Originally Posted by zeromeus
EWW!!! That's such an offensive suggestion. Why would ANYONE put an Apple logo on that piece of feces??? It's like putting a Mercedes branding on a Ford. That's just offensive!
I saw a BMW logo glued onto a Lada once, and I wasn't offended, so I dunno!
And these days, I'm not seeing much difference between Ford and Benz quality. The Chrysler merger, and subsequent loss of half the Mercedes engineers (a big chunk of those going to Audi) sure put a dent in Mercedes Benz quality...
That said, I'd rather drive an Audi than a Ford.....! And I prefer my iPhone to the Note 3 for sure. The Note 3's 50% greater weight alone convinced me I'm not interested in the "phablet" phone factor.
By the way there's been an update from the OIC: They're saying the athletes have no obligation to cover logos on their personal effects such as phones, and they can even have non-sponsor logos on their jackets, etc. so long as they are less than 10% of the total surface.
This is just a Samsung compliance requirement (nothing to do with OIC rules), tying the free gift to the "no-show" demand. If you WANT that free Note 3, then you have to cover or hide your Apple logos...
Stupid move, Samsung. More negative press than positive "perception" benefit, eh?