Originally posted by Brad
I'm not impressed by you either. Could you dodge the important question any less obviously?
I'll join in: Is there any possible evidence that could convince you of the validity of evolution as a scientific theory? If so what?
If you can't answer this question, consider your argument a complete failure and this thread ended.
I think this is very, very telling. The admistrator himself. How many of you tattled?
It should be patently obvious to a thinking person that the answer to this ongoing question is the very thing I am asking.
But you are all stung by the question---and resort to cheap games to avoid a direct, damaging assualt on your beliefs. I understand this isn't something any of you have been taught how to handle---academia has not kept it's house in order, and applied true scientific scrutiny to what evolution claims to be. But you should lose arguments with a little more class---maybe just admitting that you accept 99.9% of evolution on an irrational faith.
It's easy to "circle the wagons and dig" in at the University, or on National Geographic TV offeringsd where you don't have to answer hard questions; here on the Internet you should be prepared to be asked orginal questions that didn't end up on the cutting room floor, or went begging for a lack of funding.
Pathways between species, information-adding mutation incidence, times, rates of change while maintianing the healthiest, best-of-the-best creatures---all questions without any answers. How DARE I ask this--the nerve.
History will pass by those who will not adapt. ID is coming and none of you are ready. Tattling to the administrator will not help you.