or Connect
AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Intel buys smartwatch maker Basis for reported $100M to $150M
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Intel buys smartwatch maker Basis for reported $100M to $150M

post #1 of 27
Thread Starter 
According to a report late Monday, Smartwatch maker Basis, which just last month was rumored to be shopping itself around to the likes of Apple, Google, Samsung and Microsoft, has been acquired by Intel for between $100 million and $150 million

Basis


Sources familiar with the matter tell TechCrunch that Basis Science, makers of the Basis Health Tracker Watch, has been purchased by Intel and will likely be rolled into the chip giant's growing arsenal of sensor and processor designs for wearable devices.

While an exact price is unknown, one source claims the deal is worth "around $100 million," while another puts it closer to $150 million. In either case, Intel's offer appears to be higher than the "sub-hundred million" figure Basis was rumored to be shooting for in February.

Intel has been making moves to bolster its position in the burgeoning wearables market with new sensor and platforms like the Quark embedded processor and the Edison smart chip. With existing devices leveraging silicon from industry leaders Qualcomm, Texas Instruments and others, Intel could be looking to buy some momentum with the Basis acquisition.

The future of the Basis Health Tracker Watch, Basis Science's lone product, remains unclear and Intel has yet to officially comment on the matter.

In an Ask Me Anything session on Reddit last month, Intel CEO Brian Krzanich revealed he uses two wearable devices, one being an internally developed project. While the company is unlikely to field a branded smartwatch, the wearables sector is obviously one of interest to Intel. Major OEMs like Samsung and LG already have devices on the market, or about to hit. Even Google is rumored to be mulling an entry as part of its Nexus lineup.

As for the glut of smartwatches and wearables coming to market in recent months, industry analysts speculate the impetus for many manufacturers is to get out ahead of Apple's much-rumored "iWatch." The most recent rumblings point to a health-minded product much like the current batch of devices, except with advanced innards and seamless integration with iOS, of which Apple has a substantial installed customer base.
post #2 of 27
Desperation chows down on desperation. Basis and Intel were meant for each other. A new watch most likely will never see the light of day.
post #3 of 27
Apple kicked our asses in mobile, but dangitall, we'll beat them in wrist-tops!

Sent from my iPhone Simulator

Reply

Sent from my iPhone Simulator

Reply
post #4 of 27
Didn't Intel buy some TV content company or some set-top box?

They did nothing with it... and they already sold it...
post #5 of 27
OMG. Apple is SO screwed for not jumping on Basis when they had the chance. Those sexy watches. Those full-featured apps that look and work so beautifully.

Or they could just keep building their own next-gen watches in secret, and let Intel buy two-year-old tech.
post #6 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Scrip View Post

Didn't Intel buy some TV content company or some set-top box?

They did nothing with it... and they already sold it...

Yes. Intel had much bravado about conquering television last year then sold out to Verizon. Next?
post #7 of 27
While I can't attest to what Apple is working on, it seems as though the pattern is the same as pre-iPad. Everyone thinks the market is going a certain direction because of a variety of factors. In the pre-iPad days it was netbooks and now it's wearables and TV. Intel is a part of that craziness. Since the Windows/Intel duopoly got smacked around, Intel seems sort of lost in what to do. Here's hoping Apple and Intel start using some of the extra fab capacity instead of Intel wasting time on this insanity.

As a note regarding Basis...maybe they have some patents that we don't know about that pushes the valuation that high. With deals like Instagram and Whatsapp being so high, $100 million might not seem like a lot, but heck, it is.
post #8 of 27

100 Million is nothing.  Apple spends a LOT more than that on M&A.  Nobody spends more than Apple.

post #9 of 27
Again, I'm not convinced Apple is working on a watch at all. I'm not even convinced that the majority of people even want or need a smart watch.

As I recall, it was analysts that decided the next big thing should be a smart watch, not Apple or any other tech company. Now everyone and their brother is scrambling to do a watch. Apple doesn't do what the analysts say they should do, they do what they think that they should do. Analysts should just shut the heck up. They cannot even run their own affairs let alone trying to drive the tech industry.
post #10 of 27
There is a missing link for Intel to succeed in mobile and small device world and its BlackBerry.

Intel should buy BlackBerry.
post #11 of 27

Typical of Intel getting into markets which they do not understand, it will be dead in under 2 yrs. Intel enters markets like this in order to sell more processors in the mean time they end up screwing it up and selling what left for a loss.

post #12 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpd514 View Post

There is a missing link for Intel to succeed in mobile and small device world and its BlackBerry.

Intel should buy BlackBerry.

Wouldn't that put Intelberry in a position of competing with its customers ala Googorla?
"Swift generally gets you to the right way much quicker." - auxio -

"The perfect [birth]day -- A little playtime, a good poop, and a long nap." - Tomato Greeting Cards -
Reply
"Swift generally gets you to the right way much quicker." - auxio -

"The perfect [birth]day -- A little playtime, a good poop, and a long nap." - Tomato Greeting Cards -
Reply
post #13 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bilbo63 View Post

Again, I'm not convinced Apple is working on a watch at all. I'm not even convinced that the majority of people even want or need a smart watch.

As I recall, it was analysts that decided the next big thing should be a smart watch, not Apple or any other tech company. Now everyone and their brother is scrambling to do a watch. Apple doesn't do what the analysts say they should do, they do what they think that they should do. Analysts should just shut the heck up. They cannot even run their own affairs let alone trying to drive the tech industry.


With all the hires they've made it seems clear that they are working on some kind of wearable, with the watch being the most probable. They are not going to put a heartbeat sensor on the back of their phone like Samsung did.

post #14 of 27
I couldn't find any tech specs for the Basis device --- I assume it uses a low-power, lower-end ARM chip. Intel has recently announced a 32-bit x86 pentium-class chip called the Quark. In addition, Intel has announced Edison a SOC (including the Quark Chip) that is the size of a micro SD card.

I suspect that Intel might use the Basis talent to build a prototype reference design of the Basis device (or equivalent) using Intel tech instead of ARM. I do not think that Intel will (or should) compete with OEMs using Intel chips.
"Swift generally gets you to the right way much quicker." - auxio -

"The perfect [birth]day -- A little playtime, a good poop, and a long nap." - Tomato Greeting Cards -
Reply
"Swift generally gets you to the right way much quicker." - auxio -

"The perfect [birth]day -- A little playtime, a good poop, and a long nap." - Tomato Greeting Cards -
Reply
post #15 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClemyNX View Post
 


With all the hires they've made it seems clear that they are working on some kind of wearable, with the watch being the most probable. They are not going to put a heartbeat sensor on the back of their phone like Samsung did.

Oh, I definitely think that Apple is going to enter the wearable space, I simply have my doubts that it'll resemble any of the smart watches out there at the moment. Whatever Apple does do, you can bet that it won't be plastered with a million features that we don't need that make the thing difficult to use or drain the battery. Apple knows that it is not a race to see who can pack the most crap into a watch. Apple will choose a small specific set of carefully chosen features and do those to best of their ability.

post #16 of 27
I remember when intel was so obsessed with PDAs, they licensed ARM designs and made chips based on those. Then they lost interest. They also lost interest in making USB microscopes for children. Intel goes through these cycles of doing something outside the box, then abandoning it and crawling back inside the box.

"Apple should pull the plug on the iPhone."

John C. Dvorak, 2007
Reply

"Apple should pull the plug on the iPhone."

John C. Dvorak, 2007
Reply
post #17 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClemyNX View Post


With all the hires they've made it seems clear that they are working on some kind of wearable, with the watch being the most probable. They are not going to put a heartbeat sensor on the back of their phone like Samsung did.

My money's on the iHeadband. It's not creepy like the Google Glass, in fact it's retro stylish and evokes the health-consciousness of Native American Indians. Unlike a watch which is often unnoticeable due to clothing draping itself over and around it, The iHeadband is always in the line of sight. Furthermore the iHeadband practically screams for accessorizing: Snap some braids on behind your ears, or add some colorful feathers and beads. The possibilities are practically endless.

In no time Apple can begin to offer accessory sensors. Want to know what people are doing behind your back? There will be the rear-facing camera, the iSeeYou, A guaranteed favorite of mothers of teens and school teachers everywhere. For the naturally paranoid, sensors of the iStink can check for how greasy your hair is, sniff for body odor and bad breath while whispering in your ear how revolting you are from one minute to the next.

The iHeadband is not just another product, it's a basis for a whole panoply of add-on sales for Apple. One that is sure to be a hit is the iDance. Disco music is transmitted to your ear via bone conduction making you break out in spontaneous dance while you are shopping or in church... The iHeadband has the potential of turning the world into one big Microsoft Surface commercial....
"That (the) world is moving so quickly that iOS is already amongst the older mobile operating systems in active development today." — The Verge
Reply
"That (the) world is moving so quickly that iOS is already amongst the older mobile operating systems in active development today." — The Verge
Reply
post #18 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Applebaum View Post


Wouldn't that put Intelberry in a position of competing with its customers ala Googorla?


Um "BlackTel" is a much better name.

post #19 of 27
With the success of the Samsung Gear 2 and the WOW for the Samsung Gear Fit, probably that we will have to wait much longer for the iWatch.

Apple as to find something equally WOWing.
post #20 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bilbo63 View Post

Oh, I definitely think that Apple is going to enter the wearable space, I simply have my doubts that it'll resemble any of the smart watches out there at the moment. Whatever Apple does do, you can bet that it won't be plastered with a million features that we don't need that make the thing difficult to use or drain the battery. Apple knows that it is not a race to see who can pack the most crap into a watch. Apple will choose a small specific set of carefully chosen features and do those to best of their ability.

Very thoughtful post, Mr. Baggins.
"If the young are not initiated into the village, they will burn it down just to feel its warmth."
- African proverb
Reply
"If the young are not initiated into the village, they will burn it down just to feel its warmth."
- African proverb
Reply
post #21 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macky the Macky View Post

My money's on the iHeadband. It's not creepy like the Google Glass, in fact it's retro stylish and evokes the health-consciousness of Native American Indians. Unlike a watch which is often unnoticeable due to clothing draping itself over and around it, The iHeadband is always in the line of sight. Furthermore the iHeadband practically screams for accessorizing: Snap some braids on behind your ears, or add some colorful feathers and beads. The possibilities are practically endless.

In no time Apple can begin to offer accessory sensors. Want to know what people are doing behind your back? There will be the rear-facing camera, the iSeeYou, A guaranteed favorite of mothers of teens and school teachers everywhere. For the naturally paranoid, sensors of the iStink can check for how greasy your hair is, sniff for body odor and bad breath while whispering in your ear how revolting you are from one minute to the next.

The iHeadband is not just another product, it's a basis for a whole panoply of add-on sales for Apple. One that is sure to be a hit is the iDance. Disco music is transmitted to your ear via bone conduction making you break out in spontaneous dance while you are shopping or in church... The iHeadband has the potential of turning the world into one big Microsoft Surface commercial....

😄

Pretty accurate, apart from the iStink. I think it will be the iNoseRing, which will enable a whole new world of olfactory-enabled apps. And when you're in a meeting, it will discreetly vibrate for notifications. If you want to share photos with someone, you just touch iNoseRings together.
"If the young are not initiated into the village, they will burn it down just to feel its warmth."
- African proverb
Reply
"If the young are not initiated into the village, they will burn it down just to feel its warmth."
- African proverb
Reply
post #22 of 27
And for analysts, Apple has reserved a special product, the iRing; this is similar to the iNoseRing, but it is reserved for another orifice.
"If the young are not initiated into the village, they will burn it down just to feel its warmth."
- African proverb
Reply
"If the young are not initiated into the village, they will burn it down just to feel its warmth."
- African proverb
Reply
post #23 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by SudoNym View Post
 

100 Million is nothing.  Apple spends a LOT more than that on M&A.  Nobody spends more than Apple.

C'mon. facebook just spent $19B for a damn app's userbase.

 

Apple's buys tend to be smaller and more targeted to assets (intellectual, hardware and people) that will bolster their own development programs than say, Google's or Microsoft's.

 

And Cook just commented on their M&A strategy noting that multi-B aquisitions aren't out of the question where they'd make enough sense, but are not an Apple goal in and of themselves.

Intel is showing a bit of casting about, for sure though.  Missing the mobiles boat has really got them scrambling.

An iPhone, a Leatherman and thou...  ...life is complete.

Reply

An iPhone, a Leatherman and thou...  ...life is complete.

Reply
post #24 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatisgoingon View Post

OMG. Apple is SO screwed for not jumping on Basis when they had the chance. Those sexy watches. Those full-featured apps that look and work so beautifully.

Or they could just keep building their own next-gen watches in secret, and let Intel buy two-year-old tech.

LOL, good one.

Most tech companies have *WAGDN divisions and invest heavily in them these days.

*What's Apple Going to do Next?
Been using Apple since Apple ][ - Long on AAPL so biased
nMac Pro 6 Core, MacBookPro i7, MacBookPro i5, iPhones 5 and 5s, iPad Air, 2013 Mac mini, SE30, IIFx, Towers; G4 & G3.
Reply
Been using Apple since Apple ][ - Long on AAPL so biased
nMac Pro 6 Core, MacBookPro i7, MacBookPro i5, iPhones 5 and 5s, iPad Air, 2013 Mac mini, SE30, IIFx, Towers; G4 & G3.
Reply
post #25 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bilbo63 View Post
 

Oh, I definitely think that Apple is going to enter the wearable space, I simply have my doubts that it'll resemble any of the smart watches out there at the moment. Whatever Apple does do, you can bet that it won't be plastered with a million features that we don't need that make the thing difficult to use or drain the battery. Apple knows that it is not a race to see who can pack the most crap into a watch. Apple will choose a small specific set of carefully chosen features and do those to best of their ability.

 

Well of course.

post #26 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maestro64 View Post

Typical of Intel getting into markets which they do not understand, it will be dead in under 2 yrs. Intel enters markets like this in order to sell more processors in the mean time they end up screwing it up and selling what left for a loss.

I can't even count the number of times they've done some dumb thing like this before. Post-Andy Grove Intel has been a floundering disaster. Wasted energy, confused direction, misbegotten business acquisitions. Ugh! It's heartbreaking.

Proud AAPL stock owner.

 

GOA

Reply

Proud AAPL stock owner.

 

GOA

Reply
post #27 of 27

Seems like it's less about Intel and more about Mike Bell and his trusty band of roving lapdogs pitching their special blend of herbs and nonsense to yet another gullible megacorporation. He'll get his devoted team of sycophants mountains of signing and retention bonus money in exchange for something that almost looks like real work if you don't actually know what that is and then they'll follow him on to the next gig when this stillborn wearables project comes crashing down the way everything else the man has touched since he was tangentially involved in the iPod release has.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: General Discussion
AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Intel buys smartwatch maker Basis for reported $100M to $150M