I get rebuffering, but not that long (I'm on UT's connection, which is stupid-fast) so I suffered through it.
For those who can't bear through it, here's the summary:
The neo-cons wanted war on Iraq since before 9/11. Rumsfeld got arrogant after our seeming victory in Afghanistan and pushed all obstacles out of his way to a small force war in Iraq.
The plan Rummy wanted called for 50,000 troops who would just go straight to Baghdad. Just about every general in the Army thought this was absolutely insane (or as one said, "If you were to tell me 50,000 people, I couldn't even answer you on television.")
The Army's post-Gulf War Iraq hypothetical take-over plan called for *at least* 480,000 troops. At least.
We got compromise and ended up with a force of ~140,000.
So essentially what you have is what happened in Vietnam. The Army brass realizes what kind of overwhelming force is needed, but the politicians know that's not acceptable for re-election purposes, so we went in half-assed and got stuck.
Shinseki gets pushed out because he held fast.
Franks buckled and accepted the compromise.
It was the war plan that no one wanted; too big for Rumsfeld, too small for the military.
How could it fail!?
proud resident of a failed state
proud resident of a failed state