Quote:
Originally posted by jimwg
Greetings:
The eMac has constantly been underestimated as more than adequete "non-entry" Mac that could hold off G5s even right now. This AMUG review says it all.
http://www.amug.org/amug-web/html/am...icles/emac125/
James Greenidge
Greetings:
The eMac has constantly been underestimated as more than adequete "non-entry" Mac that could hold off G5s even right now. This AMUG review says it all.
http://www.amug.org/amug-web/html/am...icles/emac125/
James Greenidge
The emperor has no clothes. Sorry, those tests just don't fly. They seemed to have been cherry picked specifically to make the eMac look good. It does not matter how fast GB opens or imports a song to iTunes. What matters is how many midi tracks you can record before the eMac chokes. Does not system start up and shut down have more to do with what you have loaded in memory and processes working behind the scenes than anything else? Would not a PM have much more of that going on than a typical eMac? It seems unworthy to compare a dual PM to an eMac if all you are going to do is play a game on a low setting or view one Safari window or open and close a demanding app without actually using it or checking email or writing a letter to grandma. Obviously, if that is all you want to do, then it would be stupid to purchase a PM. It does not suggest the PM is a bad value or that the eMac is a good one. It does suggest that if one has little to no computing needs, an eMac is a smarter choice than a PM. Who didn't already know that?
Apple has no competition. Every commercial product which competes directly with an Apple product gives the distinct impression that, Where it is original, it is not good, and where it is good, it...
Apple has no competition. Every commercial product which competes directly with an Apple product gives the distinct impression that, Where it is original, it is not good, and where it is good, it...





\ 

It's certainly going to be loud.
