Quote:
Originally posted by Aphelion
If Apple wanted SGI's assets they would have made their move a year or so ago, when SGI stock was selling for $.50 a share.
If Apple wanted SGI's assets they would have made their move a year or so ago, when SGI stock was selling for $.50 a share.
It's not just about share price and market capitalization. SGI was bleeding money, it had yet to clean up its strategy, that is release Linux/Itanium servers and to cull non strategic business units (like Cray).
Also Apple wasn't in a position to aquire SGI.
The transition to Mac OS X was still incomplete, Apple's PowerPC processors lagging behind Intel's and Apple was in the red.
This is not to mention the gloomy economic climate.
Now things are looking up, both companies are in the red and...
Also it wasn't clear on what processor architecture SGI would support Mac OS X:
1. Itanium? Too hot, too expensive. And not compatible with Mac OS X software.
2. MIPS? legacy, dated and still not compatible with Mac OS X apps.
3. PowerPC G4? Too slow. And little to differentiate between Apple PowerMacs.
With the arrival of the 64-bit PPC970 and the 64-bit Mac OS X and HyperTransport, Apple and SGI now have a platform on which to produce high performance 4-8 or 8-16 way workstations.
So now would be a good time

"We must never forget"
- from the Holocaust Memorial, Miami Beach
- from the Holocaust Memorial, Miami Beach
"We must never forget"
- from the Holocaust Memorial, Miami Beach
- from the Holocaust Memorial, Miami Beach








Margaret Thatcher! Margaret Thatcher in her knickers! Margaret Thatcher playing baseball in her knickers! Aaaahhhhhh..... !



