see, you obviously don't care about participating in an exchange of ideas and information.
I would if someone would present some ideas or *gasp* some actual freaking information.
those of us in the real world go on living while you continue believing that you can make the world flat just by arguing that it is.
And you still can't argue my points, just how I argue them.
Groverat, you keep saying, "Iraq wasn't anywhere close to disarmed". This I don't understand. How do you know that? You know Bush lies. Now you are saying you believe anything his administration presents as evidence.
Bush? What in blue **** does Bush have to do with Iraq's disarmament?
You know we had this war with this guy named Hussein in 1991, right? A whole 12 years before Bush went to war. Right?
The UN, my friend. Hans freaking Blix the head of UNMOVIC saying Iraq wasn't anywhere close to disarmed. The freaking cluster document outlining dozens of unresolved issues 2 WEEKS before war! click
The world didn't start on Bush's inauguration day, my friend!
Read from Blix's reports to the UN-SC; I'll happily provide them for you. Oh here's part of one from 3/7/03:Mr. President, Iraq, with a highly developed administrative system, should be able to provide more documentary evidence about its proscribed weapons programs. Only a few new such documents have come to light so far and been handed over since we began inspections. It was a disappointment that Iraq's declaration of the 7th of December did not bring new documentary evidence.
But I guess Blix is secretly a war-mongering member of the Bush administration.
We now know that Blix was dead-set against war and he still couldn't make it seem like disarmament was anything but stalled at best.
Not a single goddam thing I present is from the Bush administration, not a single goddam thing.
He had something in 1998, but whatever it was was destroyed.
What did he have?
What's more likely?
A proud Saddam had actually destroyed all the weapons secretly to hide his lies.
Tons of weapons "mysteriously" disappeared or are yet to be found. Meanwhile 100% of the Bush intelligence regarding Iraq having WMD at the time of invasion would turn up completely fruitless.
What the hell does it matter?
Sorry, but "I'm prideful" doesn't mean a damned thing.
Please explain how we disarmed him if we haven't found any weapons. Please explain how Saddam chose not to disarm when we haven't found any weapons. Oh. I know. "We'll find them!" The fact is, until we do find them, statements like the one here are lies.
No need to find a damned thing WRT disarmament.
It's obvious you don't really know what the hell was going on with the UN process. Why argue things you don't know about?