even if they do themselves harm by allowing the government to become too powerful for a while.
In the same way that individuals change throughout their lives, the size of government should increase at times, but it should also shrink at times. The problems we find today are that government is not shrinking because we have had presidents and a Congress that represent the interests of certain businesses, such as oil companies, the military-industrial complex and the banking/finance sector instead of fulfilling their Constitutionally-limited and defined functions. Corporatism is the name of the game today.
So you are not against either taxes or regulation per se. You can try to pretty it up by citing "illegitimate functions of government", but I think you are saying you are only against them when it is your ox that is being gored*....... just like everybody else who is in favor of selected taxes and regulation.
*pun only half intended

So you are not against either taxes or regulation per se. You can try to pretty it up by citing "illegitimate functions of government", but I think you are saying you are only against them when it is your ox that is being gored*....... just like everybody else who is in favor of selected taxes and regulation.
*pun only half intended
The "legitimate functions of government" are spelled out in the Constitution. Some of the more recent amendments deserve to be struck down.
You always need an exit strategy. No stock runs up forever. There is always a 'highest' price. Not saying Apple's reached it, but to hold on to something forever is silly.
The 'emotional' response is to get attached to a stock. As a trader, only 1 thing matters to me. %Change/Time.
Get attached to a company as a consumer. Not as an investor.

You always need an exit strategy. No stock runs up forever. There is always a 'highest' price. Not saying Apple's reached it, but to hold on to something forever is silly.
The 'emotional' response is to get attached to a stock. As a trader, only 1 thing matters to me. %Change/Time.
Get attached to a company as a consumer. Not as an investor.
True, but that "highest price" might not come within our lifetime. Look at those companies that have been around for a half a century or more and are still growing stock prices. It happens, and it will happen again.
Too many people are obsessed with the imminent "decline" of Apple, as if it's something that will happen overnight. True, this is tech, but I think Apple are the ones who really proved how to think around that "imminent demise of tech", and they're the ones who are forging ahead the future of sustainability in tech. The fact that they've run a very unique business strategy, one of being saving a war chest of funds and keeping no debt, little overhead, relying on 3rd party suppliers to remain agile enough to shift and sway with any market conditions, etc., which about every other tech companied has tried to copy to a "T", should prove that.

Well, this morning I sold my longest held investment, so I bought a few Apple shares for the hell of it. Already up on my investment. I think ~630 was support for the near term, I expect it to go back up approaching the release of the iPad mini.
Long term, I don't like Apple's bullying business tactics and lack of openness - closed ecosystems have always failed historically. But short term - Android and Windows OEMs continue putting out garbage (except my 2 favourites - HTC and Lenovo - though they don't get much press in the US).
A wildcard is RIM - BB10 looks great, but they've already lost too much mindshare, not sure if they can re-gain customers. I really want HTC to succeed as I love their products, but they have terrible marketing, release too many products, and are at the mercy of the ecosystem. My HTC phone is great though, the only Android brand I would ever consider (I've used other people's Samsungs, LGs and Motorolas, they're all garbage).

My own analysis is pretty much the same. I bought at 630.