or Connect
AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Apple's 'attack detection mode' would protect iPhone owners in emergency situations
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Apple's 'attack detection mode' would protect iPhone owners in emergency situations

post #1 of 38
Thread Starter 
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Thursday published an Apple patent filing describing a unique mobile device feature that can automatically request assistance if it is determined that a user is in distress.

Touch ID


Apple's patent application for "Mobile emergency attack and failsafe detection" covers a software and hardware implementation for an emergency services request system using the one thing almost everyone carries on a day-to-day basis: a smartphone.

The filing describes a system that uses a mobile device's onboard sensors to detect a probable emergency situation, such as a physical attack against the user. The system can then automatically request help via cellphone call or other mode of communication.

As Apple notes, users may encounter problems or emergency situations while traveling from one place to another. The invention is meant to help assist the user in the case of automobile accidents, muggings and debilitating medical issues, among other scenarios.

First, the system generates an emergency call list from a user's address book or crowd-sourced database (like local 911 numbers). Alternatively, users may set contact numbers manually. The device can also use its GPS functionality to constantly update the database, and in the case of an emergency, will message the nearest contact on the list.

In one embodiment, the system revolves around a user-enabled "attack detection mode" that, when activated, monitors for certain events. A number of optional sub-modes can be selected to meet a multitude of operating environments.

Alarm
Source: USPTO


Most modes monitor user interaction. Examples would be a finger breaking contact with the device screen or not moving for a given period of time. In other cases, the system utilizes onboard sensors like an accelerometer or microphone. For example, the device monitors for sudden movements or loud noises surpassing a certain threshold.

In yet another example, a user can depress a physical button like volume up/down, which then acts as a "dead man switch." If the button is released, the system will determine something has gone wrong.

When the system senses a possible attack, it enters a warning mode that counts down to an audible alarm, emergency call or similar response. To exit the warning mode, the user must interact with the device, perhaps placing their finger back on the screen or dead man switch. Alternatively, a disarm code can be entered to turn return back to attack monitoring.

Alarm


If the device reaches "attack detection response mode," the system will play an audible tone, overriding "silent" or "vibrate" settings if needed. A silent alarm may also be activated, which calls a relative or predefined emergency services phone number. In the latter case, GPS coordinates can be supplied along with an alert message.

Users may also initiate the response mode manually by shaking the device or performing some other predefined gesture. The alarm or response alert can be disabled via an on-screen keypad.

In another embodiment, the device can monitor for an auto accident by using GPS and an accelerometer to determine speed, quick stops or crashes, among other events. When a device is moving faster than a baseline speed, the system is armed. If the device comes to a sudden stop, it may be determined that an accident has taken place.

Alarm


To prevent false alarms, the same warning window implemented in the attack detection embodiment is employed. Therefore, if a user accidentally drops their phone, which would possibly signal a crash, they would be able to disable a subsequent alert by entering a disarm code.

The emergency response procedure is also similar to the attack detection mode in that an alarm sounds and calls to appropriate parties are made. In this case, however, two-way communication can be automatically enabled, with speaker volume turned up to its highest setting in case a driver is trapped away from their phone.

In a final embodiment called "Failsafe emergency detection," the device can be placed in a monitoring mode that requires user interaction within predefined time intervals. For example, when this mode is engaged, a user may need to touch the screen or press a button every half hour.

The failsafe mode is useful to those who may suffer an unexpected emergency due to a medical condition.

It is unclear if Apple will deploy the proposed system in a future version of iOS, though with iPhone theft being a major issue in some areas, such a feature may be worth implementing.

Apple's emergency detection and response patent application was first filed for in 2012 and credits Robert D. Butler as its inventor.
post #2 of 38

Help.  I've fallen....   and I can't get up!

post #3 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Thursday published an Apple patent filing describing a unique mobile device feature that can automatically request assistance if it is determined that a user is in distress...

The failsafe mode is useful to those who may suffer from an unexpected emergency due to a medical condition.

 

About 18 months ago, my iPhone, which had been on a steady though accelerating trajectory, suddenly moved through a vertical arc of about 270°, coming to a sudden halt. I guess that it could then have called emergency to request an ambulance, which in the end is what I required having been brought down at 50 km/hr by a 4x4 while cycling lol. The iPhone continued to register my trip to the ER, using https://itunes.apple.com/au/app/cyclemeter-gps-cycling-running/id330595774?mt=8.


Edited by IQatEdo - 3/6/14 at 4:13am
Where are we on the curve? We'll know once it goes asymptotic!
Reply
Where are we on the curve? We'll know once it goes asymptotic!
Reply
post #4 of 38
"Threat detected! Entering iTaser mode, press device against assailant and hold down home button."
post #5 of 38
Something like this, even if patented, should be given away to all comers when/if implemented.

Just as Mercedes-Benz did with the airbag. I had in mind anti-lock brakes: http://bit.ly/P46r4q
Edited by anantksundaram - 3/6/14 at 5:31am
post #6 of 38
That's not the kind of thing I'd patent. If it can help someone it should be accessible to as many people as possible.
post #7 of 38

Utterly stupid and completely impossible to implement correctly.

 

This is how they slip in invasive technology..through the guise of safety. And it is so amazing the way idiotics just lap it up. Detect loud noises? Yeah you know what that means? Finding an excuse to listen through your microphone all the time, which they want, and have now thought of an excuse for you to opt it to it! Google would love that. So would the NSA.

 

There is absolutely no way this stupid gimmick could ever work as there is literally NO way the iPhone can ever know that there is a real emergency happening, or you're just vacuuming or working out. Complete idiocy that needs to be called out for what it is: a scam.

post #8 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClemyNX View Post

That's not the kind of thing I'd patent. If it can help someone it should be accessible to as many people as possible.

Even of that's your intention, if you don't patent it someone else could, and they might not have those intentions. You can patent something and still be altruistic.

Not saying that's Apple's intent.

Regarding the idea, it seems more useful in situations where the "threat" is from health problems or the environment (like the guy cleaning his furnace who got stuck and couldn't reach his phone and had to cut off his arm after several days), as opposed to, say, a mugging.

I'd be concerned about an audible alarm spooking a mugger. A panicked thief can be dangerous. Id rather my phone stolen than my life.
post #9 of 38

Sounds very interesting and has potential but would require an inordinate amount of time and resources to implement in manner that would be viable or acceptable. 

"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." Douglas Adams

Reply

"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." Douglas Adams

Reply
post #10 of 38

"Search karate!"

post #11 of 38
How about first we make the iPhone impossible to turn off with using a PIN/TouchID, otherwise the part about theft is pointless.

"The real haunted empire?  It's the New York Times." ~SockRolid

"There is no rule that says the best phones must have the largest screen." ~RoundaboutNow

Reply

"The real haunted empire?  It's the New York Times." ~SockRolid

"There is no rule that says the best phones must have the largest screen." ~RoundaboutNow

Reply
post #12 of 38

Yet Siri refuses to call 911 even when asked.

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply
post #13 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by mstone View Post

Yet Siri refuses to call 911 even when asked.

Are you sure?

I just asked Siri "Call 9 1 1" and this is the response I got back…





I canceled before it actually attempted to dial but I assume the 5 second delay they put in the system is to prevent unintended dials.
Edited by SolipsismX - 3/6/14 at 8:24am

"The real haunted empire?  It's the New York Times." ~SockRolid

"There is no rule that says the best phones must have the largest screen." ~RoundaboutNow

Reply

"The real haunted empire?  It's the New York Times." ~SockRolid

"There is no rule that says the best phones must have the largest screen." ~RoundaboutNow

Reply
post #14 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by SolipsismX View Post
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mstone View Post

Yet Siri refuses to call 911 even when asked.

Are you sure?

I just asked Siri "Call 9 1 1" and this is the response I got back…

I canceled before it actually attempted to dial but I assume the 5 second delay they put in the system is to prevent unintended dials.

Good to know. Must be new to iOS 7. 

 

I tried it in iOS 6 awhile ago as did several other people who made posts regarding the issue. I think the issue was first brought to light by a blind person who only knew how to call numbers using Siri and was unable to call 911 in an emergency due to the restriction. At the time I tried to get Siri to call 911 and she said she could not do it. I then tried to set up 911 as a contact named 'Emergency' but same result. I'm glad they fixed that because it was stupid to not allow Siri to call 911. In the previous versions of iOS perhaps some Apple lawyers decided there might be some liability for false 911 calls.

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply
post #15 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by pmz View Post
 

Utterly stupid and completely impossible to implement correctly.

 

This is how they slip in invasive technology..through the guise of safety. And it is so amazing the way idiotics just lap it up. Detect loud noises? Yeah you know what that means? Finding an excuse to listen through your microphone all the time, which they want, and have now thought of an excuse for you to opt it to it! Google would love that. So would the NSA.

 

There is absolutely no way this stupid gimmick could ever work as there is literally NO way the iPhone can ever know that there is a real emergency happening, or you're just vacuuming or working out. Complete idiocy that needs to be called out for what it is: a scam.

I think the "dead man switch" is a pretty good idea, actually. I can imagine someone walking home late at night in a scary neighborhood, and keeping their finger on the button, knowing that if anything bad happened, all they would have to do is let go for it to alert the authorities. You'd probably want a 5-second delay or something, just in case somebody's hand slips, but I don't think this part of the idea is that unreasonable.

post #16 of 38
post #17 of 38
As a skier who keeps my iPhone (sealed) on my person while I ski, I can only imagine how it would register when I lose it and have a "yard sale" on the slopes. When I'm trying to dig myself (and my skis) out of the snow, the last thing I need on top of that is to have my iPhone loudly alarming in my pocket. Do not want.
post #18 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by anantksundaram View Post

Something like this, even if patented, should be given away to all comers when/if implemented.

Just as Mercedes-Benz did with the airbag. I had in mind anti-lock brakes: http://bit.ly/P46r4q

 

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by ClemyNX View Post

That's not the kind of thing I'd patent. If it can help someone it should be accessible to as many people as possible.

actually, to make sure that everyone has access to it, you probably want to patent it to make sure no one else with evil intent does.

 

'CopyLeft'ing (at least the software) is even better... driving the market to submit all improvements back into the source 'right' so everyone can benefit from it.

post #19 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by ktappe View Post

As a skier who keeps my iPhone (sealed) on my person while I ski, I can only imagine how it would register when I lose it and have a "yard sale" on the slopes. When I'm trying to dig myself (and my skis) out of the snow, the last thing I need on top of that is to have my iPhone loudly alarming in my pocket. Do not want.

Say that when skiing solo and hitting a tree out of sight (bowl, woods, bad luck, last run of the night, etc)

Or learn to ski better.

Or, OMG, turn it off when you don't want it.
post #20 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by pmz View Post
 

Utterly stupid and completely impossible to implement correctly.

 

This is how they slip in invasive technology..through the guise of safety. And it is so amazing the way idiotics just lap it up. Detect loud noises? Yeah you know what that means? Finding an excuse to listen through your microphone all the time, which they want, and have now thought of an excuse for you to opt it to it! Google would love that. So would the NSA.

 

There is absolutely no way this stupid gimmick could ever work as there is literally NO way the iPhone can ever know that there is a real emergency happening, or you're just vacuuming or working out. Complete idiocy that needs to be called out for what it is: a scam.

your tinfoil is a bit tight on the noggin today;-)

 

and is 'idiotics' sort of sci-fi speak? Parallel  to 'low functioning bipedal biologics?'

post #21 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pendergast View Post

I'd be concerned about an audible alarm spooking a mugger. A panicked thief can be dangerous. Id rather my phone stolen than my life.

agreed...  

 

Better to just have a silent alarm mode that

= locks the phone till password/touchid (even blocks turning it off as solisipsm noted[or fakes turning it off would be even better then only those people who are smart enough to put it into a soundproof faraday cage have a chance]),  

= turns up the gains on WIFI(in promiscuous 'join any wifi that can connect me to apple.com' mode) and 4G radios

= sets  max mic input gain,

= sends out a 'I'm Lost or Stolen' to a master FindmyStoleniPhone.apple.com site that Apple monitors and sends out GPS tracking and audio for LEA analysis...

= sets the phone to 'fast wipe upon when battery draws down under 2%'

post #22 of 38

I would envision this leveraging SIRI and Touch ID (passcode)

 

I think that the system could monitor the Microphone, instead of just for "loud noises", but for "HELP!" or "HELP ME!"  that have enough "volume", or perhaps only listen after the phone detects some of the aforementioned "trigger events"

 

it could then buzz, and have Siri ask "Do you need help?,  if not please enter your pass-code/touchID" if the user says "yes" or "help" then the system immediately calls 911, etc.. otherwise it has a timeout say 30-60 seconds or whatever.

 

in the case of rapid deceleration (car crash) the system could bypass the listening for "help" and go straight to "Do you need help?" with the standard timeout.

 

just some ideas

post #23 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by Retrogusto View Post
 

I think the "dead man switch" is a pretty good idea, actually. I can imagine someone walking home late at night in a scary neighborhood, and keeping their finger on the button, knowing that if anything bad happened, all they would have to do is let go for it to alert the authorities. You'd probably want a 5-second delay or something, just in case somebody's hand slips, but I don't think this part of the idea is that unreasonable.

Sounds totally absurd to me. Better idea: Don't walk through bad neighborhoods.

 

I can see it now: "Oh its ok my iPhone will protect me. Oops, I'm dead. Well at least the cops will be here soon."

post #24 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by pmz View Post

Sounds totally absurd to me. Better idea: Don't walk through bad neighborhoods.

I can see it now: "Oh its ok my iPhone will protect me. Oops, I'm dead. Well at least the cops will be here soon."

1) Not everyone can avoid having to walk through bad neighborhoods because many live in bad neighborhoods.

2) I don't see this as being something Apple should include.

3) It does give me an idea for a Dead Man's Switch app. You set it up with email, iMessage, phone calls, to send out a canned message if engaged, and can also have it start recording via the mic, taking snapshots from both cameras, and recording GPS location, which it then sends to someone every 5(?) seconds after the switch has been activated.

"The real haunted empire?  It's the New York Times." ~SockRolid

"There is no rule that says the best phones must have the largest screen." ~RoundaboutNow

Reply

"The real haunted empire?  It's the New York Times." ~SockRolid

"There is no rule that says the best phones must have the largest screen." ~RoundaboutNow

Reply
post #25 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by pmz View Post
 

Sounds totally absurd to me. Better idea: Don't walk through bad neighborhoods.

 

I can see it now: "Oh its ok my iPhone will protect me. Oops, I'm dead. Well at least the cops will be here soon."

Maybe the "bad neighborhood" thing was a bad example on my part. I live in one of the nicest neighborhoods of New York City, but the only two people I know who were mugged in New York in the last decade or so had their iPhones stolen at gunpoint within a few blocks of my house (and the house of Senator Schumer, and the house of Mayor de Blasio...). Almost definitely the same guy, and within a few weeks of each other. It's pretty rare to get shot here by someone you don't know. We don't have "stand your ground" laws or a lot of trigger-happy paranoid people.

 

I don't know if people would actually use it, but if my friends had been using something like this, it could have helped the police chase the dude as he rolled down the hill on his Razor scooter (both times).

post #26 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by pmz View Post
 
Sounds totally absurd to me. Better idea: Don't walk through bad neighborhoods.

It doesn't necessarily have to be a 'bad' neighborhood. What a man might consider a dangerous situation and what a woman might think are often completely different. Say a woman is arriving at a metropolitan airport at night and has to walk through the parking garage alone with her laptop, luggage, etc. to find her car. Prime target for a opportunist mugger and totally frightening situation for most women. Anyplace downtown in a urban area at night could be considered dangerous. Like getting out of a theater, or  restaurant and walking city streets. Some people have to take mass transit. Not always the safest place but sometimes unavoidable.

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply
post #27 of 38

"Apple should pull the plug on the iPhone."

John C. Dvorak, 2007
Reply

"Apple should pull the plug on the iPhone."

John C. Dvorak, 2007
Reply
post #28 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by ktappe View Post

As a skier who keeps my iPhone (sealed) on my person while I ski, I can only imagine how it would register when I lose it and have a "yard sale" on the slopes. When I'm trying to dig myself (and my skis) out of the snow, the last thing I need on top of that is to have my iPhone loudly alarming in my pocket. Do not want.

Of course, Apple would make it impossible to disable, for extra convenience.

/s
Post from mstone to Benjamin Frost - "Perhaps that explains your lack of mental capacity. If I was your brother, I probably would have repeatedly smashed the side of your head with a cricket bat."
Reply
Post from mstone to Benjamin Frost - "Perhaps that explains your lack of mental capacity. If I was your brother, I probably would have repeatedly smashed the side of your head with a cricket bat."
Reply
post #29 of 38
Using bio sensors from, say, a hypothetical iWatch could add further accuracy to distress situations. Of course, even with sound, motion, and bio sensors, the system could be falsely triggered under certain situations (say, riding a roller coaster) or getting scared at a Halloween spook house.

"Apple should pull the plug on the iPhone."

John C. Dvorak, 2007
Reply

"Apple should pull the plug on the iPhone."

John C. Dvorak, 2007
Reply
post #30 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by pmz View Post

Utterly stupid and completely impossible to implement correctly.

This is how they slip in invasive technology..through the guise of safety. And it is so amazing the way idiotics just lap it up. Detect loud noises? Yeah you know what that means? Finding an excuse to listen through your microphone all the time, which they want, and have now thought of an excuse for you to opt it to it! Google would love that. So would the NSA.

There is absolutely no way this stupid gimmick could ever work as there is literally NO way the iPhone can ever know that there is a real emergency happening, or you're just vacuuming or working out. Complete idiocy that needs to be called out for what it is: a scam.
There are correct ways for rapid motion 70+ miles an hour or for medical with digital monitors, obviously microphone access limited to option even then activated after another sensor is triggered, now most ways aren't useful still.
post #31 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by pmz View Post

Utterly stupid and completely impossible to implement correctly.

This is how they slip in invasive technology..through the guise of safety. And it is so amazing the way idiotics just lap it up. Detect loud noises? Yeah you know what that means? Finding an excuse to listen through your microphone all the time, which they want, and have now thought of an excuse for you to opt it to it! Google would love that. So would the NSA.

There is absolutely no way this stupid gimmick could ever work as there is literally NO way the iPhone can ever know that there is a real emergency happening, or you're just vacuuming or working out. Complete idiocy that needs to be called out for what it is: a scam.
Be quiet, they don't work with the NSA. It'd be a cool feature!

Quote:
Originally Posted by mstone View Post

Yet Siri refuses to call 911 even when asked.
She calls it.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benjamin Frost View Post

Of course, Apple would make it impossible to disable, for extra convenience.

/s
No they wouldn't. You'd be able to disable it. Stop downgrading Apple! They try to help and everyone criticizes! Stop it! They're a good force for the world, and all everyone does is go against them. Why not go against the real cheaters, Samsung?
post #32 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by iNosey View Post

Be quiet, they don't work with the NSA. It'd be a cool feature!
She calls it.....
No they wouldn't. You'd be able to disable it. Stop downgrading Apple! They try to help and everyone criticizes! Stop it! They're a good force for the world, and all everyone does is go against them. Why not go against the real cheaters, Samsung?

/s=sarcasm
Post from mstone to Benjamin Frost - "Perhaps that explains your lack of mental capacity. If I was your brother, I probably would have repeatedly smashed the side of your head with a cricket bat."
Reply
Post from mstone to Benjamin Frost - "Perhaps that explains your lack of mental capacity. If I was your brother, I probably would have repeatedly smashed the side of your head with a cricket bat."
Reply
post #33 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by SolipsismX View Post

How about first we make the iPhone impossible to turn off with using a PIN/TouchID, otherwise the part about theft is pointless.

 

Even if Apple implemented something to fix that, what happens when the battery is spent?

post #34 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by BestKeptSecret View Post

Even if Apple implemented something to fix that, what happens when the battery is spent?

That doesn't matter, because you would need a fingerprint/pass code to turn it on anyway. It's the turning off that's the weak link at the moment.

One of the problems is the hard reset. That could be considered an important function. And where I feel an iWatch could come into its own. If the iDevice moves away from the iWatch, the iDevice could automatically lock itself, take regular photos, email them to owner plus police station, take video, give regular location updates, disable all buttons thereby disabling hard resets and emit an alarm; in short, make life difficult for the thief. And the iWatch would control these functions.
Post from mstone to Benjamin Frost - "Perhaps that explains your lack of mental capacity. If I was your brother, I probably would have repeatedly smashed the side of your head with a cricket bat."
Reply
Post from mstone to Benjamin Frost - "Perhaps that explains your lack of mental capacity. If I was your brother, I probably would have repeatedly smashed the side of your head with a cricket bat."
Reply
post #35 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benjamin Frost View Post

That doesn't matter, because you would need a fingerprint/pass code to turn it on anyway. It's the turning off that's the weak link at the moment.

At least after 5 bad attempts with Touch ID it then requires the passcode before TouchID is reenabled. I assume, perhaps falsely, that this also dibbles TouchID after 5 false passcode attempts. (I'll try it later)
Quote:
One of the problems is the hard reset.

I think Apple could solve this with a specialized HW chip. Basically it would make all HW hard resets not turn it off but turn it off and on, like you can do with a restart in SW, but this would be the default HW setting of the device whenever the main device loses power, and not unlike how it works when your battery dies and it goes into the deep sleep just to auto wake after it's been charging for awhile.

This is fool proof as a thief could stick it in a container that blocks wireless signals but it would be another step in the right direction for me.

"The real haunted empire?  It's the New York Times." ~SockRolid

"There is no rule that says the best phones must have the largest screen." ~RoundaboutNow

Reply

"The real haunted empire?  It's the New York Times." ~SockRolid

"There is no rule that says the best phones must have the largest screen." ~RoundaboutNow

Reply
post #36 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by SolipsismX View Post


At least after 5 bad attempts with Touch ID it then requires the passcode before TouchID is reenabled. I assume, perhaps falsely, that this also dibbles TouchID after 5 false passcode attempts. (I'll try it later)
 

What's the rationale for this policy? Is there such thing as brute-forcing a fingerprint reader?

post #37 of 38
Hello, Mikey!

Take a look at the patent filed to USPTO on the same domain (problem/solution) and dated to AUG/2011: METHOD FOR USING SMARTPHONES AS PUBLIC AND PERSONAL SECURITY DEVICES BASED ON TRUSTED SOCIAL NETWORKS (available at www.agentto.com/dev/patent1)
post #38 of 38
"Utterly stupid and completely impossible to implement correctly."

I guess you didn't read the article. What's so impossible about a dead man's switch with a delay/reset? Drop dead easy.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: General Discussion
AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Apple's 'attack detection mode' would protect iPhone owners in emergency situations