That's what my mom wants. May get her Lumia instead.
I don't see them ever selling 3 sizes at once, at least not 3 current generation models, perhaps if you include phones from previous years. However, I do think that Apple will be forced to offer two display sizes for their future phones. I think they would just keep the current 4" narrow for people that like smaller phones, and offer a wider and larger iPhone somewhere around 4.8". I don't think this is unlikely at all. It might not happen in 2013, but I think it will happen eventually.
Developers can and will adapt to various Apple display sizes and resolutions. Apple might also have some new tools to make this easier for them that we aren't aware of. Most already develop for Android as well with far more resolutions so it is not as big of a deal as many people make it out to be.
Before the iPad mini people thought it was just as crazy for Apple to make a smaller iPad. Is it really any more crazy to think Apple might make an even larger iPhone? I think not. That is where the market is heading and Apple will not be left behind. Then in a few years we will all laugh at how dated and small our old iPhones were and wonder how we managed to get by with a 3.5" display.

They can keep the resolution the same and just scale up the screen size. Samsung has shown that people want larger screens, resolution be damned. Anecdotally, I have several friends who have gone with Samsung over Apple for screen size alone.
This would seem to be a waste of time considering how many people cover their beautiful phone with a silly case.
They can, but it would be absolutely horrible.
No, not really. Samsung has shown that people are cheap [expletive redacted] who will buy anything, stolen or otherwise, as long as they save cents up front.
I thought you were joking with this statement, at first. But seeing how you have stuck to this, I'm curious.
1. Do you understanding the meaning of the word "useless" or are you trying to be hyperbolic?
2. Have you actually used one?
3. What do you do on the iPad that you can't do at all on the iPad Mini?
4. Do you expect all Apple products to fit your exact needs?
5. Are you DaHarder? Teckstud?

(2) 2010 27" iMac i7, 2012 15" Retina MacBook Pro i7, 2011 Mac Mini i5
iPad 4, iPad Mini, (2) iPhone 5, iPod Touch 5, iPod Nano 7
Time Capsule 4, Airport Extreme 5, (3) Apple TV 3
(2) 2010 27" iMac i7, 2012 15" Retina MacBook Pro i7, 2011 Mac Mini i5
iPad 4, iPad Mini, (2) iPhone 5, iPod Touch 5, iPod Nano 7
Time Capsule 4, Airport Extreme 5, (3) Apple TV 3
(2) 2010 27" iMac i7, 2012 15" Retina MacBook Pro i7, 2011 Mac Mini i5
iPad 4, iPad Mini, (2) iPhone 5, iPod Touch 5, iPod Nano 7
Time Capsule 4, Airport Extreme 5, (3) Apple TV 3
(2) 2010 27" iMac i7, 2012 15" Retina MacBook Pro i7, 2011 Mac Mini i5
iPad 4, iPad Mini, (2) iPhone 5, iPod Touch 5, iPod Nano 7
Time Capsule 4, Airport Extreme 5, (3) Apple TV 3
Apple breaks convention they've formerly held. Silly things like phones .2" larger or smaller are now on the table. You can't really assume what Apple would do until they do it.

To you these might seem like huge changes, but to the average consumer the only really noticeable difference was a slightly larger screen and possibly the addition of LTE. Then when you factor in that other phones had had larger screens and LTE for a long time before that it really does start to look rather evolutionary. Apple was also somewhat late to bring a 1.2MP front camera. Now that many phones offer 2.1MP even that is looking dated. It is a given than any new phone should include a faster CPU and GPU. But for Apple to make anything revolutionary they need to offer something not already found on the competition a year earlier and they haven't really done that in a while.
"Blank! BLANK! You're not looking at the big picture!"
"Blank! BLANK! You're not looking at the big picture!"
The general attitude of forum members towards larger and/or smaller Apple devices sure has changed over the last several months going by the responses in this thread. It used to be sub-4" iPhone and 9.7" iPad were the perfect sizes and nothing needed to change. . . except that another year passed by.
Now those "other sizes" make sense to a whole lot of Apple owners.
melior diabolus quem scies
"No theatrics and no more personal attacks, just stick to the logic and tell me why I don't have any argument ~ Jragosta/2012
melior diabolus quem scies
"No theatrics and no more personal attacks, just stick to the logic and tell me why I don't have any argument ~ Jragosta/2012
Apple could ship a smaller "iPhone mini" with Retina resolution ...
If they double the iPad mini screen resolution from 162 to 324 dpi (resulting in the fabled "Retina iPad mini").
And if they use the Retina iPad mini screen technology in an 1136x640 or 960x640 "iPhone mini."
Using a 324 dpi screen would mean that an 1136x640 "iPhone mini" would have a roughly 3.5" x 2" screen.
Or a roughly 3" x 2" screen with 960x640 screen geometry. Both of which could run apps built for iOS 5
and later with zero changes. I think that's essential. Changing the actual screen geometry, again, could be
painful for many developers with with pixel-perfect graphics in their apps.
Oh, and if Apple does ever ship an "iPhone mini," they'll need to stop numbering the "big" iPhone.
They'd call them "the new iPhone" and "the new iPhone mini" ad infinitum. Same as iPad / iPad mini.
Sent from my iPhone Simulator
Sent from my iPhone Simulator

I believe the rumor in substance. I think the iPhone should have three screen sizes. The original size, the current size, and a slightly larger size. It worked on the music player front. Colors would also be a natural extension of what Apple is doing with its music players. Further, if Apple switches to carbon fiber based products, as is the rumor, colors would be easier.
The reality is Apple likely has to become more aggressive to fend off Android. Google certainly has become more aggressive, and it is also becoming much better at software design than it used to be. Google's new search program's new voice features are nice. It works faster than Siri and the interface is clean. I still largely use Bing, but Google did nice work with the iOS search App. Google's new map program has some user interface problems as well as voice navigation issues, but the overall design is solid (I still prefer Apple's solution). I hope to see Apple improve at software design more quickly.
Revamping nearly the entire product line wasn't a terrible performance in '012, but I agree about the need for Apple to get more aggressive in covering profitable product niches, e.g., in particular larger screen phones. I'm seeing them everywhere. As many as I'm seeing iPhones, btw.
Give DuckDuckGo a shot as your search engine if you want to escape Google's "filter bubble" effect (and not be tracked and have much better privacy. Also cool features of its own - and when it strikes out it offers to take you to Google or Bing for a another search. Very cool.

Honestly, the screen size might not be a huge deal with the iPhone 5 (at least for some), but it easily blows every other phone Apple has made away. It is noticeably lighter, and incredibly fast. The 4S feels like a brick in comparison. Further, the overall design is improved.
I concur and really don't like the "brick" feel of the 4S compared to the near weightlessness of the SIII. Haven't actually pawed a 5 yet, but it sounds much more pleasant to handle and carry. I would hope the larger model, if it appears (as I dearly hope), would incorporate as many weight-saving tricks - extending the improvements of the 5 and so not be much heavier.

No complications for devs if the ppi are simply scaled down on the larger phone (say in the 280ppi +/- a bit range).
Also I watch people operate their smart phones a lot - and much of the time (while texting or writing, e.g.), they're using two hands, and of course with one hand once a song or video starts or simply scrolling an article. I have no problem with this at all, despite the "purity" of Apple/Ives's one-hand aesthetic - which starts to break down on the "tall screen" iP5 anyway.
You'll also see touch-enabled Macs by 2014. Apple's bulk of sales come from touch-enabled devices and I've seen people going back and forth between trackpad and touch on Win 8 with ease. It just makes sense - and not being able to use touch starts to feel unnatural when you move from Pad or Phone to notebook.
More importantly, implemented properly, it would "just work." An area where Apple's traditionally been on the forefront.
And before the "muscle arms" reply gets trotted out, I'm NOT (NOT!) saying the function would be for full-time use, but an option for those who want it for here and there where it's convenient. There could also be an option (over time) to choose larger or traditional clicking points in the OS UI and over time in programs.

And me! Bring it on. There's no reason for the World's largest tech company to have to stick to one current form factor. Period.
An iPhone, a Leatherman and thou... ...life is complete.
An iPhone, a Leatherman and thou... ...life is complete.
I think they do highlight the portability/pocket-ability ("hold it in your palm"..."smallest bag...") in their marketing (copy n' paste from iPad mini page on Apple website):
iPad mini has everything that makes an iPad an iPad, but it’s a fraction of the size. At just 7.2 millimetres, it’s pencil thin and unbelievably light.3 You can easily hold it in your palm. And stash it in your smallest bag without a second thought, so it’s always close at hand.
(2) 2010 27" iMac i7, 2012 15" Retina MacBook Pro i7, 2011 Mac Mini i5
iPad 4, iPad Mini, (2) iPhone 5, iPod Touch 5, iPod Nano 7
Time Capsule 4, Airport Extreme 5, (3) Apple TV 3
(2) 2010 27" iMac i7, 2012 15" Retina MacBook Pro i7, 2011 Mac Mini i5
iPad 4, iPad Mini, (2) iPhone 5, iPod Touch 5, iPod Nano 7
Time Capsule 4, Airport Extreme 5, (3) Apple TV 3



The general attitude of forum members towards larger and/or smaller Apple devices sure has changed over the last several months going by the responses in this thread. It used to be sub-4" iPhone and 9.7" iPad were the perfect sizes and nothing needed to change. . . except that another year passed by.
Now those "other sizes" make sense to a whole lot of Apple owners.
Hmmm... I seem to recall that there were quite a few people agreeing with me when I said that a smaller iPad and larger iPhone would make a lot of sense... something I've been saying for quite a while now.
My guess... all of those people that you seem to remember saying otherwise are just a lot quieter now... well, except for at least one.
5" inches minimum, in brown with a stylus and a kickstand.

I'll be honest, I've been watching a lot of videos of Android 4.2 (Jelly Bean) over the last couple of weeks. I hate to admit it but if Apple is looking to innovate and make changes, it's in the features that iOS offers, not so much the hardware.
I used Android up until Froyo and went to the iPhone. I love the feel of the iPhone 5, love iOS, but Android seems to have caught up with iOS - features wise. And I'm not trolling.
This is my opinion, only. Maybe.
Yeesh.
It's not hard.
Apple dominated the music player market for a reason. 3-4 DIFFERENT products meeting the needs and budgets of different markets and consumers.
One iphone doesn't fit all.
A similar approach to the iPod market.
The iPhone has the best design of ANY smart phone. But there is a design out there that beats it.
It's the current iPod touch. It's streamlined alu heaven. It's a great design.
Offer the new iPhone 5S in 3 models.
Nano, Classic and 'S' (super sized.)
3.5, 4 and 5 inches..?
Colours? What took them so long?
The next iPhone range is the iPod touch range. Small, medium and Large. In colours.
With price brackets for low, medium and upper to squeeze the life out the air Apple is allowing the Android and Samsung market.
Lemon Bon Bon.

I'll be honest, I've been watching a lot of videos of Android 4.2 (Jelly Bean) over the last couple of weeks. I hate to admit it but if Apple is looking to innovate and make changes, it's in the features that iOS offers, not so much the hardware.
I used Android up until Froyo and went to the iPhone. I love the feel of the iPhone 5, love iOS, but Android seems to have caught up with iOS - features wise. And I'm not trolling.
This is my opinion, only. Maybe.
I'm not saying you're wrong but this reminded me of what people used to say back in the 90s when it was mentioned that they should consider buying a Mac...
"But the PC has so much more software."
Of course, 95% of those people never used anything more than what was offered for the Mac.
What I'm saying is; what are those features and do most people really need some of those [next to] useless little bells and whistles?
I'm sure developers are thrilled to see Apple going the way of Android¡
I thought Job's mantra was to sell a few good products with not many options. We as consumers don't know what we want unless it is offered so in some cases it's just best not to offer. I have never considered an iphone in anything except black until the white one came out and then I never considered an iphone in anything except black or white until they announced the colors. The problem for me is the colours are rubbish, far too washed out. If I want a colorful phone, I want a decent representation of the color. I want an orange phone, bright orange, nothing else will do.
That's what happens when you give people tiny decisions to make.

I'm not saying you're wrong but this reminded me of what people used to say back in the 90s when it was mentioned that they should consider buying a Mac...
"But the PC has so much more software."
Of course, 95% of those people never used anything more than what was offered for the Mac.
What I'm saying is; what are those features and do most people really need some of those [next to] useless little bells and whistles?
I agree; I don't know if they utilize the features. I guess not, or Google Wallet would be bigger than it is. Maybe that's a hardware issue, though...
I guess I'm just saying that Android has caught up with Apple in terms of OS features. Their "Google Now" released last June is a pretty mature answer to Siri. I still prefer iOS but I look forward to seeing what iOS 7 offers.
We all pretty much realize the only reason Apple has never wanted to include an microSD card slot is to force people into buying the more expensive $299 and $399 models if they wanted more storage space. Hopefully if they go to 32/64/128 with this next refresh it won't an an issue, but my 64GB iPhone is already full and it would be nice to have some elbow room and a 64GN microSD would provide that. I wish they would at least offer an SD slot on their most expensive model if they do not offer a 128GB version later this year.
Apple simply has to be more aggressive in hardware features and also with iOS. Jellybean is really quite good and the next version of Key Lime pie will be out this spring. A larger screen iPhone with at least a 4.5" will keep me in the fold for my next upgrade but with many new 2013 Android phones rumored to offer 5" 1080P displays with a 441 pixel-per-inch or better displays, quad core 2 GHz processors, 2 and maybe 3GB RAM, 128GB storage standard, 16MP cameras rivaling digital cameras....Apple will have some very tough competition. They don't need to beat every spec from every phone, but the days of resting on their laurels are long gone.