or Connect
AppleInsider › Forums › Investors › AAPL Investors › Tim Cook: Apple's culture of innovation refuses to recognize any limits
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Tim Cook: Apple's culture of innovation refuses to recognize any limits

post #1 of 22
Thread Starter 
Speaking at the Goldman Sachs Conference, Tim Cook defended Apple from a whisper campaign that's seeding the idea the company is out of ideas and soon won't be able to continue to compete.

Tim Cook


Asked about Apple's "culture of innovation," Cook said, "it's never been stronger. Innovation is so deeply embedded in Apple's culture. The boldness, ambition, belief there aren't limits, a desire to make the very best products in the world. It's the strongest ever. It's in the DNA of the company.""If you look at some essentials, there's no formula. If there was a formula, a lot of companies would have bought their ability to innovate"

While Apple's products have many imitators, Cook said that Apple's "culture of innovation" isn't something that can be formulaically copied by rivals.

"If you look at some essentials, there's no formula. If there was a formula, a lot of companies would have bought their ability to innovate. Some essentials are skills and leadership," Cook said. "If you look at skills, Apple is in a unique and unrivaled position. Apple has skills in software, in hardware, and in services."

Cook added, "the model of the PC industry, that model's not working for what consumers want today. Consumers want an elegant experience where the technology flows to the background.

"The real magic happens at the intersection of these, and Apple has the ability on all three of these spheres to innovate like crazy and really cause magic. These skills, this isn't something you can just go write a check for. This is decades of experience."

Cook's mention of "writing a check" to buy innovation is a likely allusion to a comment made by Steve Jobs in 2007, where he addressed a shareholder who asked why Apple wasn't spending more on research and development by saying, "?I wish developing great products was as easy as writing a check!

"If that were the case," Jobs quipped, "then Microsoft would have great products."

No limits for Apple



Asked if Apple was reaching the point where it was approaching 'natural limits,' an apparent allusion to the "law of large numbers" talking point frequently used to predict the sudden collapse of Apple's growth trajectory, Cook answered, "There's that word 'limit.' We don't have that in Apple's vocabulary."

Cook added, "when I zoom out and look at the smartphone market in particular, what I see is a market that is projected to double in the next few years. This is a huge market. On a longer-term basis, all phones will be smartphones and there's a lot more people in the world [buying them] than 1.4 billion, and people love to upgrade their phones very regularly," Cook said.

"Over 40% of that, 500 million, happened over last year. Across that period of time, we built an ecosystem that is the best in customer experience on the planet. In addition, it's fueling an incredible economic gain for developers. We've paid over $8 billion to [iOS App Store] developers."

That figure is $1 billion higher than the number Apple last reported for the end of 2012. If the company continues the current exponential pace of growth in the App Store, it will need to pay out $14 billion this year alone, or more than $1 billion per month. That figure comes in addition to the App Store revenues Apple is booking for iTunes, which only looks at the 30 percent cut Apple charges on the sale of paid apps.

Turning attention specifically to Apple's largest, most promising new market, Cook said, "when I look at what Apple has done in China, I think it's hard for anyone to evaluate and say it's not impressive. The company has gone from a few hundred million in revenue in one year to $3 billion in the next to $13 billion the next. We're adding over $10 billion every year."
post #2 of 22
Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post
…Cook answered, "There's that word 'limit.' We don't have that in Apple's vocabulary."

 

They sure like to limit the amount of dedicated video RAM on their GPUs… I'd put the maximum each respective chip allowed, myself. Even if it meant having stuff custom designed and ordered.

Originally Posted by Marvin

The only thing more insecure than Android’s OS is its userbase.
Reply

Originally Posted by Marvin

The only thing more insecure than Android’s OS is its userbase.
Reply
post #3 of 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallest Skil View Post

They sure like to limit the amount of dedicated video RAM on their GPUs… I'd put the maximum each respective chip allowed, myself. Even if it meant having stuff custom designed and ordered.

Apple made 3.5" screens the limit for 5 years too.... will 4" be the limit for the next 5 years?

Let's hope not!
post #4 of 22
Tim opens his mouth and Apple stock drops.... Thank you Tim, stock price really was too high!
post #5 of 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by seekingtheta View Post

Tim opens his mouth and Apple stock drops.... Thank you Tim, stock price really was too high!

 

That isn't Tim's fault, it's the fault of speculators and irrational analysts.

post #6 of 22

Is there a reason Tim's comments have to be split amongst umpteen separate posts?  Why not have one thread rather than picking out certain quotes and starting separate threads about them.  9 to 5 Mac did the same thing,  so annoying.

post #7 of 22

Tim must have special affection for Jony Ive and Bob Mansfield.  Again today when he talked about leadership he specifically mentioned Jony and Bob and what they're working on (said he was "ecstatic" about Ive getting involved in software). 

post #8 of 22
Originally Posted by Michael Scrip View Post
Apple made 3.5" screens the limit for 5 years too.... will 4" be the limit for the next 5 years?

Let's hope not!

 

I'd rather my device be usable than conform to some ludicrous growth "requirement".

 

Screens are not the new megapixel war. At least, they'd better not be.


If you apply the current crop of phones to other areas, talk about a literal metaphor…

 

"Is that a Samsung in your pocket or do you often have women taking notice of your… technology?"

Originally Posted by Marvin

The only thing more insecure than Android’s OS is its userbase.
Reply

Originally Posted by Marvin

The only thing more insecure than Android’s OS is its userbase.
Reply
post #9 of 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogifan View Post

Tim must have special affection for Jony Ive and Bob Mansfield.  Again today when he talked about leadership he specifically mentioned Jony and Bob and what they're working on (said he was "ecstatic" about Ive getting involved in software). 

Maybe special affection, or maybe lots of respect and maybe he really is genuinely psyched about how the Apple software is getting some real designer love. Its much needed.

post #10 of 22
One of the secrets to winning in the battle against the competition is making services and information that has up until now been unaffordable or difficult to acquire, affordable and easy to acquire. Siri is a bit like a personal secretary. The Internet on a computer is now the Internet on a phone. Apps are like miniature versions of expensive software for the desktop. Soon our iPhones and iPads will offer us the brightest minds in the world, in the form of artificial intelligence, and these brilliant pieces of programming will be ours to consult with whenever we need them. Can you imagine your own personal team of doctors, designers, fashion consultants, coaches, lawyers, etc.? All of these things will be possible.
Edited by SpamSandwich - 2/12/13 at 12:07pm

Proud AAPL stock owner.

 

GOA

Reply

Proud AAPL stock owner.

 

GOA

Reply
post #11 of 22
Originally Posted by gwmac View Post
Anyone else hope Apple will innovate a way to control the cursor to go exactly where you want to place it easier than you can do now?

 

Called touchscreens. Already done.


How about innovating a way to have a delete or backspace?

 

So press Delete… ?


Or how about a way to scroll to the bottom of a long webpage without scrolling a dozen times?

 

Scroll 1/1000th of an inch to have the bar show up, move your cursor where you want go on the bar, click and hold. It scrolls there automatically. This was microscopically easier when scroll bars were always visible, but it's the same operation as it has always been. 

Originally Posted by Marvin

The only thing more insecure than Android’s OS is its userbase.
Reply

Originally Posted by Marvin

The only thing more insecure than Android’s OS is its userbase.
Reply
post #12 of 22
Originally Posted by gwmac View Post
I didn't mean to include delete, I know it has a delete key. I meant backspace.


Backspace is Delete in the Windows world. Do you mean right delete? Then do you mean iOS?


And anyone trying to get the cursor to go to an exact location knows about the frustration I am talking about. It is very difficult to move the cursor to a very specific letter or location.


Yeah, you're talking about iOS… That could be snappier, sure.


On OS X it is easy and as you describe, but I can't copy that in Safari with iOS.

 

Right, and that's what I thought you meant. Perhaps a 10 (20) pixel wide area on the right side of the screen could be treated like the scroll area (well, you know, whatever it is now, just always instead of conditionally). Except that would break websites, which is the opposite of what Apple would want to do. 

Originally Posted by Marvin

The only thing more insecure than Android’s OS is its userbase.
Reply

Originally Posted by Marvin

The only thing more insecure than Android’s OS is its userbase.
Reply
post #13 of 22
Originally Posted by gwmac View Post

I think an easy way to address the scroll issue would be a long fast swipe down would move it all the way to the bottom on the page. A shorter and slower flick would work the same as it does now, basically one page down. 

 

Well, if "tap the top" gets you to the top, shouldn't "tap the bottom" get you to the bottom?

Originally Posted by Marvin

The only thing more insecure than Android’s OS is its userbase.
Reply

Originally Posted by Marvin

The only thing more insecure than Android’s OS is its userbase.
Reply
post #14 of 22
So according to Fast Company Apple dropped from 1 to 13 on their list of most innovative companies.   I'm curious what made them #1 last year and what happened since to make them drop to #13?  Seems they're just jumping on the Apple no longer innovates bandwagon.
 
post #15 of 22
Originally Posted by Rogifan View Post
So according to Fast Company Apple dropped from 1 to 13 on their list of most innovative companies.   I'm curious what made them #1 last year and what happened since to make them drop to #13?  Seems they're just jumping on the Apple no longer innovates bandwagon.
 

 

Where's the link to Fast Company on that page? All I see is an unsourced report from a South Korean website.

 

Anyway, they seem to be ignoring manufacturing. Apple has pushed retina displays for quite some time now.

Originally Posted by Marvin

The only thing more insecure than Android’s OS is its userbase.
Reply

Originally Posted by Marvin

The only thing more insecure than Android’s OS is its userbase.
Reply
post #16 of 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallest Skil View Post

 

Where's the link to Fast Company on that page? All I see is an unsourced report from a South Korean website.

 

Anyway, they seem to be ignoring manufacturing. Apple has pushed retina displays for quite some time now.

I didn't bother going to their website.  I'm sure it's accurate.  The hot trend these days is massive FUD.  Just this morning some info babe on Bloomberg asked a financial analyst if Apple has a product that can "save" it and if the iWatch can do it. 1rolleyes.gif

post #17 of 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallest Skil View Post

Well, if "tap the top" gets you to the top, shouldn't "tap the bottom" get you to the bottom?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gwmac View Post

Except that it doesn't. That is my point.  On a long webpage it takes to long to scroll up or down. 

I agree with this wholeheartedly. I'm surprised I'm never seen a button at the top of a mobile version of a long page, like a forum, that will take you to the bottom. It's as easy having an href tag to the thread-footer (Post a Reply and Start a NEw Thread button) that is linked to text or a button at the top.

"The real haunted empire?  It's the New York Times." ~SockRolid

"There is no rule that says the best phones must have the largest screen." ~RoundaboutNow

Reply

"The real haunted empire?  It's the New York Times." ~SockRolid

"There is no rule that says the best phones must have the largest screen." ~RoundaboutNow

Reply
post #18 of 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallest Skil View Post

They sure like to limit the amount of dedicated video RAM on their GPUs… I'd put the maximum each respective chip allowed, myself. Even if it meant having stuff custom designed and ordered.
Ha ha.
post #19 of 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallest Skil View Post

I'd rather my device be usable than conform to some ludicrous growth "requirement".

Screens are not the new megapixel war. At least, they'd better not be.


If you apply the current crop of phones to other areas, talk about a literal metaphor…

"have women taking notice of your… technology?"
This sounds a little wrong.
post #20 of 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogifan View Post

Is there a reason Tim's comments have to be split amongst umpteen separate posts?  Why not have one thread rather than picking out certain quotes and starting separate threads about them.  9 to 5 Mac did the same thing,  so annoying.

I like it better this way.


Edited by elroth - 2/12/13 at 3:16pm
post #21 of 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Scrip View Post

Apple made 3.5" screens the limit for 5 years too.... will 4" be the limit for the next 5 years?

Let's hope not!

Lets hope at least 3(with S model it would be 4 so)if not longer...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallest Skil View Post

Well, if "tap the top" gets you to the top, shouldn't "tap the bottom" get you to the bottom?
Tap to the top has giving a problem on all IOS versions on the iPhone 5, doing it with out a tap so scrolling down to previous versions(happens when scrolling up
post #22 of 22
Originally Posted by Rogifan View Post
Just this morning some info babe on Bloomberg asked a financial analyst if Apple has a product that can "save" it and if the iWatch can do it. 1rolleyes.gif

 

This needs to be illegal to say. It's literally slander. She needs a multi-thousand dollar fine at minimum


Originally Posted by THEMAC1NT0SH View Post
This sounds a little wrong.


That was the idea. Apologies for the crudeness of the example.

Originally Posted by Marvin

The only thing more insecure than Android’s OS is its userbase.
Reply

Originally Posted by Marvin

The only thing more insecure than Android’s OS is its userbase.
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: AAPL Investors
AppleInsider › Forums › Investors › AAPL Investors › Tim Cook: Apple's culture of innovation refuses to recognize any limits