or Connect
AppleInsider › Forums › Mac Hardware › Future Apple Hardware › Let's Debate: The Case FOR and AGAINST
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Let's Debate: The Case FOR and AGAINST

post #1 of 42
Thread Starter 
I know there are alot of G5 threads here. But We haven't had one that encourages folks to post BOTH arguments for and against a MWSF release. Please don't just argue one side or the other:


For:

---Sources on The Register. These seem legit to me. Sorry if you disagree, but I think so. If a hoax, the timing is perfect. This source has been quoted numerous times and each time the claim is consistent.

---We know the G4 needs an upgrade/update. The thing has been around for two years...well two and a half in January. Time to change!

---Steve Jobs has said that the MHZ gap would be closed by the end of the year. January 7th is close enough for me...even it is 1.6GHZ.

--Timetable for release of PPC G5 on geek.com. It shows a Q1 release of the G5. Now, unless this is totally bogus, that is some hard evidence.

---The amount of rumor out there. Some even speculated that it would be released at MWNY 2001.

---The fact that neither Apple or MOT has denied the rumors. These rampant rumors MUST be cutting into G4 sales hugely. It was on CNN for Pete's sake. How could they NOT deny rumors of this magnitude. It would set us up for a massive letdown at MW and cut into current sales as well. Just like Apple said "no new hardware at Seybold"....they probably would have done so this time in my judgement. They could at least say "no G5".

--MOT's own PPC roadmap shows, albeit vaguely that a G5 is, in fact a possibility at this time.

---The sudden length and date change of the keynote. This announcement happened EXACTLY when the rumored first production run of PM G5's was supposed to be taking place.

---Sources here on AI that are virtually certain of its release. These sources/posters haven't messed with us before (i.e applenut, dorsal etc), at least not seriously.

--Dorsal now believes that his superiors may be woring on G5 testers.

--The VueScan thing.

--We know Apple has gotten more involved and it is reasonable to assume Steve has DEMANDEd faster chips.


Against:

---MOT just announced the Apollo. Will they (Apple) really just ship it in the iMac and PB?

---The slow upgrade cycle of chip performance leaves doubt about the possibility or likelihood of a 800MHZ speed increase in 6 months.

---No actual public demo/announcement of the G5, as with the G4.

---Apple just changed the PM case. Will they completely redo it six months later? Will they abandon the G4 six months after the G4+ release?

---Some sites sugesting "no G5". The most notable are ATAT and ThinkSecret. ATAT has a tremendous track record.

Anybody else care to add? Please, let us stay away from the "it ain't gonna happen, accept it" posts. Let's all make a case for and against.

I think the case FOR is much stronger. I know much of that column is coincidence and rumor. I know that any one of these things is not enough to sway opinion, but take ALL of them? Just too many coincidences here. It has to be coming....

I say G5. G4 Apollo's in iMac and PB.
I can only please one person per day.  Today is not your day.  Tomorrow doesn't look good either.  
Reply
I can only please one person per day.  Today is not your day.  Tomorrow doesn't look good either.  
Reply
post #2 of 42
I am currently against it for two reasons:

1) As the Apple Turns says it's not coming out
2) I want to think nothing great is coming out and be surprised when Macworld arrives.
post #3 of 42
Thread Starter 
[quote]Originally posted by MacAgent:
<strong>I am currently against it for two reasons:

1) As the Apple Turns says it's not coming out
2) I want to think nothing great is coming out and be surprised when Macworld arrives.</strong><hr></blockquote>


But if you had to make a case FOR what would it be?
I can only please one person per day.  Today is not your day.  Tomorrow doesn't look good either.  
Reply
I can only please one person per day.  Today is not your day.  Tomorrow doesn't look good either.  
Reply
post #4 of 42
Oh, right.

1) The Register.
2) There were rumors 8 months ago that it would be out sometime from September 2001 to January 2002.
3) It's been 3(?) years since the G4 was released - time for a change.
post #5 of 42
SDW,

You listed most of the main points on both sides. Here's a couple other things I'm thinking.

I think a case could be strengthened based on another recent ATAT report - that the OSX default would occur at MWSF. If that's true, then I would hope that all of Apple's hardware could run OSX really well and not just adequately. So that would mean G4s in the new iMac, and while I could see the new iMac with the current G4 and PowerMacs with the Apollo G4, Apple might want to retain the processor distinction between the pro and consumer line, and thus bump the PM to the G5.
OTOH, Apollo might be so much better than the current G4 that the distinction would remain even with both chips called G4.

Another case against is the announcement of the revolutionary consumer product. Would Apple want to unveil such a product as well as the G5? Assuming the new iMac is not the revolutionary product, that's three major new products...seems like too much to reasonably expect.
post #6 of 42
They also pushed the keynote up to 2.5 hours, that's a long time. And Steve usually goes past the limit too...hmm...

:cool:
post #7 of 42
[quote]Originally posted by MacAgent:
<strong>I am currently against it for two reasons:

1) As the Apple Turns says it's not coming out
2) I want to think nothing great is coming out and be surprised when Macworld arrives.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Are you not then already thinking that something great is coming? You don't want to think it, or you don't want to admitt to yourself that secretly you're thinking it, but you've clearly had the thought. You hope in spite of yourself, and one does not hope without reason -- even when the reason is a self created rationale. Isn't this a bit like telling one's self to expect the worst 'just in case'? Does that ever make the worst less painful? Why are you even acting like it's going to potentially be painful? It's just computers, whatever happens, you'll live.
IBL!
Reply
IBL!
Reply
post #8 of 42
Note the keynote is only 2 hours.
Stuck in an infinite loop waiting for an Apple PDA...

apple.otaku
Reply
Stuck in an infinite loop waiting for an Apple PDA...

apple.otaku
Reply
post #9 of 42
[quote]Originally posted by MacAgent:
<strong>
3) It's been 3(?) years since the G4 was released - time for a change.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Seybold 1999 they were announced. I ordered mine the next day and it arrived sometime in the Fall (I think around October). So it won't be 3 years until next Fall. I know..it feels like a lot longer!

For:
- everything listed above so far. I actually don't think its coming.

Against:
- I want a new machine so badly. I want to burn DVDs, have gigabit ethernet and have an LCD with a great video card. My G4 450 is very limited in that regard. So I say its not coming because God hates me and will make me wait even longer
Be quiet, Brain, or I'll stab you with a Q-tip
Reply
Be quiet, Brain, or I'll stab you with a Q-tip
Reply
post #10 of 42
For. G5

There is no reason for Apple to design a new case, Quicksilver is the best case in the industry, G5's are reportedly expensive, so Apple saves by using existing case

Moto have announced Apollo, so what? Apollo has been known for at least a year, It also dampens the expectations of the G5, so that we get an even bigger suprise? Apollo=imacs & PBooks (and Pmacs if there is no G5)

Every roadmap, rumour Ive seen over the last year says G5 in Q1 2002. Well that could incluse MWSF if Moto gets their shit together.

Apple says revolutionary product at MWSF, could be imac2 or G5?

Apple says Mhz parity by end of year? Jan7 is only a week late.

Against
-------

Two words. 'Apple, Motorola'
not necessarily in that order.
post #11 of 42
Like I posted in the thread "G5 the truth"

I'm getting confused by al this, Ingram has 80 PM in stock of the low end model, 50 on order, but they won't ship until feb 7th, 2002 .

That's late if you ask me, if the new PM would be anounced at MWSF, they would be available imediatly...in this case it's a month later ?

what could it mean ?
post #12 of 42
oh.. forgot this detail, they cut down the price for resellers for the low end model, my gues to clear the channel and there warehouse .
post #13 of 42
Reliable contributor in another forum dropped these tantalizing nuggets today:


Hi y'all! Nope, I'm not really back, just adding a tidbit for you to chew on. Apple is busy either producing 1G G4's now, or they will be very soon - hopefully to fill the channel before the MacWorld speed bump announcement.

Now, about the iMac. The current crop is being offered to employees (Apple internal EPP sale) at a significantly reduced price - smells like an iMac warehouse clearance to me! And, there is a big hubbub about the new product. Whatever it is, details are being kept just as quiet inside Apple as outside - only a select privileged few are "in the know." I may be able to get some hints over the next week or so - but don't get your hopes up. Rumor is that it's not an iMac, and jokes are circulating that maybe Apple will be the CM (contract mfr) for the X-Box. Ha!
.racecar.
Reply
.racecar.
Reply
post #14 of 42
[quote]There is no reason for Apple to design a new case, Quicksilver is the best case in the industry, G5's are reportedly expensive, so Apple saves by using existing case<hr></blockquote>

just love the confidence you have in Apple's design team.
post #15 of 42
For-

3D market. High End video editing and other markets that need more than a dual 800.

G5 would mean DDR and faster bus and from what I've been reading the memory problem has been hurting Apple for a while. I think the DDR alone will make a nice difference.

It's been almost 3 years with the G4, it's life cycle is over and needs to be rev-ed. The QS case was more of a modify then an overhaul and I've seen a lot of people complain about lack of eject button, so I think a new case is in order.

This is the cross roads, computers are starting to even out, not everyone is in a rush to get the latest computer and the mhz isn't as important as it once was IMO. I think now if comes down to value and compatibilty. XP didn't sell that well and the slow down is still here as for new sales, I think this is the perfect time for Apple to catch up while demad is slow.

Moto is about to tank or get bought out and who knows what will happen then. Can anyone say honestly that Moto will be doing our chips in 6 months?

USB 2, Gigawire, new technologies that won't go into existing G4s because they would be better served going into the next new tower.

The G5 rumors have been out for more than a year, I think that's adequate time to make it reality.

Rumors, rumors, rumors, and conflicting reports leading to more rumors.

MWNY '00. I don't think Apple wants another show like that.

The moved up keynote.

The hype behind the keynote.

The ghz barrier will be broken line by Jobs.

My faith


Against-

Moto's incompitence, or flat out inability to get it to market.

Apple wanting to juice the G4.

Time frame, maybe there just hasn't been enough time to get it to market.


Um, the naysayers? Not sure about many more aregurments against?
All Your PCs Are Belong To Trash
Reply
All Your PCs Are Belong To Trash
Reply
post #16 of 42
Thread Starter 
KidRed writes....

[quote]....Moto is about to tank or get bought out and who knows what will happen then. Can anyone say honestly that Moto will be doing our chips in 6 months?... <hr></blockquote>

ummm, no. MOT is losing money like everyone else. No one is going to buy them out. MOT is, overall, an unbelievably successful company. They had been profitable EVERY year for the last like 15 years without fail. These are their first losses in a long, long time. They will come back....though they still piss me off.
I can only please one person per day.  Today is not your day.  Tomorrow doesn't look good either.  
Reply
I can only please one person per day.  Today is not your day.  Tomorrow doesn't look good either.  
Reply
post #17 of 42
Thread Starter 
[quote]Originally posted by iCom:
<strong>Like I posted in the thread "G5 the truth"

I'm getting confused by al this, Ingram has 80 PM in stock of the low end model, 50 on order, but they won't ship until feb 7th, 2002 .

That's late if you ask me, if the new PM would be anounced at MWSF, they would be available imediatly...in this case it's a month later ?

what could it mean ?</strong><hr></blockquote>

This is another G5 "yes" piece of evidence.
I can only please one person per day.  Today is not your day.  Tomorrow doesn't look good either.  
Reply
I can only please one person per day.  Today is not your day.  Tomorrow doesn't look good either.  
Reply
post #18 of 42
Amrose Chapel: Apple might want to retain the processor distinction between the pro and consumer line, and thus bump the PM to the G5.

Remember the Pentium Pro. And then there's Pentium Xeon, and celeron. I'm sure some marketing genius could figure out some new names to help consumers make the distinctin between Apollos and 7450s.
post #19 of 42
The G5 seems like a very likely introduction for MWSF. I think it will be here because of the longer keynote and total Apple secrecy LOCKDOWN.
post #20 of 42
[quote]
For:

---Sources on The Register. These seem legit to me. Sorry if you disagree, but I think so. If a hoax, the timing is perfect. This source has been quoted numerous times and each time the claim is consistent.<hr></blockquote>

yep.

[quote]---We know the G4 needs an upgrade/update. The thing has been around for two years...well two and a half in January. Time to change!<hr></blockquote>

Well it was time to change back when we were at 500 MHz for 18 months. Doesn't have any bearing on what Moto does.


[quote]---Steve Jobs has said that the MHZ gap would be closed by the end of the year. January 7th is close enough for me...even it is 1.6GHZ.<hr></blockquote>

I wondered about this myself. He SAID Apple would close the MHz gap, but the gap hasn't really changed at all! Yeah, the G4s got a speedbump, but wintels just pulled ahead even farther. The gap is growing, not closing.

Jobs must have some reason to have said that, and I don't think he's flat-out lying.

[quote]--Timetable for release of PPC G5 on geek.com. It shows a Q1 release of the G5. Now, unless this is totally bogus, that is some hard evidence.<hr></blockquote>

Yep.

[quote]---The amount of rumor out there. Some even speculated that it would be released at MWNY 2001.<hr></blockquote>

Positive feedback loop...doesn't mean a thing.

[quote]---The fact that neither Apple or MOT has denied the rumors. These rampant rumors MUST be cutting into G4 sales hugely. It was on CNN for Pete's sake. How could they NOT deny rumors of this magnitude. It would set us up for a massive letdown at MW and cut into current sales as well. Just like Apple said "no new hardware at Seybold"....they probably would have done so this time in my judgement. They could at least say "no G5".<hr></blockquote>

Seems like it would be in their interest to deny it. Although Moto came darn close to denying it. I'd say signs point to a Moto denial, but it was a guarded denial, like in "maybe we'll get them ready, but probably not, so we can't deny it".

[quote]--MOT's own PPC roadmap shows, albeit vaguely that a G5 is, in fact a possibility at this time.<hr></blockquote>

That roadmap isn't worth the paper it's printed on. It's not even printed on paper! If it were I'd wipe my ass with it. That's what I think of Motorola.

[quote]---The sudden length and date change of the keynote. This announcement happened EXACTLY when the rumored first production run of PM G5's was supposed to be taking place.<hr></blockquote>

Or maybe it's so that Jobs' keynote competes with Gates' better.

[quote]---Sources here on AI that are virtually certain of its release. These sources/posters haven't messed with us before (i.e applenut, dorsal etc), at least not seriously.<hr></blockquote>

Teenagers whose connections are huffing whippits while masturbating. Whatever.

[quote]--Dorsal now believes that his superiors may be woring on G5 testers.<hr></blockquote>

They're WORING on the G5 testers! OMFG! How rude! I hate when people Wore on me!

[quote]--The VueScan thing.<hr></blockquote>

Some guy with a grudge.

[quote]--We know Apple has gotten more involved and it is reasonable to assume Steve has DEMANDEd faster chips.<hr></blockquote>

Steve always demands faster chips. I'm sure he demanded faster chips when the G4 was stagnating at 500 MHz for 10 years.


Against:

[quote]---MOT just announced the Apollo. Will they (Apple) really just ship it in the iMac and PB?<hr></blockquote>

Maybe. The original iMac shared the G3 with the smurf towers. If the G5 arrives, then a G4 iMac wouldn't even be trampling on the Powermac's territory. In fact, it would look odd to have a G3 iMac, and a G5 powermac. Customer walks in, "iMac's too tiny, Powermacs too much. I want a G4!". "sorry sir, but Apple doesn't make any desktop G4s, they are only for laptops". Yeah right.

[quote]---The slow upgrade cycle of chip performance leaves doubt about the possibility or likelihood of a 800MHZ speed increase in 6 months.<hr></blockquote>

Yeah, but Apple could spread it out, like 867, 1 GHz, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6. Five powermacs. Or they could keep the G4 powermacs, and have G5 powermacs priced even HIGHER. This would be just like the Apple we know and love.

[quote]---No actual public demo/announcement of the G5, as with the G4.<hr></blockquote>

Loose lips sink ships!


[quote]---Apple just changed the PM case. Will they completely redo it six months later? Will they abandon the G4 six months after the G4+ release?<hr></blockquote>

The G4 didn't get a new case! All Apple did was repaint the smurf case...so no, the case is meaningless.

[quote]---Some sites sugesting "no G5". The most notable are ATAT and ThinkSecret. ATAT has a tremendous track record.<hr></blockquote>

C'mon, would you trust a website inspired by a soap opera?
post #21 of 42
Thread Starter 
JD writes:
[quote]That roadmap isn't worth the paper it's printed on. It's not even printed on paper! If it were I'd wipe my ass with it. That's what I think of Motorola. <hr></blockquote>

LOL. Agreed.

[quote] Yeah, but Apple could spread it out, like 867, 1 GHz, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6. Five powermacs. Or they could keep the G4 powermacs, and have G5 powermacs priced even HIGHER. This would be just like the Apple we know and love. <hr></blockquote>

Agreed again. Sad, but true. G5's @ 4999. ugghhh.

[quote] C'mon, would you trust a website inspired by a soap opera? <hr></blockquote>

I don't think I would trust ANY website for the most part. Maybe Apple, that is about it.
I can only please one person per day.  Today is not your day.  Tomorrow doesn't look good either.  
Reply
I can only please one person per day.  Today is not your day.  Tomorrow doesn't look good either.  
Reply
post #22 of 42
C'mon, would you trust a website inspired by a soap opera?

You are part of that soap opera buddy, you posted on Al!
post #23 of 42
This makes so damn much sense:

iMacs: Apollo G4, ~1 GHz

Powermacs: G5, 1, 1.2, 1.4 GHz.

Titanium? Perhaps it gets the Apollo at next revision, but not at MWSF.

iBook? Sahara beckons.

G3 iMacs would be so lame. All they would amount to is a new display, new case, same old motherboard...yawn. Apple will want to differentiate the iMacs from other computers, and the G4 is the way to do it. It's time, to start advertising the G4's capabilities. And didn't Jobs say that in 2002 the iMac would be getting the superdrive? Far as I know the superdrive needs altivec in order to burn at reasonable speeds. So there we have it, a high end, uber-iMac priced to go at $1700 (but it can burn DVDs!)


If the powermacs go G5, then it would really ice the GHz cake if Apple would put a damn 2nd drive bay in the stinkin' case! It's the best case in the world, EXCEPT! EXCEPT1, for having no extra drive bays.

I'm sure that this is because Apple wants to reap profits from Firewire sales. Since Apple gets royalities on Firewire, they purposely screw Powermac buyers by leaving out a second drive bay. Those bastards.
post #24 of 42
iBook? Sahara beckons.

WE WILL SEE A LARGE iBook SPEED BUMP. Education is in their DNA.

Riddle: DNA I SEE + Sahara = *%) Mhz.
post #25 of 42
[quote]Originally posted by SDW2001:
<strong>KidRed writes....



ummm, no. MOT is losing money like everyone else. No one is going to buy them out. MOT is, overall, an unbelievably successful company. They had been profitable EVERY year for the last like 15 years without fail. These are their first losses in a long, long time. They will come back....though they still piss me off.</strong><hr></blockquote>


This is not my opinion, this was a AP news article. (can't find the link) Moto is looking to be bought out. They are looking to drop their semiconductor division to be more appealing to a potential buyer.
All Your PCs Are Belong To Trash
Reply
All Your PCs Are Belong To Trash
Reply
post #26 of 42
F*ck Motorola. They've put Apple in the sh*tter.

I wish I could throw plastic beer bottles at them!
~Winner of the Official 2003 AppleInsider NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament Pool~
Reply
~Winner of the Official 2003 AppleInsider NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament Pool~
Reply
post #27 of 42
A bit off the topic but does anybody have access to Audiogalaxy.com? I need the Rudy Theme song for an iMovie and i cant get it!!!!!
post #28 of 42
Thread Starter 
[quote]Originally posted by KidRed:
<strong>


This is not my opinion, this was a AP news article. (can't find the link) Moto is looking to be bought out. They are looking to drop their semiconductor division to be more appealing to a potential buyer.</strong><hr></blockquote>

They may sell of semiconductors. MOT itself is not going to be bought out. No way.
I can only please one person per day.  Today is not your day.  Tomorrow doesn't look good either.  
Reply
I can only please one person per day.  Today is not your day.  Tomorrow doesn't look good either.  
Reply
post #29 of 42
I could see Apple/IBM working it out so that IBM can take whatever assets they need from MOT's semiconductor business and in turn become Apple's primary source for processors. There's no reason for Apple to take on the full cost of going in-house with development when IBM is, frankly, wonderful at it (for a PC company, I really like IBM). Without MOT to strongarm them onto the back burner, I think they could really make these chips take off - and that is the answer, not selling out to AMD or something like that.

-S
post #30 of 42
"I could see Apple/IBM working it out so that IBM can take whatever assets they need from MOT's semiconductor business and in turn become Apple's primary source for processors. "

Makes sense to me, why hasn't it happened? and happened a long time ago. There must be some reason. Maybe we don't know everything that goes on behind closed doors.
just waiting to be included in one of Apple's target markets.
Don't get me wrong, I like the flat panel iMac, actually own an iMac, and I like the Mac mini, but...........
Reply
just waiting to be included in one of Apple's target markets.
Don't get me wrong, I like the flat panel iMac, actually own an iMac, and I like the Mac mini, but...........
Reply
post #31 of 42
[quote]Teenagers whose connections are huffing whippits while masturbating. Whatever.<hr></blockquote>

you should talk

If you don't want to believe me... don't. why should I care but don't try insulting me. I never just come out and say I know someone who knows something. In fact the last time I did was back in 2000 with Mac OS X and everything I said was correct except for FCP being compatible in Classic. I wouldn't say something if I didn't trust in it. believe me, the last thing I need is to be embarrased like I was with the "Mercury Rising" thing
post #32 of 42
Hey people, do you remember that movie that As The Apple Turns says mentions the G5 - it was called "Kate and something" ... well everyone said that how could that come out before Macworld - Jobs would do a Balmer. Well I just heard that that movie was supposed to be released in late Febuary - not now. I wonder if that means anything!
And yes, a PC can be had cheaper but I want a MAC!
Reply
And yes, a PC can be had cheaper but I want a MAC!
Reply
post #33 of 42
The G5 seems like a very likely introduction for MWSF. I think it will be here because of the longer keynote and total Apple secrecy LOCKDOWN.

Outside of these boards (and a few other place Apple enthusiasts confregate), how many people really care about the G5? These are going to be expensive machines, selling to the top portion of Apple's market. I don't know what percentage of Apple's sales go to the Powermac, but I'm skeptical that the introduction of a faster processor would be the cause of all of this hullabaloo. Another poster pointed out that the big consumer elctronics show starts on Tuesday, Jan 8 and I'm really starting to wonder if we're going to see a the introduction of a completely new product. We know that a Taiwanese manafacturer has made some allusion as to getting an Apple contract for new LCD screens, and lot's of people have assumed that this points to an LCD Imac. But do we know the size of these screens? Could these be the screens for the long-rumored succesor to the Newton? If Apple introduces a new PDA like thingie I really doubt that they'd put out the G5 too.

The other issue is the secrecy lockdown. Other's have raised the point that the introduction of new processors requires extensive bug and compatibility testing. Yet Apple is supposedly doing all of the G5 testing in-house, which we assume is to prevent leaks. For Apple to release a processor with a substantially different architecture, they have to be pretty sure of the new product's stability-or risk a public relations nightmare. Now if they had the thing for a good amount of time, I could see it being a possiblity that they've checked the thing out. But considering that the rumor sites have only just reported Motorola getting the bugs out of their manafacturing process, it just doesn't seem likely (and the G5 rumors have only just surfaced in the last few months)enough time has elapsed for a quality testing program to be completed. Could it be that the reason they haven't sent the new boxes out is becasue they weren't done testing in house, and the secrecy we've attributed to trying to keep the lid on the G5 development is really about the new product?

[ 12-21-2001: Message edited by: Ptrash ]</p>
post #34 of 42
If Apple introduces a new PDA like thingie I really doubt that they'd put out the G5 too.

Jesus Christ! Do you really think one products release has anything to do with anothers? Apple releases products when they are finished and when the lifecycle of that product is over so they can replace it with the new one. Regarding new products that are not just updates, Apple can release them anytime they want to after their completion.

apple is not going to talk about ONE product for 2.5 hours, are they?
post #35 of 42
That's a very good list of Pro's. I want to think we'll see the G5, but I'm terrified I'll get my hopes up and they'll be dashed.

I'm particularly worried about the G5 and associated stuff being rushed out. If there are bugs, serious incompatabilities, etc. I see it being a crusher for Apple. The timeline we're seeing doesn't seem to give enough time for testing.

Asfor a MOT buyout, that's real questionable. The whole company CAN'T be bought. It's one of the 10 or 20 biggest companies in the world. Nobody is big enough to buy them, be it GE, MSFT, or Oracle. Intel might be able to swing a merger, but there's no reason to and anti-trust would never allow it. AMD could ally even more, etc.

What MOT is looking to do is sell their chip making business. The fabs are what are costing them, and according to guys like Eskimo they suck at fabbing anyway. However, IBM doesn't want much from them. It already has better fabs. They're the high-end IP people. IBM isn't a PC maker, they're a server, mainframe and services company. Embedded stuff isn't what they want.

This is interesting and tricky, but unfortunately none of my people in Motorola are placed to know anything about this kind of stuff.
post #36 of 42
[quote]Originally posted by KD5MDK:
<strong>
What MOT is looking to do is sell their chip making business. The fabs are what are costing them, and according to guys like Eskimo they suck at fabbing anyway. However, IBM doesn't want much from them. It already has better fabs. They're the high-end IP people. IBM isn't a PC maker, they're a server, mainframe and services company. Embedded stuff isn't what they want.
</strong><hr></blockquote>

I just read they are moving to close another fab now. Now they recently closed MOS 1 and 2 this past summer I believe it was. MOS 8 is already scheduled for shutdown. What does this leave them? MOS 11, 12, and 13. So are they going to shutdown 11 and be left with just 2 fabs for MOS logic such as CPUs? Doesn't sound positive to me. I'd say if Moto isn't the partner announced to be building a 300mm fab with AMD then they are really getting ready to sell their SPS unit.
post #37 of 42
Thread Starter 
[quote]Originally posted by KD5MDK:
<strong>That's a very good list of Pro's. I want to think we'll see the G5, but I'm terrified I'll get my hopes up and they'll be dashed.

I'm particularly worried about the G5 and associated stuff being rushed out. If there are bugs, serious incompatabilities, etc. I see it being a crusher for Apple. The timeline we're seeing doesn't seem to give enough time for testing.

Asfor a MOT buyout, that's real questionable. The whole company CAN'T be bought. It's one of the 10 or 20 biggest companies in the world. Nobody is big enough to buy them, be it GE, MSFT, or Oracle. Intel might be able to swing a merger, but there's no reason to and anti-trust would never allow it. AMD could ally even more, etc.

What MOT is looking to do is sell their chip making business. The fabs are what are costing them, and according to guys like Eskimo they suck at fabbing anyway. However, IBM doesn't want much from them. It already has better fabs. They're the high-end IP people. IBM isn't a PC maker, they're a server, mainframe and services company. Embedded stuff isn't what they want.

This is interesting and tricky, but unfortunately none of my people in Motorola are placed to know anything about this kind of stuff.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Yup. MOT is huge. It is their semiconductor unit that is a pile right now...esp in fab process. The whole company is NOT going to be bought out.
I can only please one person per day.  Today is not your day.  Tomorrow doesn't look good either.  
Reply
I can only please one person per day.  Today is not your day.  Tomorrow doesn't look good either.  
Reply
post #38 of 42
[quote]Originally posted by apple_otaku:
<strong>Note the keynote is only 2 hours.</strong><hr></blockquote>

That's not what was said when Apple announced that Steve's kenote would be the 7th instead of the 8th. They said he would speak for 2 1/2 hours. This would indicate he has alot to talk about.

I say we're gettin' a G5!
post #39 of 42
Thread Starter 
Also, I just realized that The Register has had multiple sources on the G5, not just one. Go check it out.

Sounds like at least two major ones and a few minor ones.....

PM G5. mmmmmm.....PowerMac.
I can only please one person per day.  Today is not your day.  Tomorrow doesn't look good either.  
Reply
I can only please one person per day.  Today is not your day.  Tomorrow doesn't look good either.  
Reply
post #40 of 42
For:
I want one

Against:
It's apple. Who knows?
"Its a good thing theres no law against a company having a monopoly of good ideas. Otherwise Apple would be in deep yogurt..."
-Apple Press Release
Reply
"Its a good thing theres no law against a company having a monopoly of good ideas. Otherwise Apple would be in deep yogurt..."
-Apple Press Release
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Future Apple Hardware
AppleInsider › Forums › Mac Hardware › Future Apple Hardware › Let's Debate: The Case FOR and AGAINST