or Connect
AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Samsung posts bonds with ITC, suggests continued infringement of Apple patents
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Samsung posts bonds with ITC, suggests continued infringement of Apple patents

post #1 of 17
Thread Starter 
Following its defeat in court on Friday, Samsung has posted surety bonds with the U.S. International Trade Commission, a move that strongly suggests the South Korean tech giant is still importing and selling at least some products that infringe on Apple-held patents.



In handing down a victory for Apple on Friday, the ITC left open the possibility for Samsung to continue to import and sell infringing phones, media players, and tablet computers so long as the firm posted a surety bond of 1.25 percent. As Foss Patents' Florian Mueller notes, Samsung has now posted that bond, which will forestall sales bans on infringing products until the completion of a 60-day Presidential review period.

Following the ruling, a Samsung spokesperson said that "upon a thorough review of the order, we will decide upon which measures to take."

The amount of the bond posted is unknown, as that figure is redacted in the letter of receipt from ITC Secretary Lisa Barton to Samsung. The bond is meant to ensure that Apple can recover damages in the event that Samsung's liquidity changes between now and the cessation of ITC proceedings.

What is notable is that the bond is intended to specifically to cover infringing products, not those products for which Samsung has already developed a workaround. The South Korean firm has already done as much with a number of Apple patents, including some multitouch features and a mechanism for detecting when a headphone jack has been inserted into the unit's plug. An administrative law judge has consequently cleared such products for continued importation and sale in the U.S., and the workarounds were additionally supported by Judge Thomas Pender.

As Mueller points out, the posting of the bond, then, would seem to indicate that Samsung is aware that some number of the products it is still importing still infringe on Apple-held patents. Further, it would appear that the firm has been importing such products throughout the duration of the ITC's investigation.

The ITC's decision covers "electronic digital media devices that infringe one or more of [the patent claims-in-suit that the ITC deemed valid and infringed and that satisfied the domestic industry requirement]," according to Mueller. That definition could well cover products as new as Samsung's flagship Galaxy S4. Apple has already tried to add that model and others to the suit, saying that the GS4 and newer Samsung models still infringed its patents.
post #2 of 17

Import ban on South Korea.

Originally posted by Marvin

Even if [the 5.5” iPhone] exists, it doesn’t deserve to.
Reply

Originally posted by Marvin

Even if [the 5.5” iPhone] exists, it doesn’t deserve to.
Reply
post #3 of 17
Google - Samesung... A marriage that was meant to be. Written in the stars !

Could there be a better couple ? The thief and the fence...
post #4 of 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacMichiel View Post

Google - Samesung... A marriage that was meant to be. Written in the stars !

Could there be a better couple ? The thief and the fence...

+1     I Could not have said it better!

"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." Douglas Adams

Reply

"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." Douglas Adams

Reply
post #5 of 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacMichiel View Post

Google - Samesung... A marriage that was meant to be. Written in the stars !

Could there be a better couple ? The thief and the fence...

Which one is which? :)

post #6 of 17
And this is just the start of the patent wars.
Time to make some popcorn.

Sent from my iPhone Simulator

Reply

Sent from my iPhone Simulator

Reply
post #7 of 17

Decisions takes so long that company will not care about Older models. Galaxy S4 will be banned when S8 will be the current product. System is flawed!!!
 

post #8 of 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by exom View Post

Today is the celebration of Gwangbokjeol - Liberation Day or Restoration of Light Day.

 

Thus we say

 

DOWN WITH AMERICA!

 

DOWN WITH JAPAN!

 

DOWN WITH GERMANY!

 

AND FINALLY, DOWN WITH APPLE!

 

 

KOREA FIGHTING!

lol.giflol.giflol.giflol.giflol.gif

 

Thanks for the laugh.

post #9 of 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by exom View Post

 

 

YOU ARE "WELCOME" IMPERIALIST!

 

You're welcome for our Military.

post #10 of 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdriftmeyer View Post

 

You're welcome for our Military.

 

Don't get me started. Our military has no business being in Korea, Germany or anywhere else beyond our borders these days.

Proud AAPL stock owner.

 

GOA

Reply

Proud AAPL stock owner.

 

GOA

Reply
post #11 of 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by exom View Post

Today is the celebration of Gwangbokjeol - Liberation Day or Restoration of Light Day.

 

Thus we say

 

DOWN WITH AMERICA!

 

DOWN WITH JAPAN!

 

DOWN WITH GERMANY!

 

AND FINALLY, DOWN WITH APPLE!

 

KOREA FIGHTING!

 

Ah, that was good for a giggle!

 

I like you kid. You got moxie.

 

Once we clean you up and teach you to count we'll make one hell of a team...

 

(You do realise that Apple is IN America? You took them down twice)

The problem with posting nude photos of Jennifer Lawrence on the internet is that it takes away all the mystique...
Reply
The problem with posting nude photos of Jennifer Lawrence on the internet is that it takes away all the mystique...
Reply
post #12 of 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by exom View Post

 

 

YOU ARE "WELCOME" IMPERIALIST!


Hahaha. What no Imperialist.. pig ? No Imperialist ... dog ?

 

Disappointing. Anyway, this is not intended to be a forum for insults, so go out and get some yummy Korean BBQ. And lighten up.

post #13 of 17
Originally Posted by exom 
Korea Fighting!

 

We banned your last twelve accounts. Are you legitimately mentally challenged or do you need explicitly told what we mean when we do that?

Originally posted by Marvin

Even if [the 5.5” iPhone] exists, it doesn’t deserve to.
Reply

Originally posted by Marvin

Even if [the 5.5” iPhone] exists, it doesn’t deserve to.
Reply
post #14 of 17
Originally Posted by exom 

[post]

 

Guess you do: DO NOT COME BACK TO OUR WEBSITE.

Originally posted by Marvin

Even if [the 5.5” iPhone] exists, it doesn’t deserve to.
Reply

Originally posted by Marvin

Even if [the 5.5” iPhone] exists, it doesn’t deserve to.
Reply
post #15 of 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by exonn View Post

Hello, Tally!

Shouldn't you be focussing on putting your country back together?
The problem with posting nude photos of Jennifer Lawrence on the internet is that it takes away all the mystique...
Reply
The problem with posting nude photos of Jennifer Lawrence on the internet is that it takes away all the mystique...
Reply
post #16 of 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheUnfetteredMind View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by MacMichiel View Post

Google - Samesung... A marriage that was meant to be. Written in the stars !


Could there be a better couple ? The thief and the fence...
Which one is which? 1smile.gif

It's a new standard; they're actually exchangeable.
"Fibonacci: As easy as 1, 1, 2, 3..."
Reply
"Fibonacci: As easy as 1, 1, 2, 3..."
Reply
post #17 of 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTR View Post

 

Ah, that was good for a giggle!

 

I like you kid. You got moxie.

 

Once we clean you up and teach you to count we'll make one hell of a team...

 

(You do realise that Apple is IN America? You took them down twice)

 

Didn't America and its Allies save those sorry SOBs from Communism in the 1950s? This is their way of saying thank you I guess...

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: General Discussion
AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Samsung posts bonds with ITC, suggests continued infringement of Apple patents