AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Laptop, VPC5, PC Anywhere?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Laptop, VPC5, PC Anywhere?

post #1 of 8
Thread Starter 
Recently did some work for the family business. I set up a network and installed a bunch of industry specific software. Basically, the family wants me to be a remote sys admin. I will be moving around for a while so they offered to buy a laptop and pay for a cell phone to accomplish this. Probably won't need to use it much but they seem pretty keen on me dealing with the problems. I think they got burned by past software companies and so-called computer technicians.

Here is the hard part. As usual all the special software they use is PC/Windows only. I wanted to be able to dial in using PC anywhere and remotely administer any problems. I know I probably need a PC laptop to make this work but I a Mac/aspiring Unix guy who would much prefer a free Mac laptop.

Would one of the Ti books running VPC5 with W2K and PC anywhere be usable in X. I have serious doubts. I have heard that VPC5 on X is dog slow and buggy. Is it possible to set up a partition for 9 and run VPC on nine? It is still pretty fast in 9 right? Any problems with PC anywhere being run in emulation and proper ip connections and what not?
Thanx in advance
post #2 of 8
I am using the latest version of VPC on a 550MHZ TI PB with no problems. I have Win98, Win 2k and Win XP installed. The speed is fine, I was playing pinball on XP just fine. I would recommend that you load up on RAM though. As for PCanywhere, which version you gunna use? I would give PCAnywhere express a try. It has an Active X control that you use in IE. I do wonder what type of bandwidth you will get with a cell phone though. The phones I've seen only give you a 14400 connection. <img src="graemlins/surprised.gif" border="0" alt="[Surprised]" />
post #3 of 8
Thread Starter 
The cell phone is primarily for talk support. The laptop is for situations when the phone fails. When I use the laptop I will be hooking up to a dail up account at the very least. This means I will need to find some sort of roaming ISP or a very detailed map of all the internet cafes in th US. (The whole situation is starting to sound bad!)

Anyway, are you running VPC under X or 9? Also, I am a complete newbie with PC anywhere, could you elaborate on the express package and Active X control feature?
Thanx in advance
post #4 of 8
I run VPC5 on a 466 G3 iBook OSX ... noticably slow, but bearable if you're not constantly booting apps ... i just use one or two and leave them running. (and thier not real graphics intense)

I don't really know about PC anywhere, but I can't imagine it would be a problem ... VPC now just uses whatever connection you initiate in the mac environment.

As for the ISP ... I am an airline pilot ... i travel all over the US, and Earthlink has a local dial-up number EVERYWHERE I've been.
From out there on the moon, international politics look so petty. You want to grab a politician by the scruff of the neck and drag him a quarter of a million miles out and say, "Look at that!" -...
Reply
From out there on the moon, international politics look so petty. You want to grab a politician by the scruff of the neck and drag him a quarter of a million miles out and say, "Look at that!" -...
Reply
post #5 of 8
I have the same exact situation.

Instead of VPC, I use Timbuktu Pro. Got two licenses - one for Mac version and one for PC version.

Works great and costs less than VPC + PC Anywhere
eye
bee
BEE
Reply
eye
bee
BEE
Reply
post #6 of 8
You might consider an old piece of trash like win 95 or 98. These old versions will run much faster and use less ram than win XP or similar.

I used win 95 on a powerbook 233mhz and it ran faster than my Dad's 133mhz P.O.S. PC
No, the bazaar cannot satisfy users. Neither can the cathedral. Nothing can satisfy users, because software is written to enable rather than satisfy, and because most users are mewling malcontents...

Reply
No, the bazaar cannot satisfy users. Neither can the cathedral. Nothing can satisfy users, because software is written to enable rather than satisfy, and because most users are mewling malcontents...

Reply
post #7 of 8
[quote]Originally posted by stimuli:
<strong>You might consider an old piece of trash like win 95 or 98. These old versions will run much faster and use less ram than win XP or similar.

I used win 95 on a powerbook 233mhz and it ran faster than my Dad's 133mhz P.O.S. PC</strong><hr></blockquote>

Actually WIn 2000 is supposed to run quite well in VPC (so I've heard, I think Connectix did optimization for it or something). Additionally the latest VPC 5 update apparently significantly speeds up VPC 5 for OS X (apparently it's now close to OS 9 VPC speeds).
post #8 of 8
Both Win2k and XP run pretty fast for me on OSX. Win98 really sucks though.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: General Discussion
AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Laptop, VPC5, PC Anywhere?