or Connect
AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Apple's 'smart bezel' hides portions of a device display until needed, acts as secondary input
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Apple's 'smart bezel' hides portions of a device display until needed, acts as secondary input

post #1 of 28
Thread Starter 
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Tuesday granted Apple a patent for a touch-sensitive bezel that can serve as a secondary mode of input for devices with small screens, as well as change from transparent to opaque upon sensing a user's finger.

Bezel
Source: USPTO


Apple's U.S. Patent No. 8,477,114 for "Electronic device, display and touch-sensitive user interface" describes a method of deploying a touch-sensitive bezel which extends over a portion of a portable device display, and can hide or reveal that area on command.

The patent describes a system in which a portable device's display is partly overlapped by a touch-enabled bezel that is either partially, or entirely, light-transmissive. In the patent, the screen is split into two sections, the uncovered "active viewing area" and the covered "second portion" of the display.

When embedded sensors detect a finger is in close proximity or touching the device, signals from the controller trigger the second portion to illuminate, thereby changing the appearance of the overlaid bezel. The patent outlines a number of bezel state changes, including simple color-changes and light transmission, to more complex embodiments where the bezel itself turns from opaque to transparent.

For example, the second portion to illuminate briefly to indicate a touch or near touch, or may remain lit until a second touch event is detected.

Bezel
Illustration of display with active area (62), sensor (73), second screen portion (68) and bezel window (66).


In this implementation, the extended bezel area serves as a type of window through which a user can see the device's display. The bezel can be made from a number of materials such that the window disappears from view when the second portion of the screen is not illuminated. Thus an illlusion is created where the window portion of the display is "hidden" until a user triggers a touch event.

According to some embodiments, color changes and text or graphics can be displayed in the second portion of the display which, in concert with the bezel's touch-sensitive capabilities, can create a secondary form of input.

Any number of masking technologies can be applied to the bezel window, though the patent notes circular polarizers or electrowetting techniques as particularly viable potential candidates. In non-portable applications where power consumption is not a critical issue, plasma technologies can be applied.

Bezel
Top-down view of display with bezel window.


Interestingly, the property appears to be from Apple's recent Kodak patent buy, as the application was divisional application to an invention assigned to the struggling photography pioneer. The technology jibes with other Apple patents regarding touch-sensitive or otherwise interactive bezels, however, including one dating back to 2006.

While mere speculation, the patent could conceivably be used in a wearable computing device, allowing for pleasing aesthetics while maximizing utility. Apple is widely rumored to be planning a wristwatch-like product, dubbed the "iWatch," which many believed will be dominated by a multitouch screen. Most recently, the company has been on a worldwide "iWatch" trademark application spree after making a number of filings earlier in June.

Apple's "smart bezel" patent was first filed for in September 2012 and credits Michael E. Miller, Jerald J. Muszak and Michael J. Telek as its inventors.
post #2 of 28
1. What? No rounded corners? Ah, the top-down pic has those.

2. If Apple is indeed implementing this, wait for the competition to do the same, saying it's just a logical and natural thing to implement. Just like build-in batteries and unibody design.

Yeah Apple, just patent every piece you guys are tinkering on. It might just help the competition, creating the need to innovate themselves as well.
post #3 of 28
The 3 inventors listed on this patent are from NY/NJ. I didn't know Apple had corporate employees working on the east coast. I thought all corp employees in the US were in California, Austin and Orlando.
post #4 of 28
iAd is in NY.
Citing unnamed sources with limited but direct knowledge of the rumoured device - Comedy Insider (Feb 2014)
Reply
Citing unnamed sources with limited but direct knowledge of the rumoured device - Comedy Insider (Feb 2014)
Reply
post #5 of 28
Idea: Why not just dispense with the bezels altogether and have an edge to edge display? You could have sensors along each edge which would intelligently know when you were just holding it or wanted to interact with things along the edge. I think it would look really futuristic and put them way above the competition if they could do this. In addition it would cut down on weight.
"If you put your mind to it, you can accomplish anything" Robert Zemeckis/Bob Gale/Robert_E._Lee
Reply
"If you put your mind to it, you can accomplish anything" Robert Zemeckis/Bob Gale/Robert_E._Lee
Reply
post #6 of 28
Looks like they already have square tablets at IL:

post #7 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mobius View Post

Idea: Why not just dispense with the bezels altogether and have an edge to edge display? You could have sensors along each edge which would intelligently know when you were just holding it or wanted to interact with things along the edge. I think it would look really futuristic and put them way above the competition if they could do this. In addition it would cut down on weight.

That's essentially what this patent is for. It's an edge to edge display of sorts with the edges looking opaque like a bezel but still being interactive elements for the device.

In one version of the patent it said the bezel could even become part of the display.
post #8 of 28

I would rather see just touch sensors extended into the bezel rather than display elements 'underneath' it (why bother? Just make the screen bigger). With an out-of-screen touch sensor you could implement edge gestures such as scrolling and swipe-in without getting your fingers in the way of what you're looking at.

post #9 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogifan View Post

The 3 inventors listed on this patent are from NY/NJ. I didn't know Apple had corporate employees working on the east coast. I thought all corp employees in the US were in California, Austin and Orlando.

 

 

Perhaps you missed it in the article, this is a patent assigned to Apple from Kodak. Kodak is located in New York. 

post #10 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogifan View Post

The 3 inventors listed on this patent are from NY/NJ. I didn't know Apple had corporate employees working on the east coast. I thought all corp employees in the US were in California, Austin and Orlando.

There are many termed employees, or contractors, who work at Apple (not to mention all tech companies). They may not all be based in California.

post #11 of 28
I've been saying this for a while. Make the entire phone a screen and push to 720p (or higher) while maintaining the standard 640px width on the inside. This would make the phone (in this case) easy to use with one thumb and then, when requested, go into full screen mode for apps that support it like games, movies, etc.

Of course the same thing could be done on the iPad as well, but the screen resolution would be strange. I think at some point, screen resolution becomes independent of the actual design elements, so you could have a 1080p (x2) display on the iPad edge-to-edge and not have fragmentation as the OS handles the pixel translation.
post #12 of 28
I overheard a comment in a coffe shop the other day in which one of the people called Apple a "Large Patent Troll". So any intellectual property Apple goes out and gets will be seen as second rate to the general public anyway. It's so frustrating at times.
post #13 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackbook View Post

That's essentially what this patent is for. It's an edge to edge display of sorts with the edges looking opaque like a bezel but still being interactive elements for the device.

In one version of the patent it said the bezel could even become part of the display.


This is a subject of prior art dated as early as 3/1/12 :-)
http://forums.appleinsider.com/t/144963/purported-ipad-3-front-panels-show-identically-placed-home-button-and-camera/30#post_2060263
post #14 of 28
This sounds like a multi touch touch sensor home button (a square appears when touched) and could be used for Siri icon to.
post #15 of 28

Waiting for the inevitable stock downgrade from some short-happy analyst who will issue a report saying that "Apple's patent filings, although describing pie-in-the-sky products that might never see the light of day, leave me worrying about the ability of Cook and company to innovate in the near-term. I worry that their patent filings are not good enough. Recommendation: Sell." 

post #16 of 28
This is FAR too obvious, and should not be patentable.
post #17 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkVader View Post

This is FAR too obvious, and should not be patentable.

The only obvious part of this patent is the fact that it's applied to an object that has a bezel.

Originally posted by Relic

...those little naked weirdos are going to get me investigated.
Reply

Originally posted by Relic

...those little naked weirdos are going to get me investigated.
Reply
post #18 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by xsmi View Post

I overheard a comment in a coffe shop the other day in which one of the people called Apple a "Large Patent Troll". So any intellectual property Apple goes out and gets will be seen as second rate to the general public anyway. It's so frustrating at times.

 

What some people fail to understand is that a patent troll (or NPE if you're feeling cordial) doesn't make any actual products and instead make their money solely on lawsuits.  Apple doesn't fit that description.  To my knowledge Apple has only enforced patents that they use in their own products.  There's a world of difference there.

post #19 of 28
As usual, i don't get why its not obvious to just have the touch screen cover the whole thing as far as durability allows it.
And then decide what acts as bezel and whats fully used screen, in software, how ever it fits the current situation.

Or is this just their usual weaselly way to patent an already existing destination try to screw everyone already on the road there?
post #20 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by MatsSvensson View Post

As usual, i don't get why its not obvious to just have the touch screen cover the whole thing as far as durability allows it.

Because that's not what this is talking about in the slightest and all products already do that.
Quote:
And then decide what acts as bezel and whats fully used screen, in software, how ever it fits the current situation.

See, that's the part that isn't obvious. That's why the patent exists. You cannot possibly claim this is obvious.

Originally posted by Relic

...those little naked weirdos are going to get me investigated.
Reply

Originally posted by Relic

...those little naked weirdos are going to get me investigated.
Reply
post #21 of 28

I thought Android already used Smart BezeL

 

Have they emBezeled it somehow?

post #22 of 28

Although it would be very surprising to have a major  redesign of the 5 it would be very welcome. Most of us are expecting a 5S type refresh which is to say a few internal changes but nothing major on the exterior very much like the 4 to 4S. But Apple could surprise us and really shake things up. My biggest wish would be for the speakers to move to the front of the phone like the HTC One. That really makes a big difference by no longer needing to cup your hands to redirect sound when watching a video and you don't have your headphones or just don't want to use them. The chin and forehead of the iPhone do take a lot of valuable real estate and I am all for a way to reduce that footprint. That could mean a much larger display while keeping the phone size essentially the same size. But I doubt we will see larger than 4" this year but it could  set the stage for a larger one next year. 

 

Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience. 

Reply

 

Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience. 

Reply
post #23 of 28

Uncle Fester had a great laugh out of this. There's no way to attach a keyboard. No keyboard = fail...!

"That (the) world is moving so quickly that iOS is already amongst the older mobile operating systems in active development today." — The Verge
Reply
"That (the) world is moving so quickly that iOS is already amongst the older mobile operating systems in active development today." — The Verge
Reply
post #24 of 28

Yes has noted by others you already have full glass-face covering.

So if ready for production we will more likely see this in iPhone6, you'll get a tapered edge like iPhone5 but less visible,

and maybe be wider by a quarter inch also slimmer.

 

This would give full display on videos, games, surfing safari, maps and most apps that need it?

The home button would be summoned by ether a "tap" or "gesture" at central lower edge.

The camera and speaker atop are harder to hide! We remember the Apple patent for hidden camera under glass/screen.

 

I can't add links yet but remember the www.youtube.com/embed/jZkHpNnXLB0"  Although without the transparency.   

post #25 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by DroidFTW View Post

 

What some people fail to understand is that a patent troll (or NPE if you're feeling cordial) doesn't make any actual products and instead make their money solely on lawsuits.  Apple doesn't fit that description.  To my knowledge Apple has only enforced patents that they use in their own products.  There's a world of difference there.

 

They have patented a wrap around AMOLED screen and do not have a device that fits that description (yet).  I remember seeing demonstrations of flexible AMOLED screens and applications 2 or 3 years ago and a discussion of it being used on store displays or even product packaging, so the idea doesn't seem as unique as some of Apple's previous ideas and no Apple product exists with the feature.  

 

Perhaps Apple is working on a device that will use a wrap around AMOLED, but I can understand why some people see this recent patent move as trolling.  Unless a wrap around AMOLED device appears soon, it looks like Apple is just making sure no one else can make a like device without paying a royalty, and that IS the definition of a patent troll.

 

I know the "patent troll" argument assumes that Apple isn't working on any new devices, and personally, I think they plan to use the technology.  And there is no doubt these same people will just find a new reason to hate Apple when the wrap around AMOLED device appears, but I do think it is worth pointing out there is a semi-valid reason for the "patent troll" claims.

 

If two or three years from now there's still no flexible AMOLED device, Apple is a troll.  Fortunately, I don't believe that is the case.


Edited by rednival - 7/3/13 at 9:55am
post #26 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mobius View Post

Idea: Why not just dispense with the bezels altogether and have an edge to edge display? You could have sensors along each edge which would intelligently know when you were just holding it or wanted to interact with things along the edge. I think it would look really futuristic and put them way above the competition if they could do this. In addition it would cut down on weight.

 

Oh, sure... drop an iPad with no metal bezel from waist height onto almost any hard surface and let me know how that goes.

Proud AAPL stock owner.

 

GOA

Reply

Proud AAPL stock owner.

 

GOA

Reply
post #27 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpamSandwich View Post

Oh, sure... drop an iPad with no metal bezel from waist height onto almost any hard surface and let me know how that goes.

You are only basing that on the current model. A bezel-less iPad would obviously require strengthening in some other way.
"If you put your mind to it, you can accomplish anything" Robert Zemeckis/Bob Gale/Robert_E._Lee
Reply
"If you put your mind to it, you can accomplish anything" Robert Zemeckis/Bob Gale/Robert_E._Lee
Reply
post #28 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mobius View Post

You are only basing that on the current model. A bezel-less iPad would obviously require strengthening in some other way.

When you get down to it, Gorilla Glass is still glass and will break under most high impacts.

Proud AAPL stock owner.

 

GOA

Reply

Proud AAPL stock owner.

 

GOA

Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: General Discussion
AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Apple's 'smart bezel' hides portions of a device display until needed, acts as secondary input