I remember hearing a rumor a long time ago on ThinkSecret that Apple was developing iPicture, a competitor for Photoshop Elements. What ever happened to that? Will Apple attack the photo editing market any time soon? They've already done the movie and music markets...
Recent Reviews
-
I was given the Ipod nano 6th generation for Christmas 2011. I was starting to take up running and needed something to track my run. since I just started I was only using my Ipod roughly 3 times...
-
I have had the iPad Verizon 4G LTE for a month now, and over all I couldn't be happier with the machine. The only issue I have found so far is when on wifi it has a slower speed in processing...
-
I have owned at least a dozen different Mac laptops over the years, starting with a Powerbook 1400 back in the day. The 13-inch Air is my absolute favorite of the bunch. It's the first laptop...
-
I spent quite a bit of time reading the setup manuals and various Apple articles about manually setting up this device since I have an unusual setup, and the setup manuals indicated I would have...
-
all i have to say is i love it its so much faster and i could just slip it into my purse p.s it has a ton of space for the 64gb
What about iPicture?
post #2 of 15
12/15/01 at 1:43pm
post #3 of 15
12/15/01 at 1:53pm
post #4 of 15
12/15/01 at 2:44pm
post #5 of 15
12/15/01 at 7:19pm
- Joined: Dec 2001
- Location: God's Country (aka Kansas)
- Posts: 663
- offline
- Select All Posts By This User
iPhoto probably won't see the light of day until Photoshop ships in a Native OS X version. If Adobe drags its feet developing or shipping Photoshop that would definitely slow the adoption rate for OS X, definitely not a plus for Apple (I have often wondered why Apple never bought Adobe given the natural overlap of their target markets).
One possibility that could rearrange that thinking would be if iPhoto was a software "gateway" to a new Apple iDevice much like iTunes serves as the gateway between your Mac and your iPod. Apple wants to be in the gadget business and if they did have an "iCamera" it would go stale very quickly if they delayed the launch of the device (hence the accompanying software) to humor Adobe.
One possibility that could rearrange that thinking would be if iPhoto was a software "gateway" to a new Apple iDevice much like iTunes serves as the gateway between your Mac and your iPod. Apple wants to be in the gadget business and if they did have an "iCamera" it would go stale very quickly if they delayed the launch of the device (hence the accompanying software) to humor Adobe.
"Moo" said the chicken
"Cluck" said the cow
Dr. Frankenstein rubbed his hands together with glee
"Cluck" said the cow
Dr. Frankenstein rubbed his hands together with glee
"Moo" said the chicken
"Cluck" said the cow
Dr. Frankenstein rubbed his hands together with glee
"Cluck" said the cow
Dr. Frankenstein rubbed his hands together with glee
post #6 of 15
12/15/01 at 8:07pm
post #7 of 15
12/15/01 at 10:37pm
post #8 of 15
12/16/01 at 9:35am
post #9 of 15
12/16/01 at 11:53am
[quote]Originally posted by BuonRotto:
<strong>I suspect they'll just add to Image Capture and rename it, nothing at the level of a $100 app like elements. Auto-launch when cameras are connected, auto-import, basic image size and format changes, some simple touch-ups, upload to iTools, web page, printing, that's about it.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Exactly. Speaking of Image Capture, man is that program sweet. I have a Kodak DC3400 and the software that came with it is total crap compared to Image Capture. It even rips the pics off the Camera 100x faster then Kodaks software.
<strong>I suspect they'll just add to Image Capture and rename it, nothing at the level of a $100 app like elements. Auto-launch when cameras are connected, auto-import, basic image size and format changes, some simple touch-ups, upload to iTools, web page, printing, that's about it.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Exactly. Speaking of Image Capture, man is that program sweet. I have a Kodak DC3400 and the software that came with it is total crap compared to Image Capture. It even rips the pics off the Camera 100x faster then Kodaks software.
Be quiet, Brain, or I'll stab you with a Q-tip
Be quiet, Brain, or I'll stab you with a Q-tip
post #10 of 15
12/16/01 at 5:21pm
I think that this new iApp will likely integrate the Image Capture functionality. I would like this new iApp to recognize USB/FireWire Flash and SmartMedia readers like it does for cameras. I have a MicroTech ZiO that hasn't seen use for some time now because there are no OS X drivers for it. In fact, there aren't many USB readers that DO have OS X drivers.
I would think that bringing the drivers into the OS would be the best solution for everybody. Apple would get to boast auto-download capabilities, everybody would be able to use their USB cardreaders again, and the producers of said devices wouldn't have to worry about their drivers anymore... only compatibility with Apple's. Heck, lots of devices use some standard of drivers (CD/DVD drives of all types, etc.).
I just wish I didn't have to use that slow USB connectivity of my Olympus Camedia 3000.
-Ender
[ 12-16-2001: Message edited by: Ender ]</p>
I would think that bringing the drivers into the OS would be the best solution for everybody. Apple would get to boast auto-download capabilities, everybody would be able to use their USB cardreaders again, and the producers of said devices wouldn't have to worry about their drivers anymore... only compatibility with Apple's. Heck, lots of devices use some standard of drivers (CD/DVD drives of all types, etc.).
I just wish I didn't have to use that slow USB connectivity of my Olympus Camedia 3000.
-Ender
[ 12-16-2001: Message edited by: Ender ]</p>
If you find yourself sided with the majority, it is time to change your thinking.
-Mark Twain
-Mark Twain
If you find yourself sided with the majority, it is time to change your thinking.
-Mark Twain
-Mark Twain
post #11 of 15
12/16/01 at 9:10pm
post #12 of 15
12/16/01 at 9:42pm
[quote]Originally posted by KidRed:
<strong>i seriously doubt Apple would risk pissing off Adobe. If Apple is doing an image editing program it will be more along the lines of GraphicConverter- a smaller less feature laden app.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Apple did it with iMovie and Final Cut Pro. They are not that afrade of adobe. Althogh I do not think they would go as far to make a photo equivilent of FinalCut pro. To compete hed to head with PhotoShop. But apple would dare to compeat with PhotoShop elements.
Photoshop is a perfected master peice that has proven it's self. Photoshop elements is just an adobe app that has not yet been adopted as a standed in amiture photo editing like photoshop. With photo editing and importing apps right now there is no really clear leader. No one has a really good app.
This is why apple is going to make iPhoto (steve will call is iFlix or somthing just to throgh roumror people off
). iPhoto will be more than just image edting. That is only part of digital photography. iPhoto will carry users thorgh each step of digital photograpy. And hold the users hand in helping them import, orginize edit and then ether print, put in a web page, or a photo album. It will be a compleat digital photography solution.
Sure adobe should be scared. But that is there fult not apples.
<strong>i seriously doubt Apple would risk pissing off Adobe. If Apple is doing an image editing program it will be more along the lines of GraphicConverter- a smaller less feature laden app.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Apple did it with iMovie and Final Cut Pro. They are not that afrade of adobe. Althogh I do not think they would go as far to make a photo equivilent of FinalCut pro. To compete hed to head with PhotoShop. But apple would dare to compeat with PhotoShop elements.
Photoshop is a perfected master peice that has proven it's self. Photoshop elements is just an adobe app that has not yet been adopted as a standed in amiture photo editing like photoshop. With photo editing and importing apps right now there is no really clear leader. No one has a really good app.
This is why apple is going to make iPhoto (steve will call is iFlix or somthing just to throgh roumror people off
). iPhoto will be more than just image edting. That is only part of digital photography. iPhoto will carry users thorgh each step of digital photograpy. And hold the users hand in helping them import, orginize edit and then ether print, put in a web page, or a photo album. It will be a compleat digital photography solution.Sure adobe should be scared. But that is there fult not apples.

post #13 of 15
1/7/02 at 10:33pm
[quote]Originally posted by Michaelm8000:
<strong>
Apple did it with iMovie and Final Cut Pro. They are not that afrade of adobe. Althogh I do not think they would go as far to make a photo equivilent of FinalCut pro. To compete hed to head with PhotoShop. But apple would dare to compeat with PhotoShop elements.
Photoshop is a perfected master peice that has proven it's self. Photoshop elements is just an adobe app that has not yet been adopted as a standed in amiture photo editing like photoshop. With photo editing and importing apps right now there is no really clear leader. No one has a really good app.
This is why apple is going to make iPhoto (steve will call is iFlix or somthing just to throgh roumror people off
). iPhoto will be more than just image edting. That is only part of digital photography. iPhoto will carry users thorgh each step of digital photograpy. And hold the users hand in helping them import, orginize edit and then ether print, put in a web page, or a photo album. It will be a compleat digital photography solution.
Sure adobe should be scared. But that is there fult not apples.
</strong><hr></blockquote>
WOW! I totaly nailed it!!
<strong>
Apple did it with iMovie and Final Cut Pro. They are not that afrade of adobe. Althogh I do not think they would go as far to make a photo equivilent of FinalCut pro. To compete hed to head with PhotoShop. But apple would dare to compeat with PhotoShop elements.
Photoshop is a perfected master peice that has proven it's self. Photoshop elements is just an adobe app that has not yet been adopted as a standed in amiture photo editing like photoshop. With photo editing and importing apps right now there is no really clear leader. No one has a really good app.
This is why apple is going to make iPhoto (steve will call is iFlix or somthing just to throgh roumror people off
). iPhoto will be more than just image edting. That is only part of digital photography. iPhoto will carry users thorgh each step of digital photograpy. And hold the users hand in helping them import, orginize edit and then ether print, put in a web page, or a photo album. It will be a compleat digital photography solution.Sure adobe should be scared. But that is there fult not apples.
</strong><hr></blockquote>WOW! I totaly nailed it!!

post #14 of 15
1/7/02 at 10:39pm
post #15 of 15
1/8/02 at 8:28am
iPicture = iPhoto...nuff said?
Remember, Jobs said that in iPhoto you can select an option to edit the picture(s) in another application (snub to Photoshop, remember?).
I'm going to try my OSX version of Graphic Convertor with it...
Remember, Jobs said that in iPhoto you can select an option to edit the picture(s) in another application (snub to Photoshop, remember?).
I'm going to try my OSX version of Graphic Convertor with it...

I AM THE Royal Pain in the Ass.
I AM THE Royal Pain in the Ass.
Return Home
Back to Forum: Mac Software
- What about iPicture?
Currently, there are 197 Active Users
(10 Members and 187 Guests)
Recent Discussions
- › Is there a 'Contact us via iMessage' button for websites? 5 minutes ago
- › Google's Chrome team developing app launcher for Mac 6 minutes ago
- › Apple details 'extraordinary amount' of taxes it pays in testimony... 12 minutes ago
- › iCloud scam email, watch out!!! 29 minutes ago
- › Apple CEO Tim Cook says America's IP environment needs more work 37 minutes ago
- › The very real damage done by anti-gay BIGOTS--why marriage equality... 38 minutes ago
- › Cook: US-built Mac will be refreshed version of existing product 39 minutes ago
- › Possible wireless cards for next-gen Macs show 802.11ac connectivity 49 minutes ago
- › Microsoft unveils 'Xbox One,' a voice-controlled all-in-one... 1 hour, 1 minute ago
- › 10M Samsung flagship phones in 28 days a 'record,' 5M iPhone 5 in 3... 1 hour, 3 minutes ago
View: New Posts | All Discussions
Recent Reviews
- › Apple iPod nano - 16GB, Silver MC526LL/A (6th Generation) by cc420
- › Apple iPad with Retina Display Wi-Fi + Verizon/Sprint 4G - 64GB,... by Aaron Krahn
- › 13.3-inch Apple MacBook Air MD231LL/A (Mid-2012) by ahilal
- › Apple Time Capsule - 2TB (MD032LL/A) by biyahero
- › Apple iPad Wi-Fi - 64GB, White (MD330LL/A) by raeganapril
- › Apple Magic Trackpad (MC380LL/A) by WisdomSeed
- › Aperture 3 by bcbcbroderick
- › 17-inch Apple MacBook Pro MD311LL/A (Late 2011) by bcbcbroderick
- › Apple iPod touch - 32GB, Black MC544LL/A (4th Generation) by bcbcbroderick
- › Apple iPod touch - 8 GB, White MD057LL/A (4th Generation) by bcbcbroderick
View: More Reviews
New Apple Wikis
- › 2013 'Modified' iPod touch by Mikeycampbell81
- › 2013 MacBook Pros by Mikeycampbell81
- › iPad mini 2 with Retina display by Mikeycampbell81
- › 2013 iPhone 5S by Mikeycampbell81
- › Trade in your old devices for holiday cash by Mikeycampbell81
- › How to sell your old iPad for cash by Mikeycampbell81
- › How to offset the cost of a new iPhone by... by Mikeycampbell81
- › How to save money on AppleCare extended... by Kasper
- › How to offset the cost of a new iPad mini by... by Mikeycampbell81
- › Apple Prototypes by Mikeycampbell81
View: New Apple Wikis | All Apple Wikis
Home | Apple Product Guide | Forums | Apple Wikis | My Profile
About AppleInsider | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2013 AppleInsider is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map
About AppleInsider | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2013 AppleInsider is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map





