Was the Dell 1280x1024 or 1600x1200?
It's weird how we have the 1280 res on monitors from 17-20"
Depending on how the things are made a 17" widescreen might actually be cheaper to make than a 17" 5:4. I vote for an all widescreen line-up too.
17, 19, 22, and 23. No 15, but only if the 17" widescreen comes in at nearly the same price. No more than 699. A 19" would have to be widescreen to match the rest of the line-up, but it would also need to have a price in line with other 19" screens, not too much more.
" target="_blank">This Formac
</a> looks to be the best deal going as far as large displays are concerned, offering more overal pixels, contrast, fewer dead pixels, faster pixel response, and better viewing angle than just about anything on the market. Just a touch smaller than the 22, but only 2/3rds the cost, it looks like a great display for digital artists.
If Apple keeps the 22, what would the resolution of a proposed 19-20 panel be? Assuming that the 15" is dropped and the 17" becomes a 1440x900 unit like the iMac's.