New rumors are now surfacing that the PowerMac line will go all-dual within the next 2-3 months. This thread is not about those rumors themselves, but the implication of such rumors on other product lines.
If you know anything about Apple history, know the connection between the iMac and the PowerBook. Throughout the last five years, the PowerBook and iMac have mirrored each other in capability suprisingly closely. It may be due to the fact that Apple uses similar components and both are compact designs--the reasons are not important. Thus iMac<-->PowerBook, or iMac if and only if PowerBook [at some capability].
If the PM G5 line does go dual, the iMac then we can conjecture that the iMac is going G5. This is obvious. Apple would not go for an-all dual line unless it planned on having lower-end single processor systems, namely, the iMac. Thus dual G5 PM-->iMac G5, or dual G5 PM implies G5 iMac.
From the above fact that the the PowerBook is a mirror of the iMac and conversely, we can now conclude that a PowerBook G5 is close at hand.
Thus, dual PM G5-->PowerBook G5
QED.
If you know anything about Apple history, know the connection between the iMac and the PowerBook. Throughout the last five years, the PowerBook and iMac have mirrored each other in capability suprisingly closely. It may be due to the fact that Apple uses similar components and both are compact designs--the reasons are not important. Thus iMac<-->PowerBook, or iMac if and only if PowerBook [at some capability].
If the PM G5 line does go dual, the iMac then we can conjecture that the iMac is going G5. This is obvious. Apple would not go for an-all dual line unless it planned on having lower-end single processor systems, namely, the iMac. Thus dual G5 PM-->iMac G5, or dual G5 PM implies G5 iMac.
From the above fact that the the PowerBook is a mirror of the iMac and conversely, we can now conclude that a PowerBook G5 is close at hand.
Thus, dual PM G5-->PowerBook G5
QED.






