First off, FOSS Patents posts scores of in depth reports on global cases every month. If you think citing one example of a possible outcome that didn’t immediately occur lets you confidently state that nothing Mueller writes is reliable, you need to get serious.
Also, if you say things like "stretching theories to one extreme side of the argument" you can’t then cite Graklaw, a one sided propaganda site that only argues a single extremist line of Google’s talking points, contradicting itself as much as Google’s own hypocrisy does.
Google bots like yourself attack Mueller because he cuts through the "open" rhetoric bandied about by Eric Schmidt and the company’s blatant disregard for every other company’s IP while attempting to abuse any patents it can obtain itself.
Just look at Graklaw’s cheering over Samsung’s efforts to sue Apple over using IP already licensed in broadband chips. Obvious case of egregious patent abuse supported by Graklaw. http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/08/05/samsungs-vetoed-push-for-an-itc-ban-against-apple-inc-in-pictures
Mueller is a paid troll, who earns his money by generating click bait for whichever company pays him. Not too hot on declaring his interests while doing so, unfortunately. It wouldn't surprise me if "Corrections" was in fact the man himself. He had a soft spot for Groklaw also.