Quote:
Originally Posted by caliminius 
Of course it's one-sided. It's by the RoughlyDrafted website author (hence the numerous links to that site). I really wanted to be okay with this review, but like always he acts like the biggest Apple apologist around. He downplays every flaw (Flash not necessary? Makes many websites I have unusable without it.), makes claims about how features are coming to the iPhone (don't know how he can know that as no one else seems to know that), and takes cheap shots at Windows and anything else non-Apple for no apparent reason (No, I'm not a MS fan but what do they have to do with this Palm phone?).
Come on, AppleInsider, couldn't you have someone review Apple products who wasn't so clearly biased? It doesn't do much for your site's journalistic integrity to have such flagrant propaganda being posted as a review.
And before it's said, I know no one shoved this article down my throat (but I sure as h*ll wish there was a way I could throw it back up).

Of course it's one-sided. It's by the RoughlyDrafted website author (hence the numerous links to that site). I really wanted to be okay with this review, but like always he acts like the biggest Apple apologist around. He downplays every flaw (Flash not necessary? Makes many websites I have unusable without it.), makes claims about how features are coming to the iPhone (don't know how he can know that as no one else seems to know that), and takes cheap shots at Windows and anything else non-Apple for no apparent reason (No, I'm not a MS fan but what do they have to do with this Palm phone?).
Come on, AppleInsider, couldn't you have someone review Apple products who wasn't so clearly biased? It doesn't do much for your site's journalistic integrity to have such flagrant propaganda being posted as a review.
And before it's said, I know no one shoved this article down my throat (but I sure as h*ll wish there was a way I could throw it back up).
Yeah the Apple faithful always apologize for Apple and let us know what we really "don't need" they have more excuses than a pregnant Nun.
If the phone was on par price wise with other smart phones then you can make excuses but not when its 700.00 before you get out the door with tax and accessories.
This is why Verizon told Apple to get lost it just wasn't worth it to them, smart phones on average are mostly for corporate use, yes people with a over inflated self worth that feel the need to be connected all the time buy them also but as a rule Apple has never made a dent in the corporate world with anything.
The simple fact is Apple has had a great two years not because of Apple but because of the Intel name and the fact you can now install Windows on Apple hardware to make up for the lack of OsX third party apps.
You can just go down the line. Apple TV is a joke, new iMac met with very mixed reivew even though I like them, iLife 08 , imovie has been getting killed, iWorks, yeah thats really going to replace office, and while we are talking about office how about leaving in the VBA extentions for Excel.
The fact is Apple makes a good stable product most of the time, and people like the way their stuff looks. Their OS is fairly soild and if your going to work with images and movies then a Apple product works quite well. However if you actually need to interact with the other 96% of the world that uses MS based products and third party software that support that OS then a mac or any Apple product is going to fall short of expectations, in many cases very short.
Apple makes products that work well with other Apple products and apps however they fall very short on having them work well with the rest of the world.
The iphone will be no different and for the exception of ipods Apple will never have any real market share of anything. The only reason ipods have such a huge market share is they are mostly used by windows users.
People can debate this tell me im full of shit but 30 years of history is hard to dispute.









