This is pretty hilarious (and by that I mean faulty) reasoning.
People make unsupported, emotionally based statements about the reasoning behind this move, which cannot be proven. Then someone notes the obvious which is that it looks like cynicism. Your response is ... that it's not cynicism, but instead just "the truth," yet you also provide no actual evidence of this at all (and you say it in a cynical way too!)
Hmmmm... what are we to conclude from this?