AppleInsider › Forums › Mac Hardware › Current Mac Hardware › Bench Your New Mac With Factorial Bench
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Bench Your New Mac With Factorial Bench

post #1 of 79
Thread Starter 
This is the fully threaded CPU benchmark that I posted a while ago. I let Xcode optimize it this time and it includes the high-resolution timers, automatic CPU speed and bus detection, and an increase in loops to do 200 million factorials by default. It is a Universal Binary.

With the new iMacs out and the new MacBook Pros, it's time to see how they measure up. Also people with 3gHz Mac Pros can weigh in.

Download the folder, unzip it, and then double-click the "factorialBench" executable.

It will open Terminal and run.

By default, it will generate the number of threads that equals the number of cores in the machine on which it is running, and 200 million loops. To use different numbers, run it in Terminal by writing

./factorialBench c i

where c is the number of threads you want, and i is the number of iterations you want. For example to do 2 threads calculating 500 million loops, write

./factorialBench 2 500000000

Don't exceed 4 billion though. It's not 64-bit.

 

factorialBench.zip 8.51171875k . file
--Johnny
Reply
--Johnny
Reply
post #2 of 79
I love it when you post these challenges.

Tomorrow, I will clock my 2.8 GHz C2E 24" iMac for ya. It is currently doing an initial SuperDuper backup. While doing that it got 6.6 seconds @ 200,000,000!

I will shutdown Security Spy and VMWare Fusion with Windows running in the background as well, and I know that will help a bunch. This thing is a screamer.

(null) ("iMac7,1") with 2 cores, running at 2.80 gHz.
Frontside bus: 800.00 mHz
Installed memory: 4.00 GB

200,000,000 factorials will be calculated by creating 2 threads.

Thread # 1 created.
Thread # 2 created.
Waiting for threads to finish...
Thread # 1: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 6.222422 seconds at 16,070,912 factorials per second.
Thread # 2: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 6.271790 seconds at 15,944,411 factorials per second.
Hard-Core.
Reply
Hard-Core.
Reply
post #3 of 79
Thread Starter 
I figured that 2.8 would be fast.
--Johnny
Reply
--Johnny
Reply
post #4 of 79
Mac Pro ("MacPro1,1") with 4 cores, running at 3.00 gHz.
Frontside bus: 1.33 gHz
Installed memory: 3.00 GB

200,000,000 factorials will be calculated by creating 4 threads.

Thread # 1 created.
Thread # 2 created.
Thread # 3 created.
Thread # 4 created.
Waiting for threads to finish...
Thread # 4: 50,000,000 factorials calculated in 2.838536 seconds at 17,614,714 factorials per second.
Thread # 3: 50,000,000 factorials calculated in 2.875286 seconds at 17,389,576 factorials per second.
Thread # 1: 50,000,000 factorials calculated in 2.886274 seconds at 17,323,372 factorials per second.
Thread # 2: 50,000,000 factorials calculated in 2.913413 seconds at 17,162,002 factorials per second.

Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion
Reply
Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion
Reply
post #5 of 79
Thread Starter 
Here's my 2.66 quad


Mac Pro ("MacPro1,1") with 4 cores, running at 2.66 gHz.
Frontside bus: 1.33 gHz
Installed memory: 3.00 GB

200,000,000 factorials will be calculated by creating 4 threads.

Thread # 1 created.
Thread # 2 created.
Thread # 3 created.
Thread # 4 created.
Waiting for threads to finish...
Thread # 4: 50,000,000 factorials calculated in 3.311812 seconds at 15,097,476 factorials per second.
Thread # 3: 50,000,000 factorials calculated in 3.312709 seconds at 15,093,388 factorials per second.
Thread # 2: 50,000,000 factorials calculated in 3.318167 seconds at 15,068,561 factorials per second.
Thread # 1: 50,000,000 factorials calculated in 3.354682 seconds at 14,904,543 factorials per second
--Johnny
Reply
--Johnny
Reply
post #6 of 79
(null) ("MacBookPro3,1") with 2 cores, running at 2.20 gHz.
Frontside bus: 800.00 mHz
Installed memory: 2.00 GB

200,000,000 factorials will be calculated by creating 2 threads.


Thread # 1 created.
Thread # 2 created.
Waiting for threads to finish...
Thread # 2: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 8.052964 seconds at 12,417,788 factorials per second.
Thread # 1: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 8.070865 seconds at 12,390,246 factorials per second.

IMO, not too bad when compared to those MPs
Serving humanity one sarcastic comment at a time.
Reply
Serving humanity one sarcastic comment at a time.
Reply
post #7 of 79
Here's mine:

Mac Pro ("MacPro1,1") with 4 cores, running at 2.66 gHz.
Frontside bus: 1.33 gHz
Installed memory: 5.00 GB

200,000,000 factorials will be calculated by creating 4 threads.

Thread # 1 created.
Thread # 2 created.
Thread # 3 created.
Thread # 4 created.
Waiting for threads to finish...
Thread # 4: 50,000,000 factorials calculated in 3.293294 seconds at 15,182,368 factorials per second.
Thread # 2: 50,000,000 factorials calculated in 3.294029 seconds at 15,178,980 factorials per second.
Thread # 1: 50,000,000 factorials calculated in 3.312694 seconds at 15,093,456 factorials per second.
Thread # 3: 50,000,000 factorials calculated in 3.321661 seconds at 15,052,710 factorials per second.
2.66ghz Mac Pro - 5gb / 830gb / 7300gt 256mb
1ghz Tibook - 1gb / 60gb / 9000 64mb
iPhone - 8gb

netbanshee.com
Reply
2.66ghz Mac Pro - 5gb / 830gb / 7300gt 256mb
1ghz Tibook - 1gb / 60gb / 9000 64mb
iPhone - 8gb

netbanshee.com
Reply
post #8 of 79
Quote:
("MacBookPro2,2") with 2 cores, running at 2.33 gHz.
Frontside bus: 664.00 mHz
Installed memory: 2.00 GB

200,000,000 factorials will be calculated by creating 2 threads.

Thread # 1 created.
Thread # 2 created.
Waiting for threads to finish...
Thread # 1: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 7.542926 seconds at 13,257,455 factorials per second.
Thread # 2: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 7.559233 seconds at 13,228,855 factorials per second.

My 24" iMac 2.8GHz will arrive on monday.
I'm curious how much faster it will be.
alles sal reg kom
Reply
alles sal reg kom
Reply
post #9 of 79
Quote:
2007-08-18 21:07:24.309 factorialBench[2023] *** +[NSString stringWithCString:encoding:]: selector not recognized
2007-08-18 21:07:24.312 factorialBench[2023] *** Uncaught exception: <NSInvalidArgumentException> *** +[NSString stringWithCString:encoding:]: selector not recognized
Trace/BPT trap
logout

Hmm, does it require 10.4? Or perhaps my G4 is too weak to run it?

<-- Has weak UNIX-fu
You need skeptics, especially when the science gets very big and monolithic. -James Lovelock
The Story of Stuff
Reply
You need skeptics, especially when the science gets very big and monolithic. -James Lovelock
The Story of Stuff
Reply
post #10 of 79
(null) ("iMac7,1") with 2 cores, running at 2.40 gHz.
Frontside bus: 800.00 mHz
Installed memory: 2.00 GB

200,000,000 factorials will be calculated by creating 2 threads.

Thread # 1 created.
Thread # 2 created.
Waiting for threads to finish...
Thread # 2: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 9.380967 seconds at 10,659,882 factorials per second.
Thread # 1: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 10.524780 seconds at 9,501,386 factorials per second.
post #11 of 79
Thread Starter 
Tiger only. The method NSString stringWithCString:model encoding:1 is 10.4 or above only.
--Johnny
Reply
--Johnny
Reply
post #12 of 79
(edit see proper benchmark below)
post #13 of 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonnyboy View Post

(null) ("iMac7,1") with 2 cores, running at 2.40 gHz.
Frontside bus: 800.00 mHz
Installed memory: 2.00 GB

200,000,000 factorials will be calculated by creating 2 threads.

Thread # 1 created.
Thread # 2 created.
Waiting for threads to finish...
Thread # 2: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 9.380967 seconds at 10,659,882 factorials per second.
Thread # 1: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 10.524780 seconds at 9,501,386 factorials per second.

You got OWNED buddy.

(null) ("MacBook2,1") with 2 cores, running at 2.00 gHz.
Frontside bus: 664.00 mHz
Installed memory: 2.00 GB

200,000,000 factorials will be calculated by creating 2 threads.

Thread # 1 created.
Thread # 2 created.
Waiting for threads to finish...
Thread # 2: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 8.812650 seconds at 11,347,325 factorials per second.
Thread # 1: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 8.831569 seconds at 11,323,016 factorials per second.
logout
[Process completed]
post #14 of 79
8.8 seconds w000t
post #15 of 79
Thread Starter 
LOL. Hope he doesn't freak out... 2 gHz beats 2.4 gHz? He must have a virus oh nooooes... quick rush out and buy Norton
--Johnny
Reply
--Johnny
Reply
post #16 of 79
(null) ("MacPro2,1") with 8 cores, running at 3.00 gHz.
Frontside bus: 1.33 gHz
Installed memory: 4.00 GB

200,000,000 factorials will be calculated by creating 8 threads.

Thread # 1 created.
Thread # 2 created.
Thread # 3 created.
Thread # 4 created.
Thread # 5 created.
Thread # 6 created.
Thread # 7 created.
Thread # 8 created.
Waiting for threads to finish...
Thread # 8: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.410813 seconds at 17,720,280 factorials per second.
Thread # 5: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.426592 seconds at 17,524,280 factorials per second.
Thread # 1: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.432179 seconds at 17,455,918 factorials per second.
Thread # 6: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.437599 seconds at 17,390,104 factorials per second.
Thread # 3: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.448619 seconds at 17,257,818 factorials per second.
Thread # 7: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.451227 seconds at 17,226,802 factorials per second.
Thread # 2: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.453726 seconds at 17,197,190 factorials per second.
Thread # 4: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.487536 seconds at 16,806,314 factorials per second.
logout
[Process completed]

What do I win?
post #17 of 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by buddha View Post

(null) ("MacPro2,1") with 8 cores, running at 3.00 gHz.
Frontside bus: 1.33 gHz
Installed memory: 4.00 GB

200,000,000 factorials will be calculated by creating 8 threads.

Thread # 1 created.
Thread # 2 created.
Thread # 3 created.
Thread # 4 created.
Thread # 5 created.
Thread # 6 created.
Thread # 7 created.
Thread # 8 created.
Waiting for threads to finish...
Thread # 8: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.410813 seconds at 17,720,280 factorials per second.
Thread # 5: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.426592 seconds at 17,524,280 factorials per second.
Thread # 1: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.432179 seconds at 17,455,918 factorials per second.
Thread # 6: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.437599 seconds at 17,390,104 factorials per second.
Thread # 3: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.448619 seconds at 17,257,818 factorials per second.
Thread # 7: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.451227 seconds at 17,226,802 factorials per second.
Thread # 2: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.453726 seconds at 17,197,190 factorials per second.
Thread # 4: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.487536 seconds at 16,806,314 factorials per second.
logout
[Process completed]

What do I win?

You win for having the most expensive system.
post #18 of 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by lundy View Post

Tiger only. The method NSString stringWithCString:model encoding:1 is 10.4 or above only.

Ah, thanks. I've been debating wether to upgrade now, or wait for 10.5...
You need skeptics, especially when the science gets very big and monolithic. -James Lovelock
The Story of Stuff
Reply
You need skeptics, especially when the science gets very big and monolithic. -James Lovelock
The Story of Stuff
Reply
post #19 of 79
Thread Starter 
Heh - that's the first time it's actually been tested on a genuine octo-Mac.
--Johnny
Reply
--Johnny
Reply
post #20 of 79
(null) ("MacBookPro3,1") with 2 cores, running at 2.20 gHz.
Frontside bus: 800.00 mHz
Installed memory: 2.00 GB


200,000,000 factorials will be calculated by creating 2 threads.

Thread # 1 created.
Thread # 2 created.
Waiting for threads to finish...
Thread # 2: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 8.114621 seconds at 12,323,434 factorials per second.
Thread # 1: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 8.141211 seconds at 12,283,185 factorials per second.
logout
[Process completed]


Power Macintosh G5 ("PowerMac7,3") with 2 cores, running at 2.50 gHz.
Frontside bus: 1.25 gHz
Installed memory: 6.50 GB


200,000,000 factorials will be calculated by creating 2 threads.

Thread # 1 created.
Thread # 2 created.
Waiting for threads to finish...
Thread # 1: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 10.620112 seconds at 9,416,096 factorials per second.
Thread # 2: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 10.691020 seconds at 9,353,644 factorials per second.
logout
[Process completed]
post #21 of 79
(null) ("MacBookPro2,1") with 2 cores, running at 2.33 gHz.
Frontside bus: 664.00 mHz
Installed memory: 3.00 GB

200,000,000 factorials will be calculated by creating 2 threads.

Thread # 1 created.
Thread # 2 created.
Waiting for threads to finish...
Thread # 2: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 7.577313 seconds at 13,197,290 factorials per second.
Thread # 1: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 7.669458 seconds at 13,038,731 factorials per second.
post #22 of 79
24" iMac 2.8GHz
Quote:
(null) ("iMac7,1") with 2 cores, running at 2.80 gHz.
Frontside bus: 800.00 mHz
Installed memory: 4.00 GB

200,000,000 factorials will be calculated by creating 2 threads.

Thread # 1 created.
Thread # 2 created.
Waiting for threads to finish...
Thread # 1: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 6.181379 seconds at 16,177,620 factorials per second.
Thread # 2: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 6.242776 seconds at 16,018,514 factorials per second.

as expected about the same score as aplnub.
alles sal reg kom
Reply
alles sal reg kom
Reply
post #23 of 79
Picked up a new 2.4 GHz MacBook yesterday.


*****************************
(null) ("MacBook4,1") with 2 cores, running at 2.40 gHz.
Frontside bus: 800.00 mHz
Installed memory: 2.00 GB

200,000,000 factorials will be calculated by creating 2 threads.

Thread # 1 created.
Thread # 2 created.
Waiting for threads to finish...
Thread # 1: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 7.337891 seconds at 13,627,894 factorials per second.
Thread # 2: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 7.400999 seconds at 13,511,690 factorials per second.
logout

[Process completed]
Hard-Core.
Reply
Hard-Core.
Reply
post #24 of 79
("MacBook2,1") with 2 cores, running at 2.00 gHz.
Frontside bus: 664.00 mHz
Installed memory: 4.00 GB [Only 3.3 GB used]


200,000,000 factorials will be calculated by creating 2 threads.

Thread # 1 created.
Thread # 2 created.
Waiting for threads to finish...
Thread # 1: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 8.795267 seconds at 11,369,751 factorials per second.
Thread # 2: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 8.915853 seconds at 11,215,977 factorials per second. I still think I'll wait until Nehalam as this notebook is still more than I need for mobile use.

("MacPro3,1") with 8 cores, running at 2.80 gHz.
Frontside bus: 1.60 gHz
Installed memory: 2.00 GB


200,000,000 factorials will be calculated by creating 8 threads.

Thread # 1 created.
Thread # 2 created.
Thread # 3 created.
Thread # 4 created.
Thread # 5 created.
Thread # 6 created.
Thread # 7 created.
Thread # 8 created.
Waiting for threads to finish...
Thread # 2: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.594032 seconds at 15,683,501 factorials per second.
Thread # 1: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.614698 seconds at 15,482,772 factorials per second.
Thread # 6: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.646314 seconds at 15,185,439 factorials per second.
Thread # 4: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.693074 seconds at 14,766,041 factorials per second.
Thread # 8: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.693699 seconds at 14,760,591 factorials per second.
Thread # 5: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.798509 seconds at 13,900,404 factorials per second.
Thread # 3: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.861043 seconds at 13,433,328 factorials per second.
Thread # 7: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.859716 seconds at 13,442,912 factorials per second. Need more RAM!!!
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
post #25 of 79
Really, these MB's are great little machines. I like my MB better than my MBP CD. Kinda annoying not having a USB port on the right side but I'll use the BT mouse.

Overall, they are missing a graphics card but Windows boots in VMWare as fast on my MB as my MBP. I have a 4 Gb ram kit on the way from Crucial. Should be in there like swimwear in a few days.

I like smaller notebooks though. I may line up my 15" MBP CD, 12" iBook 1.2 G4, and 13" MB for a nice photo. Definitely a pleased customer with my MB. Battery life is really good too. I was shocked. I bought an extra battery for an upcoming 9 hour flight and now I wonder if I will need since I don't work the entire flight. Should be nice though.
Hard-Core.
Reply
Hard-Core.
Reply
post #26 of 79
iMac (24-inch Core 2 Duo) ("iMac6,1") with 2 cores, running at 2.16 gHz.
Frontside bus: 664.00 mHz
Installed memory: 1.00 GB

200,000,000 factorials will be calculated by creating 2 threads.

Thread # 1 created.
Thread # 2 created.
Waiting for threads to finish...
Thread # 1: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 7.971797 seconds at 12,544,223 factorials per second.
Thread # 2: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 8.084916 seconds at 12,368,712 factorials per second.
logout

[Process completed]

I feel so slow compared to some people
Windows Development Team Motto: We are not happy until YOU are not happy
Reply
Windows Development Team Motto: We are not happy until YOU are not happy
Reply
post #27 of 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by aplnub View Post

I bought an extra battery for an upcoming 9 hour flight and now I wonder if I will need since I don't work the entire flight. Should be nice though.

ou probably will. Chances are, you'll be using your computer in the terminal while waiting to board and perhaps even while sitting on the plane before take off. The former can easily be an hour worth or use and the former can can be even longer if you are delayed.

You can always search for an outlet in the terminal. They tend to be few and far between and already used up. If you don't want to wait in rotation for a space to open up then I suggest a travel sized power strip. Monster makes a very reasonably priced one. If others are alrady waiting you not only get in there right away but you instantly become everyone's favorite person as if you supplying the coke at a party in Hollywood in the 1980s.

I have 3 total batteries for my MacBook. It unfortunate that the MBA's battery life is so dismal otherwise it would be the perfect for me.
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
post #28 of 79
("MacBookPro3,1") with 2 cores, running at 2.40 gHz.
Frontside bus: 800.00 mHz
Installed memory: 4.00 GB

200,000,000 factorials will be calculated by creating 2 threads.

Thread # 1 created.
Thread # 2 created.
Waiting for threads to finish...
Thread # 1: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 7.327017 seconds at 13,648,119 factorials per second.
Thread # 2: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 7.366542 seconds at 13,574,890 factorials per second.
OK, can I have my matte Apple display, now?
Reply
OK, can I have my matte Apple display, now?
Reply
post #29 of 79
("MacBook1,1") with 2 cores, running at 1.83 gHz.
Frontside bus: 664.00 mHz
Installed memory: 2.00 GB

200,000,000 factorials will be calculated by creating 2 threads.

Thread # 1 created.
Thread # 2 created.
Waiting for threads to finish...
Thread # 1: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 10.957163 seconds at 9,126,450 factorials per second.
Thread # 2: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 10.997182 seconds at 9,093,239 factorials per second.
OK, can I have my matte Apple display, now?
Reply
OK, can I have my matte Apple display, now?
Reply
post #30 of 79
The newest macbook pro at 2.4Ghz.. Didnt see that much of a difference compared to Messiah's MBP.

(null) ("MacBookPro4,1") with 2 cores, running at 2.40 gHz.
Frontside bus: 800.00 mHz
Installed memory: 2.00 GB

200,000,000 factorials will be calculated by creating 2 threads.

Thread # 1 created.
Thread # 2 created.
Waiting for threads to finish...
Thread # 1: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 7.373708 seconds at 13,561,698 factorials per second.
Thread # 2: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 7.663430 seconds at 13,048,987 factorials per second.
logout

[Process completed]
post #31 of 79
("MacPro3,1") with 8 cores, running at 2.80 gHz.
Frontside bus: 1.60 gHz
Installed memory: 2.00 GB

200,000,000 factorials will be calculated by creating 8 threads.

Thread # 1 created.
Thread # 2 created.
Thread # 3 created.
Thread # 4 created.
Thread # 5 created.
Thread # 6 created.
Thread # 7 created.
Thread # 8 created.
Waiting for threads to finish...
Thread # 1: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.523008 seconds at 16,414,883 factorials per second.
Thread # 3: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.528582 seconds at 16,355,026 factorials per second.
Thread # 2: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.566583 seconds at 15,958,297 factorials per second.
Thread # 4: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.572128 seconds at 15,902,012 factorials per second.
Thread # 5: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.594476 seconds at 15,679,132 factorials per second.
Thread # 6: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.608338 seconds at 15,543,995 factorials per second.
Thread # 7: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.665912 seconds at 15,006,794 factorials per second.
Thread # 8: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.718719 seconds at 14,545,717 factorials per second.
OK, can I have my matte Apple display, now?
Reply
OK, can I have my matte Apple display, now?
Reply
post #32 of 79
Anybody want to test a MacBook Air, just out of interest?
OK, can I have my matte Apple display, now?
Reply
OK, can I have my matte Apple display, now?
Reply
post #33 of 79
Power Macintosh G4 (AGP-Graphics) ("PowerMac3,1") with 1 cores, running at 400.00 mHz.
Frontside bus: 99.63 mHz
Installed memory: 416.00 MB

200,000,000 factorials will be calculated by creating 1 threads.

Thread # 1 created.
Waiting for threads to finish...
Thread # 1: 200,000,000 factorials calculated in 157.891054 seconds at 1,266,696 factorials per second.
logout

So the mighty G4 does about 3 million factorials/s/GHz as compared to the Xeons 5 million /s/GHz

The dual core does a bit below 3...(at least with two foldings in the background)



Mac mini (Core Duo/Solo) ("Macmini1,1") with 2 cores, running at 1.66 gHz.
Frontside bus: 664.00 mHz
Installed memory: 1.00 GB

200,000,000 factorials will be calculated by creating 2 threads.

Thread # 1 created.
Thread # 2 created.
Waiting for threads to finish...
Thread # 2: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 20.952019 seconds at 4,772,810 factorials per second.
Thread # 1: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 21.021037 seconds at 4,757,139 factorials per second.
post #34 of 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by J120387 View Post

The newest macbook pro at 2.4Ghz.. Didnt see that much of a difference compared to Messiah's MBP.

Or my MB.
Hard-Core.
Reply
Hard-Core.
Reply
post #35 of 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by J120387 View Post

The newest macbook pro at 2.4Ghz.. Didnt see that much of a difference compared to Messiah's MBP.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aplnub View Post

Or my MB.

Have it keep running until the batttery runs out and then tell me you don't see much of a difference.
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
post #36 of 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by solipsism View Post

Have it keep running until the batttery runs out and then tell me you don't see much of a difference.

I am getting over 5.5 horus of use. Sometimes over 6. So it will be later tonight before that happens.
Hard-Core.
Reply
Hard-Core.
Reply
post #37 of 79
("MacPro3,1") with 8 cores, running at 3.20 gHz.
Frontside bus: 1.60 gHz
Installed memory: 14.00 GB

200,000,000 factorials will be calculated by creating 8 threads.

Thread # 1 created.
Thread # 2 created.
Thread # 3 created.
Thread # 4 created.
Thread # 5 created.
Thread # 6 created.
Thread # 7 created.
Thread # 8 created.
Waiting for threads to finish...
Thread # 2: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.349372 seconds at 18,527,138 factorials per second.
Thread # 4: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.345968 seconds at 18,573,992 factorials per second.
Thread # 5: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.366682 seconds at 18,292,476 factorials per second.
Thread # 8: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.338154 seconds at 18,682,452 factorials per second.
Thread # 1: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.418851 seconds at 17,619,892 factorials per second.
Thread # 3: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.409163 seconds at 17,741,028 factorials per second.
Thread # 7: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.369447 seconds at 18,255,544 factorials per second.
Thread # 6: 25,000,000 factorials calculated in 1.412434 seconds at 17,699,940 factorials per second.
logout

[Process completed]
Work Hard. Increase Production. Prevent Accidents. And Be Happy...
Reply
Work Hard. Increase Production. Prevent Accidents. And Be Happy...
Reply
post #38 of 79
Thread Starter 
1.34 - 1.42 seconds

I think that is the all-time record run on this bench. Makes sense - that's 25.6 gHz total processing power. This bench tests CPU only, probably isn't affected by cache or FSB or anything else.
--Johnny
Reply
--Johnny
Reply
post #39 of 79
("Macmini2,1") with 2 cores, running at 2.00 gHz.
Frontside bus: 664.00 mHz
Installed memory: 2.00 GB

200,000,000 factorials will be calculated by creating 2 threads.

Thread # 1 created.
Thread # 2 created.
Waiting for threads to finish...
Thread # 1: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 9.143883 seconds at 10,936,273 factorials per second.
Thread # 2: 100,000,000 factorials calculated in 9.134340 seconds at 10,947,698 factorials per second.
OK, can I have my matte Apple display, now?
Reply
OK, can I have my matte Apple display, now?
Reply
post #40 of 79
messiah, how many macs do u own?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Current Mac Hardware
AppleInsider › Forums › Mac Hardware › Current Mac Hardware › Bench Your New Mac With Factorial Bench