or Connect
AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › OtterBox secures $2M court victory over counterfeiters
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

OtterBox secures $2M court victory over counterfeiters

post #1 of 12
Thread Starter 
Popular Apple device accessory maker OtterBox has won the latest in a series of legal actions against counterfeiters, securing a $2 million verdict against a New York-based company.



A U.S. District Court judge issued a permanent injunction recently against S & P Trading Inc., saying that the firm had violated provisions of the Lanham Act in purchasing and selling at least 146,025 counterfeit cases. Those cases, the judge decided, infringed on OtterBox's federally registered trademarks.

OtterBox has more than 110 trademark registrations worldwide, with a number of others pending. OtterBox also holds more than 190 patents in the United States.

This latest decision is but one in a series of actions OtterBox has taken against counterfeiters. In 2012, OtterBox collaborated with U.S. Customs and Border Protection to seize 118,000 counterfeit items. That action resulted in additional judgments of nearly $11 million.

OtterBox's CEO praised the effect the recent decision would have on consumer protection.

?OtterBox was built on bringing our customers innovative, first-to-market products,? said OtterBox CEO Brian Thomas. ?A lot of design, engineering and testing goes into each of our custom protective cases, which is why we take a hard line with companies creating and selling fake cases, as well as those infringing on our patents and trademarks. Counterfeit products damage our reputation for delivering premium quality products because many consumers aren?t aware that they purchased a fake OtterBox. If a deal seems to be too good to be true, it probably is.?
post #2 of 12
When you can't innovate, litigate¡
Progress is a comfortable disease
--e.e.c.
Reply
Progress is a comfortable disease
--e.e.c.
Reply
post #3 of 12

If the fake OtterBox don't fit, you must acquit.

 
Where's the new Apple TV?
 
And still waiting for SolipsismX to prove his accusation:
"And yet they haven't loved Google Wallet which you claimed was the exact same thing and kept posting...
Reply
 
Where's the new Apple TV?
 
And still waiting for SolipsismX to prove his accusation:
"And yet they haven't loved Google Wallet which you claimed was the exact same thing and kept posting...
Reply
post #4 of 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bageljoey View Post

When you can't innovate, litigate¡

Innovate is exactly what Otter box did in this case. This usage of the patent and trademark system is exactly what the system is designed to do, protect the innovator from the ripoff artists.
post #5 of 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bageljoey View Post

When you can't innovate, litigate¡

but if you can and do innovate - don't litigate  ? that makes sense

post #6 of 12
Somebody post photos of rugged PDAs with the caption "LOL @ OTTERBOX". /s

"Apple should pull the plug on the iPhone."

John C. Dvorak, 2007
Reply

"Apple should pull the plug on the iPhone."

John C. Dvorak, 2007
Reply
post #7 of 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by wizard69 View Post


Innovate is exactly what Otter box did in this case. This usage of the patent and trademark system is exactly what the system is designed to do, protect the innovator from the ripoff artists.

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Right_said_fred View Post

but if you can and do innovate - don't litigate  ? that makes sense

He was being sarcastic...

post #8 of 12
I care about what Samsung and Google are up to because they are competitors to Apple.

I care about what AT&T, Verizon, et al are doing, as they directly impact Apple's fortunes.

Otterbox could disappear tomorrow and it would make no difference whatsoever for Apple. This article is so remotely related to Apple it's ridiculous.

Proud AAPL stock owner.

 

GOA

Reply

Proud AAPL stock owner.

 

GOA

Reply
post #9 of 12
Apple should buy Otterbox; they seem to have better lawyers on staff.
post #10 of 12
Manufacturers are iPhone crazy and are saturating the market with all types of infringing and counterfeit accessories-cases, cables, chargers. They will be following behind with Samsung items as well.
post #11 of 12

It floors me that anyone cannot see that innovation is threatened by knock offs and those that outright steal names, designs, logos and products. If it were your products, and your investment that was involved, your perspective would be entirely different! Stealing ideas, products advertising copy, designs etc. is no different than a thief coming to your home at night and taking your person effects!  Get real!

post #12 of 12
With Otterboxes, consumers can't always tell if they are buying fakes. People trust the discounted prices at mall kiosks but these pop up establishments have been raided for selling fakes. I have seen real and fakes of various levels, and even the "higher end" fakes will not last nor will they protect your expensive phone. http://www.wivb.com/news/crime/homeland-security-raids-mall-kiosks
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: General Discussion
AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › OtterBox secures $2M court victory over counterfeiters