Originally posted by giant
IAEA reports. You fail.
At least your aren't afraid to look stupid. Here we have a big example, since there is actually more evidence that they are not bio weapons trailers than that they are. But you haven't really looked into the particulars, have you?
The conlcusion was that they could not have been for any other purpose than for bioweapons production. They did not find any actual chemicals.
Here's a thought...how about if they are proven right...how about if it comes out that Rumsfeld, Cheney and Bush lied to start a war for their own profit and the profit of their friends. How bad would things be for them then?
Lied for their own profit? Please. Let me ask you a question then: What was Blair's motivation? The war was hugely unpopular. Why would he have done it? But if that was proven, It would be bad. But, it won't be. It's an adsurd notion.
But we already know that Bush did lie, and the most blatant of them was the fabricated IAEA reports. You fail.
Bush fabricated reports? Whatever. He made a few speeches a year or so ago and verbally referenced some things. Suddenly this becomes "fabricating reports"? Please
The bioweapons trailers were NOT for bioweaposn . . . that has been shown repeatedly . . .hese kinds of portable labs are common for testing agricu;ture and factory work . . .
more . .
That is 100% wrong. 100%.
Please, not unless they plant them. The idea that Bush being there means they will find them now when the experts couldn't is pretty far fetched.
Not unless they plant them? Really! Experts!?!?!
You mean Hans "I'm the 23rd choice for this job" Blix who was working with Iraqi minders 100% of the time after five years of no inspectors being present in Iraq? Are those the experts you mean???
Jusdt a side note:
Anybody notice this cyclical pattern:
Republicans take office and set up witch hunts to find out Dems lie about stuff . . . they find lies about romance.
Repubs take office and the Dems don't even need to try: the Criminal large scale global lying reveals itself:
Nixon and Watergate
Reagan and Bush Sr with Guns to Evil Axis member Iran for money for Contras and hostages
Bush Jr: lying to push an agenda, Pax Americana, and/or to get contracts and oil for his buddies . .
A BJ or global scale lies? . . . which is really more important?
personal life (which should have remained personal,) or sending our young men into combat and reversing our notion of pre-emption and INVADING a soveriegn nation?
Stop! My sides are splitting! Yes, pfflam, it all boils down to that: Republicans lie about global scandal and democrats lie about BJ. Congratulations, Sherlock. [pfflam filter engaged]
As a side note I just thought of something. When Clinton bombed Iraq he gave them a bloody nose to get them to comply. He wasn't out to destroy the government or kill Saddam. He never said Iraq was a direct threat to us. He just wanted them to comply. Bush was out for blood and did claim Iraq was a direct threat. He went there with a license to kill. A totally different situation.
It keeps getting better!!! This is great stuff! Nevermind that Clinton bombed without ANY U.N. approval. Nevermind that he made virutally the EXACT same arguments Bush did. Where were the charges of unilateralism in 1998? Where were they in Kosovo? Hmmm.