Originally posted by 7E7
Whatever you say...
And your suspicions that the information was not recently updated is supported by what exactly? Mere dislike of the Bush Administration does not qualify as evidence proving otherwise. I hate breaking that to you but...
I choose to believe this Administration when it comes to the war on terror because I have not seen anything that makes me doubt that they are not being straightforward and sincere. I don't think that is being gullible. All you guys on the left seem to have no problem believing guys like Kerry on everything even though his point of view and opinions on so many things seems to change by the day - and some of those positions he has are polar opposites to each other. How do you explain that? And you are very gullible if you believe what he did in Vietnam went down exactly the way he says it did...
Not 'all you guys' around here are 'on the left'
its just that you are so blindly on the right that anyone who asks about Bush, and that means looking at information (such as the long litany of liabilities that is his record) beyond the usual RNC love fest sites that you probably occasion.
If you would you would have seen, and long ago, much info that would "make me doubt that they are not being straightforward and sincere."
You need to have someone tell you that the Emperors new cloths are lies.
I think that generally the terror allert thing is not such a big deal, as it might not actually be as good for the administration as the left seem to think . . .
however, the more digging that you do with regards to this recent alert, the more it comes out smelling fishy . . . and the clincher is the outing of their most important resource in AQ!!! probably their only resource in AQ!
I mean, how stupid can that be? . . . either that, or they have a boatload of AQ double agents that give them info . . .
come on, something stinks here, its so obvious!