Naah, thats just your ISP throttling down on your youtube download... This seems to be the trend today for ISP:s to prevent networks to be spammed with videotraffic.
Recent Reviews
-
I was given the Ipod nano 6th generation for Christmas 2011. I was starting to take up running and needed something to track my run. since I just started I was only using my Ipod roughly 3 times...
-
I have had the iPad Verizon 4G LTE for a month now, and over all I couldn't be happier with the machine. The only issue I have found so far is when on wifi it has a slower speed in processing...
-
I have owned at least a dozen different Mac laptops over the years, starting with a Powerbook 1400 back in the day. The 13-inch Air is my absolute favorite of the bunch. It's the first laptop...
-
I spent quite a bit of time reading the setup manuals and various Apple articles about manually setting up this device since I have an unusual setup, and the setup manuals indicated I would have...
-
all i have to say is i love it its so much faster and i could just slip it into my purse p.s it has a ton of space for the 64gb
Intel expected to unveil cable service, set-top box at CES - Page 3
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »
It not only has HBO go, but also Amazon instant video. I've thought about trying one too for when I travel. If I like it enough I might switch. Have 3 ATV 3s right now- but I keep holding out getting a roku because I think they'll add HBO and amazon as soon as I leave. A radio streamer (roku has pandora) would be great too as opposed to the terrible "stations" we get with ATV. Doses anybody even use those?
Edited by Andysol - 1/2/13 at 6:16am
(2) 2010 27" iMac i7, 2012 15" Retina MacBook Pro i7, 2011 Mac Mini i5
iPad 4, iPad Mini, (2) iPhone 5, iPod Touch 5, iPod Nano 7
Time Capsule 4, Airport Extreme 5, (3) Apple TV 3
(2) 2010 27" iMac i7, 2012 15" Retina MacBook Pro i7, 2011 Mac Mini i5
iPad 4, iPad Mini, (2) iPhone 5, iPod Touch 5, iPod Nano 7
Time Capsule 4, Airport Extreme 5, (3) Apple TV 3
- dasanman69
- Naysayer Extraordinaire
- Joined: Sep 2009
- Posts: 4,154
- offline
- Select All Posts By This User

It does seem like a bug to me but since there is that line between Share my library on my local network and Home Sharing... which has me wondering if they are, in fact, different services. I can't say I fully understand Home Sharing compared to the Library sharing we had previously. I just want to have certain content accessible from the Apple TV and I want it to be simple. Except for the ease of AirPlay I wondered if perhaps a Roku might have been a better fit for me.
I love my Roku and Amazon has the top one on sale for $79.99.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B005CLPP84/ref=redir_mdp_mobile?m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pfRdReplace=1&ref_=pe_36900_27526840
"Just because something is deemed the law doesn't make it just" - SolipsismX to whom I bid farewell.
"Just because something is deemed the law doesn't make it just" - SolipsismX to whom I bid farewell.
- dasanman69
- Naysayer Extraordinaire
- Joined: Sep 2009
- Posts: 4,154
- offline
- Select All Posts By This User

Yes- it does have a way to view library, but not sure if you can delegate what- you might pop on a roku forum for clarification.
It not only has HBO go, but also Amazon instant video. I've thought about trying one too for when I travel. If I like it enough I might switch. Have 3 ATV 3s right now- but I keep holding out getting a roku because I think they'll add HBO and amazon as soon as I leave. A radio streamer (roku has pandora) would be great too as opposed to the terrible "stations" we get with ATV. Doses anybody even use those?
Why leave? Just supplement what you already have with a Roku. One can use Plex as a media server. Not sure if it's customizable.
"Just because something is deemed the law doesn't make it just" - SolipsismX to whom I bid farewell.
"Just because something is deemed the law doesn't make it just" - SolipsismX to whom I bid farewell.

I love my Roku and Amazon has the top one on sale for $79.99.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B005CLPP84/ref=redir_mdp_mobile?m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pfRdReplace=1&ref_=pe_36900_27526840
I won't give up the Apple TV because of AirPlay but the Roku is a solid device for the price. I like that they have a Pandora app unlike the AppleTV. They also have a nifty app to let you use your iDevice as a remote control.
"Goodbyeee…"
"Goodbyeee…"
- dasanman69
- Naysayer Extraordinaire
- Joined: Sep 2009
- Posts: 4,154
- offline
- Select All Posts By This User
There's no reason you can't diversify. No need to give one up for the other.
"Just because something is deemed the law doesn't make it just" - SolipsismX to whom I bid farewell.
"Just because something is deemed the law doesn't make it just" - SolipsismX to whom I bid farewell.
- dasanman69
- Naysayer Extraordinaire
- Joined: Sep 2009
- Posts: 4,154
- offline
- Select All Posts By This User
Ahhh gotcha. You could always go with the RCA inputs lol
"Just because something is deemed the law doesn't make it just" - SolipsismX to whom I bid farewell.
"Just because something is deemed the law doesn't make it just" - SolipsismX to whom I bid farewell.

I have to laugh at everyone trying to beat Apple to the punch in TV when they really have no idea what Apple is planning on doing in this space. I think where companies are missing the boat though is people don't really care about so-called smart TV's. They haven't taken off at all. Hopefully Apple realizes its not about a cool UI. They can have the coolest UI ever but if you're still stuck with cable monopolies and bundled packages where you're paying for channels you never watch its not really solving anything. Cable companies get all the blame but its the content providers pushing/forcing bundling. I'm skeptical Apple will be able to change any of that.
the same could be said about the Mobile industry. I pay WAAAAY more for my Voice plan than i use. I did the math and of my ATT voice plan (450min. base plan) I actually use only 178 minutes per month on average (and most of that is telemarketers, which I can't seem to shake, even when registering to DNC list). Plus I have free mobile to mobile and about 5000 roll-over minutes built-up that I never use! ATT should be refunding me each month since I have so many free minutes rolled over, but they don't and I have probably a couple years worth of minutes I'll never get back that I've already paid for.
Point is, apple didn't change the way the service providers charge it's customers, and it's very likely that this "rumored" TV system won't change the way your TV providers do business either. They would never agree to partnering with Apple if they lost some of at free money they get back with all these bogus channels they add in the bundled packages. And I think that's the #1 reason we haven't seen a full-fledged Apple TV service yet.

Problem is none of these folks know what Apple is planning so they are all scrambling around doing anything they can think of, hoping to beat Apple to what ever 'it' is. If Apple had never mentioned an interest in a new TV concept I doubt the industry would have even tried to change their concepts other than for the likes of Netflix services.
I wouldn't be surprised if Apple is intentionally smoking out the competition. My theory behind this speculation is this:
Apple has been [rumored] trying to lobby and sweet-talk the media companies to allow content contracts with [whatever this new TV is] and getting nowhere. My thought is that since everybody and their uncle is trying to one-up Apple before they release something, they too are trying to shoe-horn a deal with the same media companies. With all this interest in penning deals with the Media Companies, they (big Media) will finally see a possible market in licensing out content to the Tech Industry...waiting for that sweet deal. And finally realizing that Apple's proposals were probably the best deal to be had, given the resounding acceptance of the Apple Ecosystem. So while all the other Tech companies try and fail to ink contracts with Big Media, Apple will squeeze in after they've smoked-out the competition and emerge with "Le Grande Travaux".
Now, whether this is Comcast to start with or the Major Networks is the real question. IMO, I think for Apple to ink any partnership (which let's face it, this will have to happen at the beginning...a la, AT&T), it will have to start with the Service Providers and not the Media Giants. The Cellular Model they used for the iPhone is probably the most likely scenario for TV/Cable. They provide the fastest signals and are the most wide reaching. But, I don't see this as a TiVO model though, since I think that business model has already proved to be less than stellar. I see it more as as Apple Providing the Box (like Motorola currently does) and making this model a "Premium" service for the Cable companies to offer as an Alternative. Therein lies the problem for Apple. They still don't have control over the content and Customer Experience...hence why we probably still haven't seen an Apple Television yet.
Whatever and whenever it happens, I see it as this...but something tells me that TV isn't going to be the entire focus of this [rumored] product. I see it as much more than just a TV. I see it more at a home network that links your TV and your devices to a central system...a home server or even a "Home Automation" system that's accessible from any Apple device, be it an iOS and/or OSX device. That's really the 2nd most important feature I believe will be the success of an Apple Television...I still think this idea of an "iPanel" will be what makes it stand out from the competition.

This is why Apple trying to force there way into this market without the cable companies seems so very difficult to me. The cable and sat companies pay a huge amounts of money for the rights to these channels.
They already are talking to the Content Providers. Cook met with Time Warner a while back, as well as CEOs of Big Media.
We have seen this (the 2nd part of your quote) happen with Cellular as well. Most Smartphone users use much more Data than Voice already, yet pay huge fees for Voice. Same as Cable. You watch a few key channels but the rest if just crap you never watch...yet pay out the wazzoo for only a few channels.
What I'd like to see, is a all the Major Networks (HBO, NBC, CBS, Disney, etc...) provide Apps for the Apple TV STB where you can watch the "over-Air" content for free, then offer "In App" subscriptions to their other networks that you normally see on Cable for subscription fee. That would be the exact model of traditional Cable, but with A-La-Carte subscriptions.
I'm really shocked they haven't done this already. Seems to me like a really Winning Model.
Someone else posted this link, but I think it's exactly along the lines of some of my thinking:
http://www.mondaynote.com/2012/12/09/5175/
Edited by antkm1 - 1/3/13 at 9:39am
The problem is content. There is not enough quality content available. Unfortunately the arts have not been a priority and even if they were there just aren't that many talented people around, at least enough to provide the entertainment some want for next to nothing. People do not want to pay for content. Content owners don't want to give it away. The path in between is the least of the problems. The current cable companies have done nothing interesting for over 50 years. Tweaking their systems with a nice GUI is not going to get you better programming. Having a la carte pay structures will only lead to an increase in the cost of the better offerings and the death of the poor ones which provide a support structure for the artists. The whole thing is a mess. You've got government, huge companies, media content owners and struggling artists. Does anyone really think that rearranging some electronics is going to fix anything?
philip
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »
- Intel expected to unveil cable service, set-top box at CES
Recent Discussions
- › Google's Nexus 7 tablets dying early, possibly due to cheap memory 4 minutes ago
- › Inside iOS 7: Calendar app comes with sterilized UI, few feature... 6 minutes ago
- › Steve Jobs discusses his legacy in rare 1994 video interview 8 minutes ago
- › Apple tweaks Siri responses to help prevent suicides 9 minutes ago
- › Case intended for Apple's low-cost iPhone shows thicker, rounded... 29 minutes ago
- › Inside iOS 7: Apple's Weather app gets animated 33 minutes ago
- › OS X Mavericks' new App Nap, Timer Coalescing features target... 47 minutes ago
- › Solar charging stations with Apple Lightning & 30-pin connectors... 52 minutes ago
- › Rumor: Russian video shows iPad version of iOS 7 beta 54 minutes ago
- › This guy Michael Heilemann is absolutely killing it with his... 57 minutes ago
Recent Reviews
- › Apple iPod nano - 16GB, Silver MC526LL/A (6th Generation) by cc420
- › Apple iPad with Retina Display Wi-Fi + Verizon/Sprint 4G - 64GB,... by Aaron Krahn
- › 13.3-inch Apple MacBook Air MD231LL/A (Mid-2012) by ahilal
- › Apple Time Capsule - 2TB (MD032LL/A) by biyahero
- › Apple iPad Wi-Fi - 64GB, White (MD330LL/A) by raeganapril
- › Apple Magic Trackpad (MC380LL/A) by WisdomSeed
- › Aperture 3 by bcbcbroderick
- › 17-inch Apple MacBook Pro MD311LL/A (Late 2011) by bcbcbroderick
- › Apple iPod touch - 32GB, Black MC544LL/A (4th Generation) by bcbcbroderick
- › Apple iPod touch - 8 GB, White MD057LL/A (4th Generation) by bcbcbroderick
New Apple Wikis
- › Click here to buy the leave two OL dress by billedwarder
- › Adding in some fashion elements in ol dress, by billedwarder
- › 2013 'Modified' iPod touch by Mikeycampbell81
- › 2013 MacBook Pros by Mikeycampbell81
- › iPad mini 2 with Retina display by Mikeycampbell81
- › 2013 iPhone 5S by Mikeycampbell81
- › Trade in your old devices for holiday cash by Kasper
- › How to sell your old iPad for cash by Mikeycampbell81
- › How to offset the cost of a new iPhone by... by Kasper
- › How to save money on AppleCare extended... by Kasper
About AppleInsider | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2013 AppleInsider is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map




