or Connect
AppleInsider › Forums › Software › Mac OS X › Apple yanks wireless backup from Leopard last minute
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Apple yanks wireless backup from Leopard last minute - Page 2

post #41 of 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by camimac View Post

Pardon my ignorance, but what exactly does the Sarbanes-Oxley Act got to do with this?

A joke maybe? lol
Use duckduckgo.com with Safari, not Google Search
Been using Apples since 1978 and Macs since 1984
Long on AAPL so biased. Strong advocate for separation of technology and politics on AI.
Reply
Use duckduckgo.com with Safari, not Google Search
Been using Apples since 1978 and Macs since 1984
Long on AAPL so biased. Strong advocate for separation of technology and politics on AI.
Reply
post #42 of 155
[QUOTE=TECHSTUD;1163405]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abster2core View Post

You, by far![/QUOTE

NO- the biggest dissapointment is the AppleTV- a $400 VHS quality- criossant warming piecs of you know what. Hey maybe I can use it as the external hard drive required in order to use Time Machine ( you know the $129 application in disguise as OS lepoard)! Why didn't Steve ever mention that we would need to buy an external hard drive on order to use this "new" OS? Never once mentioned in any preview until posted 2 weeks ago. Oh, I'm sorry -it must have been so obvious!

Go back to your Vista will ya!

Leo is awesome and so will all the updates be, over the coming months.

p.s. My ATV sends 720P and looks great on my 50" 1080i HDTV, perhaps you tested yours on the wrong equipment or supplied the incorrect media to it if you see VHS quality.
Use duckduckgo.com with Safari, not Google Search
Been using Apples since 1978 and Macs since 1984
Long on AAPL so biased. Strong advocate for separation of technology and politics on AI.
Reply
Use duckduckgo.com with Safari, not Google Search
Been using Apples since 1978 and Macs since 1984
Long on AAPL so biased. Strong advocate for separation of technology and politics on AI.
Reply
post #43 of 155
Let's take an ADULT look at this, shall we?

Suppose Apple had left this Wireless Backup in Leopard and it corrupted your data. Then you'd be crying, "Why didn't they take this out if it wasn't finished!"

I'm sure Apple didn't yank out the feature for the sole reason of pissing people off. For those that bought Airport Extreme's, take it back to the store.
post #44 of 155
Apple is looking like M$ with feature deletion.
post #45 of 155
This issue on Apple ynking wireless backup is a no-brainer. Simple response to clear this matter with the MAC universe - It will take a week to backup a 1TB drive via Apple airport extreme (n)using Leopard and Time Machine and if the connection drops you have to start all over again. I truly believe that is why it was dropped. It takes me an hour to move 10gb via Airport extreme connected to a NAS drive. TOO SLOW to use as a networked backup for me and the family. DUH!
post #46 of 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gustav View Post

No kidding! He was making a point!

Geez!

There's making a point, but then there's beating a dead horse in doing so.
post #47 of 155
Features drop out of development cycles. That is one of the fastest ways to make scheduled release dates. How would have felt if apple pushed back the release date by another month for just this feature? I'm sure some of you would have liked that, but a majority of us would not have. It's the way it goes with development. It is very hard to say we want this list of features in this product by this date and make it. It takes some serious team work, professional scheduling. Don't fret, it will show up in an update later on.

 

 

Quote:
The reason why they are analysts is because they failed at running businesses.

 

Reply

 

 

Quote:
The reason why they are analysts is because they failed at running businesses.

 

Reply
post #48 of 155
I am another who purchased the Airport Extreme and had it ready to go in my home in anticipation of Leopard. We all use laptops and it made a lot more sense to do it wirelessly. This is very dissappointing.
post #49 of 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by emig647 View Post

Features drop out of development cycles. That is one of the fastest ways to make scheduled release dates. How would have felt if apple pushed back the release date by another month for just this feature? I'm sure some of you would have liked that, but a majority of us would not have. It's the way it goes with development. It is very hard to say we want this list of features in this product by this date and make it. It takes some serious team work, professional scheduling. Don't fret, it will show up in an update later on.

Absolutely right, give me what they have now and I can wait for a few updates np. At least unlike after n years of trying to create a modern OS (Longhorn) Apple didn't give up and stick a crummy GUI on DOS and call it Vista

Hey guys, notice all the nergative crap comming from posters with like 1 or 2 posts? The Windoze brigade must be sooo jealous to have to intrude on our forums

Hint: ignore trolls
Use duckduckgo.com with Safari, not Google Search
Been using Apples since 1978 and Macs since 1984
Long on AAPL so biased. Strong advocate for separation of technology and politics on AI.
Reply
Use duckduckgo.com with Safari, not Google Search
Been using Apples since 1978 and Macs since 1984
Long on AAPL so biased. Strong advocate for separation of technology and politics on AI.
Reply
post #50 of 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jemster View Post

removing features in such an Orwellian style.

Now THAT's hyperbole. Not to mention questionable metaphor.
Apple must be double-plus bad.
post #51 of 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitalclips View Post

Hey guys, notice all the nergative crap comming from posters with like 1 or 2 posts? The Windoze brigade must be sooo jealous to have to intrude on our forums

Hint: ignore trolls

Funnily enough, everyone here once had 1 or 2 posts. The fact that they've increased their post count to any appreciable number is no reflection on the quality of their posts nor is it a tacit indicator of their positivity.

More people are joining the forums as more Apple products, whether they be an iPhone or a new computer, are being bought. I expect that people who recently switched to an Apple machine will have misgivings about the fact that Apple seem to routinely use a bit of hyperbole.

It's entirely reasonable, in my opinion, to expect Apple to ship what they advertised a week ago.

Given that this isn't the case, I'd at least hope that Apple would give some guidance on a feature whose omission will certainly affect those who purchased an AE(n) with the express intent of using it with Leopard as a network Time Machine backup.
"Many people would sooner die than think; in fact, they do so." - Bertrand Russell
Reply
"Many people would sooner die than think; in fact, they do so." - Bertrand Russell
Reply
post #52 of 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitalclips View Post

Hey guys, notice all the nergative crap comming from posters with like 1 or 2 posts? The Windoze brigade must be sooo jealous to have to intrude on our forums

Coming from the person who says "windoze", that means so much.
post #53 of 155
I feel bad for those who bought the AE(n) for Time Machine, but there are make-do's. I picked one up a month or so back because I wanted (n) and... it went with my new MBP. If all you want is a backup, I've been using my AE(n) for that on both my MBP and my PC -- there's other software (perhaps not as elegant for your needs, but if your primary focus is backing up, saving your data in case of catastrophe, they work great), some of them even do things Time Machine doesn't (for me, real time backup/sync is important). Also, the hacks posted here. Again, not perfect, but no doubt TM will be "fixed" in a coming update. Or, you can bring your AE(n) back. But, as bad as I feel for you, it beats corrupted data (if the feature was flaky and they included it). I'll take my backups any way I can get them.
"I used to be disgusted, but now I try to be amused."
Macbook Pro 2.2
Reply
"I used to be disgusted, but now I try to be amused."
Macbook Pro 2.2
Reply
post #54 of 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by GQB View Post

Now THAT's hyperbole. Not to mention questionable metaphor.
Apple must be double-plus bad.

Ummm... hyperbole? How so? I'm thinking Animal Farm here, not 1984. The ever changing text on all animals being equal? i.e. the rewriting of statements that would leave people questioning whether or not it was a figment of their imagination. Apple have done it several times, we all know that.

Consider if you were a slightly less aware consumer, bought the product and then found the wonderful feature you'd read was going to be there wasn't - you'd probably go back to the web site where you thought you'd read about it only to find no trace.

I'm not trying to flame bait and even though I don't post hundreds of comments I am no troll, I just find it a little bit underhanded to take things away without explanation. We may well ass-u-me it will arrive later but an official statement wouldn't be amiss here.
post #55 of 155
Well, guess I'm glad I haven't bought that 500GB external drive yet!

This sounds like something that will be enabled in a .1 or .2 update. Like someone said above, if there's any feature Apple needs to ship bug-free, it's this one. You can't ship a backup program for the masses if it's not going to work right out of the box.

Quote:
Originally Posted by digitalclips

My ATV sends 720P and looks great on my 50" 1080i HDTV, perhaps you tested yours on the wrong equipment or supplied the incorrect media to it if you see VHS quality.

Off-topic, but where are you finding HD content for your Apple TV?
27" 3.06 GHz iMac

16 GB iPhone 4
80 GB iPod Classic
1 GB 2nd Gen iPod Shuffle

Apple TV (2nd gen)
Apple TV (1st gen 40 GB)
AirPort Extreme Base Station (802.11n)
Reply
27" 3.06 GHz iMac

16 GB iPhone 4
80 GB iPod Classic
1 GB 2nd Gen iPod Shuffle

Apple TV (2nd gen)
Apple TV (1st gen 40 GB)
AirPort Extreme Base Station (802.11n)
Reply
post #56 of 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by bdkennedy1 View Post

Let's take an ADULT look at this, shall we?

Suppose Apple had left this Wireless Backup in Leopard and it corrupted your data. Then you'd be crying, "Why didn't they take this out if it wasn't finished!"

I'm sure Apple didn't yank out the feature for the sole reason of pissing people off. For those that bought Airport Extreme's, take it back to the store.

This just shows you how Apple still doesn't get 'customer relations'. They treat everything as a trade secret, no matter what it is. They never explain anything (don't you love getting an update notification that just says "Improves reliability and stability...").

This is another case. How hard would it be to just issue a press release that says "We've had to remove such-and-such feature at the last minute because of certain issues. At this point in time, we can't promise it will return in Leopard. Anyone who purchased an Airport extreme and/or Leopard after the official announcement date can return them for full refunds."

Simple, courteous, professional. Treat your customers like intelligent people, and they might treat you in a similar fashion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kimo_ona_Mac View Post

This issue on Apple ynking wireless backup is a no-brainer. Simple response to clear this matter with the MAC universe - It will take a week to backup a 1TB drive via Apple airport extreme (n)using Leopard and Time Machine and if the connection drops you have to start all over again. I truly believe that is why it was dropped. It takes me an hour to move 10gb via Airport extreme connected to a NAS drive. TOO SLOW to use as a networked backup for me and the family. DUH!

Well, who's got a 1 TB drive? Most users have somewhere in the 100-250GB, tops. And if it is 1TB, who's got a 1TB external to use for backups?

And its not Apple's place to say "Oh, it'll take too long, well, let's just drop the feature!". Let the users decide if it takes too long. Does Apple's testing facilities suck so much that no one thought of testing this out until the last minute?

And, if the connection drops, you don't have to start all over. If that is the case, Time Machine sucks as a backup solution.

Quote:
Originally Posted by emig647 View Post

Features drop out of development cycles. That is one of the fastest ways to make scheduled release dates.

Once software hits beta, features aren't supposed to be added/dropped. Once it hits release candidate, its just bug fixing time. Once it actually is announced, you actually expect them to know what it will/won't contain. If it has to change, fine. But, again, tell your customers, don't try to hide it.
post #57 of 155
My father-in-law gave me his $100 iPhone rebate and my D-Link Wireless Router started flaking out so I bought an AEBS (GigE) a month or so ago.

I found 500 GB external FW/USB2 HD's for $119 each at Fry's so I was able to set up my dream back-up solution. I bought two drives and originally make identical full back-ups on both using SuperDuper! I took one to the office for off-site storage and kept one at home. Each Sunday, I'd do an incremental back-up and swap the drives on Monday.

I like this set-up so much, I don't think I'm going to need Time Machine so much.

I hope Shirt Pocket can get the Leopard-compatible version of SuperDuper! out soon. I am really liking their product!
post #58 of 155
[QUOTE=digitalclips;1163410]
Quote:
Originally Posted by TECHSTUD View Post


Go back to your Vista will ya!

Leo is awesome and so will all the updates be, over the coming months.

p.s. My ATV sends 720P and looks great on my 50" 1080i HDTV, perhaps you tested yours on the wrong equipment or supplied the incorrect media to it if you see VHS quality.

Too bad Apple doesn't supply any way of recording or distributing HD content. So you're stuck either getting it off bittorrent or recording it yourself via EyeTV.
post #59 of 155
Apple says: "Time Machine can also back up to another Mac running Leopard with Personal File Sharing."

I have a fileserver running Tiger. Is Time Machine unable to back up to it for some reason? Is there some Leopard-Leopard interaction going on here, is it trying to do something more than simply write files to a share?
post #60 of 155
Wel, I for one was looking forward to this feature as the owner of a MBP. Having to plugin is going to be a pain in the ass. I was unsure of upgrading to Leopard right away, mostly due to money. This will actually give me pause, not that it's a huge deal.

The "To Do" notes will be an issue once I get an iphone (after it goes 3G). I would use that feature as I would dotmac integration (both are a must for me).

Now, should people be irritated? Yes, I think they should be. Clearly Apple has its reasons, reasons that are probably stability/performance related. But they had this feature publicly announced. They talked about it. It was a sub feature under one of the major new features in the OS itself. It was one of my first questions....would it work wirelessly? Apple answered my question, and I was happy with their answer.

But now they yank the feature at the very last possible second. I think that's not right, unless the issue was so major it was going to cause your computer to explode or zero its drive, then explode. They should have a least publicly announced the reason.

I don't fault people for buying an Extreme either. They did so on Apple's word. There was no reason to think they'd yank the rug with 12 hours to go. Usually I'd say "you're screwed, don't be a baby" but in this case I think Apple screwed this one up.
I can only please one person per day.  Today is not your day.  Tomorrow doesn't look good either.  
Reply
I can only please one person per day.  Today is not your day.  Tomorrow doesn't look good either.  
Reply
post #61 of 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by camimac View Post

That's not the point, do you know many people who will bother? Isn't the whole idea of the Mac that "it just works" (even though that's just one of the worst marketing mottos I've ever seen in my life)?

Um, well that's probably why they yanked it. It didn't "just work".
post #62 of 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by mungler View Post

crees - Time Machine will do a backup every time you connect an external disk, if its overdue. This, i think, is a good solution for laptop users.

As much as I don't agree with all the whiners, your suggestion is not a good solution for laptop users.

The whole point of Time Machine is that it happens without your interaction, in the background, automatically. If you have to remember to plug in an external drive to do an occasional "catch up" backup, you're no better off than with any previous backup solution. Not to mention, your backups become so sparse that you'll probably miss files on occasion that get deleted before they are backed up.

This wireless Airport feature was not only posted all over the web site, it was featured prominently in Jobs' WWDC preview of Leopard. He had a slide with a HD hooked up to a Base Station, using Time Machine with an iMac. So it was reasonable for people to expect this functionality in the final shipping product.

However, I do think that persistent bugs must have made it necessary to temporarily disable it. My hope, and hunch, is that it will be a top priority for 10.5.1 to get this feature working again. As others have said, an unreliable backup system is worse than no backup system at all. It leaves you with a false sense of security. And the last thing Apple needs is hordes of articles talking about how Time Machine ate people's entire photo libraries, etc.

As far as TB drives, and Airport N being too slow for backups, I have to disagree. Sure, the initial backup will take a really long time over Airport. That's why I was planning on doing the initial one with a wire, and then moving over to wireless, as I did with my Apple TV. But the hourly and daily backups should be relatively small, file-size wise. On an average day, how many GBs do you change on your HD? I'm thinking that my average would be 100-500 MBs, factoring in iTunes, work files, preferences, etc. That's a few minutes over 802.11n. Sure, some days it will be more, others much less. But I've been using .Mac's Backup program over the air with my Base Station for months now, and it works fine. I can't see this being the real issue. You can still use Time Machine over the network if the drive is physically connected to another Mac. Isn't that still going over the air if my laptop is connecting to the network via Airport?

I suspect it's a bug of some kind in the base station itself, or in the Airport Disk drivers that they have to hammer out with a firmware update.
post #63 of 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by camimac View Post

Pardon my ignorance, but what exactly does the Sarbanes-Oxley Act got to do with this?

I was under the impression that Apple could not provide additional features unless they recorded income from a product as subscription revenue (which would also mean that revenue is spread out overal several quarters).

Apple charged $1.99 for the 802.11n update earlier this year becaues of that and are spreading income received from iPhones over several months for that same reason.

The basic idea is that a company can't sell a product based on some future value not yet available. That's what got Enron in trouble . The work around is to charge a "subscription" fee, so that the customer is continually paying for the product, so that feature additions can be included. This subscription is invisible to the purchaser, and completely handled by Apple accounting. So, potentially, you're one time $129 for leopard may be recorded by them as $5.375 every month for the next 24-months.

Unfortunately for Apple, that completely skews quarterly earnings, because they can't realize the full purchase price on anything until whatever "subscription" period they have created has come to an end. For something like the iPhone, that may mean it even looks like a loss, when in reality, the money just hasn't been recorded as income yet. Fortunately for Apple, that hasn't seemed to affect their quarterly earnings at all.

(IANAA [i am not an accountant], I've just been an observer on how this has affected business before.)
post #64 of 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eriamjh View Post

Apple is looking like M$ with feature deletion.

You do realize Apple has done this on almost every OS X release since 10.2? We can count a bunch of stuff. Most of it did come at some point, though some did not (Home on iPod anyone?).

Leopard is still very awesome even with a few missing things. I know for sure that this feature was axed due to bugs that were not resolvable before release.
post #65 of 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leonard View Post

Big deal! So Apple yanked one or two small (and I do mean SMALL) sub-features before release. Maybe it had some problems and wasn't ready. Would you rather have the feature and lose data? I think Apple's done this in the past once or twice. Something isn't ready for the Gold Master, so they don't put it in and release it in a later update.

You can pretty much simulate this feature by sharing an external disk on a second computer.

At least Apple stayed on schedule.

The way current version of Leopard looks, it should have been yanked altogether, until it looks more like a release and less like a beta. There are problems pretty much everywhere with the current "release" (which I have just installed from the box). Mail, .Mac syncing, Finder, sharing... And I'm sure as I'm digging deeper, more issues will show up. So far it doesn't look much better than the latest beta I've had (559).

Apple is the new Microsoft. Congratulations, everyone.
post #66 of 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by tetzel1517 View Post

Off-topic, but where are you finding HD content for your Apple TV?

Legitimately, there are some HD podcasts. Also, if you have an EyeTV HD tuner, you can transcode an HD recording to AppleTV compatible 720p file. That's hardly an ideal solution though unless you plan to re-watch them a lot.
post #67 of 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by farlander View Post

The way current version of Leopard looks, it should have been yanked altogether, until it looks more like a release and less like a beta. There are problems pretty much everywhere with the current "release" (which I have just installed from the box). Mail, .Mac syncing, Finder, sharing... And I'm sure as I'm digging deeper, more issues will show up. So far it doesn't look much better than the latest beta I've had (559).

Apple is the new Microsoft. Congratulations, everyone.

Could you outline the problems that you are having?
"Many people would sooner die than think; in fact, they do so." - Bertrand Russell
Reply
"Many people would sooner die than think; in fact, they do so." - Bertrand Russell
Reply
post #68 of 155
So any AFP-writable share will work? Seems no one has mentioned (guess it's still a bit early) what happens if you are using a shared folder on a partition with other data on it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by alienzed View Post

Personal File Sharing works wirelessly, so mount your drive and back up to it and stop complaining.
post #69 of 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by audiopollution View Post

Could you outline the problems that you are having?

First, every time I start Mail client, I get different views: sometimes it shows RSS, sometimes it doesn't. Sometimes it shows "ON MY MAC", sometimes it doesn't. Sometimes id shows "REMINDERS", sometimes it doesn't.

.Mac sync complained that there are conflicts between .Mac and local Address book. When I went to check - the conflicts were exactly the same, no difference, so I asked it to resolve conflicts, using local data. After that Sync would still say there's 1 unresolved conflict, but when it starts Conflict Resolver - no conflicts detected. The only way to fix this that I could come up with is to reset .Mac from local data, then reset local data back from .Mac.

Also, as it turns out, Leopard is completely 32-bit. No signs of anything 64-bit, and I have the latest MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo (it IS 64-bit capable).

$ uname -a
Darwin mymacbookpro 9.0.0 Darwin Kernel Version 9.0.0: Tue Oct 9 21:35:55 PDT 2007; root:xnu-1228~1/RELEASE_I386 i386

That's all after about 15 minutes of poking around in Leopard after the installation. I'm sure there'll be more problems discovered later, as I start testing other parts of the system.

To add to the list of frustration, it kernel paniced, when I starter Parallels Desktop for the first time. And VPN Tracker is not working completely.
post #70 of 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leonard View Post

Big deal! So Apple yanked one or two small (and I do mean SMALL) sub-features before release.

For some people, ZFS and Resolution Independence aren't small features.
post #71 of 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by Louzer View Post

Once software hits beta, features aren't supposed to be added/dropped. Once it hits release candidate, its just bug fixing time. Once it actually is announced, you actually expect them to know what it will/won't contain. If it has to change, fine. But, again, tell your customers, don't try to hide it.

That's untrue. If software hits beta and SQA comes back with a big bug report on a feature. And you can't fix the feature in time, you have no choice but to cut it... or push the date further. There is no other choice.

 

 

Quote:
The reason why they are analysts is because they failed at running businesses.

 

Reply

 

 

Quote:
The reason why they are analysts is because they failed at running businesses.

 

Reply
post #72 of 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leonard View Post

Big deal! So Apple yanked one or two small (and I do mean SMALL) sub-features before release.

Okay, sole arbiter of what's important to individual buyers.

I for one purchased Leopard in large part for time machine, to backup to the external drive I purchased specifically for time machine, which I have connected to the Airport Extreme I purchased specifically for time machine.

Come on Apple. That sucks.
I got nothin'.
Reply
I got nothin'.
Reply
post #73 of 155
[QUOTE=Louzer;1163448]
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitalclips View Post


Too bad Apple doesn't supply any way of recording or distributing HD content. So you're stuck either getting it off bittorrent or recording it yourself via EyeTV.


Hello- 720p is HD wannabe! How much of that "720p" did you get from iTunes? Have you been enjoying your YouTube smear videos on that 42" Plasma ?-loser Without handbrake. AppleTV would be in the grave already.
And AppleTV must be one of the most environmental unfriendly products of all time with the heat that it constantly generates. And it has no on/off switch but it constantly on- and for what?
And I don't use VISTA but will need a VISA in order to buy a new computer to run Lepoard's DVD player, new external hard drive to run time machine, dotMac account, etc. Hey- a new VISA add in the making!
post #74 of 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by GQB View Post

Ah yes... the howling at the moon begins.
Get a clue... features miss release. Welcome to the real world.
The fact that it was on the list in the first place means that it will be out as soon as its reliably working. (Want to see how many MORE people would be pissed if it had been shoehorned in and it didn't work properly?)

And finally, anyone who buys based on rumors of features is a f**cking idiot.

Rumors of features? So, I'm a f**cking idiot for relying on Apple's online marketing material? Oh, shit. Stupid me. Brilliant you.
I got nothin'.
Reply
I got nothin'.
Reply
post #75 of 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kimo_ona_Mac View Post

This issue on Apple ynking wireless backup is a no-brainer. Simple response to clear this matter with the MAC universe - It will take a week to backup a 1TB drive via Apple airport extreme (n)using Leopard and Time Machine and if the connection drops you have to start all over again. I truly believe that is why it was dropped. It takes me an hour to move 10gb via Airport extreme connected to a NAS drive. TOO SLOW to use as a networked backup for me and the family. DUH!

First of all, no one is backing up all of a 1TB drive via Time Machine most likely. You don't need to back up applications, the OS etc... What are you using Time Machine to back up a 1TB drive to anyhow? A 5 TB RAID?

Plus, this was one of the reasons why everyone was looking forward to 802.11n - much faster.

Finally, you are not constantly moving the whole drive. The first time yes, then after that it is incremental. Thus, you could do a hard connect for the first pass and then use wireless from then on.
post #76 of 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leonard View Post

Big deal! So Apple yanked one or two small (and I do mean SMALL) sub-features before release. Maybe it had some problems and wasn't ready. Would you rather have the feature and lose data?

I would rather have an official, public, honest explanation from Apple as to why the feature was removed. None of this waving the hand and doing the "Jedi Mind Trick", pretending that those words never appeared on their web site.
post #77 of 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by minderbinder View Post

This just means they didn't work out the bugs in time. I'll bet it shows up again in .1 or .2. Bummer for people who bought an airport just for this, but it wasn't a smart move, you should never buy hardware based on assumptions about potential future software features.

Overall, Leopard has been working great so far, I've even had some hardware work fine that I expected would need driver updates. It seems like some people have their panties in a bunch over relatively minor issues.

Yeah, don't ever buy hardware that touts its ability to work with an operating system that's made by the same company, *especially* when that company puts up video after video demonstrating that very feature, and mentions that *exact* hardware by name! That is just waaaaaay dumb. I mean, just wait to buy everything until you *know* you're getting what is advertised. Thanks for sharing that nugget of universal enlightenment.

At least I'm not some dumbass that bought a *whole* Mac based on assumptions about potential future software features like those contained in Leopard.
I got nothin'.
Reply
I got nothin'.
Reply
post #78 of 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by farlander View Post

Also, as it turns out, Leopard is completely 32-bit. No signs of anything 64-bit, and I have the latest MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo (it IS 64-bit capable).

$ uname -a
Darwin mymacbookpro 9.0.0 Darwin Kernel Version 9.0.0: Tue Oct 9 21:35:55 PDT 2007; root:xnu-1228~1/RELEASE_I386 i386

This is a silly, uninformed claim.

Leopard contains 4 (FOUR) versions of the frameworks etc. : 32 bit PPC, 32 bit Intel (i386), 64 bit PPC, 64 bit Intel (x86_64). unameis is not designed to list them all. I guess unames is 32 bit itself so you get this result. Try:

otool -f /System/Library/Frameworks/AppKit.framework/Versions/C/AppKit

(type the path to any library you are interested in) and see the results. You should have 4 architectures listed. I heard from developers that all Cocoa objects work fine in 64 bit, example: NSData was limited to less than 2GB before and can get huge data chunks now. So is NSImage etc. With the libraries outside Cocoa it is a more complicated issue: one and the same function can not return 32 bit and 64 bit type at the same time and you don't want to break all the existing code by suddenly returning 64 bit value where one expects 32. Mac OS X (like almost any other OS besides windows) uses LP64 model which standardizes on the data types and pointers length.

On the AirDisk: The fact that it was in all recent betas and on the Apple web site is a clear indication that it was pulled because of a bug. I expect 10.5.1 in a month from now or earlier. That is the way Apple works: when they ship the OS for mastering they start to work on the first update which should fix the most critical bugs.
With the exception of the 10.0 Public Beta, Apple never shiped betas publicly an there are always glitches with the .0 version. That's why some prefer to wait for .1. If the reports are true, the incompatibilities are not as big as with Vista. Also, if you follow the recommendations for upgrading the OS you should:

1. Make sure your critical applications (those you depend on for having work done) work, using a test configuration
OR
2. Wait for the others ( incl. software vendors) to test and report.

And cool down a bit. You will forget all these disappointments in a month and become a happy Leopard user
post #79 of 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by GQB View Post

Ok... hyperbole.
But nevertheless, making a hardware investment based on a proposed feature for an as-yet unreleased product is skating pretty close to the edge. I don't buy 1.0 anything, let alone make committments based on it.

My rant is more about the knee-jerk 'I'M GONNA SUE!!!!" idiocy.

Are you gonna buy Leopard 10.5.0?
I got nothin'.
Reply
I got nothin'.
Reply
post #80 of 155
Ok, I get it a lot of you are frustrated with this last minute announcement but I'm here to tell you it's not the end of the world. I just did some research and it turns out LaCie has a whole line of NAS (external drives you can plug ethernet into) that support AFP (the only network protocol apple is supporting currently for Time Machine) You can pick up a half terrabyte version for less then $200. Check out the LaCie Ethernet Disk, these were the only products I could find that support AFP and don't cost you about as much as a Macbook.

[Note: I don't work for LaCie I'm an independent contractor who does primarily Mac support with a bit of Linux and Windows thrown into the mix.]
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Mac OS X
AppleInsider › Forums › Software › Mac OS X › Apple yanks wireless backup from Leopard last minute