or Connect
AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Dropcam Pro takes quick & easy Wi-Fi-based home video surveillance to next level
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Dropcam Pro takes quick & easy Wi-Fi-based home video surveillance to next level

post #1 of 28
Thread Starter 
Dropcam Pro was announced on Thursday, adding sharper video, improved audio, and support for Bluetooth Low Energy and dual-band Wi-Fi to the wireless video monitoring system.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00F9FCW7K/ref=as_li_ss_til?tag=reality&camp=0&creative=0&linkCode=as4&creativeASIN=B00F9FCW7K&adid=06VFXVK79E0964P8N3PX&">Dropcam

The new Dropcam

Location awareness support also allows Dropcam users to turn their camera on and off based on where they are. And a scheduling feature can turn the camera on and off at specific times of the day or week.

Content recorded from the Dropcam can be saved to the cloud, and users can also save and share their favorite clips. Live streams can also be shared with friends or publicly for others to view.

Dropcam says it uses bank-level security to ensure live and stored video are kept safe, even when connected to an open wireless network. The video recorded on Dropcam is encrypted on the camera itself, before it its transmitted to the cloud. It's also streamed to devices securely through SSL encryption.

An entry-level Dropcam is also available with a 107-degree field of view and 4x zoom. Its low-light vision and audio quality are not as strong as the new "Pro" version.
post #2 of 28
I understand that this product is not American? This is a serious advantage as they wouldn't be bound by the NSA-Gestapo regulations and forced to provide their entire database like Facebook, Apple, Google, etc.
post #3 of 28
A video camera in my living room that can only store its footage on some company's server (which in turn offers easy access for any government agency even without a judge's permission)... yeah, that indeed takes home video surveillance to the next level. Level 1984 I'd say.

Who would seriously buy something like that?
post #4 of 28
You forgot to mention their ridiculous pricing scheme of 30 days of video at $29.95/month!!
bb
Reply
bb
Reply
post #5 of 28
icam has been doing all of this (except for the two-way audio, and the exorbitant pricing) for me for three+ years for next to nothing. (i'm not associated with icam except for being a very happy customer.) ditto for several friends of mine.
"Personally, I would like nothing more than to thoroughly proof each and every word of my articles before posting. But I can't."

appleinsider's mike campbell, august 15, 2013
Reply
"Personally, I would like nothing more than to thoroughly proof each and every word of my articles before posting. But I can't."

appleinsider's mike campbell, august 15, 2013
Reply
post #6 of 28
Try again. The selling price and monthly fee are laughable. A webcam and Evocam are a much better setup.
post #7 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by heatvision View Post

A video camera in my living room that can only store its footage on some company's server

That is optional, not mandatory.


[*] Stunning Video Quality - New optics and updated image sensor provide 2x sharper video.
[*] 60 Second Setup - Connect to Wi-Fi via computer or iOS mobile device, live stream in under a minute.
[*] Incredible Field of View - 130 degrees diagonal, plus Zoom and Night Vision, so you don't miss a thing.
[*] Stay Connected with Two-Way Talk, Intelligent Alerts, Scheduling and Mobile & Web apps.
[*] Cloud Video Recording (CVR) - Review footage and make clips with optional secure offsite recording.
[*] Dual-band Wi-Fi - Dropcam Pro supports both 2.4GHz and 5GHz Wi-Fi networks for improved wireless connectivity.
[*] The latest product from the company that makes the best-selling security camera, baby monitor and pet-cam.
[*]
I’d rather have a better product than a better price.
Reply
I’d rather have a better product than a better price.
Reply
post #8 of 28
Monthly fee? Buh bye now.
post #9 of 28
I'd like to see the Nest folks get into this area (and more), their products and software are always taken the the 'next level' and the most Apple like of anything out there.
From Apple ][ - to new Mac Pro I've used them all.
Long on AAPL so biased
Google Motto "You're not the customer. You're the product."
Reply
From Apple ][ - to new Mac Pro I've used them all.
Long on AAPL so biased
Google Motto "You're not the customer. You're the product."
Reply
post #10 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitalclips View Post

I'd like to see the Nest folks get into this area (and more), their products and software are always taken the the 'next level' and the most Apple like of anything out there.


I've thought the same thing. Nest Home Surveillance and a Nest Smart Doorbell (answer your door remotely, with video), along with Nest smart power/lighting controllers would be great next steps for Nest.

 

I currently use Axis WiFi home surveillance cameras, and store the video using Vitamin D to my QNAP NAS.

post #11 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilBoogie View Post


That is optional, not mandatory.
 

 

Understood; however, there should be an option to record footage to a local drive or memory card. A primary need for remote cameras is to retrieve footage that you've missed or recorded, and $30 a month is silly.

bb
Reply
bb
Reply
post #12 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by bloggerblog View Post

Understood; however, there should be an option to record footage to a local drive or memory card. A primary need for remote cameras is to retrieve footage that you've missed or recorded, and $30 a month is silly.

Fully agree.

And speaking of silly:
I’d rather have a better product than a better price.
Reply
I’d rather have a better product than a better price.
Reply
post #13 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilBoogie View Post


Fully agree.

And speaking of silly:

Dang... now I'm gonna have to make sure my dog poops in my yard...

2014 27" Retina iMac i5, 2012 27" iMac i7, 2011 Mac Mini i5
iPad Air 2, iPad Mini Retina, iPhone 6, iPhone 5S, iPod Touch 5
Time Capsule 5, (3) AirPort Express 2, (2) Apple TV 3

Reply

2014 27" Retina iMac i5, 2012 27" iMac i7, 2011 Mac Mini i5
iPad Air 2, iPad Mini Retina, iPhone 6, iPhone 5S, iPod Touch 5
Time Capsule 5, (3) AirPort Express 2, (2) Apple TV 3

Reply
post #14 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by bloggerblog View Post

Understood; however, there should be an option to record footage to a local drive or memory card. A primary need for remote cameras is to retrieve footage that you've missed or recorded, and $30 a month is silly.

I bought their previous dropcam mainly because of the ability to save on the cloud. There are plenty of other cameras that record to your server. Furthermore, DVR feature is $10/month for one week of recording. For home security this is more than what most people need. The $30 per month is for a month worth or DVR recording. Both allows you to save clips locally or on their server.

There are many other cameras and dropcam is another option.
post #15 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by heatvision View Post

A video camera in my living room that can only store its footage on some company's server (which in turn offers easy access for any government agency even without a judge's permission)... yeah, that indeed takes home video surveillance to the next level. Level 1984 I'd say.



Who would seriously buy something like that?

 



Doesn't have to go in a living room. Could be used as an entrance security cam or for other purposes.

As others have said, there are other options. In Canada, even Rogers offers a similar product.
post #16 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by NasserAE View Post


I bought their previous dropcam mainly because of the ability to save on the cloud. There are plenty of other cameras that record to your server. Furthermore, DVR feature is $10/month for one week of recording. For home security this is more than what most people need. The $30 per month is for a month worth or DVR recording. Both allows you to save clips locally or on their server.

There are many other cameras and dropcam is another option.

I just bought iCam from Pooch's recommendation.  Wow!  What an awesome, easy app.  You can save to Dropbox as well.

2014 27" Retina iMac i5, 2012 27" iMac i7, 2011 Mac Mini i5
iPad Air 2, iPad Mini Retina, iPhone 6, iPhone 5S, iPod Touch 5
Time Capsule 5, (3) AirPort Express 2, (2) Apple TV 3

Reply

2014 27" Retina iMac i5, 2012 27" iMac i7, 2011 Mac Mini i5
iPad Air 2, iPad Mini Retina, iPhone 6, iPhone 5S, iPod Touch 5
Time Capsule 5, (3) AirPort Express 2, (2) Apple TV 3

Reply
post #17 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by NasserAE View Post


I bought their previous dropcam mainly because of the ability to save on the cloud. There are plenty of other cameras that record to your server. Furthermore, DVR feature is $10/month for one week of recording. For home security this is more than what most people need. The $30 per month is for a month worth or DVR recording. Both allows you to save clips locally or on their server.

There are many other cameras and dropcam is another option.

 

One camera being used for home security is definitely not what most people need, in the U.S. at least, most homes have more than one room and one entry.

 

I'm sure this will be popular with the technically challenged who would like to dabble with a camera; however, they would've captured a wider market had they offered a simple local storage solution too, like an optional plug-n-play network drive.

 

Just saying

bb
Reply
bb
Reply
post #18 of 28
Paranormal Activity 5

"Apple should pull the plug on the iPhone."

John C. Dvorak, 2007
Reply

"Apple should pull the plug on the iPhone."

John C. Dvorak, 2007
Reply
post #19 of 28
Why do all these companies insist on making it a cloud offering rather than supporting local access standards?! I want to VPN into my vacation home and be able to check the video from there... not use some made-for-idiots-that-don't-understand-security-or-the-implications-of-sharing-things-with-the-world device!!
post #20 of 28

I'm curious at how much bandwidth one of these things uses per month? With just about every ISP having a bandwidth cap, I'm sure using this would eat away a big chunk of your bandwidth you are allowed each month. 

post #21 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by bloggerblog View Post

You forgot to mention their ridiculous pricing scheme of 30 days of video at $29.95/month!!

Yep! I hate subscriptions....I would rather do without.

post #22 of 28
Also, their location awareness didn't work on iOS6 and is broken on iOS7. So a major part of the "set and forget" convenience is marketing hype and no more. I don't recommend this product.
post #23 of 28
I don't understand why an iPhone costs $200 to make, an iPhone Camera costs $5.00, but security cameras all cost as much as, or more than, sophisticated smartphones.
post #24 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by bloggerblog View Post

One camera being used for home security is definitely not what most people need, in the U.S. at least, most homes have more than one room and one entry.

I'm sure this will be popular with the technically challenged who would like to dabble with a camera; however, they would've captured a wider market had they offered a simple local storage solution too, like an optional plug-n-play network drive.

Just saying

Not everyone lives in a house. Large percentage of people live in apartments. I live in an apartment and have only laptops that we take to work. Having a local storage INSIDE the apartment is useless since if someone break in he will steal that storage device as well. I needed something that just work. Like I said before, this is an option for people who don't want to maintain their own server and want something that works out of the box.

But seriously?! You think easy to use devices are for "technically challenged"?!
post #25 of 28
I have an original dropcam HD and pay for monitoring. Tried to order a new pro model and was told the 50% monitoring discount for second camera can't be used between different types of cameras. The new pro requires a separate full price monitor contract. I canceled my order in protest. A very stupid thing to do on their part I think.
post #26 of 28
Totally looking into iCam. Currently using three Sharx cams which save rather indirectly to Dropbox via Samba (since they don't support Apple's v2, the v1 public domain implementation was my only option).

But saving to Dropbox directly is a freaking deal maker; as in my order's going out tonight. Dropcam? Not given their apparent lock-you-in-to-our-cloud-service mentality.
post #27 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaarrrgggh View Post

Why do all these companies insist on making it a cloud offering rather than supporting local access standards?! I want to VPN into my vacation home and be able to check the video from there... not use some made-for-idiots-that-don't-understand-security-or-the-implications-of-sharing-things-with-the-world device!!

Two words:

Revenue stream!

Just like "software as service" (e.g. Adobe) the next step is "hardware as service",
In the end you will own nothing and everything you use will require a meter or a subscription; welcome to the new slavery...
post #28 of 28

You guys are prophets! 6/20/2014, NEST now owns Dropcam.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: General Discussion
AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Dropcam Pro takes quick & easy Wi-Fi-based home video surveillance to next level