or Connect
AppleInsider › Forums › Software › Mac Software › Adobe Creative Suite 3.0 launch confirmed for March 27
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Adobe Creative Suite 3.0 launch confirmed for March 27

post #1 of 50
Thread Starter 
Adobe Systems will officially roll out its highly anticipated Creative Suite 3.0 software bundle at a special event in New York City on March 27, the company confirmed on Monday.

According to information obtained by Macworld UK, Adobe plans to celebrate the global launch at the event, which will be webcast live at 8.30pm UK time. Expectations of a late-March release were first published by AppleInsider back in October.

Although the Adobe remained mum on specific features and applications due with Creative Suite 3.0, the company is billing the launch as "the largest software release in Adobe's 25-year history."

The San Jose-based software developer did, however, take liberties in launching a small teaser campaign dubbed "What's In the Box" to help further whet consumers' appetites. It includes an interactive website hosted off a U.K. domain where visitors are invited to "spin the box" and watch a brief video posted on YouTube.

In a note to clients last week, Merrill Lynch analyst Jay Vleeschhouwer said his checks indicate that Adobe has lined up half a dozen distinct bundles of the Creative Suite package that will sell at various price points, each including a different assortment of creative applications.

Creative Suite 3.0 has been one of the most highly anticipated high-end software releases of modern times, as it will be the first version designed to run natively on Apple Inc.'s line of Intel-based Mac computers. Its availability is expected to spark a sharp uptick in demand for the computer maker's high-end Mac Pro workstations and other assorted Pro hardware.

The release will also see an infusion of technologies and software applications brought in through Adobe's acquisition of Macromedia back in 2005. These include Dreamweaver CS3, which is expected to replace GoLive as the primary web authoring application in the release, and Fireworks CS3, which will take on the role of Adobe's Image Ready application.

In January, analysts at investment research firm PiperJaffray said initial feedback on the public preview of Photoshop CS3, Creative Suite's flagship image editor software, was a harbinger of much stronger Mac sales waiting in the wings. Analysts for the firm added that customer response to the beta software signaled that the final release would have "measurable positive impact" on Apple's Pro computer sales.

Adobe last week also confirmed plans to make an entry-level version of Photoshop available online as a hosted web service.
post #2 of 50
Just in time for a .edu discount
Report employers of illegal aliens at (866) DHS-2ICE
Reply
Report employers of illegal aliens at (866) DHS-2ICE
Reply
post #3 of 50
far out man, far out
post #4 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by dacloo View Post

far out man, far out

W00T! Score.
post #5 of 50
Ah, yes. Good ol' "the Adobe". Where can we meet this great one?
post #6 of 50
I guess there will be a lot of Intel Macs sold in April. Next big UB = MS Office.
post #7 of 50
That's more like it.

Finally, non-iPod upgrades are on the way!

Apple will release new Mac Pros either just before or just after CS3 ships. My guess is March 23rd.

The big question is...Will Leopard be ready?
The evil that we fight is but the shadow of the evil that we do.
Reply
The evil that we fight is but the shadow of the evil that we do.
Reply
post #8 of 50
excellent!

Time to sell my Quad G5!
MacPro 12 core
30" & 23" Apple Cinema HD Displays
PowerBook G4 550, MacBook Pro 2.2
Ipod 1G and 5G, Shuffle 2G, iPhone 3G
Reply
MacPro 12 core
30" & 23" Apple Cinema HD Displays
PowerBook G4 550, MacBook Pro 2.2
Ipod 1G and 5G, Shuffle 2G, iPhone 3G
Reply
post #9 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank777 View Post

That's more like it.

Finally, non-iPod upgrades are on the way!

Apple will release new Mac Pros either just before or just after CS3 ships. My guess is March 23rd.

The big question is...Will Leopard be ready?

http://forums.appleinsider.com/showt...threadid=72473
post #10 of 50
Now the question becomes: "What's in the box?" As in how are they going to package it?

I for one would love to see a custom online-only version that lets you build your own CS3 suite of apps.

Also a cross-platform upgrade path from CS2 on a PC to CS3 on a Mac.

Ahhh, dreams................
"Too much of a good thing is great." Mae West
Reply
"Too much of a good thing is great." Mae West
Reply
post #11 of 50
what is the benefit for announcing CS 3.0 when leopard release near future, does CS 3.0 already contains software to take advantage of Leopard core features?

or will they be releasing a Service Release for Leopard???

Octo Mac Pro now can roll out of the factories ...

Nov '09 | iMac 21.5" C2D 3.06 Ghz | Intel 330 240GB SSD | ATI

Sep '12| Toshiba 14" 1366 x 768! | i5 3rd Gen 6GB| Intel x25-m 120GB SSD | Win 7|  Viewsonic VX2255wmb 22" LCD
iPhone 4S| iPad 2 wifi

Reply

Nov '09 | iMac 21.5" C2D 3.06 Ghz | Intel 330 240GB SSD | ATI

Sep '12| Toshiba 14" 1366 x 768! | i5 3rd Gen 6GB| Intel x25-m 120GB SSD | Win 7|  Viewsonic VX2255wmb 22" LCD
iPhone 4S| iPad 2 wifi

Reply
post #12 of 50
No benefit. Adobe Systems just drags their feet. As soon as they release CS3, Apple will turn around and release Leopard, giving a big slap in the face to Adobe Systems, "In your face slow pokes." As if to say, "What took you so long?" "We could have done that in 6 months. Now get back to work and bring your application up to date."

I'm serious. Apple will release Leopard that next week. The first week of April.
post #13 of 50
Im thinking April as well, or maybe sometime in May for Leopard... it'll be out before June I'm almost certain though. CS3 should work fine on it.
"An investment in knowledge always pays the best interest."
"Those who would give up essential liberties to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither." -Ben Franklin
Reply
"An investment in knowledge always pays the best interest."
"Those who would give up essential liberties to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither." -Ben Franklin
Reply
post #14 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by rongold View Post

No benefit. Adobe Systems just drags their feet. As soon as they release CS3, Apple will turn around and release Leopard, giving a big slap in the face to Adobe Systems, "In your face slow pokes." As if to say, "What took you so long?" "We could have done that in 6 months. Now get back to work and bring your application up to date."

Adobe did acquire Macromedia. I can imagine it must have been alotof work to merge both products together. Ow, and did I allready say that I do strongly hate Flash designed websites:

It's all eye candy, but you can't save a single picture into iPhoto or onto your damn desktop!!

Second annoyance: Flash enabled web sites that automatically explode to the width of your screen! Owmygod, I do hate 'em so much Booh to Flash and all those annoying Flashy graphic mobbers! Get a life and please stop crippling my Tiger!!!

I do appreciate Illustrator & Photoshop though


Quote:
Originally Posted by rongold View Post

I'm serious. Apple will release Leopard that next week. The first week of April.

Hmm, not so sure about that one. It's more likely they will release the all new 15" MBP. Forget Leopard for now, you should actually be more worried on how the next MBP keyboard is gonna look like
post #15 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by rongold View Post

No benefit. Adobe Systems just drags their feet. As soon as they release CS3, Apple will turn around and release Leopard, giving a big slap in the face to Adobe Systems, "In your face slow pokes." As if to say, "What took you so long?" "We could have done that in 6 months. Now get back to work and bring your application up to date."

I'm serious. Apple will release Leopard that next week. The first week of April.

That doesn't make much sense to me. They've got developer previews of Leopard, and I wouldn't be surprised if some people at Adobe are also privy to whatever features are still being withheld from the public.

My assumption is that it's ready for Leopard. Heck, isn't there another thread about applications already being announced as Leopard only?
A good brain ain't diddly if you don't have the facts
Reply
A good brain ain't diddly if you don't have the facts
Reply
post #16 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr O View Post

and did I allready say that I do strongly hate Flash designed websites:

It's all eye candy, but you can't save a single picture into iPhoto or onto your damn desktop!!

One word- "Grab".

Quote:
Originally Posted by mr O View Post

Second annoyance: Flash enabled web sites that automatically explode to the width of your screen! Owmygod, I do hate 'em so much...

I'm annoyed by dog poop on the sidewalk, but I just choose not to step in it. It doesn't mean I hate dogs, just those dog owners. Flash is great, some programmers, maybe not so much. But I can do stuff with Flash that cannot be done with any other application, so I love it.

And I'm really looking forward to CS3 because the current versions of Flash, InDesign, AfterEffects and Dreamweaver often crash on my Intel Mac. (save, save, save)

m

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply
post #17 of 50
Hmmm, according to MacWorld Adobe is announcing CS3 on the 27th, but the ship date is listed as: "later this spring."

Read it here.

And weep.

"Too much of a good thing is great." Mae West
Reply
"Too much of a good thing is great." Mae West
Reply
post #18 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by mstone View Post

One word- "Grab".

Dear milestone,

please help me out! I can't grab a picture on a Flash site. The picture seems to be frozen. A ctrl click with my mouse shows me a play-pause option Flash is so not web 2.0!

It is a great tool however for experimental visual artists! But not for sharing information (& building my mood board in iPhoto)!
post #19 of 50
Grab is an application in your Utilities folder

Applications > Utilities > Grab

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply
post #20 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by mstone View Post

I'm annoyed by dog poop on the sidewalk, but I just choose not to step in it. It doesn't mean I hate dogs, just those dog owners. Flash is great, some programmers, maybe not so much. But I can do stuff with Flash that cannot be done with any other application, so I love it

Eh, Flash was great 5 years ago. Now? It still integrates poorly with the web/http and people have learned to abuse it. Flash is essentially a great idea with great momentum that failed to follow through. If that doesn't change, in 5 years it'll be totally irrelevant, which given Adobe's track record is a solid possibility.

And Adobe's new video: "Look, we added more toys. Colored blocks and such. Pro features? Look, colored blinky lights!"

Well, hopefully not. The CS3 Beta was a disappointment, hopefully some of the features they added will be a bit more solid in the release.
post #21 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by rongold View Post

No benefit. Adobe Systems just drags their feet. As soon as they release CS3, Apple will turn around and release Leopard, giving a big slap in the face to Adobe Systems, "In your face slow pokes." As if to say, "What took you so long?" "We could have done that in 6 months. Now get back to work and bring your application up to date."

Adobe was developing CS3 well before they had the option to do any sort of serious Leopard custom work—not that they really need to. Programs this size can’t possibly be agile enough to react on this level. After various known Leopard issues turn up and are properly understood they’ll get around to releasing an upgrade or two to iron things out a bit. Given how much they are remaking the software maybe we’ll get lucky and see some additional patching and integration, especially with the newfound inclusion of Macromedia’s product lineup.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChevalierMalFet View Post

Well, hopefully not. The CS3 Beta was a disappointment, hopefully some of the features they added will be a bit more solid in the release.

You’re speaking of Photoshop CS3 Beta? How was it a disappointment? I think the software is absolutely stellar. It features excellent performance improvements on all machines (not to mention being a wonderful Universal app). I’m much more impressed with it than I have been with a number of previous Photoshop builds.

I’m really looking forward to seeing what they do with Dreamweaver. Macromedia could have been more Mac friendly.
The true measure of a man is how he treats someone that can do him absolutely no good.
  Samuel Johnson
Reply
The true measure of a man is how he treats someone that can do him absolutely no good.
  Samuel Johnson
Reply
post #22 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChevalierMalFet View Post

Eh, Flash was great 5 years ago. Now? It still integrates poorly with the web/http and people have learned to abuse it. Flash is essentially a great idea with great momentum that failed to follow through. If that doesn't change, in 5 years it'll be totally irrelevant, which given Adobe's track record is a solid possibility.

You don't have to use it if you don't want to, you can also uninstall the plugin.

For what I'm doing, nothing works better. I build full on business applications such as GPS real-time tracking with database and satellite integration, Tradeshow exhibit floor management that can join and reconfigure booths, move them around etc. Very useful! Cross platform training videos that are way better and more portable than Quicktime, Windows Media or even mpeg for that matter.

Just for the amount of content you can squeeze into such a small file blows anything else away.

It's all about rich media - which is more than just animation. Actionscript is a very useful programming language which is improving all the time.

I don't understand why people want to bash Flash, probably because it is difficult to master. But if you know what you are doing it integrates into the web, CDs, Kiosks, cellphones etc. very nicely. Maybe it will be replaced by something else in 5 years, just like it replaced Director (some would argue), but I don't think it will be rendered obsolete by Ajax or Flex or any other current dynamic solution.

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply
post #23 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by donebylee View Post

Now the question becomes: "What's in the box?" As in how are they going to package it?

I for one would love to see a custom online-only version that lets you build your own CS3 suite of apps.

Also a cross-platform upgrade path from CS2 on a PC to CS3 on a Mac.

Ahhh, dreams................

I don't see why they wouldn't offer a cross-platform upgrade path, they have in the past.
My worked switched from PC to Mac and we were able to cross-platform upgrade to Dreamweaver 8 and CS Pro Suite on the Mac without problem from Dreamweaver 4 and Photoshop 6 on the PC.

All my life, I always wanted to be somebody. Now I see that I should have been more specific.
- Lily Tomlin
Reply

All my life, I always wanted to be somebody. Now I see that I should have been more specific.
- Lily Tomlin
Reply
post #24 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by tink View Post

I don't see why they wouldn't offer a cross-platform upgrade path, they have in the past.
My worked switched from PC to Mac and we were able to cross-platform upgrade to Dreamweaver 8 and CS Pro Suite on the Mac without problem from Dreamweaver 4 and Photoshop 6 on the PC.

It is my understanding that you had to do what is called a cross-grade from CS2 PC to CS2 Mac and then upgrade to CS3 Mac. Maybe that won't be the case now that there are more people switching back to Macs with this refresh.

Is that the procedure you had to do? I am curious about your experience with this.

Thanks.
"Too much of a good thing is great." Mae West
Reply
"Too much of a good thing is great." Mae West
Reply
post #25 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by donebylee View Post

It is my understanding that you had to do what is called a cross-grade from CS2 PC to CS2 Mac and then upgrade to CS3 Mac. Maybe that won't be the case now that there are more people switching back to Macs with this refresh.

Is that the procedure you had to do? I am curious about your experience with this.

Thanks.

I forget how exactly we did it. I think that we just called Adobe up and told them we were switching and wanted a cross-grade. I believe they sent us a full suite and had me destroy the PC disc. Macromedia did the same.

All my life, I always wanted to be somebody. Now I see that I should have been more specific.
- Lily Tomlin
Reply

All my life, I always wanted to be somebody. Now I see that I should have been more specific.
- Lily Tomlin
Reply
post #26 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by mstone View Post

For what I'm doing, nothing works better. I build full on business applications such as GPS real-time tracking with database and satellite integration, Tradeshow exhibit floor management that can join and reconfigure booths, move them around etc. Very useful! Cross platform training videos that are way better and more portable than Quicktime, Windows Media or even mpeg for that matter.

Just for the amount of content you can squeeze into such a small file blows anything else away.

It's all about rich media - which is more than just animation. Actionscript is a very useful programming language which is improving all the time.

I don't understand why people want to bash Flash, probably because it is difficult to master. But if you know what you are doing it integrates into the web, CDs, Kiosks, cellphones etc. very nicely. Maybe it will be replaced by something else in 5 years, just like it replaced Director (some would argue), but I don't think it will be rendered obsolete by Ajax or Flex or any other current dynamic solution.

It really doesn't integrate well into the web, which was where my comments were pointed; the integration is one way and limited. As far as interactive media applications; I agree whole-heartedly, if only for lack of competition. As far as video delivery goes, I've not yet seen a flash video player that I liked, or found to offer an advantage over alternatives. And for compression, doesn't Flash just use Sorenson? No advantage there over other platforms if that's the case.

Xian: I agree the speed was a welcome increase, and in many ways the interface has been improved (with the exception of ACR, which is embarrassing with those single-letter tabs). What I found disappointing were the actual features added; things like smart filters, etc., which, like many other new features added to Photoshop in the last couple of versions, feel half-implemented and unprofessional. I'd have rathered half the new features, but implemented more effectively.
post #27 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChevalierMalFet View Post

Xian: I agree the speed was a welcome increase, and in many ways the interface has been improved (with the exception of ACR, which is embarrassing with those single-letter tabs). What I found disappointing were the actual features added; things like smart filters, etc., which, like many other new features added to Photoshop in the last couple of versions, feel half-implemented and unprofessional. I'd have rathered half the new features, but implemented more effectively.

Using the program for a living performance is key, at least for me. I havent delved too deep into the new program features just yetpretty much using it for the same ol routine. In honesty Im not even well versed in what new functionality the CS3 suite is supposed to introduce. Has Adobe announced anything in real detail?
The true measure of a man is how he treats someone that can do him absolutely no good.
  Samuel Johnson
Reply
The true measure of a man is how he treats someone that can do him absolutely no good.
  Samuel Johnson
Reply
post #28 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by donebylee View Post

Hmmm, according to MacWorld Adobe is announcing CS3 on the 27th, but the ship date is listed as: "later this spring."

Read it here.

And weep.


Dammit, what the hell good is an announcement? We know it's bloody well coming. Those lazy bastards are just buying some time again. At least we'll likely see a demo of it at NAB and see what they've been doing with all the time they've had.

Ah well, I only use Photoshop personally and CS3 beta is great IMO - I just wish someone would fix the brushes issue. Either Apple or Adobe know why it's going wrong and neither seem to be willing to step up to the plate and fix it.
post #29 of 50
Think Secret had some "rumors" about new functionality, but I think the picture is still pretty open as to what the rest of CS3 will entail, as well as what changes Photoshop will see outside of the Beta (Adobe hinted that it wasn't feature complete). As far as official word from Adobe I haven't seen much.

And yes, the speed boost is welcome, but ended up being useless for me as I ended up on the tail end of an activation bug which made CS3 a paperweight. As it stands I'll have to wait and make sure the full version fixes the bug before I buy a potentially useless upgrade.

(As far as new features goes, Photoshop has fair room to grow with their Smart Objects, which if they become solid will be very useful for automation/reusability as well as image adjustment quality).
post #30 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvin View Post

I just wish someone would fix the brushes issue. Either Apple or Adobe know why it's going wrong and neither seem to be willing to step up to the plate and fix it.

The VM cache issue? as far as I'm aware that's unique to Tiger and will be fixed in Leopard.
post #31 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChevalierMalFet View Post

It really doesn't integrate well into the web, which was where my comments were pointed;...

Not going to argue the case since I like Flash you don't- to each his own. But I'll place my bets with the likes of Google video, Yahoo Maps and Youtube as to how well it integrates with the web.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChevalierMalFet View Post

And for compression, doesn't Flash just use Sorenson? No advantage there over other platforms if that's the case.

For video, Flash 8 uses new codec On2 VP6 (MX versions did use Sorenson) but I was referring to the small size with respect to the native vector format, which I think is very efficient. It also compresses text and supports subsets for embedded fonts. I could go on...

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply
post #32 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by mstone View Post

Not going to argue the case since I like Flash you don't- to each his own. But I'll place my bets with the likes of Google video, Yahoo Maps and Youtube as to how well it integrates with the web.

For video, Flash 8 uses new codec On2 VP6 (MX versions did use Sorenson) but I was referring to the small size with respect to the native vector format, which I think is very efficient. It also compresses text and supports subsets for embedded fonts. I could go on...

Google Video, YouTube, TahooMaps are all excellent examples of what I mean by one way integration. in each case Flash is able to take data from XML, HTML sources, but after data is put in the Flash container there is no outward integration (It's a presentation layer; Data actually inside the Flash container is not indexable, so keyword searches, the most rudimentary form of interoperability, doesn't work with data in a Flash container).

And yes, for applicable types of media, Flash is ideal and file sizes are tiny. There is a performance trade-off, which is often limits the complexity of the vector work, but personally being fond of animation I find Flash is great in that regard.

I think on some level you misunderstand my position; I think Flash has great potential, and v.9 addressed some of the performance issues, but Flash has the double stigma of not living up to it's potential, and coders that are stuck in the "when all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail" mentality. SVG also is a bit of a disappointment in that Adobe let it languish; and I've not looked at it in depth but from my shallow knowledge its data structure seems to be much more open and interoperable.

The real danger Flash faces at this point is that both Windows and OS X are much more vector savvy than they once were, and really it won't be long before the flash plugin doesn't offer anything compelling beyond its scripting language (which, obviously, is worth quite a lot in both functionality and momentum with developers). The only thing I can see Flash offering motion video (not animation) at this point is a closed format to give the Yahoos and Googles more control over their content delivery, at the cost of mediocre players and high CPU overhead.
post #33 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvin View Post

Dammit, what the hell good is an announcement? We know it's bloody well coming. Those lazy bastards are just buying some time again. At least we'll likely see a demo of it at NAB and see what they've been doing with all the time they've had.

Ah well, I only use Photoshop personally and CS3 beta is great IMO - I just wish someone would fix the brushes issue. Either Apple or Adobe know why it's going wrong and neither seem to be willing to step up to the plate and fix it.

The fact that Adobe's language sounds eerily similar to Apple's, e.g. "CS3 will ship later this spring," makes me believe that the two are linked. I have heard rumors that some of the new capabilities of CS3 for Macs use Leopard's Core technologies. I do not know if this is true or not, but it sure seems as if the two are going to be related.
"Too much of a good thing is great." Mae West
Reply
"Too much of a good thing is great." Mae West
Reply
post #34 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by donebylee View Post

The fact that Adobe's language sounds eerily similar to Apple's, e.g. "CS3 will ship later this spring," makes me believe that the two are linked. I have heard rumors that some of the new capabilities of CS3 for Macs use Leopard's Core technologies. I do not know if this is true or not, but it sure seems as if the two are going to be related.

...um... no

they are vague so that when said release month x rolls around with no release the stock doesn't drop and people don't get pissed off. I doubt there is an intentional connection.
post #35 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank777 View Post

Apple will release new Mac Pros either just before or just after CS3 ships. My guess is March 23rd...

Very unlikely 8) ...See special mid-April event: http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=2538

"The Cupertino-based Mac maker offered no details on what, if anything, will be announced at the event, according to Macworld. However, past company presentations at the conference have been given way to launch significant product announcements.

In 2005, Apple used the NAB conference to launch Final Cut Studio and Soundtrack Pro. Recent rumors have suggest the company may be readying a significant update to Final Cut Pro for this year's show. A brawny revision to the Mac Pro also remains ripe for the picking, and could coincide with the company's announcements.

As has been the case in recent years, Apple will command a large show floor presence at NAB, with a mammoth booth located near the entrance to the South Hall.

NAB 2007 runs April 14-19 at the Las Vegas Convention Center in Las Vegas, Nevada
."
post #36 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by donebylee View Post

The fact that Adobe's language sounds eerily similar to Apple's, e.g. "CS3 will ship later this spring," makes me believe that the two are linked. I have heard rumors that some of the new capabilities of CS3 for Macs use Leopard's Core technologies. I do not know if this is true or not, but it sure seems as if the two are going to be related.

http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pres...Photoshop.html

Says 10.4.8 is required. I very much doubt Adobe is going to force people to upgrade to Leopard on top of shelling out a lot of cash for their UniversalBinary Adobe/Macromedia stuff.

Not that a little more for Leopard is not too much to pay if you're buying a lot of CS3 bundles, but Pros would want to stick with Tiger 10.4.8/ 10.4.9 for a while... and jump to Leopard on 10.5.2 or so.**

My feeling that through March-April-May-June 2007 Pro/Prosumer/Enthusiasts will have a lot of options for getting MacIntels, or getting to CS3 on their MacIntels. There's pent-up demand.

**That and all above said and done, Apple might just release Leopard outright in middle of April at NAB. This way there's no second-guessing, oh, should I wait for Leopard or not, etc, etc.

If Leopard is not released in mid-April NAB event, then I think Apple *HAS TO* offer a 90-day free/minimal fee upgrade to Leopard--- this would cover any Mac purchased between April 15 and July 15. Again all the second-guessing can hamper sales with people all going, uh, Leopard, or not, or old stock not coming with Leopard, or as donebylee you mention, maybe CS3 will benefit from Lepoard technologies, etc, etc...
post #37 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by nvidia2008 View Post

http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pres...Photoshop.html

Says 10.4.8 is required. I very much doubt Adobe is going to force people to upgrade to Leopard on top of shelling out a lot of cash for their UniversalBinary Adobe/Macromedia stuff.

Not that a little more for Leopard is not too much to pay if you're buying a lot of CS3 bundles, but Pros would want to stick with Tiger 10.4.8/ 10.4.9 for a while... and jump to Leopard on 10.5.2 or so.**

My feeling that through March-April-May-June 2007 Pro/Prosumer/Enthusiasts will have a lot of options for getting MacIntels, or getting to CS3 on their MacIntels. There's pent-up demand.

**That and all above said and done, Apple might just release Leopard outright in middle of April at NAB. This way there's no second-guessing, oh, should I wait for Leopard or not, etc, etc.

If Leopard is not released in mid-April NAB event, then I think Apple *HAS TO* offer a 90-day free/minimal fee upgrade to Leopard--- this would cover any Mac purchased between April 15 and July 15. Again all the second-guessing can hamper sales with people all going, uh, Leopard, or not, or old stock not coming with Leopard, or as donebylee you mention, maybe CS3 will benefit from Lepoard technologies, etc, etc...

Good points about not requiring Leopard. And I agree about IT not wanting to upgrade right out to the gate.

For me the trigger is CS3. I need PhotoShop and Illustrator for work. And I would like a refreshed Mac Pro with a faster front side bus (the rumored 1333 MHz would do nicely, thank you). But I don't need Leopard or 8 cores for what I do.
"Too much of a good thing is great." Mae West
Reply
"Too much of a good thing is great." Mae West
Reply
post #38 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by rongold View Post

No benefit. Adobe Systems just drags their feet. As soon as they release CS3, Apple will turn around and release Leopard, giving a big slap in the face to Adobe Systems, "In your face slow pokes." As if to say, "What took you so long?" "We could have done that in 6 months. Now get back to work and bring your application up to date."

I'm serious. Apple will release Leopard that next week. The first week of April.

I don't think it's a problem. If Apple does their job right, Leopard should be compatible with software made for previous revisions.

Adobe can't cater to just the Mac market as if it's the only market that matters.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mstone View Post

You don't have to use it if you don't want to, you can also uninstall the plugin.

The problem is, some developers insist on making entire sites out of them.

I just use FlashBlock so I don't have to see the bottom-feeders of the flash market, the ads.
post #39 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChevalierMalFet View Post

The VM cache issue? as far as I'm aware that's unique to Tiger and will be fixed in Leopard.

I hadn't heard about that. What is the VM cache issue? The brush problem I meant was that brush shapes don't appear and every brush looks like a cross hair.
post #40 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by nvidia2008 View Post

Very unlikely 8) ...See special mid-April event: http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=2538

"The Cupertino-based Mac maker offered no details on what, if anything, will be announced at the event, according to Macworld. However, past company presentations at the conference have been given way to launch significant product announcements.

In 2005, Apple used the NAB conference to launch Final Cut Studio and Soundtrack Pro. Recent rumors have suggest the company may be readying a significant update to Final Cut Pro for this year's show. A brawny revision to the Mac Pro also remains ripe for the picking, and could coincide with the company's announcements.

As has been the case in recent years, Apple will command a large show floor presence at NAB, with a mammoth booth located near the entrance to the South Hall.

NAB 2007 runs April 14-19 at the Las Vegas Convention Center in Las Vegas, Nevada
."

I seriously doubt that the Mac Pro will be unveiled at NAB.
An update to Final Cut Studio is overdue, and NAB is the natural place to unveil it.

Apple usually features only one major product announcement at smaller media events.

In addition, unveiling the Mac Pro at a Video conference sends a signal to the publishing world that the Mac Pro line is for Video needs and the iMac line is good enough for print publishers.

That may be true, but Apple certainly isn't going to reinforce that idea.
The evil that we fight is but the shadow of the evil that we do.
Reply
The evil that we fight is but the shadow of the evil that we do.
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Mac Software
AppleInsider › Forums › Software › Mac Software › Adobe Creative Suite 3.0 launch confirmed for March 27