Originally Posted by island hermit
Apple sold the 4 and the 4s alongside each other in 2011.
And the 3G and 3GS alongside each other in 2009.
Originally Posted by macxpress0660
You’d better be joking.
Originally Posted by sog35
5C - $0
6C - $99 (Plastic case, touch ID, A7)
6 - $199
6L - $249
Nope. 6C will have an A8 and be launched in 2015. You’ve taken the 5SC and named it 6C, which it won’t be, because it’s in no way an iPhone 6.
5 - A6
5C - A6
5S - A7
6 - A8
6C - A8
6S - A9
Next year’s the 5C at $0, 5SC at $99, and 6 at $199. Year after is 5SC at $0, 6C at $99, and 6S at $199. Then the 6C at $0, 6SC at $99, and 7 at $199.
And this nonsense wouldn’t be happening if they’d just listened to me. Now we have the late ‘90s all over again. Thanks Performa 5210CD, PowerMac 5200/75 LC, Quadra 660AV, and LC 580.
From those four names, without looking up specs, can YOU tell which one is the best?
Originally Posted by Andysol
Tallest Skil thought the iPad mini was a ridiculously dumb idea, but now knows it was a great move on Apple's part because the sales and numbers prove it.
Ap, bap bap, nope. I maintain it could be dumb. It sends the wrong message for what the future of devices will be, unless they go with a four tablet lineup.
I totally agree with you about him, though. 5C was a “budget” phone in the hearts and minds of analysts ONLY, and at no time was it ever stated by anyone with any actual clout that it is anything but a 5-at-midrange replacement.