or Connect
AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Apple's Siri may offer crowd-sourced answers to user queries
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Apple's Siri may offer crowd-sourced answers to user queries

post #1 of 16
Thread Starter 
Apple's Siri may soon get more of a human touch as the Cupertino company is investigating the viability of using crowd-sourced information to broaden the virtual assistant's answer database.

Crowd Sourcing
Source: USPTO


Currently, Siri relies on data pulled from the Web and other online services, like Yahoo!, WolframAlpha and Bing, to answer user queries. While their databases are extensive, these partner services may not be able to handle nuanced or uncommon questions.

A patent filing published by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Thursday reveals Apple is looking into the viability of crowd sourcing answers for certain questions that Siri fails to answer. Titled "Crowd sourcing information to fulfill user requests," the application is a primer on how the virtual assistant can request, gather and store data from a number of crowd sourcing, or "CS," information services.

As explained by the document, the a digital assistant requires a natural language processing system, knowledge base and artificial intelligence to function satisfactorily. Any of these facets can hinder operation and, in some cases, produce unsatisfactory answers. It is in these scenarios that a CS information service can be deployed.

For example, the CS module can be invoked as part of response failure mechanism that can be updated over a period of time to remedy a speech recognition problem. More commonly, the CS module can query a CS knowledge base to address questions previously unanswerable in real time.

According to the patent language, the external sources of information can include services that compile data from experts, general information sources found on the Web and various question-and-answer forums.

Crowd Sourcing


In some embodiments, the CS module provides a knowledge base filled with responses to questions that the system previously failed to answer correctly, thus building out an existing response database. Databases can include information from a single CS service, or an aggregate from multiple sources.

A variety of knowledge base types are mentioned, such as forums where a question can be posed to the general public. In other cases, specialized sources can be pinged with a question, examples of which include "expert forums, technical support forums, [and] fan-sites for particular subject matter."

Interestingly, the invention allows for both automated and manual invocation of the CS feature. For example, if the system detects a failure to respond, it can send the query off to generate answers over an extended period of time. On the other hand, a user can specifically request that a CS knowledge base be tapped for a specific answer.

As in existing Web-based CS databases, like Quora or Answers.com, individuals can identify themselves as experts and lend answers to queries posed by the CS module. Question handling may take place through a third party, or by the CS module itself. One embodiment even describes an "answer arena" where players win points or credits for providing correct answers to a user's questions.

As the technology deals with rare or personalized queries, users may have to wait some time for the system to return an answer as it collects the appropriate data. In some cases, the length of time could be weeks. When a satisfactory response is found, the digital assistant can relay that information to the user at an appropriate time, such as in between meetings.

Finally, feedback can be provided as to whether the response generated from the CS module was correct. If a user was satisfied with the information, it can be stored in the CS knowledge base, to be retrieved when a similar question is asked. If the CS module determines the user is not pleased with the response, it can either stop looking for an answer or escalate the question to another source, such as a human representative.

Crowd Sourcing


The rest of the filing details backend operations and a run down of virtual assistant technology, including natural speech recognition and reporting. In addition, privacy concerns are addressed regarding uploading of questions to the CS module.

It is unclear if Apple will implement the invention as part of Siri. Since its launch in 2011, each iteration of the virtual assistant has added a greater range of abilities and tie-ins with third-party services, though none have as direct a human element as described in Thursday's filing.

Apple's crowd sourcing patent application was first filed for in March and credits Thomas R. Gruber, Adam J. Cheyer and Donald W. Pitschel as its inventors.
post #2 of 16
The title should specify 'patent application'. Big diff.
Citing unnamed sources with limited but direct knowledge of a rumoured device - Comedy Insider (Feb 2014)
Reply
Citing unnamed sources with limited but direct knowledge of a rumoured device - Comedy Insider (Feb 2014)
Reply
post #3 of 16

Might go some way to making Siri genuinely useful for the average person, I wish they'd implement crowd sourcing in their maps app.

 

The POI data that they have is absolutely pitiful, at least in the UK.

iPad, Macbook Pro, iPhone, heck I even have iLife! :-)
Reply
iPad, Macbook Pro, iPhone, heck I even have iLife! :-)
Reply
post #4 of 16
Apple might want to start making deals with IBM (for their Watson) or Numenta for access to their expert systems. I don't know about trusting the "wisdom of crowds" if no other alternative is available.

I can imagine Siri dispensing advice on home remedies or some half-baked advice that results in embarrassment or worse. What if the crowd one is sourcing from is popular but wrong?

"My sources tell me the best thing to do is amputate immediately." ...or... "My sources indicate 9/11 was an inside job."
Edited by SpamSandwich - 11/14/13 at 5:41am

Proud AAPL stock owner.

 

GOA

Reply

Proud AAPL stock owner.

 

GOA

Reply
post #5 of 16

Ok, not bad. Could improve services yet further. 

 

But I think personally Siri needs to prioritize a little. Start with bringing more languages as promised.

 

Sweden would very much like this!!

post #6 of 16
This is essentially a search engine
post #7 of 16
IMO, the next step for Siri is a far more advanced question and answer mode to decrease the likelihood of incorrect answers and to get more fine-grained responses.

Also, I wonder how Siri results can be improved when the answer given results in a negative result long after the initial query? Context is everything in terms of forming a positive feedback loop. At what point will Siri retain a Time Machine-like record of our questions and answers so a user could say, "Siri, remember that address you gave me last week? It's been changed."

Proud AAPL stock owner.

 

GOA

Reply

Proud AAPL stock owner.

 

GOA

Reply
post #8 of 16
Waiting for chinese spammers to leverage this ^^

Social Capitalist, dreamer and wise enough to know I'm never going to grow up anyway... so not trying anymore.

Reply

Social Capitalist, dreamer and wise enough to know I'm never going to grow up anyway... so not trying anymore.

Reply
post #9 of 16
"Siri WTF"

Siri: "Perhaps I misunderstood you"
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
post #10 of 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by lightknight View Post

Waiting for chinese spammers to leverage this ^^

Ha ha. True. But, that's the crowd part with some weighted authority. Should handle this situation for the largest questions. I look forward to naming myself the greatest mambo dancer in southern England. That would probably go uncorrected for a while.

post #11 of 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpamSandwich View Post

Apple might want to start making deals with IBM (for their Watson) or Numenta for access to their expert systems. I don't know about trusting the "wisdom of crowds" if no other alternative is available.

I can imagine Siri dispensing advice on home remedies or some half-baked advice that results in embarrassment or worse. What if the crowd one is sourcing from is popular but wrong?

"My sources tell me the best thing to do is amputate immediately." ...or... "My sources indicate 9/11 was an inside job."

Funny you say that ... My first reaction was to think ... 'yeah, great, because crowds always get it right ...' 1rolleyes.gif

Having said that there are some uses of it. As you say, consultation with authoritative sources, say like 99% of scientist ... might be a good idea. 1cool.gif
Use duckduckgo.com with Safari, not Google Search
Been using Apples since 1978 and Macs since 1984
Long on AAPL so biased. Strong advocate for separation of technology and politics on AI.
Reply
Use duckduckgo.com with Safari, not Google Search
Been using Apples since 1978 and Macs since 1984
Long on AAPL so biased. Strong advocate for separation of technology and politics on AI.
Reply
post #12 of 16

If this helps make Siri faster, then I'll actually start using the thing!

 

Apple should really be working hard in making Siri a WHOLE lot faster.  Like Google or not, their Now service responds *instantly*, Apple should be reaching for that level of interaction.  Without it, Siri is useless for me.  I can't wait all day for it to respond.

 

Apple please make Siri faster!


Edited by w00master - 11/14/13 at 1:34pm
post #13 of 16

If the wildly erroneous crowdsourced data in Gracenote and CDDB (and therefore, iTunes) are any example of crowdsourcing info, I want no part of it. When anyone with inaccurate information, whether of benevolent or malicious intent, lack of knowledge or lack of skill communicating (i.e., typing/spelling accurately) can easily contaminate a database, there are going to be huge problems.

 

Crowdsourcing could certainly be useful, but isn't it wide open to manipulation, hacking, and open warfare by opposing-opinion factions? Ever seen the back-and-forth warfare on Wikipedia, the ostensibly crowdsourced but "moderated" reference? Look at decades-old music on iTunes having the titles mangled, when they used to be correct and accurate. Same for cover art. At some point, someone has to be the ultimate arbiter of information accuracy. Who is that going to be?

 

An eight-year-old with an iDevice or computer can put up questionable "data." Is that appropriate? Is it helpful? Is it accurate and true? Remember that old rule of data processing: garbage in, garbage out.

 

Crowdsourcing reminds me of that old experiment where a chain of people repeat a phrase, whispered ear to ear, down the line, one person to the next, and the first person's version is compared with what version the last person heard/perceived. And there's generally some mismatch.

 

Even if crowdsourcing isn't a strictly linear flow of information, I don't trust the "crowd."


Edited by oirudleahcim - 11/14/13 at 5:00pm
post #14 of 16
It's amazing to read that Apple wants to register a patent like our project started last year and now in beta version... take a look at www.talkjan.it (at the moment only in italian).
Edited by talkjan - 11/15/13 at 3:11am
post #15 of 16
Apple. Why is Siri so slow?
post #16 of 16
I'd simply be thrilled if Siri was capable of answering more than the all too often, "I'm really sorry about this but I cannot take any requests right now. Please try again later." And yes I've already tried all the suggested fixes and even contacted Apple Care. Im just sayin 1wink.gif
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: General Discussion
AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Apple's Siri may offer crowd-sourced answers to user queries