Originally posted by rageous
OK . . .
Let them up on stage and they're fair game . . .
22 is plenty 'adult' as far as I'm concerned. Far too old to act 13.
If they were 'handled such as to appear according to a PR Focus group image then that image was one that deliberately tried to make them appear young and immature, youthful and vigorous, just a couple a fun-loving president's daughters . .
If they weren't handled in that direction than they revealed their true colors . . . if you think that a 22 year old is just a kid you're wrong . . . tell that to the young men fighting in Iraq.
As for Kerry's daughter and her 'semi-nudity' . . . HAH! I doubt that she appeared anything OTHER than 'incredibly regal' . . .
I have no problem with breasts . . . why do most Americans find them problematic or shameful?!
as for the public service debate . . . check out the entire opus of threads for the past 3.5 years . . . I think, actually, if it hasn't been clear where Bush's record stands by now then you aren't even looking!
BTW: what the hell does this have to do with the ex-Presidents' libido?
also BTW: as has been noted, many people who are vocally saying that the twins' performance was a catastrophe are Republicans . .
Just face it, they made a poor showing: its just that I am willing to take a chance and voice conjecture as to why both his daughters appeared so lame . . . while also, and maybe not-coincidentally, his entire record as any-sort of 'leader' -business or otherwise- has also been a catastrophe!