AppleInsider › Forums › Mac Hardware › Future Apple Hardware › G5 - The truth
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

G5 - The truth - Page 2

post #41 of 490
[quote]Originally posted by KidRed:
<strong>

I think he was assuming that there were no problems and therefore Apple could finalize it and beging fabbing </strong><hr></blockquote>


Exactly
To save time, assume I know everything.
Reply
To save time, assume I know everything.
Reply
post #42 of 490
well of course if there were no problems they could do that <img src="confused.gif" border="0">
post #43 of 490
[quote]Originally posted by applenut:
<strong>well of course if there were no problems they could do that :confused: </strong><hr></blockquote>

LOL, that's what he was assuming in his post when you replied "only if there are no problems". I was just clarifying for you as you seemed to miss that his post concluded based on the possibility of no problems
All Your PCs Are Belong To Trash
Reply
All Your PCs Are Belong To Trash
Reply
post #44 of 490
I know someone in one of my classes here at APU who works for Warner Brothers, and he says they have been using prototype G5's for the least couple months, and that G5's are coming out in desktop form in the Spring! :eek: He says they are mad-fast, and he says he is going to try to buy one now, but I assured him he would never get one... He said he knew that, but it will be worth a try. He's going to get a Dual 800 decked out (the guy makes some money, and he's only a Junior!!!). ANyways, there's my 2 cents -JB
How many licks does it take to get to the center of a Tootsie Pop? The world may never know...
Reply
How many licks does it take to get to the center of a Tootsie Pop? The world may never know...
Reply
post #45 of 490
well well, this place is alive again. is it staying up now better than before? i missed the crap people used to toss back and forth around there. /. isn't nearly as entertaining.
post #46 of 490
It must be terribly entertaining for Dorsal M to read through this forum topic and see all the speculation and turns in specs.

Hehe ;-)

Thanks God rumors dont rely on YOU Members =))))


PS: I still dont understand why this site is STILL down and I havent seen a glue for the readers why? I mean, I have been reading a "resuming publication" sicne around April or such ;-))
_ _______________ _
"Knowledge spread across quadrants"
Reply
_ _______________ _
"Knowledge spread across quadrants"
Reply
post #47 of 490
[quote]Originally posted by iBORG:
<strong>It must be terribly entertaining for Dorsal M to read through this forum topic and see all the speculation and turns in specs.

Hehe ;-)

Thanks God rumors dont rely on YOU Members =))))


PS: I still dont understand why this site is STILL down and I havent seen a glue for the readers why? I mean, I have been reading a "resuming publication" sicne around April or such ;-))</strong><hr></blockquote>

Just wait. It'll be back soon. As you may have seen the AI staff has already changed the design and they're working hard and the rumors will be back.
post #48 of 490
I guess I have to ask the mods this one again:

PS.
How is it that the mods/admins can confirm that this is the real dorsal? I thought that dorsal v1 always anonymized himself???

'esplain' this please.
IBL!
Reply
IBL!
Reply
post #49 of 490
Even if i prefer a G5 the outcome of a new G4 the 7460 based on a new mobo with DDR ram sounds logical.
BTW it will be a little bit strange if directly the mac evolution will go directly to the G5 without the step of the 7460.

If The Clock speed of the new chip go beyond 1 GHZ it will be a good new. A speed range between 1 ghz and 1,2 ghz with DDR ram will be a very big progress, the biggest since the introduction of the G3 (at the difference the G3 was in advance at this time ...).
post #50 of 490
Also, the G4's performance - especially the 7450's - is throttled back by the system bus, and by memory performance. Just like the 604's was in the 8600 and 9600. The 7460, fed with fast DDR RAM, would be a quantum leap better than the current models.

AltiVec performance in particular is bus-limited.
"...within intervention's distance of the embassy." - CvB

Original music:
The Mayflies - Black earth Americana. Now on iTMS!
Becca Sutlive - Iowa Fried Rock 'n Roll - now on iTMS!
Reply
"...within intervention's distance of the embassy." - CvB

Original music:
The Mayflies - Black earth Americana. Now on iTMS!
Becca Sutlive - Iowa Fried Rock 'n Roll - now on iTMS!
Reply
post #51 of 490
[quote]Originally posted by Amorph:
<strong>Also, the G4's performance - especially the 7450's - is throttled back by the system bus, and by memory performance. Just like the 604's was in the 8600 and 9600. The 7460, fed with fast DDR RAM, would be a quantum leap better than the current models.

AltiVec performance in particular is bus-limited.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Yes, and it's easy to see the difference of Performance between SDRAM and DDRAM if you look at the benchmarks comparing ATHLON with and without DDRAM.
post #52 of 490
Does anyone think that G4's will find their way into consumer macs in 2002??? Or that Altivec will find it's way into G3's???

Some people have said that Apple should just scrap Altivec but I think that a strong SIMD unit is essential for any future looking chip. The tasks procs are facing will only deal with increasingly large blocks of data. Repetitive operations applied to these data sets describes all manner of encoding-decoding of AV data -- something we will all want our consumer macs to do in the next 2-3 years.

However, with IBM not including an SIMD unit in the Sahara at least untill the Sahara II (not untill late 2002 at the earliest) and Apple's reluctance to rely on just Moto, it looks like Apollo belongs only to the 'power'macs for at least another year.

Whadda ya all think? One nice thing about the G5 rumors is that a slower G4 chip would then be available in large enough quantities for the rest of the line-up. Would IBM ever fab Apollos for Apple & Mot to meet such a demand? One nice thing about altivec for every mac would be that everyone just codes for it and it becomes part of the PPC software writing routine. Apple could put their marketing spin on G4 consumer macs: "Supercomputers for everyone!" or some such tag (better than the crap I came up with).

I don't think it'll happen though. Too bad. We better at least see Ghz+ G3's, with a 4 stage pipeline and 512KB on-die 1:1 cache, they ought to be quite fast with or without altivec. Hey wouldn't it be funny if a 1Ghz Sahara was just as fast or slightly faster than a 900Mhz G4?

Anyone with some proc design knowledge care to comment? I was thinking that with a 4 stage pipeline Ghz+ G3's would compare quite favorably with current offerings from Intel and AMD.
IBL!
Reply
IBL!
Reply
post #53 of 490
You don't know who you are dealing with here. Be careful about your assumptions.

dorsal
post #54 of 490
G5 will be available in a Mac during the 1st quarter of '02.
I'm not really here.
Reply
I'm not really here.
Reply
post #55 of 490
so many clairvoyants
post #56 of 490
Mods

If you "know" who the "real" dorsal is can you kill the fake account. It's just too confusing having dorsal m and dorsal posting to the same threads.


Wll I have my G5 so I am off to get a life; apart from this post...
Reply
Wll I have my G5 so I am off to get a life; apart from this post...
Reply
post #57 of 490
[quote]Originally posted by dorsal:
<strong>You don't know who you are dealing with here. Be careful about your assumptions.</strong><hr></blockquote>

It is hard to be careful about assumptions when there is no authority. Could the real dorsal please stand up?

Mandricard
AppleOutsider
Hope Springs Eternal,
Mandricard
AppleOutsider
Reply
Hope Springs Eternal,
Mandricard
AppleOutsider
Reply
post #58 of 490
real Dorsal = Dorsal M.

other = not.
post #59 of 490
Slacker, that is exactly what I heard. From apple to my source to me.
überlurker since oct '99
_my backpacks got jets_
Reply
überlurker since oct '99
_my backpacks got jets_
Reply
post #60 of 490
I don't mean for this to sound all generic and mysterious, and full of sh**, but I do know there will be a new mac launched in January. I have absolutely no clue on the specifics, but I'm guessing the new iMac is far more likely than a G5.
post #61 of 490
Jonathan, if

Dorsal M = real dorsal

please cancel the account of fake dorsal
Wll I have my G5 so I am off to get a life; apart from this post...
Reply
Wll I have my G5 so I am off to get a life; apart from this post...
Reply
post #62 of 490
[quote]Originally posted by JW Pepper:
<strong>Jonathan, if

Dorsal M = real dorsal

please cancel the account of fake dorsal</strong><hr></blockquote>
What makes the "real" Dorsal Many more valid a poster than the "fake" dorsal?
Chicanery.
Reply
Chicanery.
Reply
post #63 of 490
An excellent question Belle. (S)he has every right to post and have an account. Although, it should be said that (small d) dorsal has added nothing of relevance to this thread, and the lone post that has been made seems intended to stir up controversy. Juvenile, but not offensive. Certainly not a banning transgression.

Registered: Dec 1998
Reply
Registered: Dec 1998
Reply
post #64 of 490
[quote]Originally posted by wormboy:
<strong>Although, it should be said that (small d) dorsal has added nothing of relevance to this thread, and the lone post that has been made seems intended to stir up controversy. Juvenile, but not offensive.</strong><hr></blockquote>
I don't know, I think dorsal's contribution to this thread has been one of the most sensible.
[quote]You don't know who you are dealing with here. Be careful about your assumptions.<hr></blockquote>
I honestly couldn't agree more, even though I'm probably taking it in a different context to that originally intended.
Chicanery.
Reply
Chicanery.
Reply
post #65 of 490
post #66 of 490
There is no precedent for banning accounts for behavior like dorsal's, which might be mildly annoying to some, but which is fundamentally innocuous.

There are good reasons for that lack of precedent.
"...within intervention's distance of the embassy." - CvB

Original music:
The Mayflies - Black earth Americana. Now on iTMS!
Becca Sutlive - Iowa Fried Rock 'n Roll - now on iTMS!
Reply
"...within intervention's distance of the embassy." - CvB

Original music:
The Mayflies - Black earth Americana. Now on iTMS!
Becca Sutlive - Iowa Fried Rock 'n Roll - now on iTMS!
Reply
post #67 of 490
Thread Starter 
Dorsal is a common word so no need for banning accounts because of a name. it's not like I have a trademark on it... yet . In the meantime I thought I''d enlighten on some of the details in question. Apple has been so kind as to send some advanced information on their hardware roadmaps. Normally this is so uncommon as to be unheard of! But there are such diverging hardware plans for the upcoming year(s) that it has been made necessary. the line of work we're in demands we have advance knowledge of these plans. They are of the magnitude of when they transitioned over to the PowerPC from 680X0 or the transition to PCI from NuBus. Soon (in a couple of Quarters) Apple's hardware will be radically different than what it is now.Some of the more obscure stuff are the methods of input, output, but some other details focus on SOC develpments from Motorola and Apple and to some extent, IBM. Future personal devices from Apple will have more of an intimate relationship with Apple's desktop hardware, and to a point an integral relationship. Future desktop systems (iMac type machines and modular machines) will have bundled gadgets suited for specific uses (for example: an iPod bundled with an iMac where the iPod would slide in a slot in the imac made for it) depending on the desktop system it comes with. Some of the examples cited indicated to me atleast, that Apple want's to expand it's core business from just consumer and professional graphics artists to business and media creation.

Some of the ideas are novel but not so revolutionary. But other ideas are simply innovative and original. It gives you confidence that Apple not only wants to live on the cutting edge but thrive there. Some of this will become apparent this upcoming expo. The next couple of years will be busy for us because new opportunities have been presented to us. Some will come to fruition soon hopefully.
post #68 of 490
Oh boy, am I excited
Don't like what I do? Sue me.
Reply
Don't like what I do? Sue me.
Reply
post #69 of 490
Dorsal, you didn't give us ANY info in that last post. Anyone could have written it. Why don't you post something that will prove you have inside info? Give us some hard facts for once. Can you do that?
post #70 of 490
Why does he have to PROVE that he has insider info? Can't he just say what he thinks? Why don't you or anybody else prove they have insider info? because we don't have to. We're just having a lively discussion and this is good for the board. reminds me of the good ole days
post #71 of 490
[quote]Originally posted by Dorsal M:
<strong>Future desktop systems (iMac type machines and modular machines) will have bundled gadgets suited for specific uses (for example: an iPod bundled with an iMac where the iPod would slide in a slot in the imac made for it) depending on the desktop system it comes with. </strong><hr></blockquote>

So..... if an iPod were to slide into its "mothership," what happens when one buys the next iWidget? It doesn't fit?

It seems that there would have to be some sort of form-factor convergence, or that this connector (basically, I am assuming firewire) would have to be extended from the machine, rather than having an 8-track-like place that they would join. It seems un-Apple to force such restrictions on its products when they are banking on such open standards as FireWire. I can see, perhaps, a firewire plug on the front of the machine. Are you suggesting a "dock" of sorts? that seems a bit odd.

Puzzled,

Mandricard
AppleOutsider
Hope Springs Eternal,
Mandricard
AppleOutsider
Reply
Hope Springs Eternal,
Mandricard
AppleOutsider
Reply
post #72 of 490
[quote]Originally posted by Outsider:
<strong>Why does he have to PROVE that he has insider info? Can't he just say what he thinks? Why don't you or anybody else prove they have insider info? because we don't have to. We're just having a lively discussion and this is good for the board. reminds me of the good ole days </strong><hr></blockquote>

Exactly.
post #73 of 490
Macworld '02 prediction:

I believe the Apollo 1GHz+ G4 will be introduced at the Jan. '02 Macworld with DDR and maybe 1394B and/or USB 2.0.

I think the G5 will be released in March of '02 when Apple officially releases OS X.

I don't believe the G5 has floating/integer perf. 3X the P4 at the same clock speed. However, if true, it would be rather nice...

- Mark <img src="graemlins/smokin.gif" border="0" alt="[Chilling]" />
post #74 of 490
Alright, so it's either

No G5 in Jan
or
G5 in Jan

So, if no G5 in Jan, when would be the next best place to release it? March? 3 months after a ghz G4? I want a G5, but don't know if I can wait 6 more months for June/July.
All Your PCs Are Belong To Trash
Reply
All Your PCs Are Belong To Trash
Reply
post #75 of 490
If not MWSF, then MWNY. If March, then Apple announces it at MWSF.

It will be announced at MWSF, and you will all be both dissapointed and elated. Dissapointed because MHz won't be as high as some rumors suggest. Elated because performance will be staggering, compared to current Macs, and even to current Wintel boxes. Apple is about to leapfrog the competition.
post #76 of 490
[quote]Originally posted by Junkyard Dawg:
<strong>If not MWSF, then MWNY. If March, then Apple announces it at MWSF.

It will be announced at MWSF, and you will all be both dissapointed and elated. Dissapointed because MHz won't be as high as some rumors suggest. Elated because performance will be staggering, compared to current Macs, and even to current Wintel boxes. Apple is about to leapfrog the competition.</strong><hr></blockquote>


Well, it's the performance I'm after I'm still tugging along on my G4 450 so it will be quite a step up for me. I don't think I'll be disspointed as long as it's got faster system bus and DDR ram. A 1ghz G5 with the faster bus and ram will make me a very happy camper (not to mention the cinema display )
All Your PCs Are Belong To Trash
Reply
All Your PCs Are Belong To Trash
Reply
post #77 of 490
[quote]Originally posted by Junkyard Dawg:
<strong>If not MWSF, then MWNY. If March, then Apple announces it at MWSF.
</strong><hr></blockquote>

Ahem. Seybold.

apple_otaku
Stuck in an infinite loop waiting for an Apple PDA...

apple.otaku
Reply
Stuck in an infinite loop waiting for an Apple PDA...

apple.otaku
Reply
post #78 of 490
apple_otaku may have something there.

Remember how the G4 was announced as tech @ Seybold fall, intro'ed in January?

Perhaps the G5's technical specifications will be introduced to the developer public @ Seybold, so they can ready their apps = (recompile for 64-bit, add whatever new AltiVec calls are existant) and then the new G5, along with a slew of apps native for it, will be announced to the public in July at NY.

As for the question of breaking 32-bit compatibility, perhaps the Apps and OS would be shipped as a FAT binary, such as was shipped during the 68k-PPC switchover... both 32-bit and 64-bit versions. And, seeing as reports on the G5 say that it runs 32 bit stuff @ full speed, even non-recompiled apps would be fine.

This seems like the most plausible scenerio to me.

So, Apollo @ SF, G5 preview @ Seybold- would seem more likely in later spring, say, April? (effectively killing G4 purchasing for the time being) and then G5 public launch in July. This would also allow higher Mhz chips to be produced in great enough quantities to drive down the price, and also to meet the OVERWHELMING demand that the ~2 GHZ, Pentium 4 killin' G5 would recieve.

[ 11-27-2001: Message edited by: Jonathan ]</p>
post #79 of 490
[quote]Originally posted by Matsu:
[QB]Does anyone think that G4's will find their way into consumer macs in 2002??? Or that Altivec will find it's way into G3's???
<hr></blockquote>

I think that Steve guaranteed us Altivec in the consumer (iMac) line in January, when he said we could expect to see a SuperDrive in the iMac in 2002.

I think it will be a G4...although the idea of a G3 with Altivec added on is interesting, there's no marketing bang to this (at least not like upgrading the iMac from G3 to G4).

A G4 upgrade for the iMac line has basically been waiting for the G5 upgrade to the PowerMac line, because we can never have the iMac and PowerMac too close to each other (again for marketing and not technical reasons).

Whether we'll get a "real" G5 or a re-labeled and enhanced G4 remains to be seen.

[quote]
Some people have said that Apple should just scrap Altivec but I think that a strong SIMD unit is essential for any future looking chip.
<hr></blockquote>

Exactly... there is too much Altivec-optimized code in OS X, iTunes, iMovie, etc. for Apple to even consider abandoning it.

[quote]
However, with IBM not including an SIMD unit in the Sahara at least untill the Sahara II (not untill late 2002 at the earliest) and Apple's reluctance to rely on just Moto, it looks like Apollo belongs only to the 'power'macs for at least another year.
<hr></blockquote>

Unless Apollo magically becomes a "G5", as per some of the more reliable rumor sources lately.

[quote]
Whadda ya all think? One nice thing about the G5 rumors is that a slower G4 chip would then be available in large enough quantities for the rest of the line-up.
(snip)
Apple could put their marketing spin on G4 consumer macs: "Supercomputers for everyone!" or some such tag (better than the crap I came up with).
<hr></blockquote>

YUP
eye
bee
BEE
Reply
eye
bee
BEE
Reply
post #80 of 490
[quote]Originally posted by Jonathan:
<strong>apple_otaku may have something there.

Remember how the G4 was announced as tech @ Seybold fall, intro'ed in January?
</strong><hr></blockquote>

Again, YUP

Seybold is, from a marketing perspective, the BEST place to announce a kickass new PowerMac G5.
eye
bee
BEE
Reply
eye
bee
BEE
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Future Apple Hardware
AppleInsider › Forums › Mac Hardware › Future Apple Hardware › G5 - The truth