or Connect
AppleInsider › Forums › Mobile › iPhone › Samsung widens lead in worldwide smartphone marketshare, smaller OEMs rising
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Samsung widens lead in worldwide smartphone marketshare, smaller OEMs rising

post #1 of 80
Thread Starter 
According to a fresh report from market research firm Strategy Analytics, Samsung shipped a record 86 million smartphones worldwide during the fourth quarter of 2013, boosting its stake of the worldwide market as Apple's share fell over the same period.

Shipments
Source: Strategy Analytics


Despite announcing a record 51 million iPhone sales, Apple's share of the worldwide smartphone market fell to 17.6 percent in the three months ending in December, a 4.4 point dip from the year ago quarter. By comparison, Samsung upped its piece of the pie to 29.6 percent over the same period, up 0.6 percent year over year.

The Strategy Analytics report puts Samsung's fourth quarter smartphone shipments at 86 million units, up from 63 million in 2012. Apple also showed growth, moving from 47.8 million iPhone sales to 51 million.

For the year, Samsung reportedly shipped some 319.8 million smartphones, a huge increase from last year's 213 million. Apple's year-end sales reached 153.4 million units, up from 135.8 million in 2012. Samsung accounted for 32.3 percent of all smartphone shipments last year, while Apple came in at No. 2 with 15.5 percent.

"Despite tough competition from a long tail of Chinese and American brands, Samsung continued to deliver numerous hit models, such as the Galaxy S4 and Note 3," said Strategy Analytics Executive Director Neil Mawston. "Apple grew a sluggish 13 percent annually and shipped 153.4 million smartphones worldwide for 15 percent marketshare in 2013, dipping from the 19 percent level recorded in 2012. Apple remains strong in the high-end smartphone segment, but a lack of presence in the low-end category is costing it lost volumes in fast-growing emerging markets such as India."

Marketshare


The bigger story may be upstarts like Huawei, LG and Lenovo, each of which grew their share of smartphone shipments substantially in quarter four. With cheaper price points and competitive features, the Asian manufacturers managed to take a combined 14 percent marketshare in the three-month period.

Huawei came in third behind Apple with 16.6 million units shipped for the fourth quarter of 2013, up from 10.9 million in 2012. LG and Lenovo also upped their shipment numbers and came out with 13.2 million units and 13.6 million units, respectively. For the 2013 calendar year, Huawei, LG and Lenovo shipped a respective 50.4 million, 47.6 million and 45.5 million smartphones.

"Samsung and Apple together accounted for almost half of all smartphones shipped worldwide in 2013," said Senior Analyst at Strategy Analytics Linda Sui. "Large marketing budgets, extensive distribution channels and attractive product portfolios have enabled Samsung and Apple to maintain their grip on the smartphone industry. However, there is clearly now more competition coming from the second-tier smartphone brands."

Overall, worldwide smartphone shipments came in at 990 million units, a huge increase from 2012, which saw 700.1 million handsets shipped.
post #2 of 80

Dooooomed

post #3 of 80
Oh heLL, toyota sold more than BMW. BMW is doooooomed
post #4 of 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleFanatic View Post
 

Wow! 86 million smartphones buried in the desert during 2013 (or Strategy Analytics are just paid shills)...

 

Where are all these Samesung smartphones? I literally have never seen anybody use a Samscum phone...


My sister has an S4. What's more, she's doubly doomed - she's on Sprint.

post #5 of 80
When did Samsung say they shipped 86 million smartphones last quarter? I'm sorry but that number is so bogus it isn't even funny. If Samsung really shipped that many phones how is it that their profits came nowhere near Apple's &13B.
post #6 of 80

What this fails to say is that only 25% of those 86 million of those smartphones are in the iphone class. We are talking S2, S3 and S4 only make 25% of those sales, the rest are those cheap smartphones like the galaxy aces of the world. So if we are comparing oranges to oranges apple owns the high end with samsung getting the rest while everyone else do not even register. This is like the report that nokia is killing the iphone in spain, which fails to specify what nokia is actually selling are the 508's of the world, not the 1020's of the world which is in the iphone category. Apple does not even have a phone in those categories, way to win a race your competitor is not even participating in. Apple does not even have a phone in the sub $400 categories while a lot of those guys are fighting it in the sub $200 and $100 categories.

post #7 of 80
Strategy Analytics, also known as Samsung marketing....
post #8 of 80

Get it through your thick skulls, Apple fans, Wall Street has decided that market share is THE most important metric. And by that metric Apple is doomed. End of story, period. Why is that so hard to understand and accept? Apple had their best quarter ever in terms of sales, they make money hand over fist, their products are top shelf, their customer service is the best, but they are losing market share so that makes them poison to investors these days. Google spent $3.2 billion for a thermostat and they are applauded as the future of tech. It’s long past the time for Apple fans to wise up and drink the hemlock. Realize the company you love is dirt between the toes of Wall Street.

post #9 of 80
Shipped vs sold. Thank you.
post #10 of 80
Originally Posted by lkrupp View Post
Why is that so hard to understand and accept?

 

Because they should actually be doing their jobs, is all.

Originally posted by Marvin

Even if [the 5.5” iPhone exists], it doesn’t deserve to.
Reply

Originally posted by Marvin

Even if [the 5.5” iPhone exists], it doesn’t deserve to.
Reply
post #11 of 80

The category to watch is 'other'

 

Samsung and Apple have more or less divvied up the existing market.  Mostly the rich areas of the world.  All the rich peeps have their phones now and growth is slowing considerably.

 

Samsung also took the time to deliver smartphones to the low end of the market and pretty much dominated that with little competition.

 

That is the market that is expanding and has the future growth (despite low margins).

 

Both Apple and Samsung are likely to get a beating in market share numbers this year.  Apple chose not to release a product that will compete in the segment, and Samsung for the first time is going to counter serious competition.  China is by far the biggest market with the most growth and the homefield teams of Huawei and Lenova are likely to just keep cleaning house.


Edited by Frood - 1/28/14 at 1:35pm
post #12 of 80
Great numbers for Sammy. Can't wait until Sammy confirms them. Haha
post #13 of 80
There's no bottom when you're competing for razor-thin profits. Samsung will fall when upstarts like Xiaomi (sp?) eat their lunch.

Proud AAPL stock owner.

 

GOA

Reply

Proud AAPL stock owner.

 

GOA

Reply
post #14 of 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallest Skil View Post
 
Originally Posted by lkrupp View Post
Why is that so hard to understand and accept?

 

Because they should actually be doing their jobs, is all.

Sadly, they are.

post #15 of 80
If Samsung shipped 86 million smartphones in Q4 2013 as Strategy Analytics reported, why was the following stated for Samsung's earnings decline?

Late yesterday Samsung reported their profits for Q4 and confirmed that they were down 18.2%. A Samsung official told the Korean Herald that "This is caused by a base effect of the high growth of smartphones in the third quarter and inventory adjustment at the end of last year."
post #16 of 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by TNSF View Post

Shipped vs sold. Thank you.

 

That logic only goes so far. If Samsung consistently shipped more than it sold, its financials would suffer. Samsung's not a money-laundering operation; they have to report to their investors. 

 

Samsung and especially the others are simply willing to accept lower profit margins than Apple, and they're willing to compete in more market segments than Apple. The market for cheaper phones is growing far faster than the market for expensive phones, and Apple's not competing in it (and for the FSM's sake don't mention contracts -- practically everybody in the US has a smartphone by now, and that's not how they're marketed in the places that are starting to buy phones now). 

 

ps. Lenovo makes phones? Wow. Didn't know that. But it's a further sign of what I'm saying: Apple's just not competing (or not competing very hard) for the kind of consumers that Lenovo sold all those phones to last year. I think Apple will be fine without them, but it's time to give up on any pretense of Apple losing market share through some kind of trickery by its competitors (other than intellectual property, natch). 

post #17 of 80
Originally Posted by Arlor View Post

Samsungs not a money-laundering operation

 

Well…

Originally posted by Marvin

Even if [the 5.5” iPhone exists], it doesn’t deserve to.
Reply

Originally posted by Marvin

Even if [the 5.5” iPhone exists], it doesn’t deserve to.
Reply
post #18 of 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by leavingthebigG View Post

If Samsung shipped 86 million smartphones in Q4 2013 as Strategy Analytics reported, why was the following stated for Samsung's earnings decline?

Late yesterday Samsung reported their profits for Q4 and confirmed that they were down 18.2%. A Samsung official told the Korean Herald that "This is caused by a base effect of the high growth of smartphones in the third quarter and inventory adjustment at the end of last year."

 

Because profits are not purely a function of the volume of sales? 

 

Samsung may be:

 

1. Selling a higher proportion of lower-margin phones.

2. Spending more on capital expenses to build new facilities to make phones and parts.

3. Spending more on the average to market its phones. 

4. Spending more on a per-phone basis to reach new markets and customers.

5. Paying its executives more on a per-phone basis. 

6. ... (lots of possibilities)

 

Apple has the same problem. Apple's margins have also been falling (albeit not nearly as fast) because it costs more money to reach more customers. Think of it this way: customer #1 would probably pay Apple $1 million of the privilege of having an iPhone. Customer #2 a little less. And so on. By the time you get to customer #51m, the cost of making that customer aware of the product, working out an agreement with some carrier that that customer can afford, persuading that customer that the iPhone is the right phone for them, etc., gets higher and higher. It's amazing that Apple is as profitable as it is when it has as many customers as it has (heck, it's pretty much the only mass-market luxury goods company). Samsung has more customers than Apple, and it sells less attractive products to begin with -- and Samsung's leaders seem to have decided that market share is their goal, even if it costs profits. Apple's product and pricing strategy suggests the opposite.

post #19 of 80
Most of those are crap phones. Share of their Galaxy phones is falling and that's why their stock price and revenue was in free fall few weeks ago.

Again, garbage headline from AI staff. And why is this Samsung crap always on the front page of AI? There are two Samsung stories on the front page of AI right now.

I just don't care about Samsung, dear AI Staff. If I wanted Samsung news, I'd go to a Android/Samsung site.
post #20 of 80

Well Apple are still selling more iPhone per year. It's just the market grow a lot faster with cheap Android Phone replacing every Feature phone on earth.

 

This year we already have trends seeing more new users and old users jumping back to iPhone camp. And not to mention the deals with China Mobile. And with many still waiting for a bigger iPhone to go back to Apple, Apple should have no problem reaching the 200M iPhone unit per year. 

post #21 of 80
As always no mention of Apple profit margins and Samsung's always no profit phone salea
post #22 of 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by castcore View Post

As always no mention of Apple profit margins and Samsung's always no profit phone salea

 

Uh, the story's about market share. AI runs plenty of stories about relative profits, including today.

post #23 of 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arlor View Post

That logic only goes so far. If Samsung consistently shipped more than it sold, its financials would suffer. Samsung's not a money-laundering operation; they have to report to their investors. 

Good point.

Samsung has never been caught being dishonest.

Ever.
post #24 of 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arlor View Post

Uh, the story's about market share.

And guess what reality's about?
post #25 of 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by Just_Me View Post

DOOOOOMED

Fixed that for you.

1wink.gif
post #26 of 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleFanatic View Post
 

Wow! 86 million smartphones buried in the desert during 2013 (or Strategy Analytics are just paid shills)...

 

Where are all these Samesung smartphones? I literally have never seen anybody use a Samscum phone...

Actually, I have seen a few. Remember, they look a lot like iPhones, so you kinda have to look close. But, I've seen far more iPhones than Galaxy phones...

post #27 of 80
Marketshare, marketshare, marketshare.
post #28 of 80

Analysts; market share > money

World; Analysts < bag of hammers

Help! I'm trapped in a white dungeon of amazing precision and impeccable tolerances!

Reply

Help! I'm trapped in a white dungeon of amazing precision and impeccable tolerances!

Reply
post #29 of 80
I agree this is a crappy headline. Should read something more like "Samsung marketing analytics firm pulls numbers from thin air to dampen Apple's record iPhone growth".

At least mention somewhere in the article that Samsung has not once confirmed these numbers.
post #30 of 80
Say it with me everybody, shipped ≠ sold!
post #31 of 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by robogobo View Post

Say it with me everybody, shipped ≠ sold!

Say it with me. Apple reports shipped numbers like the rest as well. Enough of this nonsense.
post #32 of 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by zerobim08 View Post


Say it with me. Apple reports shipped numbers like the rest as well. Enough of this nonsense.

Get your facts straight don't make them. The real story is that, as in today's quarterly earning conference, Apple reports the number sold and their inventory level every quarter. When Samsung reports numbers, it always just units shipped, not units sold.

"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." Douglas Adams

Reply

"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." Douglas Adams

Reply
post #33 of 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by zerobim08 View Post

Say it with me. Apple reports shipped numbers like the rest as well. Enough of this nonsense.

You're an idiot You're mistaken, not that Apple doesn't report units shipped but that they do in fact report sales. This is why these bullshit reports are always skewed. Not that it matters in the race to the bottom.
post #34 of 80

So if Samsung sold so many handsets, where is the money?

 

Soft sales of their high end LARGE SCREEN phones easily outsold by 51 million iPhones indicate that screen size is irrelevant, the most popular highest selling phones have "small" screens.

 

Of 86 million phones, Samsung reported 9 million were Galaxy S4's, they didn't even report Note 3 sales as they were probably less, the majority of Samsung's sales were low powered tiny handsets with low resolution screens smaller than iPhone screens.

 

Samsung is following the same path Nokia followed, down into irrelevance.

Better than my Bose, better than my Skullcandy's, listening to Mozart through my LeBron James limited edition PowerBeats by Dre is almost as good as my Sennheisers.
Reply
Better than my Bose, better than my Skullcandy's, listening to Mozart through my LeBron James limited edition PowerBeats by Dre is almost as good as my Sennheisers.
Reply
post #35 of 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogifan View Post

When did Samsung say they shipped 86 million smartphones last quarter? I'm sorry but that number is so bogus it isn't even funny. If Samsung really shipped that many phones how is it that their profits came nowhere near Apple's &13B.

Because lots of those phones are cheap junk, and shipping them adds up to high unit sales eventually.
Citing unnamed sources with limited but direct knowledge of the rumoured device - Comedy Insider (Feb 2014)
Reply
Citing unnamed sources with limited but direct knowledge of the rumoured device - Comedy Insider (Feb 2014)
Reply
post #36 of 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by jm6032 View Post

Actually, I have seen a few. Remember, they look a lot like iPhones, so you kinda have to look close. But, I've seen far more iPhones than Galaxy phones...

You live in America: population 300M. Now multiply that number by 23.3 and you get the world population. There's another 95.7% of the world out there, most of which can afford a Samesong phone over an iPhone. The numbers are right. And a good reason why they probably are right is that iPhones last longer.
Citing unnamed sources with limited but direct knowledge of the rumoured device - Comedy Insider (Feb 2014)
Reply
Citing unnamed sources with limited but direct knowledge of the rumoured device - Comedy Insider (Feb 2014)
Reply
post #37 of 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by hill60 View Post

So if Samsung sold so many handsets, where is the money?

Are you saying you don't believe that number?

It's a bit like being the busiest restaurant in town. It doesn't mean you're the most profitable. You can be sure if Gordon Ramsay opened shop in your town and made the launch week entirely free to dine there you can only imagine how busy the restaurant would be. But a lot of money would be lost in the process. Like the way selling the most of anything doesn't make you the most profitable in your market segment. One of the exceptions probably being Coca Cola. But then, in their case there product doesn't cost any less than the competition. Once again in the phone space the company with the highest margin will make the most profit. And as usual we know who that company is. I'll be interested to see Apple's lineup this year.
Citing unnamed sources with limited but direct knowledge of the rumoured device - Comedy Insider (Feb 2014)
Reply
Citing unnamed sources with limited but direct knowledge of the rumoured device - Comedy Insider (Feb 2014)
Reply
post #38 of 80

Oh, they SHIPPED that many but how many did they SELL??????

post #39 of 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ireland View Post

Because lots of those phones are cheap junk, and shipping them adds up to high unit sales eventually.
Then how in the world are they considered smartphones?
post #40 of 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by robogobo View Post

Say it with me everybody, shipped ≠ sold!
No, but if you're not selling what you are shipping eventually it's going to impact the bottom line.

That said, where does Strategy Analytics get their figures from?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: iPhone
  • Samsung widens lead in worldwide smartphone marketshare, smaller OEMs rising
AppleInsider › Forums › Mobile › iPhone › Samsung widens lead in worldwide smartphone marketshare, smaller OEMs rising