Of course I know what was written and what it means, you said that there were mental defectives within the EU (I don't deny that, the UK put some of them there) in direct relation to a decision on anti-competitive evaluation. Since the decision went Apple's favour, and I don't think for a second you'd consider that mentally defective, the implication has to be that the very existence of an evaluation means that there are mental defectives. Which is what I responded with. To which, as per normal, you retort with nothing of any substance, just jibes about your critics' reading ability - even though we saw direct evidence in another thread that it's you who don't read posts carefully.
Obviously you're just mouthing off as normal, so I shouldn't bother responding at all, but I do so hate to see your pompous ridiculousness go unchallenged.