I'll sum your entire post up: "Live in constant fear of censorship."
In this respect you are wrong I'm sorry to inform you. Not allowing a decidedly partisan media conglomerate to air untruths about a candidate days before an election is not censorship. Sinclair should not have the right to attempt to swing an election in such a manner using public air ways which are given to these broadcasters for free providing the broadcasters adhere to certain rules. Is fining CBS for showing a funky titty not censorship? In this regard what Sinclair is trying to do is more egregious that the brief shot of an obscure boob. Sinclair is using public interests to soap box it's message. Nothing is stopping these guys from using the same outlets available to you and me trump. What people are trying to do is to stop this partisan hack job from occurring on airwaves which belong to you and me. Sinclair agreed to abide by certain rules when entrusted with their broadcasting license. Simply because Sinclair has the short-term rights to certain frequencies does not mean they own those frequencies. Not air this trash is not censorship. Telling individuals who work at sinclair to not publish books would be because publishers are not public interest companies. Telling individuals at Sinclair to not speak their feelings in the same venues available to common man (not the troll here at AO either) would be.
I know you'll disregard everything I just typed because it clashes with your view that all things pro-Bush anti-Kerry should be allowed while the converse is not true to you.
Enjoy your fantasy world. Good day.