or Connect
AppleInsider › Forums › Mac Hardware › Future Apple Hardware › The MW that would make you switch to PC....Fantasy/Horror Time
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The MW that would make you switch to PC....Fantasy/Horror Time

post #1 of 76
Thread Starter 
Steve takes stage. Begins talk of OSX:

Steve: Well, OSX is progressing nicely.

Audience: uh-huh.

Steve: But, the thing we really need to do now is convince software DEVELOPERS to support us more, so we can increase our market share.

Audience: OK, uh-huh.

Steve: It all comes down to one word: Developers (audience begins to see where he is going and gasps: "OMFG")

Steve: Join me! "Developers, Developers, Developers.....Developers Developers, Developers......GOD, I LOVE THIS COMPANY...STAND UP FOR ME!!!!! STAND THE **** UP!!!!!! (begins to sweat profusely and starts pulling out clumps of hair)

Products: Apple says there have been some yield problems with MOT and the new line-up will be:

PM 400, 450, 500
--smaller hard drives due to the fact "that damn CD-RW thing that we missed the boat on is taking over....people just don't need internal storage anymore. Since Steve is now also pissed at nvidia for revealing the manuafacturer of his black turtleneck he would wear for the show, they go with "FINAST" brand video cards.

iMac:

Steve: "Well, the iMac just isn't selling all that well anymore. So rather than invest 10's of millions in R&D were just going to cut it. It it did its job, **** it.

ibook: Steve:

"Wow. Who would have guessed that people found it so small and portable they would actually lose it? Well, to fix that we have some great news. All ibooks now ship with a lead weight inside, weighing in 7.9 lbs w/o battery. We also took some design cues from Dell (well, us, now that we think about it) to make it less likely to be stolen.

Tibook:

Steve: All production is now being donated to Afghanistan. Demand for IMovie over there is HUGE.

iPod

Steve: People just don't seem convinced that this a revolutionary product. So, we need a price change! (audience cheers!). To make it seem REALLY revolutionary, we need to RAISE the price to $799. (people begin throwing things)

Steve: Well, I forgot folks. We have severed all ties with Adobe because they pollute this little stream near them....you know how I feel about the environment and all. We also are going to be using our $4B in cash reserves to buy 2 and a half B1 Bombers. We are going to put them on display at the campus. Let MS **** with us now! (some people like this and start to clap)

Steve: And that is about all folks.

Yep, that would do it for me. And you?

[ 12-09-2001: Message edited by: SDW2001 ]</p>
I can only please one person per day.  Today is not your day.  Tomorrow doesn't look good either.  
Reply
I can only please one person per day.  Today is not your day.  Tomorrow doesn't look good either.  
Reply
post #2 of 76
I think that's pretty much what would do it for me too.
post #3 of 76
Anything less then a good value will make me switch on my next purchase. I am so close to building a PC.

Unless Apple releases a PowerMac with 2 full size drive bays, a processor that can push over 100 fps in QIII, and something other than a budget nVidia graphics card for under $1500 I'm jumping ship.
*Registered March 1, 1999*
Member #14
Reply
*Registered March 1, 1999*
Member #14
Reply
post #4 of 76
[quote]Originally posted by MacAddict:
<strong>Anything less then a good value will make me switch on my next purchase. I am so close to building a PC.

</strong><hr></blockquote>

That's how I felt earlier this year. That's the reason why I got an iBook in June, that was really the only value in Apple's lineup.
post #5 of 76
I would NEVER jump ship just because of hardware shortcomings (none of which, by the way, hamper my ability to do my job).

Yes, it does get frustrating with Apple's slow update cycles and reliance on less-than-stellar video cards in the iMac and so forth.

But it's ALWAYS been about more than the hardware for me. I don't care if the Mac stalled at 867 for the next four years...I'm not about to forsake the Mac OS for Windows.

Just not gonna happen. I started on a Mac, learned on a Mac, own a Mac, make my living with a Mac, etc.

The industry I'm in is STILL (despite the bullcrap you may be hearing) predominantly Mac-based as well.

As long as OS X is made more powerful and stable and cooler (and more of the software I use on a daily basis runs natively on X), I can forgive the occasional lapses in hardware.
post #6 of 76
[quote]Originally posted by MacAddict:
<strong>Anything less then a good value will make me switch on my next purchase. I am so close to building a PC.

Unless Apple releases a PowerMac with 2 full size drive bays, a processor that can push over 100 fps in QIII, and something other than a budget nVidia graphics card for under $1500 I'm jumping ship.</strong><hr></blockquote>

I hope you can swim!
post #7 of 76
I'd be gone before you could say, "Wait till MWNY"
Only morons use signatures
Reply
Only morons use signatures
Reply
post #8 of 76
I don't plan to purchase any new computer for at least a year yet. My G4 sawtooth 350 works for all I need it for. By that time we'll see what's out.

My problem will be 'Do I go portable or desktop then'.
post #9 of 76
Jumping ship because your mac can't push 100 FPS in Q3?
I'm sorry for you man, I really am. Better get a PC right now, don't wait, in your case, it's a waste of time.

Some people actually work with their computers too.

G-News (tztztztz)
Matyoroy!
Reply
Matyoroy!
Reply
post #10 of 76
[quote]Originally posted by G-News:
<strong>Jumping ship because your mac can't push 100 FPS in Q3?
I'm sorry for you man, I really am. Better get a PC right now, don't wait, in your case, it's a waste of time.

Some people actually work with their computers too.

G-News (tztztztz)</strong><hr></blockquote>

Yeah MacAddict, he's right. I didn't think about that before when I posted. You're probably gunna have to wait years to be able to get that.
post #11 of 76
I'm seriously thinking what's the use of staying with Macs if their desktop computers suck so much, but unfortunately I hate Windows so much I probably will never jump ship. But I'm getting damn close in wanting to run Mandrake 8.0 on a Athlon XP 1900+.

Little things about Apple piss me off. Like the fact that they can't give us a case with 2 full drive bays. Like the fact they can't give us a descet amount of ram. Like the fact that they haven't used DDR ram yet. Like the measly speed increases. Like the budget nVidia cards on high-end machines. Get a clue Steve, it's not that difficult.

MacAddict: RIght now Macs can push over 100 FPS easily in Quake III. If you're talking about a value system doing that, I think it's a little unreasonable to jump ship because an iMac can't hit 100 FPS. If you're that much of a hardcore gamer, then by all means buy a PC. Personally, it takes more than games for me to want to switch.

I just hope that Apple can take a look around and see what us Mac users want.
~Winner of the Official 2003 AppleInsider NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament Pool~
Reply
~Winner of the Official 2003 AppleInsider NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament Pool~
Reply
post #12 of 76
Years?

Come off it, the 800 Dual get 100 fps in Quake

Just think what a Dual 1.6 ghz G5 will do.

Besides, 80fps, 100fps....you can't tell the difference.
Only morons use signatures
Reply
Only morons use signatures
Reply
post #13 of 76
Arg. I will buy the next revision of the Power mac, be it aG4 or G5. Hopefully it will be a G4 1 GHz. G5 too muc h to hope for this January.
post #14 of 76
Yeah...according to MacWorld, in a November 2001 article (Product review of the Power Mac G4/800 Dual Processor), the 867MHz Power Mac can do 107 FPS in quake, and thats with a stock video card. The dual 800 does 95. Just imagine those things with a GeForce3..mmmm.
post #15 of 76
[quote]Originally posted by iDogcow:
<strong>Years?

Come off it, the 800 Dual get 100 fps in Quake

Just think what a Dual 1.6 ghz G5 will do.

Besides, 80fps, 100fps....you can't tell the difference.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Yes years. If MacAddict wanted to spend a lot of money then yeah he could get something now. But he wants this for $1500. Knowing Apple I think it'll be at least a year or two until you can get that for $1500.
post #16 of 76
For 1500, a mac ought to at least come close. Consider that for 1500 you can buy a PC that will do that and more. Damn, I can do pretty good for 1500 in canadian dollars, so imagine what I could buy with real money. However, that $1500 PC won't really do better than a mac in any area other than Games.

Now it's time to think a little about PC games, most of the types of games that distinguish a PC from a games platform will run fine on either a mac or budget PC -- sims, diablo, starcraft, baldur's gate, puzzel, real-time strategy... and the like.

Is the PC really better at games? We're really only talking about FPS games now, that's where you'll notice the difference. Is it worth it to buy a computer just for UT or Quake? When you think about it, those are the only games where a PC is better than both a console and a mac, period. Platformer (2d and 3d), racing sim, 3d fighter, sports... they're all better on a console, despite the spec. Even in three years time when PC's have about 8 times the power of the current consoles, I'm willing to bet that the gaming experience is still qualitatively better on today's consoles.

Computers -- with their monitors, keyboards, and mice -- are great for FPS's, and sims/RPG's. But macs are equally good at sims/RPGs. So, PC's are really only better at one specific genre of game. This genre, the FPS, has about 3 distinct titles max. Is it good sense, to buy any computer just for three very similar games? It isn't.

Buy the 'interface' you like/can afford/need. Buy a console for fun. There are arguments in favor of the PC, but games are not really a great one, or at best, when you think about it, they're a stupid one.
IBL!
Reply
IBL!
Reply
post #17 of 76
I know I can't tell the difference between 80 and a 100 fps in Quake. Hell, I don't even play Quake.

Quake is just a benchmark for 3D games. The top of the line Macs right now barely eke out 100fps.

To upgrade my foolish Rage 128, I have to pay $200 for an Ati Radeon 32MB...years old, underperforming, outdated...blah blah blah. I could get a GeForce 3, but the 2X AGP bus that Apple gave us when all of the PC motherboards included 4X slots can't handle the bandwidth. Plus Apple will charge you a huge premium for a GF3.

I'd love to get a CD burner...but not a $300 external that just wastes another FireWire port...I want an internal one. But since Apple only gave us one full size drive bay in a pro machine, I would have to give up my DVD drive (yes I do use it).

The only consumer soundcard for the Mac is a $130 Soundblaster...buggy and overpriced. I can't upgrade my CPU because Apple doesn't seem to want any 3rd party manufacturers stealing sales. Mac motherboards will never be upgradable. I have to wait months or years after a PC game is published to get a Mac port of it. We have what, three flight sims out on the Mac? And ones developed back when 266MHz was crazy fast don't count. Ati made some great AIW cards for TiVo capabilities, then never made them for the Mac.

I like the Mac a lot...but Apple doesn't make their stuff with gamers/multimedia enthusiasts in mind. Eventually a 16MB GPU and a G4 won't make it around anymore and chances are that when it comes time to upgrade there will be better values and performance on the x86 side of the fence. A $600 PC could be a much better gaming machine than a $1600 PowerMac. I hate consoles (trying to play Civ 3 with a gamepad has to be interesting), so right now a cheap PC looks like a great option.

Anyway, my point is that Apple doesn't make very good gaming stuff and probably never will...they're not that kind of company. What I want out of MWSF will probably never come. I realize that.
*Registered March 1, 1999*
Member #14
Reply
*Registered March 1, 1999*
Member #14
Reply
post #18 of 76
MacAddict, if you're willing to give up some speed why don't you just get an internal Combo drive?
post #19 of 76
Heres the horror MWSF that would truly drive me away for good:

The Revolutionary New LCD iMac:

800 MHz G3
Same old 8x4x24 CDRW
Same old PC100 RAM
16MB nVidia GeForce 2MX
60 Gig HD
15 LCD
$1499 (Fastest; I dont even want to think about Fast and Faster)


The All-New PowerMac G4:

1.0 GHz G4 / Dual 933 MHz G4
SuperDrive (whee.)
PC 133 RAM (still)
32MB nVidia GeForce 2MX
80Gig HD / 100 Gig HD (ooh, a 20 Gig boost. Each. Ooh.)
$2499 / $3499 (the low end machine is too dreary to mention)


Photoshop for OSX: Shipping in March!! Or April!!
\t(Actually ships on April 27th , performs so slowly youd think it was a beta)
Mini-Lecture About the MHz Myth
Ensuing Bakeoff
\tTwelve Photoshop filters that only 3% of the population uses
\t$3500 G4 wipes the floor with a $1500 P4 1.8 GHz (monitor included, probably)
\t
Displays:
\t15 same old resolution, $449
\t17 1280x1024 (same), $799
\t19 same resolution as 17 , $1399
\t22 same resolution, $2399 (we dropped the price! $100!!)

Oh, and one more thing:
\tWe brought back the Cube. Introducing, the SuperCube2K2!!
\t
\t800 MHz G4
\tCDRW
\t40 Gig HD
\tPC 133 RAM
\t16 MB nVidia GeForce 2MX
\t$1499

Audience goes nuts.


I start learning Linux.

-mithral
The crowd goes wild! It thinks you're terrific.
Reply
The crowd goes wild! It thinks you're terrific.
Reply
post #20 of 76
The expansion options, and price-erformance ratio are some good arguments for the PC side. Then again, for certain markets price-performance is actually better on the mac. Pre-press benefits greatly from the color corrected workflow of the mac; Apple will sell you a very capable video production system at a fraction of what dedicated vid-production systems cost; Even 'professional' audio is arguably more cost effective on a mac.

It is the iMac which needs to catch-up to the bargain PC. The powermac will always remain a specifically targeted machine, so lets leave it alone for now.

Integration and simplicity will go so far -- iMac is good at that -- but it needs a little more expansion and A/V power. I think we can forget about a PCI bus. Fine, I'd like one, but fine. Apple could replace the PCI bus entirely with a faster version of firewire (could this be the recently registered Gigawire?). 1394 calls for up to 3.2Gbps (400MB/s) nearly twice the speed of the PCI bus. We might just see such an animal: gigawire suggests at least 1000Mbps so I expect a 1600Mbps (200MB/s) version to appear. 800mbps wouldn't quite justify a gigawire naming scheme. Depending on who supplies the chips it might be 800, 1600, or even 3200 Mbps. The spec does include all three speeds; some manufacturers might not supply them right away but Apple would do well to go directly to at least the 1600 speed. At that speed, many PCI peripherals could be made available on the mac over the Firewire bus. We would see more options if consumer machines had a way to use expansion cards. The options for powermacs are limited because, for the most part, even those that own them are unlikely to invest in consumer grade components. There needs to be a way to supply expansion to the iMac for peripheral makers to be interested enough in the mac. If it were made just a little faster, Firewire could be that method.

As to the videocard, I think it would be best for Apple to build the new iMac with a cube style AGP port. Most users would leave it alone anyway, but it makes bumping the system spec easier throughout the life of the machine -- they don't have to mess about with the motherboard to supply a graphics update. But also, users could BTO a faster or dual display option to create a viable prosumer model that doesn't have all the seperate design, production, and marketing/inventory drawbacks for Apple, that the cube had.

Just wait untill January, Apple may very well get it right.
IBL!
Reply
IBL!
Reply
post #21 of 76
[quote]Originally posted by Mithral:
<strong>Here?s the horror MWSF that would truly drive me away for good:

[...]


Audience goes nuts.


I start learning Linux.

-mithral</strong><hr></blockquote>


Loved it! I am pretty convinced we'll be pissed off by sth. very similar to your scenario! Do you have any ideas for the iPod?

Regards, TWD
_______________________________________
Love the Mac too, though
I am living so far beyond my income that we almost can be said to be living apart
Reply
I am living so far beyond my income that we almost can be said to be living apart
Reply
post #22 of 76
Matsu, I completely agree with you. The Macintosh is the best computer for almost everything out there...home use, digital video, 2D illustration and design, etc. Sadly, gaming is not one of those things.

Apple will never be able to beat the x86 world in hardcore gaming because of their marketshare and just the way the Macintosh is designed and the vision that Steve has for Apple. If Apple tried to change that, they'd lose money and customers.
*Registered March 1, 1999*
Member #14
Reply
*Registered March 1, 1999*
Member #14
Reply
post #23 of 76
[quote]Originally posted by James Flowers:
<strong>Yeah...according to MacWorld, in a November 2001 article (Product review of the Power Mac G4/800 Dual Processor), the 867MHz Power Mac can do 107 FPS in quake, and thats with a stock video card. The dual 800 does 95. Just imagine those things with a GeForce3..mmmm.</strong><hr></blockquote>

I have an 867 w geforce3, and you wont hear any complaints from me.
onlooker
Registered User

Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: parts unknown




http://www.apple.com/feedback/macpro.html
Reply
onlooker
Registered User

Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: parts unknown




http://www.apple.com/feedback/macpro.html
Reply
post #24 of 76
A friend of mine has a G4/867 with GF3 and gets 180 FPS on default settings playing Return to Castle Wolfenstein.

While I get 35 (outside) and 50 (inside) using my G4/400 AGP ATI-RAGE 128.

Too bad my flashing of the PC Geoforce II didnt work, looks like all I have now is a radeon option

Sigh.
post #25 of 76
Nightmare scenario... OK.

The lights dim. A figure walks out onto the stage.

Bill Gates.

He explains that, to placate the states that want Office for Macintosh guaranteed indefinitely, he bought Apple and turned it over to a trustworthy party. It takes him 20 minutes of droning to get this across. Finally, he introduces Apple's new CEO:

Mike Dell takes the stage, sipping from a Starbuck's cup.

Mike explains that the platform is being retired, which doesn't matter because it was so insignificant anyway. He will keep the brand around, though: Any models that Dell discontinues will be spraypainted bright colors ("Apple's only real innovation," sneers Gates) and marketed as a Macintosh - at the old Apple price points ("You guys are used to that price/performance ratio anyway," Dell harrumphs).

Gates notes that it will now be very easy for MS to offer Office for Macintosh into the foreseeable future, and spends the next three hours droning on about COM and DCOM and .NET.

What happened to Steve? The big screen darkens, then shows Jobs in a beige padded cell, straitjacketed, while Steve Ballmer shouts "Give it up for me!" and runs around the room.

Bill Gates reappears, and spends six more hours droning on about Windows XP.

(Actually, this probably wouldn't make me switch. It would make me give computers up altogether. )
"...within intervention's distance of the embassy." - CvB

Original music:
The Mayflies - Black earth Americana. Now on iTMS!
Becca Sutlive - Iowa Fried Rock 'n Roll - now on iTMS!
Reply
"...within intervention's distance of the embassy." - CvB

Original music:
The Mayflies - Black earth Americana. Now on iTMS!
Becca Sutlive - Iowa Fried Rock 'n Roll - now on iTMS!
Reply
post #26 of 76
[quote]Apple will never be able to beat the x86 world in hardcore gaming because of their marketshare and just the way the Macintosh is designed and the vision that Steve has for Apple. If Apple tried to change that, they'd lose money and customers.<hr></blockquote>
Why not?
Hardcore gamers wants frames/sec which is based on GPU speed, AGP bus throughput, CPU speed and CPU-memory throughput--all of which when improved on the Mac would make it good for gaming, and by strange coincidence anyone else who gives a damn about performance. Hint the PM core market is supposed to graphics pros and power users. If thats not in Steve's vision then Apple has a problem.
four more beers, four more beers
Reply
four more beers, four more beers
Reply
post #27 of 76
Scenario:

Curtain opens on stage.

Fred Anderson (Apple's CFO) walks out on stage, picks up the microphone:

"Hello. I'll try to make this brief. It turns out that Mike Dell was right. After consultation with the Board of Directors, we have decided that the best use of Apple's resources for the benefit of the shareholders is to dissolve the company, sell the assets, and return the money directly back to the shareholders.

While we understand that this appears to strand our large user base, we have prepared what we believe to be an appropriate migration path towards Microsoft. Allow me to please introduce Bill Gates."

And after that, I migrate my home machines to Linux.

-HOS
You are in a twisty maze of passages, all alike.
Reply
You are in a twisty maze of passages, all alike.
Reply
post #28 of 76
[quote]Originally posted by MajorMatt:
<strong>
Too bad my flashing of the PC Geoforce II didnt work, looks like all I have now is a radeon option </strong><hr></blockquote>

You tried to flash a regular GeForce 2? It will never work. You need a GeForce 2 MX or a GeForce 3, and they *have* to follow the nVidia reference design. Asus and Hercules are a good bet.

The reason a Geforce 2 won't work is that the Mac and the PC communicate with the PCI/AGP bus in different directions. Big-endian vs. Little-endian, or something like that. Basically, the Geforce2 MX is the first nVidia card that could interpret both little- and big-endian busses.

That's the basic jist of it, anyways. I used to know this very well, but I haven't been paying close attention to this stuff any more.
"The image is a dream. The beauty is real. Can you see the difference?" -- Richard Bach, Illusions
Reply
"The image is a dream. The beauty is real. Can you see the difference?" -- Richard Bach, Illusions
Reply
post #29 of 76
I would never switch to PC, never. I would just use what I have and be bitter. The only way I switch is if Apple folds and PPC is no longer delevoped.
All Your PCs Are Belong To Trash
Reply
All Your PCs Are Belong To Trash
Reply
post #30 of 76
I will never switch to any side cause I am using both
Mac Pro 2.66, 5GB RAM, 250+120 HD, 23" Cinema Display
MacBook 1.83GHz, 2GB RAM
Reply
Mac Pro 2.66, 5GB RAM, 250+120 HD, 23" Cinema Display
MacBook 1.83GHz, 2GB RAM
Reply
post #31 of 76
I'd like to try flashing a GF2MX (mmm...64MB video card), but I don't have a PC to do it on. And all of my friends are weenies and would never let me crack open the case.
*Registered March 1, 1999*
Member #14
Reply
*Registered March 1, 1999*
Member #14
Reply
post #32 of 76
Mithral
----------------------------
Heres the horror MWSF that would truly drive me away for good:

The Revolutionary New LCD iMac:

800 MHz G3
Same old 8x4x24 CDRW
Same old PC100 RAM
16MB nVidia GeForce 2MX
60 Gig HD
15 LCD
$1499 (Fastest; I dont even want to think about Fast and Faster)


The All-New PowerMac G4:

1.0 GHz G4 / Dual 933 MHz G4
SuperDrive (whee.)
PC 133 RAM (still)
32MB nVidia GeForce 2MX
80Gig HD / 100 Gig HD (ooh, a 20 Gig boost. Each. Ooh.)
$2499 / $3499 (the low end machine is too dreary to mention)


I really think that it is what is going to happen... If so I switch to the PC side
post #33 of 76
Bill Gates walks onto stage...

You see where I'm going...
post #34 of 76
what's with all the bitching and negativity??

it's a month BEFORE macworld and people are already complaining about the products......geesh

can we just think a little more positively? please? i know this thread is supposed to be neg, but do you really think apple's going to bring out a 500Mhz PM?

macs are a little slower than PCs....ok....but apple's selling point is not speed, but quality products. PM are about trying to be as fast as they can be, but you can't blame them......it's really hard to keep up with AMD and Intel......

so can we all just relax a little?

[end of pointless rant........]
post #35 of 76
[quote]Originally posted by Toofeu:
<strong>I really think that it is what is going to happen... If so I switch to the PC side</strong><hr></blockquote>

Let's just hope it doesn't happen.
post #36 of 76
To the people who are bitching a moaning about future products being too slow, I urge you to find an 867 MHz or Dual 800 MHz G4, sit down, and try things on it. It's fast. Faster would be nice, but, seriously, what's a 20 second wait compared to a 15 second wait? It's not going to change that drastically, so don't get your hopes up. I'd be happy if I had an 867 MHz G4, but I don't. I have a 500 MHz iBook and a 400 MHz PowerBook G3, and you know what? They work. And they're not that slow either.

Thank you for your time.
post #37 of 76
[quote]Originally posted by Max8319:
<strong>what's with all the bitching and negativity??

it's a month BEFORE macworld and people are already complaining about the products......geesh

can we just think a little more positively? please? i know this thread is supposed to be neg, but do you really think apple's going to bring out a 500Mhz PM?

macs are a little slower than PCs....ok....but apple's selling point is not speed, but quality products. PM are about trying to be as fast as they can be, but you can't blame them......it's really hard to keep up with AMD and Intel......

so can we all just relax a little?

[end of pointless rant........]</strong><hr></blockquote>

I agree, you can do much more out of the box with a Mac than you can with a PC. This is what Apple's whole advertising campaign is trying to show. It's all about having the best consumer oriented software solutions. Hardware buffs need not apply. I own a Mac because I enjoy using OS X, iMovie, and iTunes. Apple needs more agressive marketing, but I don't think they need to tout superior hardware to succeed.
14" iBook
700MHz G3
640MB RAM

Kecksy's Korner
Reply
14" iBook
700MHz G3
640MB RAM

Kecksy's Korner
Reply
post #38 of 76
Steve Jobs stomps on stage, dragging a table with a Quicksilver case and an imac behind him...

Jobs: Well, first the good news. Adobe Photoshop 6.5 for OS X is here. And we are going to release Mac OS X 10.2 and Mac OS 9.3.

::Crowd cheers::

Thats about it for good news. Heres the bad news. We aren't selling a whole lot of PM G4's, so to reduce price, we are now upgrading it to a G3 processor @ 350MHz because those ****ing pricks at Moto have their heads up their ***es. Also, we are now including the Rage Pro as standard graphics card, it only has space for one drive, so no more internal zip, and we are wiping out our line of lcd monitors, since everyone bought third party displays anyway. Plus there is no more firewire, only 1 adb port for our recycle old keyboards and mice program. And its now at the low, low price of $3,399. Only one model.

::Several people in crowd start to draw guns, and fire at the stage::

As for the iMac, well, thats our new cheap display. Were going to stop putting in most of the componets including the processor and you can hook it directly to the new G4.

::The rest of the people, except the ones carrying around laptops, start to draw guns and fire at the stage::

Now about the iPod. Since it was priced so high, we are now introducing the iPod LC, @ $35. It includes, among other things:
-A standard cacluator display.
-A serial port (cant be used with any current macs)
-A 550 mb ata hard drive.
-A random, unlabeled assortment of buttons.
-Some kind of euorpean sound port. Did we mention it cant play mp3's anymore?

New marketing slogan: 100 of your favorite songs, now able to fit in your backpack.

For portables, we are upgrading to theG3 processor @ 233MHz. Also, we are recyclying old adb keyboards and mice, as well as 14 inch applevision displays, and including these, so they now all weigh 50 pounds and take up about as much space as the new display (imac). On a side note, the ibook now comes with an lcd watch, since we couldnt get the ****ing pram to work right. Oh well.

Now for airport. No one bought it. Too ****ing expensive. So we are duct taping them to the g4's as a present.

::Crowd cheers::

[ 12-09-2001: Message edited by: James Flowers ]</p>
post #39 of 76
[quote]Originally posted by Mithral:
<strong>Heres the horror MWSF that would truly drive me away for good:

The Revolutionary New LCD iMac:

800 MHz G3
Same old 8x4x24 CDRW
Same old PC100 RAM
16MB nVidia GeForce 2MX
60 Gig HD
15 LCD
$1499 (Fastest; I dont even want to think about Fast and Faster)

I start learning Linux.

-mithral</strong><hr></blockquote>

Well, good luck with that, pal.



What in the hell kind of iMac are you expecting?!? You're not one of these snapperheads actually thinking the iMac is going to magically jump up to a 17" 1GHz G4 with SuperDrive and a TwinView video card, all for $1099, are you?

Jeez.

There's NOTHING wrong with the specs you listed. As a matter of fact, replace the CD-R drive with a DVD/CD-R combo drive and I'm there!

You sound like a total G4 candidate. But I imagine if they're not up to 2.2GHz come next month, you're not interested, right?
post #40 of 76
Oddly enough, this is probably the most realistic and probable outcome of MWSF. Just watch. Maybe the prices will be a LITTLE less...but just a little.

Of course, no one will abandon the Apple platform. Steve will get you all with this evergrowing RDF (Reality Distortion Feild)

-Moazam

[quote]Originally posted by Mithral:
<strong>Heres the horror MWSF that would truly drive me away for good:

The Revolutionary New LCD iMac:

800 MHz G3
Same old 8x4x24 CDRW
Same old PC100 RAM
16MB nVidia GeForce 2MX
60 Gig HD
15 LCD
$1499 (Fastest; I dont even want to think about Fast and Faster)


The All-New PowerMac G4:

1.0 GHz G4 / Dual 933 MHz G4
SuperDrive (whee.)
PC 133 RAM (still)
32MB nVidia GeForce 2MX
80Gig HD / 100 Gig HD (ooh, a 20 Gig boost. Each. Ooh.)
$2499 / $3499 (the low end machine is too dreary to mention)


Photoshop for OSX: Shipping in March!! Or April!!
\t(Actually ships on April 27th , performs so slowly youd think it was a beta)
Mini-Lecture About the MHz Myth
Ensuing Bakeoff
\tTwelve Photoshop filters that only 3% of the population uses
\t$3500 G4 wipes the floor with a $1500 P4 1.8 GHz (monitor included, probably)
\t
Displays:
\t15 same old resolution, $449
\t17 1280x1024 (same), $799
\t19 same resolution as 17 , $1399
\t22 same resolution, $2399 (we dropped the price! $100!!)

Oh, and one more thing:
\tWe brought back the Cube. Introducing, the SuperCube2K2!!
\t
\t800 MHz G4
\tCDRW
\t40 Gig HD
\tPC 133 RAM
\t16 MB nVidia GeForce 2MX
\t$1499

Audience goes nuts.


I start learning Linux.

-mithral</strong><hr></blockquote>
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Future Apple Hardware
AppleInsider › Forums › Mac Hardware › Future Apple Hardware › The MW that would make you switch to PC....Fantasy/Horror Time