Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gatorguy 
Now you're being dishonest. You cited one "imaginary phone" and one running Brew as the OS.
No, I cited the Galaxy Star. I also referred you back to the time I did this previously when I identified half a dozen feature phones running Android.
But since you apparently STILL haven't found a third grader to explain how to use a search engine, here are some more:
http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-19736_7-20040826-251.html
"The i886 is billed as a feature phone with a slide-out QWERTY keyboard,"
"And yet, it IS an Android phone. We dug around in the phone's settings and discovered that according to the phone's open-source licenses, it runs using Android code."
http://pocketnow.com/android/lg-adds-android-os-to-env-touch-feature-phone-follow-up
"The enV series has been a popular consumer-oriented feature phone series for Verizon, and by adding Android to the enV Touch 2, LG is helping to expand the scope of Google’s mobile operating system to reach more consumers."
http://www.zdnet.com/android-to-make-waves-among-feature-phones-2062201480/
http://www.phonearena.com/phones/compare/T-Mobile-G1,LG-Town-GT350/phones/3097,4417
(note table which lists it as a feature phone and Android)
http://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/10/13/leap-plans-android-feature-phone-wait-what/
http://www.mobiletechreview.com/phones/T-Mobile-G1-Android.htm
" we expect to see a wide variety of Android phones running the gamut from feature phone to smartphone."
That took just a couple of minutes - there are many more references.
I can't believe that you shills are still denying that Android has been used on feature phones.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gatorguy 
You're mixing worldwide smartphone shipping estimates with numbers for specific Samsung handsets produced for sale in only the US over a span of 24 months beginning in 2010, and then with only a subset of those being cited by Apple with sales numbers produced. Somehow you think you've managed to prove something from the two unrelated sets of numbers. You've offered no proof at all that previous estimates of that subset were "far, far too high". There were no previous estimates of those AFAIK.
Sometimes you just make stuff up I think, hoping I really don't "keep up".
Once again, all of Samsung's best selling phones were in that number. So your position is that they only sold 21 M of their best selling phones but sold 150 M of 'everything else'? That's blatantly ridiculous.