Originally posted by pfflam... You imagine that you have some sort of moral high ground because . . . well . . . because why? let me guess . . . you go to church: tired of arrogant church goers who think that morality needs them to exist.
oh, and this is good, we get our morals from 'science' which naturally is wrong . . . we all know how bankrupt science is!! \
and then the pompous speil about 'silencing those who do not agree' . .
Stern is hardly saying how his party is the White-Man's party . . . Savage is.
tsk, tsk pfflam, you are definetly DOING IT agian.
.......no arrogance there---As for going to church, that's a kinda screwball, wag-the-dog, definition of a Christian. Christians realize at some point they are fucked up morally, and turn to Christ. Then
wanting to hang out with other Christians comes, well, naturally.
As for you naughty response, I think it bemoans your underlying amoral approach to life---the whole "I am my own" bit. You have a core set a values (like any Christian does), and when Savage goes off on the homos as sex perverts, that's more than you want to hear.
Since the news media is something of a junta, I thought the DeTocqueville rang particularly true.
What blows me away are the number of relativists/positivists like yourself that INSIST on making absolute judgements about morality. By your own standards we are all free to make any choices we wish based on our preceptions---but you want only some those outcomes.
As for Stern, he's much more popular, and, at least when I was listening to him in the mid '90s, ranted about "the blacks" to no end.