Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr. H 
I think [the black bezel] looks smarter, sharper than the previous incarnation.
No doubt Jonathon Ive and Mr. Jobs will agree with you on that! But sales over the next few months will tell if "the average iMac consumer" agrees with you and the Ive team or me and the anti-black-bezel team.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr. H 
The average consumer seems to love glossy displays, the iMac is aimed at the average consumer, so it gets glossy displays.
Until the debut of the "prosumer" 24" iMac, I would have agreed with you. But the last 24" iMac was made for a professional breed of consumer who wants to do PRO work without the massive footprint and massive cost of a Mac Pro. Indeed, the swappable video card of the previous generation 24" iMac proved that.
So I do not buy it for one minute that Apple can get away with now calling a Prosumer Mac a "Joe Sixpack Mac" now. This is especially true in light of the fact the new iMacs have Firewire 800. Or are you going to now call that a "Joe Six Pack" connectivity interface? Indeed, Firewire is a "pro" connection, not a consumer one. Hence, the irony of the glossy screen on the highest end model.
With that said, I wouldn't complain at all if all the Macs had a glossy screen as a standard feature and then the high end model could be "upgraded" with a non-glossy model. But because that is not an option, I have lodged my legitimate complaint here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr. H 
Plastic -> aluminium, doubtless all internal and external dimensions changed; trust me, this is a major change on the manufacturing side.
I think you should apply as a replacement for Guy Kawasaki, who used to be a major apologist for Apple in the mid-1990's. Seriously, your hype misses my point completely. Namely, that the "basic look" of the machine stands largely unchanged from the previous generation. I couldn't care less how much aluminum costs or weighs or looks. The basic "form factor" is the same. And I believe many of us expected a NEW FORM FACTOR. That was my point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr. H 
Apple can't give you what doesn't exist. Apple are restricted by the available LCD panels at the correct price points.
Give me a break. LED backlights exist in other Apple machines (or have you not read the news over the past few months). LED backlights likely exist for even big 24" LCDs too. And in light of my above explanation that the highest end 24" model was actually intended to be a PROSUMER machine, such customers should have a BTO option of spending mega-bucks on an LED, non-glossy screen. I think people would pay extra for it, especially if they are like me, in the design industry and love the compact size of the iMac (and the lower cost) but need good color accuracy. This is especially true if Apple, renown for its cutting edge graphics hardware, could implement a wider gamut color palette with an LED backlit display. That would really boost sales.
"Don't you think Apple would have done that if it were economically possible?" Not necessarily. I suspect this may be one of the last (or perhaps the last of two) revisions of this form factor of iMac. Perhaps they will release the TRUE renewed design sometime next year. And in that new design they may make up for the "BAD."