They'd probably end up on court for that.
However, a bit more generic "I'm an iPhone", "I'm Android" ad... could be just fine.





Quit advertising and see how long it takes to be placed on the high shelves.
Keep thinking that "good enough" is the way to go. It's so easy to be forgotten by a fickle public.

Actually, I thought those ads worked because Justin Long was just the straight man and John Hodgman's "PC guy" had all the funny lines. You'd think Mac vs. PC ads would be mean-spirited, but Hodgman's character was kind of a lovable boob, so Apple made its point without seeming mean.

No... you make it sound like "Good Enough" is all that is necessary.
... and when Coke no longer has the money to pay... do you really believe that a company would last that long if it didn't advertise... really.
If you follow the thread....
I'd like to see how long they would remain on top if they stopped advertising.
…No. That's the idea…
You can't have it both ways. Either Apple is cool or they didn't have to "apologize" to Samsung and should be financially compensated by the court for the damage done to Apple.
One of the earlier posts talked about "consumers with buying power".... Good point!
I just don't like companies that push their product by portraying buyers (or fans) of other competing products as stupid (standing in line), dumb ("they don't see that the next big thing is already here") and now in their latest "campaign" being old, out-of-touch and being mocked by "hip" tween employees. These "older" or "dumb" people are all potential buyers of other Samsung products now or in the future. Products of other divisions like TVs, computers, appliances.
If I would be the head of any of these other Samsung 'silos', I'd pick up the phone and call my counterpart in "Mobile": "What the heck are you doing? You pissing off my potential customers. You want me (us) to loose a $2,500 TV or Fridge deal just so you might sell more S III ! ?"
Back to 'buying power': Call me sensitive but Samsung lost me.
Now - what TV should I get...? Typical First World problem....

... but that wasn't the argument... and you know it... or you actually weren't following the thread.
As a refresher:
The day Apple or any other company stops advertising is the first day they start on the road to the bottom.
The day that Coke stops advertising but Pepsi continues to advertise is the day that Coke heads down the ladder and Pepsi goes to the top.

One of the earlier posts talked about "consumers with buying power".... Good point!
I just don't like companies that push their product by portraying buyers (or fans) of other competing products as stupid (standing in line), dumb ("they don't see that the next big thing is already here") and now in their latest "campaign" being old, out-of-touch and being mocked by "hip" tween employees. These "older" or "dumb" people are all potential buyers of other Samsung products now or in the future. Products of other divisions like TVs, computers, appliances.
If I would be the head of any of these other Samsung 'silos', I'd pick up the phone and call my counterpart in "Mobile": "What the heck are you doing? You pissing off my potential customers. You want me (us) to loose a $2,500 TV or Fridge deal just so you might sell more S III ! ?"
Back to 'buying power': Call me sensitive but Samsung lost me.
Now - what TV should I get...? Typical First World problem....
I don't agree with what I'm about to write (poor logic), but how about this:
"Hey, I 'may' be old and out-of-touch, but if I buy this Samsung fridge, I will become cool and hip. That's what the ads say."


You're right. Companies spend billions of dollars every year for nothing. 
Remain uneducated if you will.
Coca Cola was by far the King of the soft drink world until the 50s. Nothing even close.
In the late 40s and early 50s Pepsi made everything else equal: infrastructure & distribution. Coca Cola began to have a real contender. Then Pepsi started firing on all cylinders with a few of its ad campaigns. Coke and Pepsi almost bankrupted themselves during the Cola Wars of the 60s, 70s and early 80s.
Once the business ends were similar it's advertising that made the difference. Coke will never stop advertising as Jaragosta stated because Pepsi would roll over them like a 300 mph train.


Since most people drink soda, and most people aren't brain damaged, I don't see how the evidence supports your conclusion.
I'd be quite happy if it was illegal to put HFCS in foods. For a few years now, I've not imbibed anything with HFCS in it, and that limits me to water, milk, 100% juice, and specialized sodas. I'd say it's less than 10% of the total "drinks" market. And I'm fine with that. Stop wasting sugar on ethanol and use the corn instead.
But there's no evidence supporting either of your claims.
The majority is always sane. Damage stops being damage if everyone has it. 